Can Superselective Intra-Arterial Chemoradiotherapy Replace Surgery Followed by Radiation for Advanced Cancer of the Tongue and Floor of the Mouth?

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare quality of life (QoL) and the survival rate after surgery with and without radiotherapy versus superselective intra-arterial chemoradiotherapy (SSIACRT) for advanced cancer of the tongue and floor of the mouth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with stage III and IV squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue and floor of the mouth treated between 2000 and 2013 were included in this study. The predictor variables were surgery without radiotherapy, surgery followed by radiotherapy, and SSIACRT. The outcome variables were QoL and the survival rate. The University of Washington QoL questionnaire (UW-QOL) was used for evaluation of QoL. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the overall survival rate. The UW-QOL was analyzed by analysis of covariance, and the survival rate was analyzed statistically by the log-rank test. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were eligible for this study. Of these, 13 were treated by surgery without radiotherapy, 29 were treated by surgery plus radiotherapy, and 20 were treated by SSIACRT. The SSIACRT group had the best UW-QOL scores among the 3 groups. The 5-year Kaplan-Meier disease-specific survival rates for these groups were 92.9%, 62.9%, and 83.2%, respectively, with no significant difference (P = .20) shown. CONCLUSIONS: The QoL scores of the SSIACRT group were the best among the 3 groups in most domains. The superiority of QoL and the survival rate in the SSIACRT group showed that SSIACRT should be preferred in managing advanced cancer of the tongue and floor of the mouth.

Comparison of osteoradionecrosis of the jaw after superselective intra-arterial chemoradiotherapy versus conventional concurrent chemoradiotherapy of oral cancer.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to compare the incidence of osteoradionecrosis between superselective intra-arterial chemoradiotherapy and intravenous chemoradiotherapy and to verify the risk factors for osteoradionecrosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of the 79 patients with oral cancer, 40 were treated with intra-venous chemoradiotherapy and 39 were treated with superselective intra-arterial chemoradiotherapy. The incidence of, and risk factors for, osteoradionecrosis were evaluated using statistical analysis. RESULTS: Of the 79 patients, 4 (10%) of 40 in the intravenous chemoradiotherapy and 7 (17.9%) of 39 in the superselective intra-arterial chemoradiotherapy group developed osteoradionecrosis of the jaw. No significant difference was found between the 2 groups. Although the chemoradiotherapy methods, anatomic tumor location, smoking behavior, alcohol consumption, condition of teeth, teeth extraction before radiation, and progression of dental caries were considered predisposing factors for the occurrence of osteoradionecrosis, only progressive dental caries resulted in a significant difference for osteoradionecrosis. CONCLUSIONS: The present study is the first report comparing the incidence of osteoradionecrosis between superselective intra-arterial chemoradiotherapy and intravenous chemoradiotherapy. The administration methods of anticancer drugs were not related to the incidence of osteoradionecrosis in our study. From our study, dental caries is the most important risk factor for osteoradionecrosis; therefore, a radiation caries prevention program is crucial to control osteoradionecrosis.

Superselective intra-arterial chemoradiotherapy with docetaxel-nedaplatin for advanced oral cancer.

Cisplatin-based, superselective, intra-arterial chemotherapy concurrent with radiotherapy (SSIACRT) has gained wide acceptance as a common/curative treatment for advanced head and neck cancer. We combined nedaplatin (CDGP) with docetaxel (DOC) as a new combination in SSIACRT for advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma in 2003. Twenty-two patients with advanced oral cancer were treated by radiotherapy (66 Gy) concurrent with superselective intra-arterial DOC (40 mg/body) and CDGP (80 mg/m²) infusion between 2003 and 2009. Complete response was achieved in 18 (81.8%) of the 22 patients. Of the 17 patients with positive neck disease, 16 (94%) were assessed as disease-free. The 5-year overall survival rate was 78.5%, and the major adverse effects were leukocytopenia and mucositis. Five patients (22.7%) developed distant metastases post-treatment. These results indicate that intra-arterial docetaxel-nedaplatin infusion concurrent with radiotherapy is efficacious for advanced oral cancer. The side effects are easily manageable, and the most important outcome of the treatment is the preservation of patients' quality of life (QOL) and improved prognosis.