Celiac axis stenosis and lethal liver ischemia after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Celiac axis stenosis can lead to a fatal hepatic ischemia after pancreaticoduodenectomy unless a simultaneous revascularisation of the celiac circulation is performed. In the present study are reported three cases of celiac axis stenosis, all of which had histologically confirmed periampullary cancer. Case 1: a 50-year-old male with a history of myocardial infarction and liver steatosis; visceral arteriography prior to the surgery demonstrated a celiac axis stenosis. Whipple operation was performed. After removing the specimen, no signs of liver ischemia were found (liver was cholestatic) and pulsation of the hepatic artery was strong. The patient died on the second postoperative day after an abrupt irreversible cardiac arrest. Autopsy proved acute severe hepatic ischemia. Case 2: a 64-year-old female. Preoperative visceral angiography showed significant celiac axis stenosis. As a first step of surgery the root of the celiac trunk was exposed, a fibrotic ring around it was divided. Standard D1 pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed. Case 3: a 58-year-old female without preoperative angiography, indicated for surgery. After an occlusion test of the gastroduodenal artery the liver became ischemic. Division of the fibrotic ring around celiac axis was performed together with a standard D1 pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. No postoperative complications were reported in both case 2 and 3.

Tumor markers in patients with relapse of colorectal carcinoma.

AIM: To evaluate CEA and CA19-9 in a long-term follow-up after radical surgery for colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1,090 patients were operated on for colorectal cancer, 716 patients underwent R0 resection, 631 patients were under further surveillance, relapse was diagnosed in 122 patients (20%), 74 patients were indicated for reoperation The resectability of the relapse was 35%. An AxSYM instrument (Abbott) was used for analysis. RESULTS: At the time of relapse both markers were normal in 31% of the patients. When relapse was diagnosed, in patients with normal preoperative levels, CEA and CA19-9 were below cut-off in 48% and 79%, respectively, and in those with primary elevation, they were again elevated in 78% and 64%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The surveillance based only on CEA and/or CA19-9 was cost-effective, but failed to disclose 1/3 of patients suffering from relapse; these markers must be combined with liver and chest imaging methods and colonoscopy.

Multiorgan resections for advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: A retrospective review is presented of a single institution's experience with multivisceral resections for locally-advanced colorectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients, who had undergone RO multiorgan resection, were identified from the database of a total of 1150 patients operated on for colorectal carcinoma in the years 1995-2005 at a single center. There were twelve total pelvic exenterations and 16 patients had undergone en bloc primary tumor resection with adherent organs, such as the spleen, diaphragm, pancreas, stomach, kidney, etc. The patients were followed-up according to a standard protocol. RESULTS: The post-operative mortality was 7%, the average follow-up 21.6 months and the 5-year survival 45%. CONCLUSION: Our results confirmed that, in the case of invasion of colorectal cancer to the adjacent intra-abdominal organs or structures, multiorgan resection 'offers the only chance of potentially-curative treatment.

Mesohepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis. Case report.

A 54-year-old woman was operated for obstructive ileus in 1996. Obstruction was caused by a tumor of the descending colon invading the abdominal wall. Urgent left colectomy with lymphadenectomy was performed. Microscopically six lymphatic nodes were positive. The patient was postoperatively treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Fifteen months later the patient underwent a resection of central hepatic segments (Couinaud's segment 4,5,8) for metachronous metastasis. At present the patient has no signs of recurrence, she has returned back to her normal life. Despite several unfavorable prognostic factors--obstruction, abdominal wall infiltration, number of positive nodes, short time between primary tumor resection and diagnosis of liver metastasis and centrally located metastasis with satellite lesions, the patient has been surviving for 6 years now.

Routine (18)F-FDG PET preoperative staging of colorectal cancer: comparison with conventional staging and its impact on treatment decision making.

UNLABELLED: The preoperative staging of colorectal cancer (CRC) with (18)F-FDG PET is not as yet generally considered to be evidence based. We have found only 1 study that evaluated (18)F-FDG PET in a nonselected population with proven CRC. Several other studies have concentrated on more advanced disease. The aim of this study was to assess the potential clinical benefit of (18)F-FDG PET in the routine staging of CRC. METHODS: Thirty-eight consecutive patients who had had CRC histologically proven by colonoscopy underwent prospective preoperative staging by plain chest radiography, sonography, CT, and (18)F-FDG PET. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were retrospectively assessed by comparison with the histologic results after surgery (36 patients) or clinical follow-up (2 inoperable cases-both patients died within 1 y of the PET examination). The impact of (18)F-FDG PET on therapeutic decision making was evaluated by comparing medical records before and after (18)F-FDG PET. RESULTS: (18)F-FDG PET correctly detected 95% of primary tumors, whereas CT and sonography correctly detected only 49% and 14%, respectively. Lymph nodes were involved in 7 patients. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET were 29%, 88%, and 75%, respectively. CT and sonography did not reveal any lymph node involvement. Liver metastases were present in 9 patients. (18)F-FDG PET, CT, and sonography had a sensitivity of 78%, 67%, and 25%, respectively; a specificity of 96%, 100%, and 100%, respectively; and an accuracy of 91%, 91%, and 81%, respectively. (18)F-FDG PET revealed further lesions in 11 patients. Levels of carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 tumor markers were elevated in, respectively, only 33% and 8% of cases of proven CRC. (18)F-FDG PET changed the treatment modality for 8% and the range of surgery for 13% of patients. In total, (18)F-FDG PET changed the method of treatment for 16% of patients. CONCLUSION: Plain chest radiography and sonography did not bring any clinical benefits. No correlation was found between the level of tumor markers and the stage of disease. CT is necessary for confirmation of PET findings at extraabdominal sites (PET-guided CT) and for their morphologic specification at abdominal and pelvic sites before an operation. (18)F-FDG PET is the best method for the staging of CRC in all localities, despite the high rate of false-negative PET findings in patients with lymph node involvement. PET should be performed as a first examination after verification of CRC. We propose a PET/CT hybrid system as optimal in the staging of CRC.