ABSTRACT
Remdesivir (RDV) is a phosphoramidate prodrug designed to have activity against a broad spectrum of viruses. Following IV administration, RDV is rapidly distributed into cells and tissues and simultaneously metabolized into GS-441524 and GS-704277 in plasma. LC-MS/MS methods were validated for determination of the 3 analytes in human plasma that involved two key aspects to guarantee their precision, accuracy and robustness. First, instability issues of the analytes were overcome by diluted formic acid (FA) treatment of the plasma samples. Secondly, a separate injection for each analyte was performed with different ESI modes and organic gradients to achieve sensitivity and minimize carryover. Chromatographic separation was achieved on an Acquity UPLC HSS T3 column (2.1 × 50 mm, 1.8 µm) with a run time of 3.4 min. The calibration ranges were 4-4000, 2-2000, and 2-2000 ng/mL, respectively for RDV, GS-441524 and GS-704277. The intraday and interday precision (%CV) across validation runs at 3 QC levels for all 3 analytes was less than 6.6%, and the accuracy was within ±11.5%. The long-term storage stability in FA-treated plasma was established to be 392, 392 and 257 days at -70 °C, respectively for RDV, GS-441524 and GS-704277. The validated method was successfully applied in COVID-19 related clinical studies.
Subject(s)
Adenosine Monophosphate/analogs & derivatives , Alanine/analogs & derivatives , Antiviral Agents/blood , Drug Monitoring/methods , Furans/blood , Pyrroles/blood , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Triazines/blood , Adenosine/analogs & derivatives , Adenosine Monophosphate/blood , Alanine/blood , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Humans , Limit of Detection , COVID-19 Drug TreatmentABSTRACT
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) are both tenofovir (TFV) prodrugs, with the same active intracellular metabolite, TFV-diphosphate (TFV-DP). TAF delivers TFV-DP to target cells more efficiently and at lower doses than TDF, thereby substantially reducing systemic exposure to TFV, which results in improved bone and renal safety relative to TDF. As such, the method developed for the determination of TFV following TAF administration involved two key differences from determination of TFV following TDF administration. First, human plasma samples (500 µL) immediately upon collection were treated with 20% formic acid (40 µL) (plasma: formic acid ratio of 100:8) to minimize hydrolysis of TAF to TFV, and thereby avoided overestimation of TFV concentrations. Second, various TFV validation tests were conducted in the presence of TAF to mimic the high TAF:TFV ratios in clinical samples collected within ~2 h after dosing. The method for determination of TFV was developed and validated at a US lab and followed FDA and EMA guidelines. To support global clinical studies of TAF, the method was cross-validated (one-way) between the US lab and a China lab and was successfully used for TFV determination in plasma samples from a clinical study that involved healthy Chinese subjects.
Subject(s)
Adenine/analogs & derivatives , Anti-HIV Agents/pharmacokinetics , Chromatography, Liquid/methods , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Tenofovir/blood , Adenine/pharmacokinetics , Alanine , Formates/chemistry , Humans , Prodrugs/pharmacokineticsABSTRACT
A fluorescent quantitation method to determine PBMC-derived DNA amounts using purified human genomic DNA (gDNA) as the reference standard was developed and validated. gDNA was measured in a fluorescence-based assay using a DNA intercalant, SYBR green. The fluorescence signal was proportional to the amount (mass) of DNA in the sample. The results confirmed a linear fit from 0.0665 to 1.17⯵g/µL for gDNA, corresponding to 2.0â¯×â¯106 to 35.0â¯×â¯106â¯cells/PBMC sample. Intra-batch and inter-batch accuracy (%RE) was within ±15%, and precision (%CV) was <15%. Benchtop stability, freeze/thaw stability and long term storage stability of gDNA in QC sample matrix, PBMC pellets samples, and pellet debris samples, respectively, as well as dilution linearity had been established. Consistency between hemocytometry cell counting method and gDNA-based counting method was established. 6 out of 6 evaluated PBMC lots had hemocytometry cell counts that were within ±20% of the cell counts determined by the gDNA method. This method was used in conjunction with a validated LC-MS/MS method to determine the level of tenofovir diphosphate (TFV-DP), the active intracellular metabolite of the prodrugs tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), measured in PBMCs in clinical trials of TAF or TDF-containing fixed dose combinations.
Subject(s)
Adenine/analogs & derivatives , DNA/chemistry , Leukocytes, Mononuclear/metabolism , Organophosphates/analysis , Adenine/analysis , Adenine/metabolism , Alanine , Cell Count/methods , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Fluorescent Dyes/chemistry , Genomics , Humans , Image Cytometry , Intercalating Agents/chemistry , Prodrugs/metabolism , Tandem Mass Spectrometry , Tenofovir/metabolismABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cluster of differentiation (CD)73-adenosine and transforming growth factor (TGF)-ß pathways are involved in abrogated antitumor immune responses and can lead to protumor conditions. This Phase 1 study (NCT03954704) evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy of dalutrafusp alfa (also known as GS-1423 and AGEN1423), a bifunctional, humanized, aglycosylated immunoglobulin G1 kappa antibody that selectively inhibits CD73-adenosine production and neutralizes active TGF-ß signaling in patients with advanced solid tumors. METHODS: Dose escalation started with an accelerated titration followed by a 3+3 design. Patients received dalutrafusp alfa (0.3, 1, 3, 10, 20, 30, or 45 mg/kg) intravenously every 2 weeks (Q2W) up to 1 year or until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: In total, 21/22 patients received at least one dose of dalutrafusp alfa. The median number of dalutrafusp alfa doses administered was 3 (range 1-14). All patients had at least one adverse event (AE), most commonly fatigue (47.6%), nausea (33.3%), diarrhea (28.6%), and vomiting (28.6%). Nine (42.9%) patients had a Grade 3 or 4 AE; two had Grade 5 AEs of pulmonary embolism and PD, both unrelated to dalutrafusp alfa. Target-mediated drug disposition appears to be saturated at dalutrafusp alfa doses above 20 mg/kg. Complete CD73 target occupancy on B cells and CD8+ T cells was observed, and TGF-ß 1/2/3 levels were undetectable at dalutrafusp alfa doses of 20 mg/kg and higher. Free soluble (s)CD73 levels and sCD73 activity increased with dalutrafusp alfa treatment. Seventeen patients reached the first response assessment, with complete response, partial response, stable disease, and PD in 0, 1 (4.8%), 7 (33.3%), and 9 (42.9%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Dalutrafusp alfa doses up to 45 mg/kg Q2W were well tolerated in patients with advanced solid tumors. Additional evaluation of dalutrafusp alfa could further elucidate the clinical utility of targeting CD73-adenosine and TGF-ß pathways in oncology.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Bispecific , Neoplasms , Humans , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Neoplasms/pathology , Immunoglobulin G , Transforming Growth Factor beta , Antibodies, Bispecific/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Remdesivir (RDV) and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) are prodrugs designed to be converted to their respective active metabolites. Plasma protein binding (PPB) determination of these prodrugs is important for patients with possible alteration of free fraction of the drugs due to plasma protein changes in renal impairment, hepatic impairment, or pregnancy. However, the prodrugs' instability in human plasma presents a challenge for accurate PPB determination. In this research work, two approaches were used in the method development and qualification for PPB assessment of RDV and TAF. For RDV, dichlorvos was used to inhibit esterase activity to stabilize the prodrug in plasma during equilibrium dialysis (ED). The impact of dichlorvos on protein binding was evaluated and determined to be insignificant by comparing the unbound fraction (fu) determined by the ED method with dichlorvos present and the fu determined by an ultrafiltration method without dichlorvos. In contrast to RDV, TAF degradation in plasma is â¼3-fold slower, and TAF stability cannot be improved by dichlorvos. Fit-for-purpose acceptance criteria for the TAF PPB method were chosen, and an ED method was developed based on these criteria. These two methods were then qualified and applied for PPB determinations in clinical studies.
Subject(s)
Adenosine Monophosphate/analogs & derivatives , Alanine/analogs & derivatives , Anti-HIV Agents , HIV Infections , Prodrugs , Humans , Tenofovir , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Protein Binding , Prodrugs/metabolism , Dichlorvos/therapeutic use , Adenine , Blood Proteins/metabolism , HIV Infections/drug therapyABSTRACT
Filgotinib, an oral Janus kinase-1 preferential inhibitor, is approved in Europe and Japan for adults with rheumatoid arthritis. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis are at higher risk of cardiovascular morbidity/mortality; thus, it is important to understand potential drug-drug interactions of filgotinib with lipid-lowering agents. This open-label, randomized, 2-way crossover study evaluated the pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin, pravastatin, and rosuvastatin with and without filgotinib coadministration. Healthy participants (N = 27) received single doses of atorvastatin (40 mg) and of a pravastatin (40 mg)/rosuvastatin (10 mg) cocktail-alone or with filgotinib (200 mg once daily for 11 days)-on 2 different occasions with washout in between. Serial pharmacokinetic blood samples were collected, and safety was assessed. Pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated using 90% confidence intervals (CI) of the geometric least-squares mean (GLSM) ratio of the test treatment (statin coadministration with filgotinib) vs statin alone, with prespecified lack-of-interaction bounds of 0.70 to 1.43. Coadministration of filgotinib did not affect atorvastatin area under the plasma concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf ; [GLSM ratios (90% CI): 0.91 (0.84-0.99)]), but maximum concentration [Cmax ] was slightly lower [0.82 (0.69-0.99)]. The exposure of 2-hydroxy-atorvastatin was unaffected (GLSM ratios [90% CI], 0.98 [0.81-1.19] for Cmax ; 1.11 [1.02-1.22] for AUCinf ). Pravastatin AUCinf was also unaffected (GLSM ratios, 1.22 [1.05-1.41], but Cmax was slightly higher 1.25 [1.01-1.54]). Rosuvastatin exposure was moderately higher with filgotinib coadministration-GLSM ratios (90% CI), 1.68 (1.43-1.97) for Cmax ; 1.42 (1.30-1.57) for AUCinf -but this was not considered clinically relevant. These results indicate that filgotinib has no clinically meaningful effect on exposure of atorvastatin, pravastatin, or rosuvastatin.
Subject(s)
Pravastatin , Adult , Atorvastatin/adverse effects , Atorvastatin/pharmacokinetics , Cross-Over Studies , Drug Interactions , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Pravastatin/adverse effects , Pravastatin/pharmacokinetics , Pyridines , Rosuvastatin Calcium , TriazolesABSTRACT
Tirabrutinib (TIRA), a potent and nonreversible oral Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is evaluated for treatment of certain hematological malignancies and inflammatory diseases. A drug-drug interaction study to evaluate the effect of TIRA on the pharmacokinetics of the oral contraceptive levonorgestrel (LEVO)/ethinyl estradiol (EE) was conducted in healthy female participants (N = 26). Participants received a single dose of LEVO (150 mcg)/EE (30 mcg) alone (reference), and on day 12 of a 15-day regimen of TIRA 160 mg once-daily (test). Intensive blood sampling for determination of LEVO, EE, and TIRA plasma concentrations was conducted, and safety was assessed throughout the study. Pharmacokinetic interactions were evaluated using 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric least squares mean (GLSM) ratios of the test versus reference treatments. The GLSM (90% CI) ratios of area under the concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUCinf ; LEVO: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.88-1.03, EE: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.05-1.16) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ; LEVO: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.74-0.98, EE: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.98-1.18) were within the prespecified 0.70 to 1.43 no effect bounds; and the AUC ratios met the stricter 0.80 to 1.25 equivalence bounds. Study treatments were generally well-tolerated. In conclusion, co-administration with TIRA did not alter the exposure of LEVO/EE, and accordingly LEVO/EE containing oral contraceptives can serve as a contraception method for participants on TIRA 160 mg (or lower) daily doses.
Subject(s)
Ethinyl Estradiol , Levonorgestrel , Drug Interactions , Ethinyl Estradiol/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Imidazoles , Levonorgestrel/adverse effects , Pyrimidines , VolunteersABSTRACT
Tirabrutinib is an irreversible, small-molecule Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, which was approved in Japan (VELEXBRU) to treat B-cell malignancies and is in clinical development for inflammatory diseases. As an application of model-informed drug development, a semimechanistic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model for irreversible BTK inhibition of tirabrutinib was developed to support dose selection in clinical development, based on clinical PK and BTK occupancy data from two phase I studies with a wide range of PK exposures in healthy volunteers and in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis. The developed model adequately described and predicted the PK and PD data. Overall, the model-based simulation supported a total daily dose of at least 40 mg, either q.d. or b.i.d., with adequate BTK occupancy (> 90%) for further development in inflammatory diseases. Following the PK/PD modeling and simulation, the relationship between model-predicted BTK occupancy and preliminary clinical efficacy data was also explored and a positive trend was identified between the increasing time above adequate BTK occupancy and better efficacy in treatment for RA by linear regression.
Subject(s)
Agammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine Kinase/antagonists & inhibitors , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/administration & dosage , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Imidazoles/administration & dosage , Models, Biological , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Pyrimidines/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Adult , Agammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine Kinase/metabolism , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/pharmacokinetics , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/enzymology , Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic , Computer Simulation , Drug Dosage Calculations , Female , Humans , Imidazoles/pharmacokinetics , Male , Middle Aged , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Pyrimidines/pharmacokinetics , Young AdultABSTRACT
SBECD (Captisol®) with an average degree of substitution of 6.5 sulfobutylether functional groups (SBE = 6.5), is a solubility enhancer for remdesivir (RDV) and a major component in Veklury, which was approved by FDA for the treatment of patients with COVID-19 over 12 years old and weighing over 40 kg who require hospitalization. SBECD is cleared mainly by renal filtration, thus, potential accumulation of SBECD in the human body is a concern for patients dosed with Veklury with compromised renal function. An LC-MS/MS method was developed and validated for specific, accurate, and precise determination of SBECD concentrations in human plasma. In this method, the hexa-substituted species, SBE6, was selected for SBECD quantification, and the mass transition from its dicharged molecular ion [(M-2H)/2]2-, Molecular (parent) Ion (Q1)/Molecular (parent) Ion (Q3) of m/z 974.7/974.7, was selected for quantitative analysis of SBECD. Captisol-G (SBE-γ-CD, SBE = 3) was chosen as the internal standard. With 25 µL of formic-acid-treated sample and with a calibration range of 10.0-1000 µg/mL, the method was validated with respect to pre-established criteria based on regulatory guidelines and was applied to determine SBECD levels in plasma samples collected from pediatric patients during RDV clinical studies.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , beta-Cyclodextrins , Adenosine Monophosphate/analogs & derivatives , Alanine/analogs & derivatives , Child , Chromatography, Liquid , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Sodium , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methodsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) are a critical component of the immune system and the target cells for human immunodeficiency virus, type 1 (HIV-1) infection. Nucleoside/nucleotide analogs for the treatment of HIV infection are prodrugs that require cellular activation to triphosphate (TP) metabolites for antiviral activity. A reliable method of PBMC isolation and subsequent cell counting, as well as an accurate bioanalytical determination of the TPs in PBMCs are important for understanding the intracellular pharmacokinetic (PK) of the TPs and its correlation with plasma PK, the drug effect, and dose determination. Areas covered: The authors review the challenges and solutions in PBMC sample collection, sample processing, cell lysis, cell counting methods, analyte extraction, and liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) quantitative analysis of the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-triphosphate (NRTI-TP) metabolites, and analogs. Expert opinion: Analyzing large numbers of clinical PBMC samples for determination of NRTI-TPs and analogs in PBMCs requires not only a validated LC-MS/MS bioanalytical method but also reliable methods for PBMC isolation, counting, cell lysis, and analyte recovery, and an approach for assessing analyte stability. Furthermore, a simple, consistent, and validated cell counting method often involves DNA quantitation of the PBMCs samples collected from clinical studies.
Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/pharmacokinetics , Leukocytes, Mononuclear/metabolism , Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Anti-HIV Agents/administration & dosage , Cell Count , Chromatography, Liquid/methods , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Humans , Polyphosphates/metabolism , Reproducibility of Results , Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methodsABSTRACT
Momelotinib is a Janus kinase 1/2 inhibitor in clinical development for the treatment of myelofibrosis. Two phase 1 open-label, parallel-group, adaptive studies were conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of a single 200-mg oral dose of momelotinib in subjects with hepatic or renal impairment compared with healthy matched control subjects with normal hepatic or renal function. Plasma pharmacokinetics of momelotinib and its major active metabolite, M21, were evaluated, and geometric least-squares mean ratios (GMRs) and associated 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for impaired versus each control group were calculated for plasma exposures (area under concentration-time curve from time 0 to ∞ [AUC∞ ] and maximum concentration) of momelotinib and M21. There was no clinically significant difference in plasma exposures of momelotinib and M21 between subjects with moderate or severe renal impairment or moderate hepatic impairment and healthy control subjects. Compared with healthy control subjects, momelotinib AUC∞ was increased (GMR, 197%; 90%CI, 129%-301%), and M21 AUC∞ was decreased (GMR, 52%; 90%CI, 34%-79%) in subjects with severe hepatic impairment. The safety profile following a single dose of momelotinib was similar between subjects with hepatic or renal dysfunction and healthy control subjects. These pharmacokinetic and safety results indicate that dose adjustment is not necessary for momelotinib in patients with renal impairment or mild to moderate hepatic impairment. In patients with severe hepatic impairment, however, the dose of momelotinib should be reduced.
Subject(s)
Benzamides/pharmacokinetics , Liver Diseases/metabolism , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Pyrimidines/pharmacokinetics , Renal Insufficiency/metabolism , Adult , Aged , Benzamides/adverse effects , Benzamides/blood , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/blood , Pyrimidines/adverse effects , Pyrimidines/bloodABSTRACT
Momelotinib is a potent and selective small-molecule inhibitor of JAK1/2 that is under investigation for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms. In a phase 1/2 study in myelofibrosis patients, once-daily dosing of a 300-mg momelotinib capsule was selected for further development based on a favorable benefit:risk profile. A tablet formulation was recently developed for further clinical evaluation. In this study, the relative bioavailability of the tablet formulation versus the initial capsule formulation and the effect of food and omeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of a single-dose momelotinib tablet were evaluated in healthy subjects. The momelotinib tablet, 200 mg, provided plasma exposure equivalent to the 300-mg capsule. Plasma exposure of momelotinib increased less than dose-proportionally from 100 to 800 mg. Food intake modestly increased Cmax (38% and 28% increase for low- and high-fat meals, respectively) and AUCinf (16% and 28% increase for low- and high-fat meals, respectively) for the momelotinib tablet. Omeprazole reduced the exposure of the momelotinib tablet by 36% for Cmax and 33% for AUCinf . Neither the food effect nor the omeprazole effect on momelotinib exposure was considered clinically meaningful because of the safety and efficacy profile of momelotinib.