ABSTRACT
In multiple myeloma (MM), B cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed CAR T cells have emerged as a novel therapy with potential for long-term disease control. Anti-BCMA CAR T cells with a CD8-based transmembrane (TM) and CD137 (41BB) as intracellular costimulatory domain are in routine clinical use. As the CAR construct architecture can differentially impact performance and efficacy, the optimal construction of a BCMA-targeting CAR remains to be elucidated. Here, we hypothesized that varying the constituents of the CAR structure known to impact performance could shed light on how to improve established anti-BCMA CAR constructs. CD8TM.41BBIC-based anti-BCMA CAR vectors with either a long linker or a short linker between the light and heavy scFv chain, CD28TM.41BBIC-based and CD28TM.CD28IC-based anti-BCMA CAR vector systems were used in primary human T cells. MM cell lines were used as target cells. The short linker anti-BCMA CAR demonstrated higher cytokine production, whereas in vitro cytotoxicity, T cell differentiation upon activation and proliferation were superior for the CD28TM.CD28IC-based CAR. While CD28TM.CD28IC-based CAR T cells killed MM cells faster, the persistence of 41BBIC-based constructs was superior in vivo. While CD28 and 41BB costimulation come with different in vitro and in vivo advantages, this did not translate into a superior outcome for either tested model. In conclusion, this study showcases the need to study the influence of different CAR architectures based on an identical scFv individually. It indicates that current scFv-based anti-BCMA CAR with clinical utility may already be at their functional optimum regarding the known structural variations of the scFv linker.
Subject(s)
Multiple Myeloma , Humans , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , B-Cell Maturation Antigen , Antibodies , CD28 Antigens , Cell- and Tissue-Based TherapyABSTRACT
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has led to remarkable clinical outcomes in the treatment of hematological malignancies. However, challenges remain, such as limited infiltration into solid tumors, inadequate persistence, systemic toxicities, and manufacturing insufficiencies. The use of alternative cell sources for CAR-based therapies, such as natural killer cells (NK), macrophages (MΦ), invariant Natural Killer T (iNKT) cells, γδT cells, neutrophils, and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC), has emerged as a promising avenue. By harnessing these cells' inherent cytotoxic mechanisms and incorporating CAR technology, common CAR-T cell-related limitations can be effectively mitigated. We herein present an overview of the tumoricidal mechanisms, CAR designs, and manufacturing processes of CAR-NK cells, CAR-MΦ, CAR-iNKT cells, CAR-γδT cells, CAR-neutrophils, and iPSC-derived CAR-cells, outlining the advantages, limitations, and potential solutions of these therapeutic strategies.
Subject(s)
Receptors, Chimeric Antigen , Humans , Receptors, Chimeric Antigen/immunology , Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells/cytology , Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells/immunology , Immunotherapy, Adoptive , Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy/methods , Killer Cells, Natural/immunology , Killer Cells, Natural/cytology , Macrophages/immunology , Macrophages/cytology , Macrophages/metabolism , Neutrophils/immunology , Neutrophils/metabolism , Animals , Neoplasms/therapy , Neoplasms/immunology , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , T-Lymphocytes/cytologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Conditioning regimens and the choice of immunosuppression have substantial impact on immune reconstitution after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT). The pivotal mechanism to maintain remission is the induction of the graft-versus-tumor effect. Relapse as well as graft versus host disease remain common. Classic immunosuppressive strategies implementing calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) have significant toxicities, hamper the immune recovery, and reduce the anti-cancer immune response. METHODS: We designed a phase II clinical trial for patients with relapsed and refractory lymphoid malignancies undergoing aHSCT using a CNI-free approach consisting of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and short-term Everolimus after reduced-intensity conditioning and matched peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. The results of the 19 planned patients are presented. Primary endpoint is the cumulative incidence and severity of acute GvHD. RESULTS: Overall incidence of acute GvHD was 53% with no grade III or IV. Cumulative incidence of NRM at 1, 2, and 4 years was 11%, 11%, and 16%, respectively, with a median follow-up of 43 months. Cumulative incidence of relapse was 32%, 32%, and 42% at 1, 2, and 4 years after transplant, respectively. Four out of six early relapses were multiple myeloma patients. Overall survival was 79%, 74%, and 62% at 1, 2, and 4 years. GvHD-relapse-free-survival was 47% after 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: Using PTCy and short-term Everolimus is safe with low rates of aGvHD and no severe aGvHD or cGvHD translating into a low rate of non-relapse mortality. Our results in this difficult to treat patient population are encouraging and warrant further studies.
Subject(s)
Cyclophosphamide , Everolimus , Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Multiple Myeloma , Transplantation Conditioning , Humans , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Everolimus/administration & dosage , Everolimus/therapeutic use , Female , Middle Aged , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage , Male , Adult , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Multiple Myeloma/mortality , Multiple Myeloma/diagnosis , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Aged , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Recurrence , Lymphoma/therapy , Lymphoma/mortality , Lymphoma/diagnosis , Treatment Outcome , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Transplantation, HomologousABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis and treatment of cancer are highly stressful. Exercise therapy is often used to mitigate the adverse effects of treatment. But how good is the evidence base, and what has changed in recent years? In this narrative review, we present the current data and what it implies for the care of adults with cancer. METHODS: This review is based on data from meta-analyses and systematic reviews concerning 16 relevant clinical endpoints (outcomes) of exercise therapy for cancer patients. RESULTS: The literature evaluated for this paper reveals that targeted exercise therapy is feasible and safe under appropriate supervision. It is highly effective for improving eight endpoints (anxiety, depression, fatigue, quality of life, physical function, secondary lymphedema after breast cancer, urinary incontinence, post-mastectomy pain syndrome in breast cancer) and may also have a beneficial effect on sleep quality, cardiotoxicity, and cognitive function. Less conclusive studies are currently available with respect to chemotherapy-induced polyneuropathy, nausea/vomiting, and bone health. There is currently insufficient data to suggest any benefit with respect to sexual function and risk factors for falling. CONCLUSION: The data shows that exercise therapy for cancer patients is safe and has manifold effects on selected clinically relevant parameters. Further studies should be performed regarding the possible utility of exercise therapy against treatment-related side effects for which the evidence is currently insufficient. On the basis of the currently available and already existing recommendations, quality-assured exercise therapy can be recommended to cancer patients suffering from a wide range of neoplastic conditions.
Subject(s)
Exercise Therapy , Neoplasms , Humans , Exercise Therapy/methods , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/therapy , Quality of Life , Female , Male , Treatment Outcome , Medical Oncology/methodsABSTRACT
Although chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy represents a transformative immunotherapy, it is also associated with distinct toxicities that contribute to morbidity and mortality. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL (Cochrane) for reports of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) after CAR T cell therapy in lymphoma and multiple myeloma up to March 2024. After extraction of causes and numbers of death, we analyzed NRM point estimates using random-effect models. We identified 7,604 patients across 18 clinical trials and 28 real-world studies. NRM point estimates varied across disease entities and were highest in patients with mantle-cell lymphoma (10.6%), followed by multiple myeloma (8.0%), large B cell lymphoma (6.1%) and indolent lymphoma (5.7%). Entity-specific meta-regression models for large B cell lymphoma and multiple myeloma revealed that axicabtagene ciloleucel and ciltacabtagene autoleucel were independently associated with increased NRM point estimates, respectively. Of 574 reported nonrelapse deaths, over half were attributed to infections (50.9%), followed by other malignancies (7.8%) and cardiovascular/respiratory events (7.3%). Conversely, the CAR T cell-specific side effects, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome/neurotoxicity, cytokine release syndrome and hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, represented only a minority of nonrelapse deaths (cumulatively 11.5%). Our findings underline the critical importance of infectious complications after CAR T cell therapy and support the comprehensive reporting of NRM, including specific causes and long-term outcomes.