Management of partial and non-responding cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) and basal cell carcinoma are the most common types of skin cancer. For patients with locally advanced and metastatic cSCC, the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor cemiplimab is approved for systemic treatment. Despite this revolutionary immunomodulatory therapeutic approach, tumours may fail to respond either completely or partially. In addition to the previously established local treatment with radiotherapy or systemic treatment with chemotherapy and epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, ongoing trials are currently focussed on re-stimulating the antitumour immune response in patients with advanced cSCC refractory to PD-1 inhibitors. In this review, ongoing and recently finished trials with different therapeutic approaches will be discussed.

Checkpoint immunotherapy of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in patients suffering from chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: divergent outcomes in two men treated with PD-1 inhibitors.

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) numbers among the most common types of skin cancer and is known as one of the cancer entities with the highest mutational burden among all solid tumours. Due to the positive correlation between mutational burden and response rate to inhibitors of the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), those inhibitors are considered promising candidates for the systemic therapy of cSCC. Recently, the PD-1 inhibitors pembrolizumab, nivolumab and cemiplimab demonstrated efficacy in the systemic treatment of locally advanced or metastatic cSCC leading to the approval of cemiplimab by the FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration) in 2018 and the EMA (European Medicines Agency) in 2019. Patients with haematological malignancies tend to develop skin cancers of high aggressiveness, enhanced cumulative recurrence rate and higher rates of metastases with subsequent death. Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) is the most frequent type of leukaemia in the United States and Europe with the majority of patients older than 50 years of age. This neoplasm predominantly originates from B -cells leading to an impaired immune system of the patient. Although CLL is a B-cell malignancy, studies have also described the involvement of T cells in the pathogenesis and progression of the disease with contradictory findings on the effects of PD-1 inhibitors in CLL. Due to their underlying hematologic malignancy, these patients have commonly no access to PD-1 inhibitor trials for treatment of advanced cSCC. We report on two patients with locally advanced or metastatic cSCC. Both patients had been suffering from a CLL for many years without indication for treatment. Despite a potential immunosuppressive state of the patients due to their CLL, both were treated with the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab resulting in different therapy outcomes.

Response durability after cessation of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma: a retrospective multicenter DeCOG study.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have led to a prolongation of progression-free and overall survival in patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). However, immune-mediated adverse events due to ICI therapy are common and often lead to treatment discontinuation. The response duration after cessation of ICI treatment is unknown. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the time to relapse after discontinuation of ICI in MCC patients. METHODS: We analyzed 20 patients with metastatic MCC who have been retrospectively enrolled at eleven skin cancer centers in Germany. These patients have received ICI therapy and showed as best overall response (BOR) at least a stable disease (SD) upon ICI therapy. All patients have discontinued ICI therapy for other reasons than disease progression. Data on treatment duration, tumor response, treatment cessation, response durability, and tumor relapse were recorded. RESULTS: Overall, 12 of 20 patients (60%) with MCC relapsed after discontinuation of ICI. The median response durability was 10.0 months. Complete response (CR) as BOR to ICI-treatment was observed in six patients, partial response (PR) in eleven, and SD in three patients. Disease progression was less frequent in patients with CR (2/6 patients relapsed) as compared to patients with PR (7/11) and SD (3/3), albeit the effect of initial BOR on the response durability was below statistical significance. The median duration of ICI therapy was 10.0 months. Our results did not show a correlation between treatment duration and the risk of relapse after treatment withdrawal. Major reasons for discontinuation of ICI therapy were CR (20%), adverse events (35%), fatigue (20%), or patient decision (25%). Discontinuation of ICI due to adverse events resulted in progressive disease (PD) in 71% of patients regardless of the initial response. A re-induction of ICI was initiated in 8 patients upon tumor progression. We observed a renewed tumor response in 4 of these 8 patients. Notably, all 4 patients showed an initial BOR of at least PR. CONCLUSION: Our results from this contemporary cohort of patients with metastatic MCC indicate that MCC patients are at higher risk of relapse after discontinuation of ICI as compared to melanoma patients. Notably, the risk of disease progression after discontinuation of ICI treatment is lower in patients with initial CR (33%) as compared to patients with initial PR (66%) or SD (100%). Upon tumor progression, re-induction of ICI is a feasible option. Our data suggest that the BOR to initial ICI therapy might be a potential predictive clinical marker for a successful re-induction.

High tumour mutational burden and EGFR/MAPK pathway activation are therapeutic targets in metastatic porocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Eccrine porocarcinoma (EPC) is a rare skin cancer arising from the eccrine sweat glands. Due to the lack of effective therapies, metastasis is associated with a high mortality rate. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the drivers of EPC progression. METHODS: We carried out genomic and transcriptomic profiling of metastatic EPC (mEPC), validation of the observed alterations in an EPC patient-derived cell line, confirmation of relevant observations in a large patient cohort of 30 tumour tissues, and successful treatment of a patient with mEPC under the identified treatment regimens. RESULTS: mEPC was characterized by a high tumour mutational burden (TMB) with an ultraviolet signature, widespread copy number alterations and gene expression changes that affected cancer-relevant cellular processes such as cell cycle regulation and proliferation, including a pathogenic TP53 (tumour protein 53) mutation, a copy number deletion in the CDKN2A (cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 2A) region and a CTNND1/PAK1 [catenin delta 1/p21 (RAC1) activated kinase 1] gene fusion. The overexpression of EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor), PAK1 and MAP2K1 (mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1; also known as MEK1) genes translated into strong protein expression and respective pathway activation in the tumour tissue. Furthermore, a patient-derived cell line was sensitive to EGFR and MEK inhibition, confirming the functional relevance of the pathway activation. Immunohistochemistry analyses in a large patient cohort showed the relevance of the observed changes to the pathogenesis of EPC. Our results indicate that mEPC should respond to immune or kinase inhibitor therapy. Indeed, the advanced disease of our index patient was controlled by EGFR-directed therapy and immune checkpoint inhibition for more than 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Molecular profiling demonstrated high TMB and EGFR/MAPK pathway activation to be novel therapeutic targets in mEPC.

[Cutaneous angiosarcoma clinically presenting as Quincke's edema]. / Kutanes Angiosarkom mit klinischem Bild eines Quincke-Ödems.

We report a case of a 75-year-old man with facial edema that also affected the periorbital area who was admitted to the hospital with the suspected diagnosis of Quincke's edema. The diagnosis of cutaneous angiosarcoma was made by microscopic examination and immunohistochemical staining. Chemotherapy was initially initiated because the angiosarcoma was unresectable and the radiation situation was difficult. Therapy has to be switched to second and third line therapy due to disease progression. The case illustrates the complexity of diagnosis and therapy in patients with cutaneous angiosarcoma.

Elevated baseline serum PD-1 or PD-L1 predicts poor outcome of PD-1 inhibition therapy in metastatic melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) checkpoint inhibition has recently advanced to one of the most effective treatment strategies in melanoma. Nevertheless, a considerable proportion of patients show upfront therapy resistance and baseline predictive biomarkers of treatment outcome are scarce. In this study we quantified PD-1 and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in baseline sera from melanoma patients in relation to therapy response and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sera taken at therapy baseline from a total of 222 metastatic melanoma patients (two retrospectively selected monocentric discovery cohorts, n = 130; one prospectively collected multicentric validation cohort, n = 92) and from 38 healthy controls were analyzed for PD-1 and PD-L1 concentration by sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: Melanoma patients showed higher serum concentrations of PD-1 (P = 0.0054) and PD-L1 (P < 0.0001) than healthy controls. Elevated serum PD-1 and PD-L1 levels at treatment baseline were associated with an impaired best overall response (BOR) to anti-PD-1 (P = 0.014, P = 0.041), but not to BRAF inhibition therapy. Baseline PD-1 and PD-L1 serum levels correlated with progression-free (PFS; P = 0.0081, P = 0.053) and overall survival (OS; P = 0.055, P = 0.0062) in patients who received anti-PD-1 therapy, but not in patients treated with BRAF inhibitors. By combining both markers, we obtained a strong discrimination between favorable and poor outcome of anti-PD-1 therapy, with elevated baseline serum levels of PD-1 and/or PD-L1 associated with an impaired BOR (P = 0.037), PFS (P = 0.048), and OS (P = 0.0098). This PD-1/PD-L1 combination serum biomarker was confirmed in an independent multicenter validation set of serum samples prospectively collected at baseline of PD-1 inhibition (BOR, P = 0.019; PFS, P = 0.038; OS, P = 0.022). Multivariable Cox regression demonstrated serum PD-1/PD-L1 as an independent predictor of PFS (P = 0.010) and OS (P = 0.003) in patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate PD-1 and PD-L1 as useful serum biomarkers to predict the outcome of PD-1 inhibition therapy in melanoma patients and to select patients for PD-1-based versus BRAF-based therapy strategies.

GNAQ and GNA11 mutant nonuveal melanoma: a subtype distinct from both cutaneous and uveal melanoma.

BACKGROUND: GNAQ and GNA11 mutant nonuveal melanoma represent a poorly characterized rare subgroup of melanoma with a gene mutation profile similar to uveal melanoma. OBJECTIVES: To characterize these tumours in terms of clinical behaviour and genetic characteristics. METHODS: Patients with nonuveal GNAQ/11 mutated melanoma were identified from the prospective multicentre tumour tissue registry ADOREG, Tissue Registry in Melanoma (TRIM) and additional cooperating skin cancer centres. Extensive data on patient, tumour and treatment characteristics were collected retrospectively. Targeted sequencing was used to determine tumour mutational burden. Immunohistochemistry staining was performed for programmed death-ligand 1 and BRCA1-associated protein (BAP)1. Existing whole-exome cutaneous and uveal melanoma data were analysed for mutation type and burden. RESULTS: We identified 18 patients with metastatic GNAQ/11 mutant nonuveal melanoma. Tumours had a lower tumour mutational burden and fewer ultraviolet signature mutations than cutaneous melanomas. In addition to GNAQ and GNA11 mutations (nine each), six splicing factor 3b subunit 1 (SF3B1), three eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A X-linked (EIF1AX) and four BAP1 mutations were detected. In contrast to uveal melanoma, GNAQ/11 mutant nonuveal melanomas frequently metastasized lymphatically and concurrent EIF1AX, SF3B1 and BAP1 mutations showed no apparent association with patient prognosis. Objective response to immunotherapy was poor with only one partial response observed in 10 treated patients (10%). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that GNAQ/11 mutant nonuveal melanomas are a subtype of melanoma that is both clinically and genetically distinct from cutaneous and uveal melanoma. As they respond poorly to available treatment regimens, novel effective therapeutic approaches for affected patients are urgently needed. What is already known about this topic? The rare occurrence of GNAQ/11 mutations in nonuveal melanoma has been documented. GNAQ/11 mutant nonuveal melanomas also harbour genetic alterations in EIF1AX, SF3B1 and BAP1 that are of prognostic relevance in uveal melanoma. What does this study add? GNAQ/11 mutant nonuveal melanomas show metastatic spread reminiscent of cutaneous melanoma, but not uveal melanoma. GNAQ/11 mutant nonuveal melanomas have a low tumour mutational burden that is higher than uveal melanoma, but lower than cutaneous melanoma. What is the translational message? Primary GNAQ/11 mutant nonuveal melanomas are a subtype of melanoma that is clinically and genetically distinct from both cutaneous and uveal melanoma. As metastatic GNAQ/11 mutant nonuveal melanomas respond poorly to available systemic therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibition, novel therapeutic approaches for these tumours are urgently needed. Linked Comment: Rafei-Shamsabadi. Br J Dermatol 2020; 183:806-807.

[Immunotherapy for malignant melanoma]. / Immuntherapie beim malignen Melanom.

Although cutaneous melanoma accounts for only about 4% of all skin cancers (including nonmelanocytic skin cancer), it is responsible for 80% of all deaths caused by skin cancer. The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors led to a significant improvement in long-term survival of patients in an advanced stage regardless of BRAF mutation status. In addition to targeted therapy for patients with BRAF-mutated melanoma, immunotherapies are the therapies of choice in advanced stages and, since 2018, also in the adjuvant setting. The effectiveness of combination therapies and sequences of targeted and immunotherapies are currently being tested.

A multicenter DeCOG study on predictors of vemurafenib therapy outcome in melanoma: pretreatment impacts survival.

BACKGROUND: Kinase inhibitors targeting the BRAF V600 mutation have become standard in the treatment of metastatic melanoma. Albeit in wide clinical use, the patterns associated with therapy outcome are not fully elucidated. The present study was aimed to identify predictive factors of therapy response and survival under the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study analyzed patient, tumor, and pretreatment characteristics collected in BRAF V600-mutated stage IV melanoma patients before single-agent therapy with the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib. RESULTS: A total of 300 patients from 14 centers were included into this study with a median follow-up time of 13.0 months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.1 months; median overall survival (OS) was 7.6 months. Best response under vemurafenib was associated with serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH; ≤ versus >upper normal limit; P = 0.0000001), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) overall performance status (OPS) (0 versus ≥ 1; P = 0.00089), and BRAF mutation subtype (V600E versus V600K; P = 0.016). Multivariate analysis identified ECOG OPS ≥ 1 [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.88; P = 0.00005], immunotherapy pretreatment (HR = 0.53; P = 0.0067), elevated serum LDH (HR = 1.45; P = 0.012), age >55 years (HR = 0.72; P = 0.019), and chemotherapy pretreatment (HR = 1.39; P = 0.036) as independent predictors of PFS. For OS, elevated serum LDH (HR = 1.99; P = 0.00012), ECOG OPS ≥ 1 (HR = 1.90; P = 0.00063), age >55 years (HR = 0.65; P = 0.011), kinase inhibitor pretreatment (HR = 1.86; P = 0.014), immunotherapy pretreatment (HR = 0.57; P = 0.025), chemotherapy pretreatment (HR = 2.17; P = 0.039), and male gender (HR = 0.70; 95% confidence interval 0.50-0.98; P = 0.039) were found as predictors. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that the type of pretreatment strongly influences the outcome of vemurafenib therapy, with a precedent immunotherapy showing a positive, and a prior chemotherapy and kinase inhibitors showing a negative impact on survival, respectively. Moreover, we show that the patient's OPS, serum LDH, age, and gender independently impact vemurafenib therapy outcome. These findings should be taken into account for the future design of therapy sequencing in BRAF V600 mutation-positive melanoma patients.

Erythema nodosum-like lesions during BRAF inhibitor therapy: Report on 16 new cases and review of the literature.

IMPORTANCE: BRAF inhibitors have been licensed for the therapy of BRAF-mutated melanoma. Recently, inflammatory skin lesions clinically resembling erythema nodosum have been reported as therapy side-effects that may lead to treatment discontinuation. OBJECTIVE: To identify and characterize cases with BRAF inhibitor-associated erythema nodosum-like inflammatory skin lesions and development of an algorithm for their management. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective chart review of melanoma patients treated with BRAF inhibitors in 14 departments of Dermatology in Germany and Austria and PubMed search for cases in the literature. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were identified who developed erythema nodosum-like lesions under BRAF inhibitor therapy; 14 had received vemurafenib and two dabrafenib plus trametinib. The most frequently involved body sites were the legs. Histopathology was performed in five cases and revealed panniculitis in three and vasculitis in two patients respectively. Arthralgia and fever were associated symptoms in 44% and 31% of patients respectively. Inflammatory symptoms led to discontinuation of treatment in three patients, while in the majority of cases symptomatic management was sufficient. Skin lesions finally resolved despite continued BRAF inhibitor therapy in seven patients. In the literature, 19 additional patients with similar cutaneous appearance under BRAF inhibitors could be identified. An algorithm for the management of such lesions is proposed. CONCLUSION: Erythema nodosum-like skin lesions histologically correspond to panniculitis and/or vasculitis. Symptomatic treatment may be sufficient. However, additional work-up and interruption of BRAF inhibitor therapy may be necessary in severe cases which are commonly associated with systemic symptoms.

[Cutaneous sarcomas: update on selected fibrohistiocytic and myofibroblastic tumors]. / Kutane Sarkome: update ausgewählter Entitäten fibrohistiozytärer und myofibrozytärer Morphologie.

BACKGROUND: Malignant fibrohistiocytic tumors are a heterogeneous group of mesenchymal neoplasms that may occur in the skin and subcutaneous tissues. DIAGNOSIS: Diagnosis of these tumors may be difficult, as they are rare, and a wide morphological diversity of types and subtypes has been described. In this update, relevant aspects of selected entities like dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, desmoid tumor, atypical fibroxanthoma, pleomorphic dermal sarcoma, and myxofibrosarcoma are discussed according to the WHO classification of 2013. The typical clinical feature of these tumors is their mostly asymptomatic appearance. For diagnosis, the histologic workup is therefore the key feature; herein immunohistochemistry as well as molecular diagnostics become increasingly important. THERAPY: The primary treatment for locally resectable tumors is complete surgical removal; chemotherapy, radiation, and targeted therapies with kinase inhibitors are available for inoperable and metastatic disease.

[Cutaneous side effects of anti-tumor therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors]. / Kutane Nebenwirkungen der medikamentösen Tumortherapie mit BRAF- und MEK-Inhibitoren.

BACKGROUND: BRAF and MEK inhibitors are new targeted therapies which are used in the treatment of malignancies, in particular of malignant melanoma. SIDE EFFECTS: Cutaneous side effects are common during the treatment with both types of inhibitors. These side effects include inflammatory reactions such as maculopapular and papulopustular exanthema, hand-foot syndrome, panniculitis, paronychia, photo- and radio-sensitization. As a class effect, BRAF-inhibitors induce proliferative disorders of keratinocytes and melanocytes, such as palmoplantar hyperkeratosis (as part of the hand-foot syndrome), verruciform and acanthoma-like lesions, follicular and Grover disease-like hyperkeratoses, keratoacanthomas, squamous cell carcinomas and atypical melanocytic nevi with transition to secondary melanomas. Furthermore, hair alterations and xerosis are possible. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with BRAF and MEK inhibitors requires close dermatologic monitoring of the patient. This manuscript summarizes the most frequent cutaneous side effects and their management.

Early switch from run-in treatment with vemurafenib plus cobimetinib to atezolizumab after 3 months leads to rapid loss of tumour control in patients with advanced BRAFV600-positive melanoma: The ImmunoCobiVem phase 2 randomised trial.

AIM: ImmunoCobiVem investigated whether a planned switch to atezolizumab after achieving tumour control during run-in with vemurafenib + cobimetinib improves progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to continuous targeted therapy (TT) in patients with previously untreated advanced BRAFV600-mutated melanoma. METHODS: In this multicenter phase 2 study, patients received vemurafenib plus cobimetinib. After 3months, patients without progressive disease (PD) were randomly assigned (1:1) to continue vemurafenib + cobimetinib (Arm A) or switch to atezolizumab (Arm B) until first documented PD (PD1). Primary outcome was PFS1 (time from start of run-in until PD1 or death). OS and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: Of 185 patients enroled between November 2016 and December 2019, 135 were randomly assigned after the run-in period (Arm A, n = 69; Arm B, n = 66). Median PFS1 was significantly longer in Arm A versus Arm B (13.9 versus 5.9months; hazard ratio [HR] 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37-0.84; PStratified=0.001). Median OS was not reached in either arm (HR 1.22; 95%CI, 0.69-2.16; PStratified=0.389); 2-year OS was higher in Arm B versus Arm A (67%; 95%CI, 53-78 versus 58%; 95%CI, 45-70). Grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 55% of patients in Arm A and 64% in Arm B; treatment-related AEs led to discontinuation of any drug in 7% and 9% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: In patients with BRAFV600-mutated advanced melanoma who achieve tumour control with TT, early switch at 3months to atezolizumab led to rapid loss of tumour control but provided a numerical OS benefit at 2years compared with continued TT.

Sorafenib and pegylated interferon-α2b in advanced metastatic melanoma: a multicenter phase II DeCOG trial.

BACKGROUND: The combination of sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor, and pegylated interferon-α2b (Peg-IFN-α2b) could potentially lead to an improved antitumoral response. Previously, combinations of interferon and sorafenib have been used in renal cell cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage IV metastatic melanoma and no previous systemic therapies apart from adjuvant immunotherapy received Peg-IFN-α2b 3 µg/kg once per week, and sorafenib 400-mg b.i.d. for a minimum of 8 weeks. The primary study end point was disease control rate (DCR). RESULTS: Between February 2008 and February 2009, 55 patients were enrolled with a median age of 64 years (20-85). At 8 weeks, 2 patients (3.6%) had a partial response (PR) and 14 patients a stable disease (25.5%), for a DCR of 29.1% in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. The median progression-free survival in the ITT population was 2.47 months (95% confidence interval 1.22-3.72 months). The toxicity of sorafenib and Peg-IFN-α2b combination was characterized by mainly hematological side-effects, including one treatment-related bleeding complication with a fatal outcome. Other grade 3/4 toxic effects were fatigue and flu-like symptoms. CONCLUSION: The combination of sorafenib and Peg-IFN-α2b showed modest clinical activity and some serious side-effects including fatal bleeding complications.

[Treatment of advanced metastatic melanoma]. / Therapie des inoperabel metastasierten Melanoms.

In the past therapy of advanced melanoma with distant metastases was characterized by limited success. In recent years the increased understanding of the pathogenesis of melanoma as well as tumor immunology, however, has allowed the development of new promising therapeutic options for certain subgroups of melanoma patients. In the present review these molecular-targeted and immune-modulating therapies, as well as already established therapies such as radiation or chemotherapy, will be discussed.

Temozolomide plus pegylated interferon alfa-2b as first-line treatment for stage IV melanoma: a multicenter phase II trial of the Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group (DeCOG).

BACKGROUND: Combination of temozolomide (TMZ) with nonpegylated interferon alfa is associated with increased efficacy in terms of response rates compared with monotherapy. A multicenter phase II study was carried out to assess the activity and toxicity of TMZ plus pegylated interferon alfa-2b (peg-IFNalpha-2b), hypothesizing improved efficacy due to modified pharmacokinetic properties of the novel interferon (IFN) formulation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 124 patients with stage IV melanoma without prior chemotherapy and no cerebral metastases were treated with 100 mug peg-IFNalpha-2b s.c. per week and oral TMZ 200 mg/m(2) (days 1-5, every 28 days). Primary study end point was objective response, and secondary end points were overall and progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. RESULTS: In all, 116 patients were assessable for response: 2 (1.7%) had a complete response and 19 (16.4%) a partial response (overall response rate 18.1%). Of total, 25.0% achieved disease stabilization and 56.9% progressed. Overall survival was 9.4 months; PFS was 2.8 months. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 20.7% and grade 3/4 leukopenia in 23.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of TMZ plus peg-IFNalpha-2b in this large phase II study is moderate and comparable to published results of the combination of TMZ with non-peg-IFN. Likewise, the safety profile of peg-IFNalpha-2b seems to be similar to non-peg-IFN when combined with TMZ.

[Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans]. / Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans.

Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a rare tumor but still the most common cutaneous sarcoma. DFSP is a tumor of fibroblastic origin, characterized by a slow, undermining and locally destructive growth pattern, which only rarely metastasizes. The clinical appearance, especially of smaller lesions, is often not characteristic, so that diagnosis is often made late and only on biopsy findings. The standard treatment of DFSP is excision with safety margins of 2 to 3 cm. If smaller margins are employed, the risk of local relapse is high. Surgically incurable or metastatic DFSP can be irradiated; the cells are generally radiation-sensitive. 90% of DFSP carry a chromosome translocation of 17 and 22, harboring a gene fusion, which results in a continuous activation of the PDGFbeta signal transduction pathway. This finding led the way to a new molecular targeted therapy of DFSP using inhibitors of the PDGFbeta pathway. The first drug to be registered for targeted treatment of locally advanced or metastasized DFSP is the multikinase inhibitor imatinib, showing a response of about 70% in clinical trials.

[Cutaneous reactions to molecular targeted therapies]. / Kutane Nebenwirkungen molekular zielgerichteter Therapien.

The use of molecular targeted therapies currently is on the rise in the treatment of severe diseases, particularly for malignant tumors. The targeted agents show a high specificity against one or more molecular target structures, hereby inhibiting or modifying signal transduction pathways connected to these targets, and thus strongly altering proliferation, activation and interaction of the targeted cells. These manipulations of highly specific signaling pathways are associated with again highly specific side effects, which often affect the skin. These cutaneous reactions present a new spectrum of adverse drug events to the dermatologist. We reviews the cutaneous reactions of molecular targeted agents used in the treatment of psoriasis (alefacept, efalizumab, etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab), as well as agents used in cancer therapy (imatinib, sorafenib, sunitinib, EGFR antagonists and CTLA-4-antagonists).