Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 43
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Cancer Sci ; 115(4): 1346-1359, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38310695

ABSTRACT

Mounting evidence suggests that body mass index (BMI) is inversely associated with the risk of lung cancer. However, relatively few studies have explored this association in Asian people, who have a much lower prevalence of obesity than Caucasians. We pooled data from 10 prospective cohort studies involving 444,143 Japanese men and women to address the association between BMI and the risk of lung cancer. Study-specific hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated in each cohort using the Cox proportional hazards model. A meta-analysis was undertaken by combining the results from each cohort. Heterogeneity across studies was evaluated using Cochran's Q and I2statistics. During 5,730,013 person-years of follow-up, 6454 incident lung cancer cases (4727 men and 1727 women) were identified. Baseline BMI was inversely associated with lung cancer risk in men and women combined. While leanness (BMI <18.5) was associated with a higher risk of lung cancer (HR 1.35; 95% CI, 1.16-1.57), overweight and obesity were associated with a lower risk, with HRs of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.71-0.84) and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.45-1.07), respectively. Every 5 kg/m2 increase in BMI was associated with a 21% lower risk of lung cancer (HR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.75-0.83; p < 0.0001). Our pooled analysis indicated that BMI is inversely associated with the risk of lung cancer in the Japanese population. This inverse association could be partly attributed to residual confounding by smoking, as it was more pronounced among male smokers.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Female , Body Mass Index , Japan/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Lung Neoplasms/complications , Prospective Studies , Obesity/complications , Obesity/epidemiology , Proportional Hazards Models
2.
Cancer Sci ; 114(7): 2961-2972, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37013939

ABSTRACT

The effect of body mass index (BMI) on esophageal and gastric carcinogenesis might be heterogeneous, depending on subtype or subsite. However, findings from prospective evaluations of BMI associated with these cancers among Asian populations have been inconsistent and limited, especially for esophageal adenocarcinoma and gastric cardia cancer. We performed a pooled analysis of 10 population-based cohort studies to examine this association in 394,247 Japanese individuals. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate study-specific hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), then pooled these estimates to calculate summary HRs with a random effects model. During 5,750,107 person-years of follow-up, 1569 esophageal cancer (1038 squamous cell carcinoma and 86 adenocarcinoma) and 11,095 gastric (728 cardia and 5620 noncardia) cancer incident cases were identified. An inverse association was observed between BMI and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (HR per 5-kg/m2 increase 0.57, 95% CI 0.50-0.65), whereas a positive association was seen in gastric cardia cancer (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.00-1.32). A nonsignificant and significant positive association for overweight or obese (BMI ≥25 kg/m2 ) relative to BMI <25 kg/m2 was observed with esophageal adenocarcinoma (HR 1.32, 95% CI 0.80-2.17) and gastric cardia cancer (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.05-1.46), respectively. No clear association with BMI was found for gastric noncardia cancer. This prospective study-the largest in an Asian country-provides a comprehensive quantitative estimate of the association of BMI with upper gastrointestinal cancer and confirms the subtype- or subsite-specific carcinogenic impact of BMI in a Japanese population.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma , Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Stomach Neoplasms/epidemiology , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Body Mass Index , Esophageal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Prospective Studies , Japan/epidemiology , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/epidemiology , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiology , Risk Factors
3.
Cancer Sci ; 113(1): 261-276, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34689390

ABSTRACT

The association between alcohol intake and stomach cancer risk remains controversial. We undertook a pooled analysis of data from six large-scale Japanese cohort studies with 256 478 participants on this topic. Alcohol intake as ethanol was estimated using a validated questionnaire. The participants were followed for incidence of stomach cancer. We calculated study-specific hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for stomach cancer according to alcohol intake using a Cox regression model. Summary HRs were estimated by pooling the study-specific HRs using a random-effects model. During 4 265 551 person-years of follow-up, 8586 stomach cancer cases were identified. In men, the multivariate-adjusted HRs (95% CIs) of stomach cancer were 1.00 (0.87-1.15) for occasional drinkers, and 1.00 (0.91-1.11) for <23 g/d, 1.09 (1.01-1.18) for 23 to <46 g/d, 1.18 (1.09-1.29) for 46 to <69 g/d, 1.21 (1.05-1.39) for 69 to <92 g/d, and 1.29 (1.11-1.51) for ≥92 g/d ethanol in regular drinkers compared with nondrinkers. In women, the multivariate-adjusted HRs were 0.93 (0.80-1.08) for occasional drinkers, and 0.85 (0.74-0.99) for <23 g/d, and 1.22 (0.98-1.53) for ≥23 g/d in regular drinkers compared with nondrinkers. The HRs for proximal and distal cancer in drinkers vs nondrinkers were 1.69 (1.15-2.47) and 1.24 (0.99-1.55) for ≥92 g/d in men, and 1.60 (0.76-3.37) and 1.18 (0.88-1.57) for ≥23 g/d in women, respectively. Alcohol intake increased stomach cancer risk in men, and heavy drinkers showed a greater point estimate of risk for proximal cancer than for distal cancer.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Stomach Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alcohol Drinking/adverse effects , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Japan/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Regression Analysis , Sex Characteristics , Stomach Neoplasms/chemically induced
4.
Int J Cancer ; 148(11): 2736-2747, 2021 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33497475

ABSTRACT

Although alcohol consumption is reported to increase the incidence of breast cancer in European studies, evidence for an association between alcohol and breast cancer in Asian populations is insufficient. We conducted a pooled analysis of eight large-scale population-based prospective cohort studies in Japan to evaluate the association between alcohol (both frequency and amount) and breast cancer risk with categorization by menopausal status at baseline and at diagnosis. Estimated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated in the individual cohorts and combined using random-effects models. Among 158 164 subjects with 2 369 252 person-years of follow-up, 2208 breast cancer cases were newly diagnosed. Alcohol consumption had a significant association with a higher risk of breast cancer in both women who were premenopausal at baseline (regular drinker compared to nondrinker: HR 1.37, 1.04-1.81, ≥23 g/d compared to 0 g/d: HR 1.74, 1.25-2.43, P for trend per frequency category: P = .017) and those who were premenopausal at diagnosis (≥23 g/d compared to 0 g/d: HR 1.89, 1.04-3.43, P for trend per frequency category: P = .032). In contrast, no significant association was seen in women who were postmenopausal at baseline or at diagnosis, despite a substantial number of subjects and long follow-up period. Our results revealed that frequent and high alcohol consumption are both risk factors for Asian premenopausal breast cancer, similarly to previous studies in Western countries. The lack of a clear association in postmenopausal women in our study warrants larger investigation in Asia.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Premenopause , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alcohol Drinking/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/etiology , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Incidence , Japan/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors
5.
Int J Cancer ; 148(3): 654-664, 2021 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32761607

ABSTRACT

Smoking has been consistently associated with the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) in Western populations; however, evidence is limited and inconsistent in Asian people. To assess the association of smoking status, smoking intensity and smoking cessation with colorectal risk in the Japanese population, we performed a pooled analysis of 10 population-based cohort studies. Study-specific hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox's proportional hazards model and then pooled using a random-effects model. Among 363 409 participants followed up for 2 666 004 person-years, 9232 incident CRCs were identified. In men, compared with never smokers, ever smokers showed higher risk of CRC. The HRs (95% CI) were 1.19 (1.10-1.29) for CRC, 1.19 (1.09-1.30) for colon cancer, 1.28 (1.13-1.46) for distal colon cancer and 1.21 (1.07-1.36) for rectal cancer. Smoking was associated with risk of CRC in a dose-response manner. In women, compared with never smokers, ever smokers showed increased risk of distal colon cancer (1.47 [1.19-1.82]). There was no evidence of a significant gender difference in the association of smoking and CRC risk. Our results confirm that smoking is associated with an increased risk of CRC, both overall and subsites, in Japanese men and distal colon cancer in Japanese women.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Smoking/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Colorectal Neoplasms/chemically induced , Female , Humans , Incidence , Japan/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Smoking/adverse effects
6.
Eur J Epidemiol ; 36(4): 415-428, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33492551

ABSTRACT

We examined the mortality risks among 2463 individuals who were exposed in utero to atomic bomb radiation in Hiroshima or Nagasaki in August 1945 and were followed from October 1950 through 2012. Individual estimates of mother's weighted absorbed uterine dose (DS02R1) were used. Poisson regression method was used to estimate the radiation-associated excess relative risk per Gy (ERR/Gy) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for cause-specific mortality. Head size, birth weight, and parents' survival status were evaluated as potential mediators of radiation effect. There were 339 deaths (216 males and 123 females) including deaths from solid cancer (n = 137), lymphohematopoietic cancer (n = 8), noncancer disease (n = 134), external cause (n = 56), and unknown cause (n = 4). Among males, the unadjusted ERR/Gy (95% CI) was increased for noncancer disease mortality (1.22, 0.10-3.14), but not for solid cancer mortality (- 0.18, < - 0.77-0.95); the unadjusted ERR/Gy for external cause mortality was not statistically significant (0.28, < - 0.60-2.36). Among females, the unadjusted ERRs/Gy were increased for solid cancer (2.24, 0.44-5.58), noncancer (2.86, 0.56-7.64), and external cause mortality (2.57, 0.20-9.19). The ERRs/Gy adjusted for potential mediators did not change appreciably for solid cancer mortality, but decreased notably for noncancer mortality (0.39, < - 0.43-1.91 for males; 1.48, - 0.046-4.55 for females) and external cause mortality (0.10, < - 0.57-1.96 for males; 1.38, < - 0.46-5.95 for females). In conclusion, antenatal radiation exposure is a consistent risk factor for increased solid cancer mortality among females, but not among males. The effect of exposure to atomic bomb radiation on noncancer disease and external cause mortality among individuals exposed in utero was mediated through small head size, low birth weight, and parental loss.


Subject(s)
Atomic Bomb Survivors/statistics & numerical data , Fetus/radiation effects , Maternal Exposure/adverse effects , Mortality , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/mortality , Radiation Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Pregnancy/radiation effects , Risk Factors
7.
Jpn J Clin Oncol ; 51(7): 1158-1170, 2021 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33893508

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In Japan, there are ongoing efforts to shift the gastric cancer prevention and control policy priorities from barium-based screening to Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori)-oriented primary prevention. A comprehensive summary of the evidence regarding the effects of H. pylori eradication on the risk of gastric cancer could inform policy decisions. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies evaluating the effectiveness of H. pylori eradication for the prevention of gastric cancer in otherwise healthy individuals (primary prevention) and early gastric cancer patients (tertiary prevention). RESULTS: In total, 19 studies were included. Three moderate-quality observational cohort studies showed that H. pylori eradication may be associated with a decreased risk of gastric cancer in healthy asymptomatic Japanese people. There is moderate certainty regarding the effectiveness of H. pylori eradication in patients with gastrointestinal diseases, such as peptic ulcers. A meta-analysis of 10 observational studies with otherwise healthy individuals (mainly peptic ulcer patients) yielded an overall odds ratio of 0.34 (95% CI: 0.25-0.46). Regarding tertiary prevention, the overall odds ratio for developing metachronous gastric cancer was 0.42 (95% CI: 0.35-0.51) in the eradication group in a meta-analysis of nine studies involving early gastric cancer patients who underwent endoscopic resection. CONCLUSION: H. pylori eradication is effective in preventing gastric cancer in the Japanese population, regardless of symptoms. Well-designed, large cohort studies are warranted to determine the long-term efficacy and safety of H. pylori eradication in the context of reducing the gastric cancer burden through population-based screening and treatment.


Subject(s)
Helicobacter Infections/epidemiology , Helicobacter pylori , Stomach Neoplasms/epidemiology , Helicobacter Infections/complications , Humans , Incidence , Japan/epidemiology , Odds Ratio , Stomach Neoplasms/etiology , Stomach Neoplasms/prevention & control
8.
Int J Cancer ; 146(3): 635-645, 2020 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30873589

ABSTRACT

Radiation effects on colorectal cancer rates, adjusted for smoking, alcohol intake and frequency of meat consumption and body mass index (BMI) by anatomical subsite (proximal colon, distal colon and rectum) were examined in a cohort of 105,444 atomic bomb survivors. Poisson regression methods were used to describe radiation-associated excess relative risks (ERR) and excess absolute rates (EAR) for the 1958-2009 period. There were 2,960 first primary colorectal cancers including 894 proximal, 871 distal and 1,046 rectal cancers. Smoking, alcohol intake and BMI were associated with subsite-specific cancer background rates. Significant linear dose-responses were found for total colon (sex-averaged ERR/Gy for 70 years old exposed at age 30 = 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.34; 0.98), proximal [ERR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.32; 1.44] and distal colon cancers [ERR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.04; 0.97], but not for rectal cancer [ERR = 0.023, 95% CI: -0.081; 0.13]. The ERRs for proximal and distal colon cancers were not significantly different (p = 0.41). The ERR decreased with attained age for total colon, but not for proximal colon cancer, and with calendar year for distal colon cancer. The ERRs and EARs did not vary by age at exposure, except for decreasing trend in EAR for proximal colon cancer. In conclusion, ionizing radiation is associated with increased risk of proximal and distal colon cancers. The ERR for proximal cancer persists over time, but that for distal colon cancer decreases. There continues to be no indication of radiation effects on rectal cancer incidence in this population.


Subject(s)
Atomic Bomb Survivors/statistics & numerical data , Colonic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/epidemiology , Rectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alcohol Drinking/adverse effects , Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Body Mass Index , Child , Child, Preschool , Colon/radiation effects , Colonic Neoplasms/etiology , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Intestinal Mucosa/radiation effects , Japan/epidemiology , Male , Meat/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Rectal Neoplasms/etiology , Rectum/radiation effects , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors , Smoking/adverse effects , Smoking/epidemiology , Young Adult
9.
Eur J Epidemiol ; 35(6): 591-600, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31982981

ABSTRACT

Radiation exposure is among the few factors known to be associated with risk of central nervous system (CNS) tumors. However, the patterns of radiation risk by histological type, sex or age are unclear. We evaluated radiation risks of first primary glioma, meningioma, schwannoma, and other or not otherwise specified (other/NOS) tumors in the Life Span Study cohort of atomic bomb survivors. Cases diagnosed between 1958 and 2009 were ascertained through population-based cancer registries in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. To estimate excess relative risk per Gy (ERR/Gy), we fit rate models using Poisson regression methods. There were 285 CNS tumors (67 gliomas, 107 meningiomas, 49 schwannomas, and 64 other/NOS tumors) among 105,444 individuals with radiation dose estimates to the brain contributing 3.1 million person-years of observation. Based on a simple linear model without effect modification, ERR/Gy was 1.67 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.12 to 5.26) for glioma, 1.82 (95% CI: 0.51 to 4.30) for meningioma, 1.45 (95% CI: - 0.01 to 4.97) for schwannoma, and 1.40 (95% CI: 0.61 to 2.57) for all CNS tumors as a group. For each tumor type, the dose-response was consistent with linearity and appeared to be stronger among males than among females, particularly for meningioma (P = 0.045). There was also evidence that the ERR/Gy for schwannoma decreased with attained age (P = 0.002). More than 60 years after the bombings, radiation risks for CNS tumors continue to be elevated. Further follow-up is necessary to characterize the lifetime risks of specific CNS tumors following radiation exposure.


Subject(s)
Atomic Bomb Survivors/statistics & numerical data , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/epidemiology , Radiation Exposure/adverse effects , Adult , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/etiology , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/pathology , Cohort Studies , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Female , Glioma/epidemiology , Glioma/etiology , Glioma/pathology , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Longevity , Male , Meningioma/epidemiology , Meningioma/etiology , Meningioma/pathology , Middle Aged , Neurilemmoma/epidemiology , Neurilemmoma/etiology , Neurilemmoma/pathology , Registries , Risk Assessment
10.
Biom J ; 62(8): 1939-1959, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32608110

ABSTRACT

The paper proposes an approach to causal mediation analysis in nested case-control study designs, often incorporated with countermatching schemes using conditional likelihood, and we compare the method's performance to that of mediation analysis using the Cox model for the full cohort with a continuous or dichotomous mediator. Simulation studies are conducted to assess our proposed method and investigate the efficiency relative to the cohort. We illustrate the method using actual data from two studies of potential mediation of radiation risk conducted within the Adult Health Study cohort of atomic-bomb survivors. The performance becomes comparable to that based on the full cohort, illustrating the potential for valid mediation analysis based on the reduced data obtained through the nested case-control design.

11.
Int J Cancer ; 144(9): 2144-2152, 2019 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30474210

ABSTRACT

In Japan, cervical cancer incidence has increased since the late 1990s especially among young women, despite a decreasing trend in most developed countries. Here, we examined age, period and birth cohort trends in cervical cancer incidence rates from 1985 to 2012. Incidence rates were ascertained using three population-based cancer registries and analyzed using Joinpoint regression and age-period-cohort models. We compared the findings in Japan to trends among Japanese-Americans in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Registries and among women in South Korea using the Korea Central Registry. Age-standardized incidence rates in Japan decreased by 1.7% per year (95% confidence interval - 3.3%, 0.0%) until 1997 and thereafter increased by 2.6% per year (1.1%, 4.2%). Incidence rates increased among women under age 50, were stable among women aged 50-54, and decreased or remained stable among women aged 55 and over. The age-standardized incidence rate ratio by birth cohort showed a U-shaped pattern with the lowest rates in women born in the late 1930s and 1940s. In comparison, women born before 1920 and after 1970 had about double the incidence. Increasing risk in recent birth cohorts was not evident in Japanese-American or South Korean women. The trends in Japan may be attributable to increasing prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection among young women. Screening and vaccination have been shown to be highly effective and would help reverse these trends.


Subject(s)
Cigarette Smoking/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Asian/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Incidence , Japan/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Registries , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
12.
J Epidemiol ; 29(6): 238-240, 2019 Jun 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30224578

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Histological classification of lung cancer is essential for investigations of carcinogenesis and treatment selection. We examined the temporal changes of lung cancer histological subtypes. METHODS: Lung cancer cases diagnosed in the Life Span Study cohort between 1958 and 1999 were collected from tumor registries (TR), mainly consisting of population-based cancer registries. A total of 1,025 cases were histologically reviewed according to the World Health Organization 2004 Classification by a panel of pathologists (PP). Sensitivity and specificity of diagnoses in TR were calculated, assuming that the diagnosis by PP was the gold standard. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity were 0.91 and 0.92 for adenocarcinoma (AD), respectively, and 0.92 and 0.94, respectively, for squamous cell carcinoma (SQ). They were similar for AD and SQ throughout the observation period. For small cell carcinoma (SM), sensitivity was low until about 1980 (0.47 in 1958-1969, and 0.61 in 1970-1979) and then became higher thereafter (0.98 in 1980-1989, and 0.95 in 1990-1999), whereas specificity was high during the whole period (range 0.99 to 1.00). Among 45 cases that were not reported as SM in TR but diagnosed as SM by PP, 16 cases were recorded as undifferentiated carcinoma in TR. CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of AD and SQ of lung cancer were generally consistent between TR records and PP review, but SMs tended to be coded as other histological types until the 1970s.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Carcinoma, Small Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/classification , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Registries , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Small Cell/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/epidemiology , Humans , Japan , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , World Health Organization
13.
Eur J Epidemiol ; 32(12): 1055-1063, 2017 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29204903

ABSTRACT

In cohort studies, unbiased estimation of exposure-outcome associations requires selection of an appropriate reference group of unexposed individuals. We illustrate strategies for analyzing cohort data with multiple potential reference groups. We analyzed the association between radiation exposure and incidence of first primary solid cancer among 105,444 participants of the Life Span Study (Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan, 1958-2009). Potential reference groups included zero-dose survivors at different ground distances from the hypocenter (internal) and city residents who were not in either city at the time of the bombings (external). DS02R1 weighted absorbed colon doses were estimated by the DS02 dosimetry system. Piecewise constant hazard models estimated excess relative risks of first primary solid cancer. We focused on sex-averaged excess relative risks and the shape of the dose-response curve. A model with internal standardization provided a sex-averaged excess relative risk of 0.510, 95% confidence interval: (0.414, 0.612) per gray of weighted absorbed colon dose, as well as strong evidence of a curvilinear dose response among males (P = 0.008). Selection of not-in-city residents as the reference group resulted in a larger excess relative risk of 0.560, 95% confidence interval: (0.467, 0.657) per gray, and reduced evidence of a curvilinear dose response among males (P = 0.042). These differences were particularly apparent at weighted absorbed colon doses < 1 gray. In cohort studies, selection of an appropriate reference group requires understanding of the nature of unmeasured confounding to which the results could be sensitive.


Subject(s)
Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/epidemiology , Nuclear Weapons/statistics & numerical data , Radiation Exposure/adverse effects , Radiation Injuries , Survivors/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Japan/epidemiology , Male , Radiation Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Registries , Risk Factors , Sex Distribution , Survival Analysis , Young Adult
15.
Lancet Oncol ; 16(13): 1316-23, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26384241

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: No clear epidemiological hereditary effects of radiation exposure in human beings have been reported. However, no previous studies have investigated mortality into middle age in a population whose parents were exposed to substantial amounts of radiation before conception. We assessed mortality in children of the atomic bomb survivors after 62 years of follow-up. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, we assessed 75 327 singleton children of atomic bomb survivors in Hiroshima and Nagasaki and unexposed controls, born between 1946 and 1984, and followed up to Dec 31, 2009. Parental gonadal doses of radiation from the atomic bombings were the primary exposures. The primary endpoint was death due to cancer or non-cancer disease, based on death certificates. FINDINGS: Median follow-up was 54·3 years (IQR 45·4-59·3). 5183 participants died from disease. The mean age of the 68 689 surviving children at the end of follow-up was 53·1 years (SD 7·9) with 15 623 (23%) older than age 60 years. For parents who were exposed to a non-zero gonadal dose of radiation, the mean dose was 264 mGy (SD 463). We detected no association between maternal gonadal radiation exposure and risk of death caused by cancer (hazard ratio [HR] for 1 Gy change in exposure 0·891 [95% CI 0·693-1·145]; p=0·36) or risk of death caused by non-cancer diseases (0·973 [0·849-1·115]; p=0·69). Likewise, paternal exposure had no effect on deaths caused by cancer (0·815 [0·614-1·083]; p=0·14) or deaths caused by non-cancer disease (1·103 [0·979-1·241]; p=0·12). Age or time between parental exposure and delivery had no effect on risk of death. INTERPRETATION: Late effects of ionising radiation exposure include increased mortality risks, and models of the transgenerational effects of radiation exposure predict more genetic disease in the children of people exposed to radiation. However, children of people exposed to the atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki had no indications of deleterious health effects after 62 years. Epidemiological studies complemented by sensitive molecular techniques are needed to understand the overall effects of preconception exposure to ionising radiation on human beings.


Subject(s)
Adult Children , Maternal Exposure/adverse effects , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/mortality , Nuclear Warfare , Nuclear Weapons , Paternal Exposure/adverse effects , Radiation Dosage , Survivors , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Case-Control Studies , Cause of Death , Child , Female , Heredity , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/diagnosis , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/genetics , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Young Adult
16.
J Perianesth Nurs ; 30(6): 460-467, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26596381

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate how both visual analog scale cutoff scores and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory scores relate to hemodynamic changes in patients entering the operating theater. DESIGN: A prospective observational study. METHODS: The study subjects included 130 prospectively enrolled patients who were scheduled for abdominal surgery under combined epidural-general anesthesia and who underwent preoperative anxiety level measurements using both scales. FINDINGS: The heart rate and systolic blood pressure on entering the operating theater were significantly higher than those at baseline in the high and low/moderate anxiety groups. Variations in heart rate and systolic blood pressure were significantly higher, whereas peripheral blood flow was significantly lower in the high anxiety group compared with the low/moderate anxiety group. CONCLUSIONS: Using the visual analog scale to measure anxiety can improve our understanding of the hemodynamic changes that occur when patients enter the operating theater.


Subject(s)
Hemodynamics , Visual Analog Scale , Adult , Aged , Anxiety , Blood Pressure , Female , Heart Rate , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Operating Rooms , Prospective Studies
17.
Cancer Sci ; 105(7): 890-6, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24814518

ABSTRACT

In this retrospective study, we aimed to clarify the risk of developing a second primary cancer and to determine the periods of high risk of second primary cancers. Subjects were all patients who had been diagnosed with a first primary cancer and registered with the Nagasaki Prefecture Cancer Registry between 1985 and 2007. We calculated the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of second primary cancer according to site and years after diagnosis of the first primary cancer. A second primary cancer developed in 14 167 of 174 477 subjects (8.1%) during a median follow-up of 1.8 years. The SIR of all cancer was 1.10 (95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.11). Some specific relationships were observed between sites with risk factors in common, such as smoking, drinking, and hormone status. The SIRs were relatively high after approximately 10 years for all sites, and trends differ among cancer sites. We showed that cancer patients are at higher risk of a second primary cancer than the general population. In respect of the risk of a second primary cancer, physicians should be alert for cancers that have risk factors in common with the first primary cancer.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms, Multiple Primary/epidemiology , Neoplasms, Second Primary/epidemiology , Confidence Intervals , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Male , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Smoking/epidemiology
18.
J Epidemiol ; 24(3): 193-9, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24614916

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A report of multiple cases of bile duct cancer at a Japanese printing company raised concern about such cancers. We examined long-term trends in bile duct cancer in Japan. METHODS: Data from 4 population-based cancer registries were used to calculate incidence between 1985 and 2007, and vital statistics were used to estimate mortality between 1985 and 2011. Age-standardized rates were calculated and analyzed using a joinpoint regression model. RESULTS: Among men, the incidence rate of intrahepatic bile duct cancer increased throughout the observation period; among women, it increased until 1996-1998 and remained stable thereafter. The incidence rate of extrahepatic bile duct cancer was stable in men and decreased from 1993-1995 in women. In people aged 30 to 49 years, the incidence rates of intra- and extrahepatic bile duct cancer remained stable or decreased. The mortality rate of intrahepatic bile duct cancer increased in both sexes and in all age groups since 1996, while that of extrahepatic bile duct cancer decreased since 1992. In people aged 30 to 49 years, the mortality rates of intra- and extrahepatic bile duct cancer remained stable and decreased, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence and mortality rates of intrahepatic bile duct cancer remained stable or increased throughout the observation period. The incidence rate of extrahepatic bile duct cancer remained stable or decreased, and the mortality rate decreased since 1992. In people aged 30 to 49 years, the incidence and mortality rates of intra- and extrahepatic bile cancer remained stable or decreased.


Subject(s)
Bile Duct Neoplasms/epidemiology , Bile Ducts, Extrahepatic , Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic , Mortality/trends , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bile Duct Neoplasms/mortality , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Japan/epidemiology , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Registries , Sex Distribution , Young Adult
19.
Int J Epidemiol ; 53(3)2024 Apr 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38604675

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies have shown inconsistent results regarding the link between smoking and breast cancer risk, despite the biological plausibility of a positive association. METHODS: Participants were 166 611 women from nine prospective cohort studies in Japan which launched in 1984-1994 and followed for 8-22 years. Information on smoking and secondhand smoke was obtained through self-administered baseline questionnaires. Breast cancer was defined as code C50 according to the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, 3rd Edition or the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision. After adjusting for several potential confounders, relative risks for breast cancer were calculated in the individual studies according to the current or previous status of active and passive smoking using Cox regression, followed by a summary estimate of hazard ratios using random-effects meta-analyses. RESULTS: Of the 60 441 participants who reported being premenopausal and 106 170 who reported being postmenopausal at baseline, 897 and 1168 developed breast cancer during follow-up, respectively. Compared with never smokers, current smokers had a higher risk of developing breast cancer before the age of 50 years. In addition, ever smokers who started smoking at 30 years of age or younger, or who started smoking before first childbirth, had a higher risk of developing breast cancer before the age of 50 years. No association between adulthood or childhood exposure to secondhand smoke and breast cancer was observed. CONCLUSION: Smoking may increase the risk of premenopausal breast cancer, and smoking earlier in life might be especially harmful. The impact of secondhand smoke needs further investigation.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Tobacco Smoke Pollution , Female , Humans , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/etiology , Japan/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/adverse effects
20.
Radiat Res ; 200(1): 96-101, 2023 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37141253

ABSTRACT

Following our previous report on the radiation dose-response for prostate cancer incidence rates in the Life Span Study (LSS) cohort of atomic bomb survivors, we reevaluated the radiation-related risk adjusting for differences in baseline cancer incidence rates among three subsets of the LSS cohort defined by the timing of their first participation in biennial health examinations offered to the Adult Health Study (AHS) sub-cohort members and prostate-specific-antigen (PSA) testing status for AHS participants: 1. non-AHS participants, 2. AHS participants before receiving PSA test, and 3. AHS participants after receiving PSA test. We found a 2.9-fold increase in the baseline incidence rates among AHS participants after receiving PSA test. After adjusting for the PSA-testing-status effects on the baseline rates the estimated excess relative risk (ERR) per Gy was 0.54 (95% CI: 0.15, 1.05), which was almost identical to the previously reported unadjusted ERR estimate (0.57, 95% CI: 0.21, 1.00). The current results confirmed that, while the PSA testing among AHS participants increased the baseline incidence rates, it did not impact the radiation risk estimate, strengthening the previously reported dose-response relationship for prostate cancer incidence in the LSS. As the use of PSA tests continue in screening and medical settings, analyses of possible effects of PSA testing should be an important aspect of future epidemiological studies of the association between radiation exposure and prostate cancer.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced , Prostatic Neoplasms , Adult , Male , Humans , Incidence , Prostate-Specific Antigen , Atomic Bomb Survivors , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/epidemiology , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Survivors , Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/etiology , Japan/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL