ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is significantly increased in organ transplant recipients (OTRs). Clearance of actinic keratoses (AKs) is generally regarded as a surrogate biomarker for cSCC prevention. OTR-cSCC chemoprevention with topical AK treatments has not been investigated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), although there is evidence that 5% 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) may be chemoprotective in immunocompetent patients. OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility, activity and evaluation outcomes relevant to the design of a future phase III RCT of topical cSCC chemoprevention in OTRs. METHODS: OTRs with 10 or more AKs in predefined areas were randomized 1 : 1 : 1 to topical 5-FU, 5% imiquimod (IMIQ) or sunscreen (sun-protective factor 30+) in a phase II, open-label RCT over 15 months. Feasibility outcomes included proportions of eligible OTRs randomized, completing treatment and willing to be re-treated. AK activity [AK clearance, new AK development, patient-centred outcomes (toxicity, health-related quality of life, HRQoL)] and evaluation methodology (clinical vs. photographic) were assessed. RESULTS: Forty OTRs with 903 AKs were randomized. All feasibility outcomes were met (56% of eligible OTRs were randomized; 89% completed treatment; 81% were willing to be re-treated). AK activity analyses found 5-FU and IMIQ were superior to sunscreen for AK clearance and prevention of new AKs. 5-FU was more effective than IMIQ in AK clearance and prevention in exploratory analyses. Although toxicity was greater with 5-FU, HRQoL outcomes were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Trials of topical AK treatments in OTRs for cSCC chemoprevention are feasible and AK activity results support further investigation of 5-FU-based treatments in future phase III trials. What is already known about this topic? Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is significantly more common in immunocompromised individuals including organ transplant recipients (OTRs) compared with immunocompetent populations. cSCC chemoprevention activity of sunscreen and 5-fluorouracil-based (5-FU) actinic keratosis (AK) treatments has been demonstrated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in immunocompetent populations but not in OTRs. AKs are cSCC precursors and their clearance and prevention are generally regarded as surrogate endpoint biomarkers for potential cSCC chemoprevention activity. What does this study add? SPOT (SCC Prevention in OTRs using Topical treatments) has confirmed that RCTs of OTR-cSCC chemoprevention with topical AK treatments are feasible. It also suggests that topical 5-FU may be superior to 5% imiquimod and sunscreen in AK clearance and prevention. Together with recent evidence from several RCTs in the general population, these data provide a compelling rationale for further studies of intervention with 5-FU-based topical chemoprevention approaches in OTR-cSCC prevention.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Keratosis, Actinic , Organ Transplantation , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/etiology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/prevention & control , Feasibility Studies , Fluorouracil/therapeutic use , Humans , Imiquimod/therapeutic use , Keratosis, Actinic/drug therapy , Keratosis, Actinic/pathology , Keratosis, Actinic/prevention & control , Organ Transplantation/adverse effects , Sunscreening Agents/therapeutic use , Transplant Recipients , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL) are a heterogeneous group of non-Hodgkin lymphomas characterized by an infiltration of malignant monoclonal T lymphocytes into the skin. Mycosis fungoides (MF), the most common subtype, and the rarer Sézary syndrome (SS), are considered the classical forms of CTCL, which, because of a varying presentation and lack of genetic and immunophenotypical markers, can often have a delayed diagnosis. With skin-directed topical treatment being the mainstay of therapy in the early stages, there is an absence of long-term curative therapies for advanced disease. Recent insight into the pathogenesis of CTCL has identified new potential therapeutic targets including the monoclonal antibody therapies, brentuximab vedotin and mogamulizumab. Brentuximab vedotin, an anti-CD30 antibody-drug conjugate, received extended approval by the US FDA in 2017 to include primary cutaneous anaplastic large-cell lymphoma and CD30-expressing MF. Mogamulizumab, an anti-CCR4 antibody, received FDA approval in 2018 for relapsed or refractory MF and SS. Further targets and therapies continue to be investigated, including the monoclonal antibody therapy alemtuzumab, an anti-CD52 antibody, and the immune checkpoint blockade therapies, pembrolizumab and nivolumab. These new and emerging targets and therapies may lead to a promising broadening of CTCL treatment options in the future.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Immunotherapy/methods , Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous/drug therapy , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Alemtuzumab/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Brentuximab Vedotin/therapeutic use , Clinical Trials as Topic , Humans , Imidazoles/therapeutic use , Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous/immunology , Nivolumab/therapeutic use , Skin Neoplasms/immunologyABSTRACT
There is no standard definition regarding the severity of psoriasis, and a number of factors should be considered, including the extent and stability of skin disease, involvement of joints, response to treatment, and impact on quality of life. Erythrodermic psoriasis and pustular psoriasis are severe conditions and the patient may be systemically unwell and febrile. NICE recommends that four key areas should be evaluated and recorded when assessing patients: severity, using the static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA); disease impact on physical, psychological and social wellbeing using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI); the presence of psoriatic arthritis; and comorbidities. Ideally, patients should be assessed annually for psoriatic arthritis: the Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool is a validated tool to screen for psoriatic arthritis in primary and secondary care. Patients with severe psoriasis should undergo cardiovascular risk assessment at presentation and every five years, or more frequently if indicated. Referral to secondary care should be made for patients with any type of psoriasis with poor response to topical therapy (after 2 or 3 months according to SIGN) and for extensive psoriasis. Cases where the psoriasis is having a significant physical or psychological impact on an individual's quality of life warrant early referral, as do those where the diagnosis is uncertain. Patients with generalised pustular psoriasis or erythroderma should be referred urgently for same-day specialist input. Patients with acute guttate psoriasis who may require phototherapy should also be referred. Children and adolescents with any type of psoriasis should be referred to a specialist at initial presentation.
Subject(s)
Parapsoriasis/therapy , Precision Medicine/methods , Psoriasis/therapy , Humans , Parapsoriasis/pathology , Psoriasis/pathologySubject(s)
Dapsone/therapeutic use , Immunoglobulin A/immunology , Pemphigus/pathology , Skin Diseases, Vesiculobullous/pathology , Aged , Biopsy, Needle , Diagnosis, Differential , Erythema/diagnosis , Female , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect/methods , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Pemphigus/diagnosis , Pemphigus/drug therapy , Skin Diseases, Vesiculobullous/diagnosis , Treatment OutcomeSubject(s)
Erythema/pathology , Immunoglobulin A/immunology , Pemphigus/pathology , Skin Diseases, Vesiculobullous/pathology , Aged , Biopsy, Needle , Dapsone/therapeutic use , Diagnosis, Differential , Erythema/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Pemphigus/diagnosis , Pemphigus/drug therapy , Skin Diseases, Vesiculobullous/diagnosis , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Importance: Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the most frequent malignant neoplasm found in solid organ transplant recipients and is associated with a more aggressive disease course and higher risk of metastasis and death than in the general population. Objectives: To report the clinicopathologic features of and identify factors associated with aggressive SCC in solid organ transplant recipients. Methods: This retrospective multicentric case series included 51 patients who underwent solid organ transplantation and were found to have aggressive SCC, defined by nodal or distant metastasis or death by local progression of primary SCC. Standard questionnaires were completed by the researchers between July 18, 2005, and January 1, 2015. Data were analyzed between February 22, 2016, and July 12, 2016. Results: Of the 51 participants, 43 were men and 8 were women, with a median age of 51 years (range, 19-71 years) at time of transplantation and 62 years (range, 36-77 years) at time of diagnosis of aggressive SCC. The distribution of aggressive SCC was preferentially on the face (34 [67%]) and scalp (6 [12%]), followed by the upper extremities (6 [12%]). A total of 21 tumors (41%) were poorly differentiated, with a median tumor diameter of 18.0 mm (range, 4.0-64.0 mm) and median tumor depth of 6.2 mm (range, 1.0-20.0 mm). Perineural invasion was present in 20 patients (39%), while 23 (45%) showed a local recurrence. The 5-year overall survival rate was 23%, while 5-year disease-specific survival was 30.5%. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this case series suggest that anatomical site, differentiation, tumor diameter, tumor depth, and perineural invasion are important risk factors in aggressive SCC in solid organ transplant recipients.