Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 164
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
BJOG ; 2024 Jun 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38923115

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Severe early-onset fetal growth restriction (FGR) causes stillbirth, neonatal death and neurodevelopmental impairment. Poor maternal spiral artery remodelling maintains vasoactive responsiveness but is susceptible to treatment with sildenafil, a phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor, which may improve perinatal outcomes. DESIGN: Superiority, double-blind randomised controlled trial. SETTING: A total of 20 UK fetal medicine units. POPULATION: Pregnancies affected by FGR, defined as an abdominal circumference below the tenth centile with absent end-diastolic flow in the umbilical artery between 22+0 and 29+6 weeks of gestation. METHODS: Treatment with sildenafil (25 mg three times/day) or placebo until delivery or 32 weeks of gestation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All infants alive at hospital discharge were assessed for cardiovascular function and cognitive, speech/language and neuromotor impairment at 2 years of age. The primary outcome was survival without cerebral palsy or neurosensory impairment, or a Bayley-III composite score of >85. RESULTS: In total, 135 women were randomised between November 2014 and July 2016 (70 to sildenafil and 65 to placebo). We previously published that there was no improvement in time to delivery or perinatal outcomes with sildenafil. In all, 75 babies (55.5%) were discharged alive, with 61 infants eligible for follow-up (32 sildenafil and 29 placebo). One infant died (placebo), three mothers declined and ten mothers were uncontactable. There was no difference in neurodevelopment or blood pressure following treatment with sildenafil. Infants who received sildenafil had a larger head circumference at 2 years of age (median difference 49.2 cm, IQR 46.4-50.3, vs 47.2 cm, 95% CI 44.7-48.9 cm). CONCLUSIONS: Sildenafil therapy did not prolong pregnancy or improve perinatal outcomes and did not improve infant neurodevelopment in FGR survivors. Therefore, sildenafil should not be prescribed for this condition.

2.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 78(9): 2148-2161, 2023 09 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37531085

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetic (PK) data underlying paediatric penicillin dosing remain limited, especially in critical care. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of the Neonatal and Paediatric Pharmacokinetics of Antimicrobials study (NAPPA) was to characterize PK profiles of commonly used penicillins using data obtained during routine care, to further understanding of PK variability and inform future evidence-based dosing. METHODS: NAPPA was a multicentre study of amoxicillin, co-amoxiclav, benzylpenicillin, flucloxacillin and piperacillin/tazobactam. Patients were recruited with informed consent. Antibiotic dosing followed standard of care. PK samples were obtained opportunistically or at optimal times, frozen and analysed using UPLC with tandem MS. Pharmacometric analysis was undertaken using NONMEM software (v7.3). Model-based simulations (n = 10 000) tested PTA with British National Formulary for Children (BNFC) and WHO dosing. The study had ethical approval. RESULTS: For the combined IV PK model, 963 PK samples from 370 participants were analysed simultaneously incorporating amoxicillin, benzylpenicillin, flucloxacillin and piperacillin data. BNFC high-dose regimen simulations gave these PTA results (median fT>MIC at breakpoints of specified pathogens): amoxicillin 100% (Streptococcus pneumoniae); benzylpenicillin 100% (Group B Streptococcus); flucloxacillin 48% (MSSA); and piperacillin 100% (Pseudomonas aeruginosa). Oral population PK models for flucloxacillin and amoxicillin enabled estimation of first-order absorption rate constants (1.16 h-1 and 1.3 h-1) and bioavailability terms (62.7% and 58.7%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: NAPPA represents, to our knowledge, the largest prospective combined paediatric penicillin PK study undertaken to date, and the first paediatric flucloxacillin oral PK model. The PTA results provide evidence supportive of BNFC high-dose IV regimens for amoxicillin, benzylpenicillin and piperacillin.


Subject(s)
Floxacillin , Piperacillin , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Child , Adolescent , Piperacillin/pharmacokinetics , Amoxicillin , Prospective Studies , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Penicillins , Microbial Sensitivity Tests
3.
Drug Metab Dispos ; 51(8): 1035-1045, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37169511

ABSTRACT

Pediatric physiologically based pharmacokinetics modeling in drug development has grown in the past decade but uncertainty remains regarding ontogeny of some drug metabolizing enzymes. In this study, a midazolam and 1-hydroxymidazolam physiologically based pharmacokinetic model (PBPK) model was developed and used to define the ontogeny for hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and uridine diphosphate glucuronosyl transferase (UGT) 2B4. Data for model development and pharmacokinetic studies on intravenous midazolam in adults and pediatrics were collated from the literature. The PBPK model was verified in the adult population and then used to compare the performance of two ontogeny profiles for CYP3A4 in terms of parent drug elimination in pediatrics. Four studies also published data on the 1-hydroxymidazolam, and this was used to evaluate the known ontogeny for UGT2B4.For midazolam elimination, the Upreti CYP3A4 ontogeny performed better than Salem; mean error (bias) and mean squared error (precision) were 0.14 and 0.064 compared with 0.69 and 1.21, respectively. For 1-hydroxymidazolam elimination, the Simcyp default ontogeny of UGT2B4 appeared to perform best for studies covering the age range 0.5 to 15.7 years, while for a study in younger ages 0 to 1 years it was the Badee UGT2B4 ontogeny. In preterm neonates, overall expression of UGT appeared to be around 10% of that in adults.Identifying the optimal model of CYP3A4 ontogeny is important for the regulatory use of PBPK. The results for midazolam are conclusive but research about other CYP3A4 metabolized compounds will underpin generalizability of the CYP3A4 ontogeny. UGT2B4 ontogeny is less certain, but this study indicates the most likely scenarios. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: A PBPK model for midazolam and 1-hydroxymidazolam was developed to test various ontogeny scenarios for CYP3A4 and UGT2B4. The CYP3A4 ontogeny of Upreti resulted in more accurate prediction of midazolam CL across nine clinical studies, age range birth to 18 years. 1-Hydroxy midazolam was used as a marker of UGT. The Simcyp default 'no ontogeny' profiles for UGT2B4 performed the best; however, for <1 year of age, there was some evidence of overactivity of this enzyme compared to adults.


Subject(s)
Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A , Midazolam , Infant, Newborn , Adult , Child , Humans , Infant , Child, Preschool , Adolescent , Midazolam/pharmacokinetics , Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A/metabolism , Glucuronosyltransferase/metabolism , Liver/metabolism , Models, Biological , Drug Interactions
4.
Pediatr Res ; 94(1): 96-98, 2023 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36550353

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There are no generally accepted age-appropriate reference ranges for laboratory values in neonates. This also matters for drug development. The International Neonatal Consortium (INC) is engaged to define actionable reference ranges of commonly used laboratory values in neonates. METHODS: A structured literature search was performed to identify standards or recommendations for publications that present neonatal laboratory data to assess the publication quality of laboratory values in neonates. Using a modified Delphi approach, an assessment and data extraction instrument to screen on completeness of information was developed. RESULTS: On 2908 hits, 281 papers were retained for full reading and 257 for data extraction. None of the papers reported a publication standard. Using the extraction instrument, most papers presented single country or unit findings. The median number of neonates was 120, with uncertainty on single or repeated measurements. Clinically meaningful information on age, sex, and medical conditions was commonly provided. Information on pharmacotherapy, equipment, analytical method, or laboratory location was rarely mentioned. CONCLUSIONS: Published information on laboratory values for neonates is sparse, not systematic, and incomplete. This undermines efforts to compare treatments, safety monitoring, or clinical management. Furthermore, there appears to be no standard yet to report laboratory values in neonates. IMPACT: There are no generally accepted age-appropriate reference ranges for laboratory values in neonates, leading to a significant knowledge gap, also for safety reporting and drug development in neonates. We performed a literature search to identify standards or recommendations for publications on neonatal laboratory data and to assess the publication quality of laboratory values in clinical studies involving neonates. Standards or recommendations for publications that present neonatal laboratory data were not identified, while published information on laboratory values for neonates is sparse, not systematic, and incomplete.


Subject(s)
Bibliometrics , Neonatology , Publications , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Publications/standards , Reference Values , Delphi Technique , Clinical Laboratory Techniques
5.
Pediatr Res ; 93(5): 1141-1148, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34743180

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Neonatal sepsis is a leading cause of infant mortality worldwide with non-specific and varied presentation. We aimed to catalogue the current definitions of neonatal sepsis in published randomised controlled trials (RCTs). METHOD: A systematic search of the Embase and Cochrane databases was performed for RCTs which explicitly stated a definition for neonatal sepsis. Definitions were sub-divided into five primary criteria for infection (culture, laboratory findings, clinical signs, radiological evidence and risk factors) and stratified by qualifiers (early/late-onset and likelihood of sepsis). RESULTS: Of 668 papers screened, 80 RCTs were included and 128 individual definitions identified. The single most common definition was neonatal sepsis defined by blood culture alone (n = 35), followed by culture and clinical signs (n = 29), and then laboratory tests/clinical signs (n = 25). Blood culture featured in 83 definitions, laboratory testing featured in 48 definitions while clinical signs and radiology featured in 80 and 8 definitions, respectively. DISCUSSION: A diverse range of definitions of neonatal sepsis are used and based on microbiological culture, laboratory tests and clinical signs in contrast to adult and paediatric sepsis which use organ dysfunction. An international consensus-based definition of neonatal sepsis could allow meta-analysis and translate results to improve outcomes.


Subject(s)
Neonatal Sepsis , Adult , Child , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Infant Mortality , Neonatal Sepsis/diagnosis , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Sepsis/diagnosis , Sepsis/therapy
6.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 89(4): 1318-1328, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36680782

ABSTRACT

Setting-up a high quality, compliant and efficient pharmacovigilance (PV) system in multi-country clinical trials can be more challenging for academic sponsors than for companies. To ensure the safety of all participants in academic studies and that the PV system fulfils all regulations, we set up a centralized PV system that allows sponsors to delegate work on PV. This initiative was put in practice by our Inserm-ANRS MIE PV department in two distinct multinational European consortia with 19 participating countries: conect4children (c4c) for paediatrics research and EU-Response for Covid-19 platform trials. The centralized PV system consists of some key procedures to harmonize the complex safety processes, creation of a local safety officer (LSO) network and centralization of all safety activities. The key procedures described the safety management plan for each trial and how tasks were shared and delegated between all stakeholders. Processing of serious adverse events (SAEs) in a unique database guaranteed the full control of the safety data and continuous evaluation of the risk-benefit ratio. The LSO network participated in efficient regulatory compliance across multiple countries. In total, there were 1312 SAEs in EU-Response and 83 SAEs in c4c in the four trials. We present here the lessons learnt from our experience in four clinical trials. We managed heterogeneous European local requirements and implemented efficient communication with all trial teams. Our approach builds capacity for PV that can be used by multiple academic sponsors.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pharmacovigilance , Humans , Child , Risk Assessment , Databases, Factual
7.
Acta Paediatr ; 112(11): 2440-2448, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37485905

ABSTRACT

Several high-risk medical devices for children have become unavailable in the European Union (EU), since requirements and costs for device certification increased markedly due to the EU Medical Device Regulation. The EU-funded CORE-MD project held a workshop in January 2023 with experts from various child health specialties, representatives of European paediatric associations, a regulatory authority and the European Commission Directorate General Health and Food Safety. A virtual follow-up meeting took place in March 2023. We developed recommendations for investigation of high-risk medical devices for children building on participants' expertise and results of a scoping review of clinical trials on high-risk medical devices in children. Approaches for evaluating and certifying high-risk medical devices for market introduction are proposed.

8.
Pediatr Res ; 91(4): 735-742, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34997225

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The lack of a consensus definition of neonatal sepsis and a core outcome set (COS) proves a substantial impediment to research that influences policy and practice relevant to key stakeholders, patients and parents. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. In the included studies, the described outcomes were extracted in accordance with the provisions of the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) handbook and registered. RESULTS: Among 884 abstracts identified, 90 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included in this review. Only 30 manuscripts explicitly stated the primary and/or secondary outcomes. A total of 88 distinct outcomes were recorded across all 90 studies included. These were then assigned to seven different domains in line with the taxonomy for classification proposed by the COMET initiative. The most frequently reported outcome was survival with 74% (n = 67) of the studies reporting an outcome within this domain. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review constitutes one of the initial phases in the protocol for developing a COS in neonatal sepsis. The paucity of standardised outcome reporting in neonatal sepsis hinders comparison and synthesis of data. The final phase will involve a Delphi Survey to generate a COS in neonatal sepsis by consensus recommendation. IMPACT: This systematic review identified a wide variation of outcomes reported among published RCTs on the management of neonatal sepsis. The paucity of standardised outcome reporting hinders comparison and synthesis of data and future meta-analyses with conclusive recommendations on the management of neonatal sepsis are unlikely. The final phase will involve a Delphi Survey to determine a COS by consensus recommendation with input from all relevant stakeholders.


Subject(s)
Neonatal Sepsis , Research Design , Delphi Technique , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Neonatal Sepsis/diagnosis , Neonatal Sepsis/therapy , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome
9.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 88(10): 4349-4383, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35229891

ABSTRACT

Developing suitable paediatric formulations and ensuring access to them by the greatest number of the 2.2 billion children worldwide are equally important to provide optimal pharmacotherapy. This review focuses on the progress made over the last two decades with paediatric oral formulations with respect to evidence for acceptability and dosing flexibility of liquid and solid oral dosage forms. It also discusses the clinical needs for, and the access to, paediatric formulations for existing authorised medicines. A significant body of new knowledge now supports the acceptability of solid oral dosage forms in children, resulting in an increasing number of medicines commercialised as multiparticulates, including minitablets that are starting to be brought to market. However, there are gaps with these formulations that deserve more research. Even though efforts have been made to identify medicines in need of age-appropriate formulations, there is no common priority list shared internationally. Such prioritisation would help to develop paediatric formulations with the greatest potential for providing a health benefit to children worldwide. In addition, available data highlight that paediatric formulation access is fragmented and unequal, with commercialisation of suitable paediatric formulations too often limited to some countries/regions. We propose actions to better align decisions during the development of paediatric formulations and promote a more globalised approach to facilitate registration pathways between different jurisdictions. Furthermore, discussions about alignment between approval, pricing and reimbursement processes should also happen, leaving working in siloes behind us. It is time for adults to start thinking outside the box for children.


Subject(s)
Pharmaceutical Preparations , Adult , Child , Humans , Pediatrics
10.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 88(10): 4258-4266, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32893382

ABSTRACT

Paediatric drug development faces several barriers. These include fragmentation of stakeholders and inconsistent processes during the conduct of research. This review summarises recent efforts to overcome these barriers in Europe. Two exemplar initiatives are described. The European Paediatric Translational Research Infrastructure facilitates preclinical research and other work that underpins clinical trials. conect4children facilitates the design and implementation of clinical trials. Both these initiatives listen to the voices of children and their advocates. Coordination of research needs specific effort that supplements work on science, resources and the policy context.


Subject(s)
Pharmaceutical Research , Child , Europe , Humans , Translational Research, Biomedical
11.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 88(12): 4965-4984, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34180088

ABSTRACT

Developmental pharmacology describes the impact of maturation on drug disposition (pharmacokinetics, PK) and drug effects (pharmacodynamics, PD) throughout the paediatric age range. This paper, written by a multidisciplinary group of experts, summarizes current knowledge, and provides suggestions to pharmaceutical companies, regulatory agencies and academicians on how to incorporate the latest knowledge regarding developmental pharmacology and innovative techniques into neonatal and paediatric drug development. Biological aspects of drug absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion throughout development are summarized. Although this area made enormous progress during the last two decades, remaining knowledge gaps were identified. Minimal risk and burden designs allow for optimally informative but minimally invasive PK sampling, while concomitant profiling of drug metabolites may provide additional insight in the unique PK behaviour in children. Furthermore, developmental PD needs to be considered during drug development, which is illustrated by disease- and/or target organ-specific examples. Identifying and testing PD targets and effects in special populations, and application of age- and/or population-specific assessment tools are discussed. Drug development plans also need to incorporate innovative techniques such as preclinical models to study therapeutic strategies, and shift from sequential enrolment of subgroups, to more rational designs. To stimulate appropriate research plans, illustrations of specific PK/PD-related as well as drug safety-related challenges during drug development are provided. The suggestions made in this joint paper of the Innovative Medicines Initiative conect4children Expert group on Developmental Pharmacology and the European Society for Developmental, Perinatal and Paediatric Pharmacology, should facilitate all those involved in drug development.


Subject(s)
Models, Biological , Pharmacology , Humans , Child , Infant, Newborn , Research Design , Data Collection , Pharmacokinetics
12.
Eur J Pediatr ; 181(3): 1117-1124, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34748081

ABSTRACT

Monitoring patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in premature infants is currently performed intermittently using echocardiography which requires considerable expertise. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate whether PDA status could be assessed from standard neonatal intensive care monitoring. Electrocardiography (ECG) and blood pressure (BP) waveforms were acquired from extremely preterm infants using standard neonatal monitors. We developed software using MATLAB to analyse ECG and BP waveforms and their interrelationships in terms of pulse transit time (PTT) and pulse wave velocity (PWV). The times from peak systolic BP to diastolic trough (BPFt) and from the diastolic trough to peak systolic BP (BPRt) were also calculated. PTT, BPFt and BPRt were normalised for heart rate (HR) termed NPTT, NBPFt and NBPRt, respectively. ECG, invasive aortic BP monitoring and echocardiography were performed in 14 preterm infants < 29 weeks' gestation in the first 3 days after birth. The median (range) birth weight of the infants was 0.90 (0.48-1.31) kg, gestation 26.6 (24.0-28.7) weeks, PDA diameter 1.6 (0.8-3.6) mm and mean BP 32 (16-40) mmHg. We found a significant positive correlation between PDA diameter and NPTT (r = 0.69, P = 0.007) as well as NBPFt (r = 0.65, P = 0.012) and NBPRt (r = 0.71, P = 0.005). No relationship was found between PDA diameter and pulse pressure.Conclusions: Interrelationships between ECG and BP traces as well as BP waveform time analysis are straightforward to measure and associated with PDA diameter. The results of this pilot study suggest that this approach may help provide biomarkers for continuous monitoring PDA diameter and function. What is Known: • Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in premature infants is associated with increased risk of developing chronic lung disease, necrotising enterocolitis and cerebral injury. • Currently PDA is assessed intermittently using echocardiography which requires considerable expertise and sometimes is not well tolerated by critically ill preterm infants. What is New: • Blood pressure (BP) and ECG waveform interrelation and BP trace time analysis, taking account of heart rate, relate to PDA diameter. • ECG and BP waveform phase difference as well as BP waveform time analysis may be useful in the continuous assessment of PDA function.


Subject(s)
Ductus Arteriosus, Patent , Ductus Arteriosus, Patent/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Ibuprofen/therapeutic use , Infant , Infant, Extremely Premature , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care, Neonatal , Pilot Projects , Pulse Wave Analysis
13.
J Pediatr ; 239: 67-73.e3, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34437911

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To capture the early effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on pediatric clinical research. STUDY DESIGN: Pediatric clinical research networks from 20 countries and 50 of their affiliated research sites completed two surveys over one month from early May to early June 2020. Networks liaised with their affiliated sites and contributed to the interpretation of results through pan-European group discussions. Based on first detection dates of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), countries formed 1 early detecting and 1 late detecting cluster. We tested the hypothesis that this clustering influenced clinical research. RESULTS: Research sites were first impacted by the pandemic in mid-March 2020 (March 16 ± 10 days, the same date as lockdown initiation; P = .99). From first impact up until early June, site initiation and feasibility analysis processes were affected for >50% of the sites. Staff were redirected to COVID-19 research for 44% of the sites, and 75.5% of sites were involved in pediatric COVID-19 research (only 6.3% reported COVID-19 cases in their other pediatric trials). Mitigation strategies were used differently between the early and late detecting country clusters and between countries with and without a pediatric COVID-19 research taskforce. Positive effects include the development of teleworking capacities. CONCLUSIONS: Through this collaborative effort from pediatric research networks, we found that pediatric trials were affected and conducted with a range of unequally applied mitigations across countries during the pandemic. The global impact might be greater than captured. In a context where clinical research is increasingly multinational, this report reveals the importance of collaboration between national networks.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Clinical Trials as Topic/organization & administration , Canada/epidemiology , Child , Europe/epidemiology , Humans
14.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 87(3): 1541-1546, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32696451

ABSTRACT

Neonates experience adverse drug reactions (ADRs), but under-reporting of suspected ADRs to national spontaneous reporting schemes in this population is particularly high. A prospective observational study collected suspected neonatal ADRs at a tertiary neonatal unit. Cases were analysed for causality by six assessors using three existing methods. Sixty-three suspected ADR cases were identified in 35/193 neonates (18.1%). The proportion of suspected ADRs where the drug was prescribed "off-label" was 30/68 (44.1%). When 34 cases were assessed for causality using three methods, global kappa scores of less than 0.3 for each tool suggested only "fair" inter-rater reliability. Neonatal ADRs can be captured and occur from a variety of drugs affecting many organ systems. The current tools for assessing causality need to be adapted before they can reliably assess neonatal ADRs.


Subject(s)
Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/diagnosis , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pharmacovigilance , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results
15.
Pediatr Res ; 88(1): 14-26, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32126571

ABSTRACT

Sepsis remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the neonatal population, and at present, there is no unified definition of neonatal sepsis. Existing consensus sepsis definitions within paediatrics are not suited for use in the NICU and do not address sepsis in the premature population. Many neonatal research and surveillance networks have criteria for the definition of sepsis within their publications though these vary greatly and there is typically a heavy emphasis on microbiological culture. The concept of organ dysfunction as a diagnostic criterion for sepsis is rarely considered in neonatal literature, and it remains unclear how to most accurately screen neonates for organ dysfunction. Accurately defining and screening for sepsis is important for clinical management, health service design and future research. The progress made by the Sepsis-3 group provides a roadmap of how definitions and screening criteria may be developed. Similar initiatives in neonatology are likely to be more challenging and would need to account for the unique presentation of sepsis in term and premature neonates. The outputs of similar consensus work within neonatology should be twofold: a validated definition of neonatal sepsis and screening criteria to identify at-risk patients earlier in their clinical course. IMPACT: There is currently no consensus definition of neonatal sepsis and the definitions that are currently in use are varied.A consensus definition of neonatal sepsis would benefit clinicians, patients and researchers.Recent progress in adults with publication of Sepsis-3 provides guidance on how a consensus definition and screening criteria for sepsis could be produced in neonatology.We discuss common themes and potential shortcomings in sepsis definitions within neonatology.We highlight the need for a consensus definition of neonatal sepsis and the challenges that this task poses.


Subject(s)
Neonatal Sepsis/blood , Neonatal Sepsis/classification , Neonatology/standards , Biomarkers/blood , Consensus , Europe , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Mass Screening , Neonatal Sepsis/diagnosis , Prognosis , Treatment Outcome
16.
Eur J Pediatr ; 179(5): 839-847, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31897842

ABSTRACT

Health-care professionals who prescribe medicines have the professional duty to choose medicines that are in the best interest of their individual patient, irrespective if that patient is an adult or a child. However, the availability of medicines with an appropriate label for pediatric use is lagging behind those for adults, and even available pediatric drugs are sometimes not suitable to administer to children. Consequently, health-care professionals often have no other option than to prescribe off-label medicines to children. An important reason for use of off-label medicines is to improve access to (innovative) treatments or to address medical needs and preferences of patients, especially when no other options are available. However, off-label use of medicines is in general not supported by the same level of evidence as medicines licensed for pediatric use. This may result in increased uncertainty on efficacy as well as the risk for toxicity and other side effects. In addition, liability may also be of concern, counterbalanced by professional guidelines.Conclusion: The purpose of this joint EAP/ESDPPP policy statement is to offer guidance for HCPs on when and how to prescribe off-label medicines to children and to provide recommendations for future European policy.


Subject(s)
Off-Label Use/standards , Pediatrics/standards , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Europe , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Pediatrics/methods , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Societies, Medical
17.
J Pediatr ; 206: 56-65.e8, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30471715

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate recombinant human insulin-like growth factor 1 complexed with its binding protein (rhIGF-1/rhIGFBP-3) for the prevention of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and other complications of prematurity among extremely preterm infants. STUDY DESIGN: This phase 2 trial was conducted from September 2014 to March 2016. Infants born at a gestational age of 230/7 weeks to 276/7 weeks were randomly allocated to rhIGF-1/rhIGFBP-3 (250 µg/kg/ 24 hours, continuous intravenous infusion from <24 hours of birth to postmenstrual age 296/7 weeks) or standard neonatal care, with follow-up to a postmenstrual age of 404/7 weeks. Target exposure was ≥70% IGF-1 measurements within 28-109 µg/L and ≥70% intended therapy duration. The primary endpoint was maximum severity of ROP. Secondary endpoints included time to discharge from neonatal care, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intraventricular hemorrhage, and growth measures. RESULTS: Overall, 61 infants were allocated to rhIGF-1/rhIGFBP-3, 60 to standard care (full analysis set); 24 of 61 treated infants achieved target exposure (evaluable set). rhIGF-1/rhIGFBP-3 did not decrease ROP severity or ROP occurrence. There was, however, a 53% decrease in severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia in the full analysis set (21.3% treated vs 44.9% standard care), and an 89% decrease in the evaluable set (4.8% vs 44.9%; P = .04 and P = .02, respectively) for severity distribution between groups. There was also a nonsignificant trend toward decrease in grades 3-4 intraventricular hemorrhage in the full analysis set (13.1% vs 23.3%) and in the evaluable set (8.3% vs 23.3%). Fatal serious adverse events were reported in 19.7% of treated infants (12/61) and 11.7% of control infants (7/60). No effect was observed on time to discharge from neonatal care/growth measures. CONCLUSIONS: rhIGF-1/rhIGFBP-3 did not affect development of ROP, but decreased the occurrence of severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia, with a nonsignificant decrease in grades 3-4 intraventricular hemorrhage. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01096784.


Subject(s)
Cerebral Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Insulin-Like Growth Factor I/therapeutic use , Recombinant Proteins/therapeutic use , Retinopathy of Prematurity/prevention & control , Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia/prevention & control , Cerebral Hemorrhage/therapy , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Infant, Extremely Premature , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Infusions, Intravenous , Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 3/therapeutic use , Male , Retinopathy of Prematurity/mortality , Retinopathy of Prematurity/therapy , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
18.
Pediatr Res ; 86(5): 567-572, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31398720

ABSTRACT

There is significant uncertainty over the role of assessment of long-term neurodevelopmental outcome (LTO) in neonatal clinical trials. A multidisciplinary working group was established to identify key issues in this area and to make recommendations about optimal approaches to evaluate LTO in therapeutic trials in newborns, which can be developed by sponsors and investigators with other key stakeholders. A key consideration for neonatal trials is the potential for the investigational product to cause widespread effects and drives the need to assess outcome in multiple organs. Thus investigators must assess whether the product has an impact on the brain and the potential for it to cause potential effects on LTO. Critically, is assessment of LTO an important direct therapeutic target or a safety outcome? Such decisions and outcomes need to be specific to the product being studied and use published data, only considering expert opinion when prior evidence does not exist. In designing the trial, the balance of benefits, costs, and burdens of assessments to the researcher and families need to be considered. Families and parent advocates should be involved in design and execution of the study. A framework is presented for use by all key stakeholders to determine the need, nature, and duration of LTO assessments in regulatory trials involving newborn infants.


Subject(s)
Brain/drug effects , Clinical Trials as Topic , Neuroprotective Agents/administration & dosage , Humans , Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain/drug therapy , Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain/physiopathology , Infant, Newborn , Treatment Outcome
19.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 85(10): 2332-2340, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31269280

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Drug disposition in children may vary from adults due to age-related variation in drug metabolism. Microdose studies present an innovation to study pharmacokinetics (PK) in paediatrics; however, they should be used only when the PK is dose linear. We aimed to assess dose linearity of a [14 C]midazolam microdose, by comparing the PK of an intravenous (IV) microtracer (a microdose given simultaneously with a therapeutic midazolam dose), with the PK of a single isolated microdose. METHODS: Preterm to 2-year-old infants admitted to the intensive care unit received [14 C]midazolam IV as a microtracer or microdose, followed by dense blood sampling up to 36 hours. Plasma concentrations of [14 C]midazolam and [14 C]1-hydroxy-midazolam were determined by accelerator mass spectrometry. Noncompartmental PK analysis was performed and a population PK model was developed. RESULTS: Of 15 infants (median gestational age 39.4 [range 23.9-41.4] weeks, postnatal age 11.4 [0.6-49.1] weeks), 6 received a microtracer and 9 a microdose of [14 C]midazolam (111 Bq kg-1 ; 37.6 ng kg-1 ). In a 2-compartment PK model, bodyweight was the most significant covariate for volume of distribution. There was no statistically significant difference in any PK parameter between the microdose and microtracer, nor in the area under curve ratio [14 C]1-OH-midazolam/[14 C]midazolam, showing the PK of midazolam to be linear within the range of the therapeutic and microdoses. CONCLUSION: Our data support the dose linearity of the PK of an IV [14 C]midazolam microdose in children. Hence, a [14 C]midazolam microdosing approach may be used as an alternative to a therapeutic dose of midazolam to study developmental changes in hepatic CYP3A activity in young children.


Subject(s)
Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Midazolam/administration & dosage , Models, Biological , Administration, Intravenous , Age Factors , Area Under Curve , Carbon Radioisotopes , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Humans , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacokinetics , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units , Midazolam/analogs & derivatives , Midazolam/pharmacokinetics , Tissue Distribution
20.
Lancet ; 390(10095): 669-680, 2017 Aug 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28668289

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Between 62 000 and 77 000 women die annually from pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Prompt delivery, preferably by the vaginal route, is vital for good maternal and neonatal outcomes. Two low-cost interventions-low-dose oral misoprostol tablets and transcervical Foley catheterisation-are already used in low-resource settings. We aimed to compare the relative risks and benefits of these interventions. METHODS: We undertook this multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial in two public hospitals in Nagpur, India. Women (aged ≥18 years) who were at 20 weeks' gestation or later with a live fetus and required delivery as a result of pre-eclampsia or hypertension were randomly assigned (1:1), via computer-generated block randomisation (block sizes of four, six, and eight) with concealment by use of opaque, sequentially numbered, sealed envelopes, to receive labour induction with either oral misoprostol 25 µg every 2 h (maximum of 12 doses) or a transcervical Foley catheter (silicone, size 18 F with 30 mL balloon). Randomisation was stratified by study centre. The catheter remained in place until active labour started, the catheter fell out, or 12 h had elapsed. If the catheter did not fall out within 12 h, induction continued with artificial membrane rupture and oxytocin, administered through a micro-drip gravity infusion set. Fetal monitoring was by intermittent auscultation. The primary outcome was vaginal birth within 24 h. Due to the nature of the interventions, masking of participants, study investigators, and care providers to group allocation was not possible. We analysed by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01801410. FINDINGS: Between Dec 20, 2013, and June 29, 2015, we randomly assigned 602 women to induction with misoprostol (n=302) or the Foley catheter (n=300; intention-to-treat population). Vaginal birth within 24 h was more common in women in the misoprostol group than in the Foley catheter group (172 [57·0%] vs 141 [47·0%] women; absolute risk difference 10·0%, 95% CI 2·0-17·9; p=0·0136). Rates of uterine hyperstimulation were low in both the misoprostol and Foley catheter groups (two [0·7%] vs one [0·3%] cases; absolute risk difference 0·3%, 95% CI -0·8 to 1·5; p=0·566) and neonatal deaths did not differ significantly between groups (six [2·0%] vs three [1·0%] neonatal deaths; 1·0, -1·04 to 2·97; p=0·322). 17 serious adverse events (3%) were reported during the study: one case of intrapartum convulsion and one case of disseminated intravascular coagulation (both in the Foley group); ten perinatal deaths, including two stillbirths (both in the Foley catheter group) and eight neonatal deaths (n=5 in the misoprostol group and n=3 in the Foley catheter group); and five of neonatal morbidity, comprising birth asphyxia (n=3), septicaemia (n=1), and neonatal convulsion (n=1). INTERPRETATION: Oral misoprostol was more effective than transcervical Foley catheterisation for induction of labour in women with pre-eclampsia or hypertension. Future studies are required to assess whether oxytocin augmentation following misoprostol can be replaced by regular doses of oral misoprostol tablets. FUNDING: Medical Research Council, Department for International Development, and Wellcome Trust Joint Global Health Trials Scheme.


Subject(s)
Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced/therapy , Labor, Induced/methods , Misoprostol , Oxytocics , Pre-Eclampsia/therapy , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Adult , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Humans , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced/economics , India , Labor, Induced/economics , Pre-Eclampsia/economics , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Tablets , Urinary Catheterization/economics , Urinary Catheterization/statistics & numerical data , Vagina , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL