The impact of socio-economic factors on parental non-adherence to the Ponseti protocol for clubfoot treatment in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review.

Background: The Ponseti treatment is considered the gold standard for clubfoot globally, but requires strong engagement from parents. The aim of this review is to assess the impact of socio-economic factors on the presence of drop-out, relapse or non-compliance during Ponseti treatment in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods: This scoping review includes all articles available from inception until 4.4.2022. All articles describing an association between one or more socio-economic factors and one or more adverse outcomes during the Ponseti treatment in an LMICs were considered for inclusion. Studies were identified by searching Medline/PubMed, Embase, Global Health and Global Index Medicus. Data extraction was done using Covidence extraction 2.0 by two independent reviewers. Findings: A total of 281 unique references were retrieved from the database searches, 59 abstracts were retained for full-text review, of which 19 studies were included in the final review. We grouped the identified socio-economic factors into 4 larger themes: poverty and physical accessibility of clubfoot clinics, presence of support systems, educational level of the parents, and household-level factors and cultural norms. Reduced access to care for girls was considered an important risk factor in South Asia and the Caribbean. Lack of family and community support was an issue raised more often in studies from Eastern Africa. The extreme heterogeneity among collected variables within a small sample of papers made it not possible to perform a meta-analysis. Interpretation: The identified factors are very similar to the socio-economic factors identified in studies looking at the barriers parents and children face when seeking care initially. Poverty was identified as a cross-cutting risk factor in all 4 domains and the most important socio-economic risk factor based on this review, reconfirming poverty eradication as the challenge for the 21st century. Funding: None.

Timely Access to Neurosurgical Care in the Caribbean Using Geospatial Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Access to timely neurosurgical care in particular remains limited worldwide, and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, a decrease in overall life expectancy, and catastrophic economic costs. To date, access to neurosurgical care has not been completely studied and reported in the Caribbean neurosurgical literature. In this study, we aim to understand the geographic distribution of hospital facilities with neurosurgical capacity among the CARICOM member states to determine timely access to neurosurgical care. METHODS: We assessed geographical access to facilities capable of providing neurosurgical care in the Caribbean. The GPS coordinates of the hospitals that provide neurosurgical care were identified using street addresses and satellite imaging from Google Maps. Facilities with neurosurgical care were mapped in ArcGIS Pro (Version 2.6.0). using Manhattan distance. We identified the area around each facility and stratified by 30- minute, 1-hour, 2-hour, and 4-hour geographic driving intervals. RESULTS: A total of 16 hospitals were identified as providing neurosurgical care in the Caribbean. Our results suggest that 14 million people (76% of the population) had 4-hour geographic access to a facility capable of providing neurosurgical care. In addition, 7 million people (40% of the population) had 2-hour geographical access to neurosurgical care. CONCLUSIONS: Timely access to care is an important tenet of global neurosurgery. We found that 3.5 million Caribbean residents are outside of the access zone to neurosurgical capacity. Public health advocates, governments, providers, and patients should be aware of the inequity in access to neurosurgical care and should collectively work to close the gap.

Emphasizing the Role of Neurosurgery Within Global Health and National Health Systems: A Call to Action.

Background: Worldwide, neurological disorders are the leading cause of disability-adjusted life years lost and the second leading cause of death. Despite global health capacity-building efforts, each year, 22.6 million individuals worldwide require neurosurgeon's care due to diseases such as traumatic brain injury and hydrocephalus, and 13.8 million of these individuals require surgery. It is clear that neurosurgical care is indispensable in both national and international public health discussions. This study highlights the role neurosurgeons can play in supporting the global health agenda, national surgical plans, and health strengthening systems (HSS) interventions. Methods: Guided by a literature review, the authors discuss key topics such as the global burden of neurosurgical diseases, the current state of neurosurgical care around the world and the inherent benefits of strong neurosurgical capability for health systems. Results: Neurosurgical diseases make up an important part of the global burden of diseases. Many neurosurgeons possess the sustained passion, resilience, and leadership needed to advocate for improved neurosurgical care worldwide. Neurosurgical care has been linked to 14 of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), thus highlighting the tremendous impact neurosurgeons can have upon HSS initiatives. Conclusion: We recommend policymakers and global health actors to: (i) increase the involvement of neurosurgeons within the global health dialogue; (ii) involve neurosurgeons in the national surgical system strengthening process; (iii) integrate neurosurgical care within the global surgery movement; and (iv) promote the training and education of neurosurgeons, especially those residing in Low-and middle-income countries, in the field of global public health.

An Assessment of Global Neurotrauma Prevention and Care Delivery: The Provider Perspective.

BACKGROUND: Neurotrauma is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality around the world. Assessment of injury prevention and prehospital care for neurotrauma patients is necessary to improve care systems. METHODS: A 29-question electronic survey was developed based on the Enhancing the Quality and Transparency Of health Research (EQUATOR) checklist to assess neurotrauma policies and laws related to safety precautions. The survey was distributed to members of World Health Organization regions that were considered to be experienced medical authorities in neurosurgery and traumatic brain injury. RESULTS: There were 82 (39%) responses representing 46 countries. Almost all respondents (95.2%) were within the neurosurgical field. Of respondents, 40.2% were from high-income countries (HICs), and 59.8% were from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Motor vehicle accidents were reported as the leading cause of neurotrauma, followed by workplace injury and assault. Of respondents, 84.1% reported having a helmet law in their country. HICs (4.38 ± 0.78) were ranked more likely than LMICs (2.88 ± 1.34; P = 0.0001) to enforce helmet laws on a scale of 1-10. Effectiveness of helmet laws was rated as 3.94 ± 0.95 out of 10. Measures regarding prehospital care varied between HICs and LMICs. Patients in HICs were more likely to use public emergency ambulance transportation (81.8% vs. 42.9%; P = 0.0004). All prehospital personnel having emergency training was also reported to be more likely in HICs than LMICs (60.6% vs. 8.7%; P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: When injuries occur, timely access to neurosurgical care is critical. A focus on prehospital components of the trauma system is paramount, and policymakers can use the information presented here to implement and refine health care systems to ensure safe, timely, affordable, and equitable access to neurotrauma care.