ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: We investigated the effect of levodopa on postural blood pressure changes in individuals with Parkinson disease (PD) with (PD+OH) and without neurogenic OH (PD-OH). METHODS: We performed a prospective randomized crossover study with autonomic testing performed ON and OFF levodopa. The primary outcome was the change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) from supine to 70° tilt at 3 min (ΔSBP-3'). Secondary outcomes included indices of baroreflex function and blood pressure and heart rate during tilt. RESULTS: We enrolled 40 individuals with PD (21 PD+OH, 19 PD-OH), mean age (SD) 73.2 years (7.9), 13 women (32.5%)). There was no difference in age, sex, disease duration, and severity between PD+OH and PD-OH. Mean difference in ΔSBP-3' ON versus OFF levodopa in the whole study population was - 3.20 mmHg [- 7.36 to 0.96] (p = 0.14). Mean difference in ΔSBP-3' was - 2.14 mmHg [- 7.55 to 3.28] (p = 0.45) in PD+OH and - 5.14 mmHg [- 11.63 to 1.35] (p = 0.14) in PD-OH. Mean difference in ΔSBP ON versus OFF levodopa was greater at 7 and 10 min (- 7.52 mmHg [- 11.89 to - 3.15], p = 0.002, and - 7.82 mmHg [- 14.02 to - 1.67], p = 0.02 respectively). Levodopa was associated with lower absolute values of blood pressure in both PD+OH and PD-OH and cardiovascular noradrenergic baroreflex impairment. CONCLUSION: Levodopa decreases blood pressure in both PD with and without autonomic failure, but it does not cause a greater fall in blood pressure from supine to standing at 3 min. Levodopa-induced baroreflex sympathetic noradrenergic impairment may contribute to lower blood pressure. Lower standing blood pressure with levodopa may increase the risks of fall and syncope.
Subject(s)
Hypotension, Orthostatic , Parkinson Disease , Humans , Female , Aged , Levodopa/pharmacology , Levodopa/therapeutic use , Parkinson Disease/complications , Blood Pressure/physiology , Cross-Over Studies , Hypotension, Orthostatic/complications , Prospective Studies , NorepinephrineABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Gabriele-de Vries syndrome (GADEVS) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by developmental delay and/or intellectual disability, hypotonia, feeding difficulties, and distinct facial features. To refine the phenotype and to better understand the molecular basis of the syndrome, we analyzed clinical data and performed genome-wide DNA methylation analysis of a series of individuals carrying a YY1 variant. METHODS: Clinical data were collected for 13 individuals not yet reported through an international call for collaboration. DNA was collected for 11 of these individuals and 2 previously reported individuals in an attempt to delineate a specific DNA methylation signature in GADEVS. RESULTS: Phenotype in most individuals overlapped with the previously described features. We described 1 individual with atypical phenotype, heterozygous for a missense variant in a domain usually not involved in individuals with YY1 pathogenic missense variations. We also described a specific peripheral blood DNA methylation profile associated with YY1 variants. CONCLUSION: We reported a distinct DNA methylation episignature in GADEVS. We expanded the clinical profile of GADEVS to include thin/sparse hair and cryptorchidism. We also highlighted the utility of DNA methylation episignature analysis for classification of variants of unknown clinical significance.
Subject(s)
Intellectual Disability , Neurodevelopmental Disorders , DNA Methylation/genetics , Genome , Humans , Intellectual Disability/genetics , Intellectual Disability/pathology , Male , Neurodevelopmental Disorders/genetics , Phenotype , SyndromeABSTRACT
Yin and yang 1 (YY1) is a well-known zinc-finger transcription factor with crucial roles in normal development and malignancy. YY1 acts both as a repressor and as an activator of gene expression. We have identified 23 individuals with de novo mutations or deletions of YY1 and phenotypic features that define a syndrome of cognitive impairment, behavioral alterations, intrauterine growth restriction, feeding problems, and various congenital malformations. Our combined clinical and molecular data define "YY1 syndrome" as a haploinsufficiency syndrome. Through immunoprecipitation of YY1-bound chromatin from affected individuals' cells with antibodies recognizing both ends of the protein, we show that YY1 deletions and missense mutations lead to a global loss of YY1 binding with a preferential retention at high-occupancy sites. Finally, we uncover a widespread loss of H3K27 acetylation in particular on the YY1-bound enhancers, underscoring a crucial role for YY1 in enhancer regulation. Collectively, these results define a clinical syndrome caused by haploinsufficiency of YY1 through dysregulation of key transcriptional regulators.
Subject(s)
Chromatin/metabolism , Haploinsufficiency/genetics , Intellectual Disability/genetics , Transcription, Genetic , YY1 Transcription Factor/genetics , Acetylation , Adolescent , Base Sequence , Child, Preschool , Chromatin Immunoprecipitation , Cohort Studies , Enhancer Elements, Genetic/genetics , Female , Gene Ontology , Haplotypes/genetics , Hemizygote , Histones/metabolism , Humans , Lymphocytes/metabolism , Male , Methylation , Models, Molecular , Mutation, Missense/genetics , Protein Binding/genetics , Protein Domains , YY1 Transcription Factor/chemistryABSTRACT
We utilise a clinical case to highlight why exclusion of voltage-gated potassium channel (VGKC)-complex autoantibody testing in serological evaluation of patients may delay or miss the diagnosis. A 68-year-old man presented with increasing involuntary movements consistent with faciobrachial dystonic seizures (FBDS). Initial evaluation demonstrated VGKC antibody seropositivity with leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 (LGI1) and contactin-associated protein-like 2 (CASPR2) seronegativity. Aggressive immunotherapy with methylprednisolone and plasmapheresis was started early in the course of his presentation. Following treatment with immunotherapy, the patient demonstrated clinical improvement. Repeat serum evaluation 4â months posthospitalisation remained seropositive for VGKC-complex antibodies, with development of LGI1 autoantibody seropositivity. VGKC-complex and LGI1 antibodies remained positive 12â months posthospitalisation. Our findings suggest that clinical symptoms can predate the detection of the antibody. We conclude that when suspicion for autoimmune encephalitis is high in the setting of VGKC autoantibody positivity, regardless of LGI1 or CASPR2 seropositivity, early immunotherapy and repeat testing should be considered.