ABSTRACT
Bardet-Biedl syndrome (BBS) is a rare recessive multisystem disorder characterized by retinitis pigmentosa, obesity, postaxial polydactyly, cognitive deficits, and genitourinary defects. BBS is clinically variable and genetically heterogeneous, with 26 genes identified to contribute to the disorder when mutated, the majority encoding proteins playing role in primary cilium biogenesis, intraflagellar transport, and ciliary trafficking. Here, we report on an 18-year-old boy with features including severe photophobia and central vision loss since childhood, hexadactyly of the right foot and a supernumerary nipple, which were suggestive of BBS. Genetic analyses using targeted resequencing and exome sequencing failed to provide a conclusive genetic diagnosis. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) allowed us to identify compound heterozygosity for a missense variant and a large intragenic deletion encompassing exon 12 in BBS9 as underlying the condition. We assessed the functional impact of the identified variants and demonstrated that they impair BBS9 function, with significant consequences for primary cilium formation and morphology. Overall, this study further highlights the usefulness of WGS in the diagnostic workflow of rare diseases to reach a definitive diagnosis. This report also remarks on a requirement for functional validation analyses to more effectively classify variants that are identified in the frame of the diagnostic workflow.
Subject(s)
Bardet-Biedl Syndrome , Whole Genome Sequencing , Bardet-Biedl Syndrome/genetics , Bardet-Biedl Syndrome/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Adolescent , Cilia/pathology , Cilia/genetics , Cytoskeletal ProteinsABSTRACT
The high prevalence of Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a real global health problem. Its complex pathophysiology involves different pathways. Over the last decade, the introduction of intravitreal treatments has dramatically changed the management and prognosis of DME. Among the different treatment options, inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) and intravitreal steroids implants represent the first-line therapy of DME. We conducted a review of electronic databases to compile the available evidence about the clinical management of DME in a clinical setting, with a special focus on treatment-naïve patients. Anti-VEGF therapies represent a valuable option for treating DME patients. However, many patients do not respond properly to this treatment and, due to its administration regimen, many patients receive suboptimal treatment in real life. Current evidence demonstrated that in patients with DME, DEX-i improved significantly both anatomic and visual outcomes. Besides eyes with insufficient anti-VEGF respond or recalcitrant DME cases, DEX-i can be effectively and safely used in treatment-naïve DME patients as first line therapy. DEX-i may be considered first line therapy in different clinical scenarios, such as DME eyes with a greater inflammatory component, patients with cardiovascular events, vitrectomized eyes, or those requiring cataract surgery. In conclusion, there are still many points for improvement pending in the clinical management of the patient with DME. Since DME treatment must follow a patient-tailored approach, selecting the best therapeutic approach for each patient requires a good understanding of the pathophysiology of DME.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: Limited data is available on treatment satisfaction with the management of wet age-related macular degeneration (wAMD) among patients in Italy. In this cross-sectional real-world study, treatment satisfaction with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGFs) was assessed in patients with wAMD in Italy. Patients and Methods: This was a non-interventional, cross-sectional survey involving patients with wAMD receiving anti-VEGFs. The survey was administered through a virtual assistant via phone. Patients' treatment satisfaction was assessed using a newly developed Novartis Tailored Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (NVS TTSQ) and the validated Macular Disease Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (MacTSQ). Results: Overall, 154 evaluable patients were enrolled in 5 centers across Italy. The mean (SD) age of the patients was 76.8 years (7.01). Overall treatment satisfaction score assessed by NVS TTSQ was 40.50 (7.11), with a mean of 9.97 (1.84) on the information domain and 22.98 (4.57) on the unmet need domain. Patients were satisfied with diagnosis communication (4.99 [1.30]), information provided on treatment administration (4.58 [1.49], range 0-6), the waiting room (4.40 [1.43]), and management of visits and injections at the center (5.14 [1.12]), general management of maculopathy at the center (5.22 [1.01]). Patients were not satisfied with their independence in terms of disease management (2.56 [2.45]); they would like additional information about the disease (5.38 [1.03]) and to discuss the injection procedures (4.02 [1.94]) with already-treated patients. The overall treatment satisfaction score on MacTSQ scale was 55.84 (10.13). Conclusion: Patients with wAMD are satisfied with the overall management of their disease in Italy. However, patients would like to have more information on prognosis and management of the disease.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of anxiety and depression on clinician decision-making in patients suffering from chronic eye disease in ophthalmological clinical practice. DESIGN AND SETTING: This multicentre observational study, in collaboration with the WHO, included ophthalmologists and their patients affected by chronic eye disease. States of anxiety and depression were screened with specific questionnaires, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), self-administered by patients before the visit. In the present analysis, we report data from three major eye care centres in Italy between 2021 and 2022. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: To assess self-reported changes in ophthalmologists' clinical approach (communication style and their clinical-therapeutic strategies) and decisions after knowing questionnaire scores (primary aim), and to analyse the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores in patients with chronic eye diseases (secondary aim). RESULTS: 41 ophthalmologists and 359 patients were included. The results from PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores showed critical depression and anxiety status scores (PHQ-9 ≥5 and GAD-7 ≥10) in 258 patients. In 74% of cases, no actions were taken by the ophthalmologists based on these scores; in 26% of cases, they changed their clinical approach; and in 14% of cases, they referred the patients for psychological/psychiatric evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: States of anxiety and depression affect many patients with chronic eye conditions and need to be detected and managed early to improve patients' well-being. Providing ophthalmologists with knowledge of their patients' psychological conditions can change the clinical management and attitude towards referral for a psychological evaluation. Further studies are needed to expand our knowledge of how to raise awareness among ophthalmologists regarding multimorbidity of patients suffering from chronic eye diseases in order to achieve better clinical outcomes.