ABSTRACT
Stress-induced cortical alertness is maintained by a heightened excitability of noradrenergic neurons innervating, notably, the prefrontal cortex. However, neither the signaling axis linking hypothalamic activation to delayed and lasting noradrenergic excitability nor the molecular cascade gating noradrenaline synthesis is defined. Here, we show that hypothalamic corticotropin-releasing hormone-releasing neurons innervate ependymal cells of the 3rd ventricle to induce ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) release for transport through the brain's aqueductal system. CNTF binding to its cognate receptors on norepinephrinergic neurons in the locus coeruleus then initiates sequential phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 and tyrosine hydroxylase with the Ca2+-sensor secretagogin ensuring activity dependence in both rodent and human brains. Both CNTF and secretagogin ablation occlude stress-induced cortical norepinephrine synthesis, ensuing neuronal excitation and behavioral stereotypes. Cumulatively, we identify a multimodal pathway that is rate-limited by CNTF volume transmission and poised to directly convert hypothalamic activation into long-lasting cortical excitability following acute stress.
Subject(s)
Adrenergic Neurons/metabolism , Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor/metabolism , Hypothalamus/metabolism , Locus Coeruleus/metabolism , Stress, Physiological , Adrenergic Neurons/pathology , Animals , Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor/genetics , Hypothalamus/pathology , Locus Coeruleus/pathology , Mice , Mice, Knockout , RatsABSTRACT
Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is the most frequent form of focal epilepsies and is generally associated with malfunctioning of the hippocampal formation. Recently, a preferential loss of parvalbumin (PV) neurons has been observed in the subiculum of TLE patients and in animal models of TLE. To demonstrate a possible causative role of defunct PV neurons in the generation of TLE, we permanently inhibited GABA release selectively from PV neurons of the ventral subiculum by injecting a viral vector expressing tetanus toxin light chain in male mice. Subsequently, mice were subjected to telemetric EEG recording and video monitoring. Eighty-eight percent of the mice presented clusters of spike-wave discharges (C-SWDs; 40.0 ± 9.07/month), and 64% showed spontaneous recurrent seizures (SRSs; 5.3 ± 0.83/month). Mice injected with a control vector presented with neither C-SWDs nor SRSs. No neurodegeneration was observed due to vector injection or SRS. Interestingly, mice that presented with only C-SWDs but no SRSs, developed SRSs upon injection of a subconvulsive dose of pentylenetetrazole after 6 weeks. The initial frequency of SRSs declined by â¼30% after 5 weeks. In contrast to permanent silencing of PV neurons, transient inhibition of GABA release from PV neurons through the designer receptor hM4Di selectively expressed in PV-containing neurons transiently reduced the seizure threshold of the mice but induced neither acute nor recurrent seizures. Our data demonstrate a critical role for perisomatic inhibition mediated by PV-containing interneurons, suggesting that their sustained silencing could be causally involved in the development of TLE.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Development of temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) generally takes years after an initial insult during which maladaptation of hippocampal circuitries takes place. In human TLE and in animal models of TLE, parvalbumin neurons are selectively lost in the subiculum, the major output area of the hippocampus. The present experiments demonstrate that specific and sustained inhibition of GABA release from parvalbumin-expressing interneurons (mostly basket cells) in sector CA1/subiculum is sufficient to induce hyperexcitability and spontaneous recurrent seizures in mice. As in patients with nonlesional TLE, these mice developed epilepsy without signs of neurodegeneration. The experiments highlight the importance of the potent inhibitory action mediated by parvalbumin cells in the hippocampus and identify a potential mechanism in the development of TLE.
Subject(s)
Hippocampus/physiopathology , Interneurons/physiology , Parvalbumins/antagonists & inhibitors , Parvalbumins/physiology , Seizures/physiopathology , Animals , Electroencephalography/methods , Hippocampus/drug effects , Inhibitory Postsynaptic Potentials/drug effects , Inhibitory Postsynaptic Potentials/physiology , Interneurons/drug effects , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Mice, Transgenic , Organ Culture Techniques , Pentylenetetrazole/toxicity , Seizures/chemically inducedABSTRACT
Epigenetic mechanisms like altered histone acetylation may have a crucial role in epileptogenesis. In two mouse models of temporal lobe epilepsy, we investigated changes in the expression of class II histone deacetylases (HDAC), a group of signal transducers that shuttle between nucleus and cytoplasm. Intrahippocampal injection of kainic acid (KA) induced a status epilepticus, development of spontaneous seizures (after 3 days), and finally chronic epilepsy and granule cell dispersion. Expression of class II HDAC mRNAs was investigated at different time intervals after KA injection in the granule cell layers and in sectors CA1 and CA3 contralateral to the site of KA injection lacking neurodegeneration. Increased expression of HDAC5 and 9 mRNAs coincided with pronounced granule cell dispersion in the KA-injected hippocampus at late intervals (14-28 days after KA) and equally affected both HDAC9 splice variants. In contrast, in the pilocarpine model (showing no granule cell dispersion), we observed decreases in the expression of HDAC5 and 9 at the same time intervals. Beyond this, striking similarities between both temporal lobe epilepsy models such as fast decreases in HDAC7 and 10 mRNAs during the acute status epilepticus were observed, notably also in the contralateral hippocampus not affected by neurodegeneration. The particular patterns of HDAC mRNA expression suggest a role in epileptogenesis and granule cell dispersion. Reduced expression of HDACs may result in increased expression of pro- and anticonvulsive proteins. On the other hand, export of HDACs from the nucleus into the cytoplasm could allow for deacetylation of cytoplasmatic proteins involved in axonal and dendritic remodeling, like granule cell dispersion. HDAC 5 and HDAC 9 expression is highly increased in granule cells of the KA-injected hippocampus and parallels granule cell dispersion. Both HDACs are thought to be targeted to the cytoplasm and to act there by deacetylating cytoplasmatic (e.g. cytosceleton-related) proteins.
ABSTRACT
Anxiety is integrated in the amygdaloid nuclei and involves the interplay of the amygdala and various other areas of the brain. Neuropeptides play a critical role in regulating this process. Neuropeptide Y (NPY), a 36 aa peptide, is highly expressed in the amygdala. It exerts potent anxiolytic effects through cognate postsynaptic Y1 receptors, but augments anxiety through presynaptic Y2 receptors. To identify the precise anatomical site(s) of Y2-mediated anxiogenic action, we investigated the effect of site-specific deletion of the Y2 gene in amygdaloid nuclei on anxiety and depression-related behaviors in mice. Ablating the Y2 gene in the basolateral and central amygdala resulted in an anxiolytic phenotype, whereas deletion in the medial amygdala or in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis had no obvious effect on emotion-related behavior. Deleting the Y2 receptor gene in the central amygdala, but not in any other amygdaloid nucleus, resulted in an added antidepressant-like effect. It was associated with a reduction of presumably presynaptic Y2 receptors in the stria terminalis/bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, the nucleus accumbens, and the locus ceruleus. Our results are evidence of the highly site-specific nature of the Y2-mediated function of NPY in the modulation of anxiety- and depression-related behavior. The activity of NPY is likely mediated by the presynaptic inhibition of GABA and/or NPY release from interneurons and/or efferent projection neurons of the basolateral and central amygdala.
Subject(s)
Amygdala/physiology , Anxiety/genetics , Depression/genetics , Neuropeptide Y/physiology , Receptors, Neuropeptide Y/genetics , Receptors, Neuropeptide Y/physiology , Amygdala/metabolism , Animals , Anxiety/metabolism , Anxiety/physiopathology , Depression/metabolism , Depression/physiopathology , Disease Models, Animal , Locus Coeruleus/metabolism , Male , Mice , Mice, Knockout , Neuropeptide Y/metabolism , Septal Nuclei/metabolism , Septal Nuclei/physiologyABSTRACT
Disproportionate, maladapted, and generalized fear are essential hallmarks of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), which develops upon severe trauma in a subset of exposed individuals. Among the brain areas that are processing fear memories, the hippocampal formation exerts a central role linking emotional-affective with cognitive aspects. In the hippocampus, neuronal excitability is constrained by multiple GABAergic interneurons with highly specialized functions and an extensive repertoire of co-released neuromodulators. Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is one of these co-transmitters that significantly affects hippocampal signaling, with ample evidence supporting its fundamental role in emotional, cognitive, and metabolic circuitries. Here we investigated the role of NPY in relation to GABA, both released from the same interneurons of the dorsal dentate gyrus (DG), in different aspects of fear conditioning. We demonstrated that activation of dentate GABA neurons specifically during fear recall reduced cue-related as well as trace-related freezing behavior, whereas inhibition of the same neurons had no significant effects. Interestingly, concomitant overexpression of NPY in these neurons did not further modify fear recall, neither under baseline conditions nor upon chemogenetic stimulation. However, potentially increased co-release of NPY substantially reduced contextual fear, promoted extinction learning, and long-term suppression of fear in a foreground context-conditioning paradigm. Importantly, NPY in the dorsal DG was not only expressed in somatostatin neurons, but also in parvalbumin-positive basket cells and axoaxonic cells, indicating intense feedback and feedforward modulation of hippocampal signaling and precise curtailing of neuronal engrams. Thus, these findings suggest that co-release of NPY from specific interneuron populations of the dorsal DG modifies dedicated aspects of hippocampal processing by sharpening the activation of neural engrams and the consecutive fear response. Since inappropriate and generalized fear is the major impediment in the treatment of PTSD patients, the dentate NPY system may be a suitable access point to ameliorate PTSD symptoms and improve the inherent disease course.
ABSTRACT
Bioimage analysis of fluorescent labels is widely used in the life sciences. Recent advances in deep learning (DL) allow automating time-consuming manual image analysis processes based on annotated training data. However, manual annotation of fluorescent features with a low signal-to-noise ratio is somewhat subjective. Training DL models on subjective annotations may be instable or yield biased models. In turn, these models may be unable to reliably detect biological effects. An analysis pipeline integrating data annotation, ground truth estimation, and model training can mitigate this risk. To evaluate this integrated process, we compared different DL-based analysis approaches. With data from two model organisms (mice, zebrafish) and five laboratories, we show that ground truth estimation from multiple human annotators helps to establish objectivity in fluorescent feature annotations. Furthermore, ensembles of multiple models trained on the estimated ground truth establish reliability and validity. Our research provides guidelines for reproducible DL-based bioimage analyses.
Research in biology generates many image datasets, mostly from microscopy. These images have to be analyzed, and much of this analysis relies on a human expert looking at the images and manually annotating features. Image datasets are often large, and human annotation can be subjective, so automating image analysis is highly desirable. This is where machine learning algorithms, such as deep learning, have proven to be useful. In order for deep learning algorithms to work first they have to be 'trained'. Deep learning algorithms are trained by being given a training dataset that has been annotated by human experts. The algorithms extract the relevant features to look out for from this training dataset and can then look for these features in other image data. However, it is also worth noting that because these models try to mimic the annotation behavior presented to them during training as well as possible, they can sometimes also mimic an expert's subjectivity when annotating data. Segebarth, Griebel et al. asked whether this was the case, whether it had an impact on the outcome of the image data analysis, and whether it was possible to avoid this problem when using deep learning for imaging dataset analysis. For this research, Segebarth, Griebel et al. used microscopy images of mouse brain sections, where a protein called cFOS had been labeled with a fluorescent tag. This protein typically controls the rate at which DNA information is copied into RNA, leading to the production of proteins. Its activity can be influenced experimentally by testing the behaviors of mice. Thus, this experimental manipulation can be used to evaluate the results of deep learning-based image analyses. First, the fluorescent images were interpreted manually by a group of human experts. Then, their results were used to train a large variety of deep learning models. Models were trained either on the results of an individual expert or on the results pooled from all experts to come up with a consensus model, a deep learning model that learned from the personal annotation preferences of all experts. This made it possible to test whether training a model on multiple experts reduces the risk of subjectivity. As the training of deep learning models is random, Segebarth, Griebel et al. also tested whether combining the predictions from multiple models in a so-called model ensemble improves the consistency of the analyses. For evaluation, the annotations of the deep learning models were compared to those of the human experts, to ensure that the results were not influenced by the subjective behavior of one person. The results of all bioimage annotations were finally compared to the experimental results from analyzing the mice's behaviors in order to check whether the models were able to find the behavioral effect on cFOS. Segebarth, Griebel et al. concluded that combining the expert knowledge of multiple experts reduces the subjectivity of bioimage annotation by deep learning algorithms. Combining such consensus information in a group of deep learning models improves the quality of bioimage analysis, so that the results are reliable, transparent and less subjective.
Subject(s)
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Animals , Deep Learning , Fear , Fluorescent Dyes , Male , Mice , Reproducibility of Results , Signal-To-Noise Ratio , ZebrafishABSTRACT
Survival in a natural environment forces an individual into constantly adapting purposive behavior. Specified interoceptive neurons monitor metabolic and physiological balance and activate dedicated brain circuits to satisfy essential needs, such as hunger, thirst, thermoregulation, fear, or anxiety. Neuropeptides are multifaceted, central components within such life-sustaining programs. For instance, nutritional depletion results in a drop in glucose levels, release of hormones, and activation of hypothalamic and brainstem neurons. These neurons, in turn, release several neuropeptides that increase food-seeking behavior and promote food intake. Similarly, internal and external threats activate neuronal pathways of avoidance and defensive behavior. Interestingly, specific nuclei of the hypothalamus and extended amygdala are activated by both hunger and fear. Here, we introduce the relevant neuropeptides and describe their function in feeding and emotional-affective behaviors. We further highlight specific pathways and microcircuits, where neuropeptides may interact to identify prevailing homeostatic needs and direct respective compensatory behaviors. A specific focus will be on neuropeptide Y, since it is known for its pivotal role in metabolic and emotional pathways. We hypothesize that the orexigenic and anorexigenic properties of specific neuropeptides are related to their ability to inhibit fear and anxiety.
Subject(s)
Fear , Hunger , Neuropeptide Y/physiology , Animals , Brain/physiology , Cholecystokinin/physiology , Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone/physiology , Ghrelin/physiology , Homeostasis , Humans , Leptin/physiology , Melanocyte-Stimulating Hormones/physiologyABSTRACT
Posttraumatic stress disorder is characterized by contextually inappropriate, dys-regulated and generalized fear expression and often resistant to therapy. The hippocampus integrates contextual information into spatial and emotional memories, but how diverse modulatory neurotransmitters are shaping this process is not known. Neuropeptide Y is a peptide-neurotransmitter, which modulates hippocampal excitability by activating several G-protein-coupled receptors. Postsynaptic Y1 receptors create strong anxiolytic and fear-suppressing behavior, while pre-synaptic Y2 receptors (Y2R) are mainly anxiogenic. The role of Y2Rs in spatial compared to emotional learning is, however, still controversial. Here we show that deletion of Y2Rs increased recall, but delayed extinction of contextual fear. Interestingly, spatial memory in the Barnes maze was enhanced during early and late testing, suggesting that Y2Rs suppress learning by hippocampal and extra-hippocampal mechanisms. To demonstrate sufficiency of hippocampal Y2Rs we performed viral vector-mediated, locally restricted re-expression of Y2Rs in the hippocampus of Y2KO mice. This treatment reduced spatial memory to the level of wildtype mice only during early, but not late recall. Furthermore, contextual fear was reduced, while induction of fear extinction appeared earlier. Our results suggest that hippocampal Y2R signaling inhibits learning in a time- and content-specific way, resulting in an early reduction of spatial memory and in a specific suppression of fear, by reducing fear recall and promoting fear extinction. We thus propose that reduction of hippocampal excitability through pre-synaptic Y2Rs may control the integration of contextual information into developing memories.
Subject(s)
Emotions/physiology , Hippocampus/metabolism , Memory/physiology , Receptors, Neuropeptide Y/metabolism , Animals , Green Fluorescent Proteins/genetics , Green Fluorescent Proteins/metabolism , Hippocampus/cytology , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Mice, Transgenic , Receptors, Neuropeptide Y/deficiency , Receptors, Neuropeptide Y/genetics , Space Perception/physiology , Time FactorsABSTRACT
A prominent role of epigenetic mechanisms in manifestation of epilepsy has been proposed. Thus altered histone H3 and H4 acetylation has been demonstrated in experimental models of temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). We now investigated changes in the expression of the class I and class IV histone deacetylases (HDAC) in two complementary mouse TLE models. Unilateral intrahippocampal injection of kainic acid (KA) induced a status epilepticus lasting 6 to 24h, development of spontaneous limbic seizures (2 to 3 days after KA injection) and chronic epilepsy, as revealed by telemetric recordings of the EEGs. Mice were killed at different intervals after KA injection and expression of HDAC mRNAs was investigated by in situ hybridization. We observed marked decreases in the expression of HDACs 1, 2 and 11 (by up to 75%) in the granule cell and pyramidal cell layers of the hippocampus during the acute status epilepticus (2 to 6h after KA injection). This was followed by increased expression of all class I HDAC mRNAs in all principal cell layers of the hippocampus after 12 to 48 h. In the chronic phase, 14 and 28 days after KA, only modest increases in the expression of HDAC1 mRNA were observed in granule and pyramidal cells. Immunohistochemistry using an antibody detecting HDAC2 revealed results consistent with the mRNA data and indicates also expression in glial cells on the injection side. Similar changes as seen in the KA model were observed after a pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus except that decreases in HDACs 2, 3 and 8 were also seen at the chronic 28 day interval. The prominent decreases in HDAC expression during status epilepticus are consistent with the previously demonstrated increased expression of numerous proteins and with the augmented acetylation of histone H4. It is suggested that respective putative gene products could facilitate proconvulsive as well as anticonvulsive mechanisms. The increased expression of all class I HDACs during the "silent phase", on the other hand, may be related to decreased histone acetylation, which could cause a decrease in expression of certain proteins, a mechanism that could also promote epileptogenesis. Thus, addressing HDAC expression may have a therapeutic potential in interfering with a status epilepticus and with the manifestation of TLE.