Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Otol Neurotol ; 45(8): 913-918, 2024 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39142312

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This study reviews the feasibility of implanting active osseointegrated bone conduction devices in young children, below the prior age for FDA indication (<12 years), which has recently been reduced to 5 years. Outcomes included differences in adverse event rates and operative time between two groups (<12 and 12 years or older). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is a retrospective review of children receiving active osseointegrated bone conduction devices at a tertiary referral center academic hospital. One hundred and twenty-four children received 135 active osseointegrated bone conduction devices (May 2018-March 2024). RESULTS: Of 135 devices, 77 (57%) were in children <12 years (mean age (SD) = 7.9 (2.0) years, range = 4.9-11.9 years) and 58 (43%) were in 12 years or older (mean age (SD) = 15.1 (1.7) years, range = 12-18 years). Adverse events were significantly higher in the older group, occurring in 8 (10%) of 77 devices in children <12 years and 15 (26%) of 58 devices in children 12 years and older (26%) (Fisher's exact test = 0.0217 at p < 0.05). Major adverse events occurred in 5/124 (4%) patients, with 2 in patients <12 years (2/73, 3%) and 3 in children 12 and older (3/51, 6%). The proportion of major events between groups was not significantly different (Fisher's exact test = 0.4, p < 0.05). Mean surgical time was significantly less (t = -2.8799, df = 120.26, p = 0.005) in the children <12 years (mean (SD) = 66.5 (22.4) min) compared to those 12 and over (mean (SD) = 78.32 (23.1) min). CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of active osseointegrated bone conduction devices is feasible in children as young as 5 years and demonstrates low rates of complication. Further miniaturization may allow even earlier safe intervention.


Subject(s)
Bone Conduction , Feasibility Studies , Osseointegration , Humans , Child , Bone Conduction/physiology , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Child, Preschool , Osseointegration/physiology , Adolescent , Treatment Outcome , Hearing Loss, Conductive/surgery , Hearing Aids , Bone-Anchored Prosthesis , Prosthesis Implantation/methods
2.
Laryngoscope ; 2024 Sep 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39263884

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: National guidelines advise delaying initiation of solid foods until after 4-6 months of age and avoiding "high-risk" foods under the age of 4 years. However, foreign body aspiration of food remains a common preventable pediatric emergency. Our primary aim was to investigate public knowledge regarding the safe age of introduction of different foods to children and determine if demographic factors affect this knowledge. METHODS: An online survey was designed following a literature review and consultation with an expert panel. This was distributed via social media platforms. A review of our institutional data of bronchoscopy/foreign body retrievals was performed to identify trends. RESULTS: There were 1000 survey responses: 79.4% of respondents cared for children and 21.5% were medical professionals; 37.7% of respondents (n = 385) would offer high-risk foods to children <2 years of age and 56.9% (n = 582) to children <3 years. At our institution nuts (65.7%) were the most common food-related foreign body retrieved from a total of 265 over 21 years. Notably, 80% of respondents (n = 800) would offer whole nuts to children <4 years. Respondents with medical training were more likely to hold off on introducing nuts to children until a later age. CONCLUSION: Although the public has an overall appreciation of food safety, a significant proportion would feel comfortable offering high-risk foods to children under 2 and 3 years. There is a poor understanding of the danger of nuts and the appropriate age of introduction. Further research into effective public education strategies on safe food introduction in children are warranted. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: V Laryngoscope, 2024.

3.
Otol Neurotol ; 44(3): 241-245, 2023 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36622652

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the degree to which transnasal eustachian tube (ET) dilation balloon catheters are able to be passed through the ET in a cadaver model. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: A cadaveric study of 8 cadaver heads (16 ears), which underwent transnasal ET insertion with a 3 × 20-mm balloon catheter with transtympanic endoscopic visualization and grading. RESULTS: Catheter tip incursion into the protympanum or mesotympanum occurred in all ears. Radiological validation was obtained with correlation to published ET length data. CONCLUSION: Middle ear incursion of balloon catheter tips can be demonstrated in a cadaver model and highlights the ongoing need for both caution in novel surgical techniques and evolution in device design.


Subject(s)
Ear Diseases , Eustachian Tube , Humans , Eustachian Tube/surgery , Dilatation/methods , Ear, Middle/surgery , Catheters , Cadaver
4.
Otol Neurotol ; 39(5): 539-549, 2018 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29595579

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of the published evidence relating to the prevention of otic barotrauma in aviation. In particular, this review sought to identify procedures, techniques, devices, and medications for the prevention of otic barotrauma as well as evaluate the evidence relating to their efficacy. DATA SOURCES: Ten databases including Embase, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched using the full historical range. STUDY SELECTION: English language articles including more than or equal to five participants or cases were included. Outcomes of interest were reduced severity or the successful prevention of otic barotrauma in participants undergoing gradual changes in pressure during air travel or its simulation. DATA EXTRACTION: Articles and data were extracted and analyzed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and other international guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights the lack of published evidence relating to what is a significant and increasingly common problem in otology. There is level 1 evidence that supports the efficacy of oral pseudoephedrine (120 mg) in preventing otic barotrauma in adults. However, oral pseudoephedrine (1 mg/kg) does not appear to be effective in children. There is insufficient evidence to support the efficacy of either nasal balloon inflation or pressure-equalizing ear plugs for the prevention of otic barotrauma. A recently reported, novel technique for insertion of temporary tympanostomy tubes is promising but requires further evaluation.


Subject(s)
Aerospace Medicine/methods , Air Travel , Barotrauma/etiology , Barotrauma/prevention & control , Adult , Child , Humans
5.
Otol Neurotol ; 37(4): 350-5, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26859544

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of transtympanic balloon catheter dilatation of the Eustachian tube (ET) in a cadaver model. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: A cadaveric study of 10 cadaver heads, which underwent unilateral transtympanic dilatation of the ET with a 3 × 20 mm balloon catheter with full endoscopic guidance and visualization. RESULTS: Procedural safety was demonstrated, with no damage to any essential structures found. Feasibility of the procedure was demonstrated in all cadavers with 100% success rate, despite a small number of encountered difficulties. Statistically significant efficacy was also demonstrated in both radiologic and manometric data. CONCLUSION: With full endoscopic visualization, the transtympanic approach to balloon catheter dilatation of the ET seems to be a feasible and safe procedure in the cadaver model.


Subject(s)
Eustachian Tube/diagnostic imaging , Dilatation/methods , Endoscopy , Humans , Manometry , Pilot Projects
6.
ANZ J Surg ; 84(11): 820-2, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25155645

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Topographical anatomy has been taught to medical students by cadaver-based dissection for centuries. However, there is a void in the literature assessing the long-term retention of anatomical knowledge by medical students following teaching by whole-body dissection. The purpose of this paper was to assess both the acquisition and retention of topographical anatomical knowledge gained by medical students undertaking an elective whole-body dissection course. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of prospectively gathered data. A total of 24 students completed the elective 8-week Anatomy by Whole Body Dissection course at the University of Sydney in 2013. Surgeons and surgical trainees acted as demonstrators and anatomical knowledge was assessed on four occasions: pre, mid, end and 8 months post-course in the form of a 20-question wet specimen tag test. RESULTS: There was strong evidence of a significant difference (P < 0.001) in the students' pre-course scores (median = 8 out of 20, IQR = 6) compared with their end-course scores (median = 19 out of 20, IQR = 2). Similarly, there was a highly significant difference (P < 0.001) between students' pre-course scores and the 8-month follow-up post-course test (median = 18, IQR = 3), with a median difference of 10 points. There was no significant difference (P > 0.2) between the students' end-course assessment results and the 8 months post-course assessment indicating retention of knowledge. CONCLUSION: Surgeon-facilitated anatomical teaching to medical students by whole-body dissection significantly improves topographical anatomical knowledge which is maintained in the long term.


Subject(s)
Anatomy/education , Curriculum/standards , Dissection/education , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methods , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Students, Medical , Surgeons/education , Cadaver , Educational Measurement , Humans , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL