Adoptive Transfer of Renal Allograft Tolerance in a Large Animal Model.

Our recent studies in an inbred swine model demonstrated that both peripheral and intra-graft regulatory cells were required for the adoptive transfer of tolerance to a second, naïve donor-matched kidney. Here, we have asked whether both peripheral and intra-graft regulatory elements are required for adoptive transfer of tolerance when only a long-term tolerant (LTT) kidney is transplanted. Nine highly-inbred swine underwent a tolerance-inducing regimen to prepare LTT kidney grafts which were then transplanted to histocompatible recipients, with or without the peripheral cell populations required for adoptive transfer of tolerance to a naïve kidney. In contrast to our previous studies, tolerance of the LTT kidney transplants alone was achieved without transfer of additional peripheral cells and without strategies to increase the number/potency of regulatory T cells in the donor. This tolerance was systemic, since most subsequent, donor-matched challenge kidney grafts were accepted. These results confirm the presence of a potent tolerance-inducing and/or tolerance-maintaining cell population within LTT renal allografts. They suggest further that additional peripheral tolerance mechanisms, required for adoptive transfer of tolerance to a naïve donor-matched kidney, depend on peripheral cells that, if not transferred with the LTT kidney, require time to develop in the adoptive host.

Abrogation of renal allograft tolerance in MGH miniature swine: the role of intra-graft and peripheral factors in long-term tolerance.

We have previously demonstrated that long-term tolerance (LTT) of an MHC class-I mismatched renal allograft can be achieved with a short course of cyclosporine. In order to examine regulatory mechanisms underlying tolerance in this model, we assessed the contributions of factors within the graft and in the peripheral blood for their relative roles in the maintenance of stable tolerance. Twelve LTT recipients of MHC class-I mismatched primary kidneys were subjected to a treatment consisting of donor-specific transfusion followed by leukapheresis, in order to remove peripheral leukocytes, including putative regulatory T cells (Tregs). Following treatment, 2 controls were followed clinically and 10 animals had the primary graft removed and received a second, donor-MHC-matched kidney. Neither control animal showed evidence of rejection, while 8 of 10 retransplanted animals developed either rejection crisis or full rejection of the second transplant. In vitro assays confirmed that the removed leukocytes were suppressive and that CD4(+) Foxp3(+) Treg reconstitution in blood and kidney grafts correlated with return to normal renal function in animals experiencing transient rejection crises. These data indicate that components of accepted kidney grafts as well as peripheral regulatory components both contribute to the tolerogenic environment required for tolerance of MHC class-I mismatched allotransplants.

A case with 46,XX,del(11)(q23.2) karyotype and poor vision with literature review.

Here we describe clinical and cytogenetic data on a female child whom had been referred to our laboratory suspected to have Turner syndrome since she had webbed neck. Cytogenetic analysis revealed that she had deletion at 11q23.2 to 11q terminal so her karyotype was ascertained as 46,XX,del(11)(q23.2). Her parents had normal karyotypes. In addition to many clinical features of del(11q ) syndrome the case had poor vision which is not common for this syndrome. Clinical features of this case and a few published cases will be reviewed briefly.

Partial Trisomy 9p(p22→pter) from a Maternal Translocation 4q35 and 9p22.

We present clinical and cytogenetic data on a 7-year-old female child with partial trisomy for 9p22→9pter as a result of a maternal balanced reciprocal translocation. Her karyotype was ascertained as 46,XX,dec(4)t(4;9)(q35; p22)mat. The father had a normal karyotype, while the mother had an apparently balanced translocation involving chromosomes 4 and 9 [46,XX,t(4;9)(q35;p22)]. This case will be briefly compared with other published cases of a similar translocation.

Skin grafts from genetically modified α-1,3-galactosyltransferase knockout miniature swine: A functional equivalent to allografts.

Burn is associated with a considerable burden of morbidity worldwide. Early excision of burned tissue and skin grafting of the resultant wound has been established as a mainstay of modern burn therapy. However, in large burns, donor sites for autologous skin may be limited. Numerous alternatives, from cadaver skin to synthetic substitutes have been described, each with varying benefits and limitations. We previously proposed the use of genetically modified (alpha-1,3-galactosyl transferase knockout, GalT-KO) porcine skin as a viable skin alternative. In contrast to wild type porcine skin, which has been used as a biologic dressing following glutaraldehyde fixation, GalT-KO porcine skin is a viable graft, which is not susceptible to loss by hyperacute rejection, and undergoes graft take and healing, prior to eventual rejection, comparable to cadaver allogeneic skin. In the current study we aimed to perform a detailed functional analysis of GalT-KO skin grafts in comparison to allogeneic grafts for temporary closure of full thickness wounds using our baboon dorsum wound model. Grafts were assessed by measurement of fluid loss, wound infection rate, and take, and healed appearance, of secondary autologous grafts following xenograft rejection. Comparison was also made between fresh and cryopreserved grafts. No statistically significant difference was identified between GalT-KO and allogeneic skin grafts in any of the assessed parameters, and graft take and function was not adversely effected by the freeze-thaw process. These data demonstrate that GalT-KO porcine grafts are functionally comparable to allogeneic skin grafts for temporary closure of full thickness wounds, and support their consideration as an alternative to cadaver allogeneic skin in the emergency management of large burns.

Age increases the risk of immediate postoperative dysphagia and pneumonia after odontoid screw fixation.

INTRODUCTION: Type II odontoid fractures are the most common spinal fracture in the elderly population and may be managed with halo immobilization, posterior fusion, and anterior odontoid screw fixation. Anterior odontoid screw fixation has several advantages over posterior fusion, including: reduced surgical time, decreased post-operative pain, preserved range of motion, earlier mobilization, and decreased postoperative narcotic requirement. We review our experience using anterior odontoid screw fixation in type II odontoid fractures in the elderly and non-elderly populations. METHODS: Demographic and outcome data were retrospectively collected in 30 consecutive patients with type II odontoid fractures treated with anterior odontoid screw fixation. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 70.7 (range 20-92); 18 of the patients were male and 12 were female. All patients had successful placement of a single anterior odontoid screw without intra-operative complication. Complications included pneumonia in nine patients (30%), gastrostomy tube placement due to patient failing swallow evaluation in 13 patients (43%), and vocal cord paralysis in one patient (3.3%). Patients over the age of 75 accounted for 12 of the 13 (92%) gastrostomy tube placements and eight of the nine (88.9%) pneumonias, respectively. The difference in rates of gastrostomy tube placement and pneumonia for the older patients were both found to be statistically significant with P<.0001 for gastrostomy tubes and P<.02 for pneumonias. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior odontoid screw fixation is an effective treatment option for patients with Type II odontoid fractures. In the elderly population, however, the benefits of the procedure must be weighed against the risks of postoperative dysphagia requiring gastrostomy and pneumonia.