Antithrombotic Treatment for Chronic Coronary Syndrome: Evidence and Future Perspectives.

BACKGROUND: The clinical presentation of coronary artery disease can range from asymptomatic, through stable disease in the form of chronic coronary syndrome, to acute coronary syndrome. Chronic coronary syndrome is a frequent condition, and secondary prevention of ischaemic events is essential. SUMMARY: Antithrombotic therapy is a key component of secondary prevention strategies, and it may vary in type and intensity depending on patient characteristics, comorbidities, and revascularisation modalities. Dual antiplatelet therapy is the default strategy in patients with chronic coronary syndrome and recent coronary stent implantation, while antiplatelet monotherapy is commonly prescribed for long-term prevention of cardiovascular events. Oral anticoagulation, in combination with antiplatelet therapy or alone, is used in patients with, e.g., concomitant atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism. KEY MESSAGES: This review provides an overview of antithrombotic treatment strategies in patients with chronic coronary syndrome. Key messages from current guidelines are conveyed, and we provide future perspectives on long-term antithrombotic strategies.

Dual antithrombotic treatment in chronic coronary syndrome: European Society of Cardiology criteria vs. CHADS-P2A2RC score.

AIMS: According to the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines on chronic coronary syndromes (CCS), adding a P2Y12 inhibitor or rivaroxaban to aspirin should be considered in high-risk patients. We estimated the proportion of patients eligible for treatment with the ESC criteria and examined if a recently validated risk score (CHADS-P2A2RC) could improve risk prediction. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included 61 338 CCS patients undergoing first-time coronary angiography in Western Denmark (2003-16) and classified them according to the ESC criteria and the CHADS-P2A2RC score. The ESC criteria identified 33.9% as high risk, 53.3% as moderate risk, and 12.8% as low risk. The CHADS-P2A2RC score identified 24.9% as high risk (≥4 points), 48.1% as moderate risk (2-3 points), and 27.0% as low risk (≤1 points). Major adverse cardiovascular events per 100 person-years were 4.8 [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.6-5.0] in patients considered high risk with both schemes, 2.1 (95% CI 2.0-2.2) in patients considered high risk with the ESC but low-to-moderate risk with the CHADS-P2A2RC criteria, 3.8 (95% CI 3.6-4.1) in patients considered low-to-moderate risk with the ESC but high risk with the CHADS-P2A2RC criteria, and 1.5 (95% CI 1.5-1.6) in patients considered low-to-moderate risk with both schemes. The CHADS-P2A2RC score enabled correct downward risk reclassification of 5161 patients (8%) without events, yielding an improved specificity of 9.7%, a loss of sensitivity of 4.4%, and an overall net reclassification index of 0.053. CONCLUSION: Based on the 2019 ESC guidelines, dual antithrombotic treatment should be considered in one-third of CCS patients. The CHADS-P2A2RC score improved risk classification and may particularly identify low-risk patients with limited benefit from treatment.

CHA2 DS2 -VASc impact on risk following percutaneous coronary intervention in atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: In 2010, the European Society of Cardiology Guidelines on atrial fibrillation (AF) introduced the CHA2 DS2 -VASc score to guide initiation of oral anticoagulation. In patients with AF undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), triple therapy with oral anticoagulation and dual antiplatelet therapy was recommended to reduce ischaemic risk. We examined how the CHA2 DS2 -VASc score impacted oral anticoagulation use and risks of ischaemic and hospitalized bleeding events in patients with AF undergoing PCI. METHODS: We included 6,014 patients with AF undergoing first-time PCI in Western Denmark between 2003 and 2017. We divided patients into four groups based on year of PCI and estimated 1-year risks of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and hospitalization for bleeding. RESULTS: The proportion of oral anticoagulation users was 48% in 2003-2006 and 49% in 2006-2010. Following the CHA2 DS2 -VASc score implementation, the proportion increased to 59% in 2011-2014 and 77% in 2015-2017. Using 2003-2006 as reference, risks of MACE were similar in 2007-2010 (adjusted relative risk [RRadj ] 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83-1.18) and 2011-2014 (RRadj 0.92, 95% CI 0.78-1.09), but declined by 23% in 2015-2017 (RRadj 0.77, 95% CI 0.65-0.92). Hospitalizations for bleeding did not increase despite wider use of triple therapy. CONCLUSION: Implementation of the CHA2 DS2 -VASc score in the 2010 European guidelines on AF was associated with an increased utilization of oral anticoagulation and triple therapy among AF patients undergoing PCI. These changes were associated with a gradual decline in the risk of MACE, while the risk of hospitalized bleeding remained unchanged.

Diabetes Mellitus Is Associated With Increased Risk of Ischemic Stroke in Patients With and Without Coronary Artery Disease.

Background and Purpose- Diabetes mellitus (DM) and non-DM patients without coronary artery disease (CAD) have a similar low risk of myocardial infarction after coronary angiography. The risk of ischemic stroke in DM patients dependent on CAD status is less explored. We examined whether DM patients without CAD have a risk of ischemic stroke similar to that in patients with neither DM nor CAD. Methods- We conducted a cohort study of patients who underwent coronary angiography between 2004 and 2012 in Western Denmark. Patients diagnosed with previous ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack were excluded. Patients were stratified according to the presence of DM and CAD. Follow-up started 30 days after coronary angiography. We computed event rates and adjusted incidence rate ratios using patients without DM or CAD as reference. We examined the trend between CAD extent and ischemic stroke in patients with DM. Results- A total of 81 909 patients were included. Median follow-up was 3.8 years. Patients with both DM and CAD were at the highest risk of ischemic stroke (1.32 events per 100 person-years; adjusted incidence rate ratio, 2.00 [95% CI, 1.72-2.32]). Patients with CAD alone (0.77 events per 100 person-years; adjusted incidence rate ratio, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.12-1.44]) or DM alone (0.95 events per 100 person-years; adjusted incidence rate ratio, 1.74 [95% CI, 1.42-2.15]) were at intermediate risk, whereas patients with neither DM nor CAD (0.52 events per 100 person-years) were at the lowest risk. Among patients with DM, extent of CAD was further predictive of risk (Ptrend<0.001). Conclusions- Not only CAD but also DM are associated with the risk of ischemic stroke after coronary angiography. Their combination further increases the risk of ischemic stroke depending on the extent of CAD.

Effect of remote ischaemic conditioning on platelet aggregation and platelet turnover.

Remote ischaemic conditioning (RIC) is a new beneficial treatment for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. RIC may inhibit thrombus formation and, therefore, we investigated whether RIC affects platelet aggregation and turnover. 30 healthy male volunteers were subjected to intervention on day 1 (sham intervention, no aspirin), day 2 (RIC, no aspirin), and day 16 (RIC, treated 7 days with aspirin 75 mg/day). RIC was performed as four cycles of 5 min interchangeable inflation and deflation using an automated cuff. Blood samples were collected 5 min before, as well as 5 and 45 min after RIC. Platelet aggregation was measured by Multiplate® using collagen (COLtest), adenosine diphosphate (ADPtest), and arachidonic acid (ASPItest) as agonists. Platelet turnover was evaluated by flow cytometry. Serum thromboxane B2 was determined by ELISA to confirm aspirin compliance. We found no significant change in platelet aggregation at visit 1 (COLtest: p = 0.32; ADPtest: p = 0.24; ASPItest: p = 0.07), visit 2, except for ADP-induced platelet aggregation evaluated 5 min after RIC (COLtest: p = 0.39; ADPtest: p = 0.02; ASPItest: p = 0.39), or visit 3 (COLtest: p = 0.48; ADPtest: p = 0.61; ASPItest: p = 0.90). Platelet turnover was not influenced by RIC, neither on nor off aspirin (all p-values > 0.07). (1) RIC did not affect platelet aggregation in healthy young men. (2) RIC did not affect platelet turnover in healthy young men. (3) Aspirin did not influence the effect of RIC on platelet aggregation and turnover. (4) Future studies exploring the effect of RIC on platelet aggregation and turnover in patients with ischaemic heart disease are warranted.

Thrombopoietin and platelet aggregation in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

Thrombopoietin (TPO) may facilitate platelet activation and aggregation. However, data on the impact of TPO on platelet aggregation in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) are scarce. We aimed to investigate associations between TPO and platelet aggregation and activation in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). We studied 900 stable CAD patients. Serum TPO was assessed by ELISA. Platelet aggregation was evaluated using the Multiplate Analyzer (agonists: arachidonic acid [AA] and collagen) and the VerifyNow Aspirin Assay. Platelet activation was evaluated by soluble (s)P-selectin. Cyclooxygenase-1 inhibition was evaluated by serum thromboxane B2 (TXB2). We found that TPO correlated weakly with platelet aggregation evaluated by Multiplate using AA (r = -0.09, p = 0.01) and collagen as agonists (r = -0.03, p = 0.43) and by VerifyNow (r = 0.07, p = 0.03). We found no correlation between TPO and sP-selectin (r = -0.01, p = 0.70). Independent predictors of AA-induced platelet aggregation by Multiplate included high levels of sP-selectin and serum TXB2, high platelet count, increasing age and body mass index, female sex, and active smoking. Independent predictors of TPO included low AA-induced platelet aggregation by Multiplate, high levels of hs-CRP, active smoking, and high platelet aggregation evaluated by VerifyNow. In conclusion, TPO levels did not correlate with platelet activation and only weak associations were found between TPO and platelet aggregation, suggesting that TPO did not substantially facilitate platelet aggregation in stable CAD patients.

Proton Pump Inhibitors in Cardiovascular Disease: Drug Interactions with Antiplatelet Drugs.

Aspirin and P2Y12 receptor antagonists are widely used across the spectrum of cardiovascular diseases. Upper gastrointestinal complications, including ulcer and bleeding, are relatively common during antiplatelet treatment and, therefore, concomitant proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment is often prescribed.PPIs provide gastroprotection by changing the intragastric milieu, essentially by raising intragastric pH. In recent years, it has been heavily discussed whether PPIs may reduce the cardiovascular protection by aspirin and, even more so, clopidogrel. Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies suggested an interaction between PPIs and clopidogrel, and subsequent clinical studies were conducted to evaluate the clinical impact of this interaction. More recently, it was reported that PPIs may also attenuate the antiplatelet effect of aspirin. This may be clinically important, because a fixed combination of aspirin and a PPI (esomeprazole) has recently been approved and because aspirin is the most widely used drug in patients with cardiovascular disease. The antiplatelet effect of the new P2Y12 receptor antagonists, ticagrelor and prasugrel, seems less influenced by PPI co-treatment.Given the large number of patients treated with antithrombotic drugs and PPIs, even a minor reduction of platelet inhibition potentially carries considerable clinical impact. The present book chapter summarizes the evidence regarding the widespread use of platelet inhibitors and PPIs in combination. Moreover, it outlines current evidence supporting or opposing drug interactions between these drugs and discusses clinical implications.

Reduced antiplatelet effect of aspirin during 24 hours in patients with coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes.

Reduced antiplatelet effect of aspirin has been reported in patients with type 2 diabetes, and recent studies suggest that once-daily aspirin provides insufficient platelet inhibition. We investigated if the effect of aspirin declined during the 24-hour dosing interval in patients with coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes, and whether this correlated with increased platelet turnover. Furthermore, the intra-individual variation in platelet aggregation was determined during a 28-day period. We included 47 patients with coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes treated with aspirin 75 mg daily. Blood samples were obtained 1 and 24 hours after aspirin intake, and this was repeated three times with a 2-week interval between each visit. Platelet aggregation was evaluated by impedance aggregometry (Multiplate® Analyzer) using arachidonic acid (1.0 mM) and collagen (3.2 µg/ml) as agonists. Markers of platelet turnover were measured by flow cytometry. Compliance was confirmed by serum thromboxane B2. Platelet aggregation levels measured 1 and 24 hours after aspirin intake were compared using the mean of 1- and 24-hour measurements at the three study visits. The difference in platelet aggregation was 70 ± 97 AU × min (p < 0.0001) when using arachidonic acid as agonist and 33 ± 76 AU × min (p = 0.01) when using collagen. Markers of platelet turnover correlated positively, though not significantly, with residual platelet aggregation 24 hours after aspirin intake (p values 0.06 and 0.07). Median intra-individual variation of platelet aggregation was 9-16%. Patients with coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes had increased platelet aggregation at the end of the 24-hour aspirin dosing interval. Platelet turnover did not correlate significantly with residual platelet aggregation, although a trend was observed. The intra-individual variation of platelet aggregation after aspirin intake was low.

Rapid evaluation of platelet function using the Multiplate® Analyzer.

Rapid evaluation of platelet function may be advantageous in the setting of surgical and interventional procedures to tailor treatment of ongoing bleeding. We investigated if platelet function testing performed with the Multiplate® Analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) only 5 minutes after blood sampling yields reliable test results compared to analyses performed 30 minutes after sampling as currently recommended. We included 48 patients with type II diabetes and stable coronary artery disease treated with aspirin 75 mg daily and 50 healthy individuals not taking any medications. Platelet aggregometry by the Multiplate® Analyzer was performed 5 and 30 minutes after blood sampling using arachidonic acid (1.0 mM), collagen (3.2 µg/ml) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP; 6.5 µM) as agonists. Compliance with aspirin was verified by serum thromboxane B2 measurements. Aggregation levels assessed 5 minutes after blood sampling correlated strongly with those assessed after 30 minutes irrespective of the agonist used (r-values 0.75-0.89, p values <0.0001). Aggregation levels were 4-8% lower and displayed a larger standard deviation when measured 5 minutes after sampling, compared to 30 minutes after sampling. Weak, but significant correlations were observed between platelet aggregation and platelet count (r-values = 0.28-0.39; p values <0.01). The currently recommended 30-minute standing time can be omitted, when platelet aggregation is measured using the Multiplate® Analyzer. Platelet aggregation measured 5 minutes after blood sampling correlates strongly with aggregation measured 30 minutes after sampling, but yields slightly lower aggregation levels. The Multiplate® Analyzer enables rapid on-site evaluation of platelet function.

Net clinical benefit of extended dual pathway inhibition according to baseline risk in patients with chronic coronary syndrome: a COMPASS substudy.

AIMS: Guidelines recommend extended dual pathway inhibition (DPI) with aspirin and rivaroxaban in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) at high ischaemic risk. The CHADS-P2A2RC score improves risk prediction and enables antithrombotic treatment allocation in these patients. This study evaluated the net clinical benefit of DPI treatment according to baseline risk as classified by the CHADS-P2A2RC score in patients with CCS included in the COMPASS (Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies) trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: COMPASS patients with CCS (n = 14 670), randomized to aspirin alone or DPI, were stratified according to cardiovascular risk using the CHADS-P2A2RC score. Endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), all-cause death, fatal/critical organ bleeding, and composite adverse events (MACE and bleeding). Net clinical benefit was the 30-month risk difference of MACE and bleeding. Thirty-month incidences of MACE [7.9% vs. 3.9%, hazard ratio (HR) 2.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.83-2.18] and fatal/critical organ bleeding (1.2% vs. 0.8%, HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.06-1.92) were higher in high-risk (CHADS-P2A2RC ≥ 4) than in low/moderate-risk (CHADS-P2A2RC < 4) patients. DPI reduced MACE (low/moderate risk: HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.47-0.82; high risk: HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-0.99, P for interaction 0.09) and all-cause death (low/moderate risk: HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.46-0.91; high risk: HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.65-1.00, P for interaction 0.29), without substantially increasing fatal/critical organ bleeding (low/moderate risk: HR 1.35, 95% CI 0.72-2.53; high risk: HR 1.18, 95% CI 0.73-1.90, P for interaction 0.73). DPI provided net clinical benefit of similar magnitude in low/moderate-risk (-1.81%, 95% CI -3.00 to -0.62) and high-risk (-1.96%, 95% CI -3.60 to -0.33) CCS patients. CONCLUSION: As classified by the CHADS-P2A2RC score, low/moderate- and high-risk patients with CCS derived similar net clinical benefit and reduction in all-cause death from DPI treatment.

Gastrointestinal events with clopidogrel: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Clopidogrel prevents cardiovascular events, but has been linked with adverse gastrointestinal (GI) complications, particularly bleeding events. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the risk of adverse GI events in patients treated with clopidogrel. DESIGN: A nationwide population-based cohort study based on linkage of three administrative registries in Denmark. PARTICIPANTS: All individuals who redeemed at least one prescription of clopidogrel from 1996 to 2008 were included as exposed subjects (n = 77,503). For each exposed subject, three matched controls were randomly selected from the background population (n = 232,510). ANALYSES: Follow-up began on January 1, 1996, and was censored on December 31, 2007, or if patients emigrated or died. The study endpoint was the occurrence of any gastritis, GI ulcer or bleeding. Analyses were adjusted for comorbidity and medication. RESULTS: Regardless of dose, adjusted odds ratios associating clopidogrel use with the study endpoint were statistically significant and followed a dose-response pattern. The crude absolute risk of GI events were: never users: 2.2 %; <0.1 defined daily dose (DDD) of clopidogrel per day: 7.1 %; 0.1-0.39 DDD: 6.0 %; 0.4-0.79 DDD: 5.7 %; ≥0.80 DDD: 4.4 %. Adjusted odds ratios were: <0.1 DDD: 1.34, 95 % CI: 1.26-1.42; 0.1-0.39 DDD: 1.58, 95 % CI: 1.48-1.68; 0.4-0.79 DDD: 1.91, 95 % CI: 1.77-2.06; ≥0.80 DDD: 1.77, 95 % CI: 1.66-1.89, all p-values < 0.01. Depending on the dose, numbers needed to harm ranged from 58 to 33 patients receiving 12 months of clopidogrel treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The well-known cardioprotective effect of clopidogrel must be carefully weighed against an increased risk of GI events.

Antithrombotic treatment beyond 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: Beyond 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), guidelines recommend anticoagulant monotherapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) rather than dual therapy with an anticoagulant and an antiplatelet drug. The risks and benefits of this strategy, however, remain uncertain. We examined hospitalization for bleeding and ischaemic risk beyond 1 year after PCI in patients with AF treated with monotherapy vs. dual therapy. Furthermore, among patients treated with monotherapy, we compared direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy and vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included all patients with AF undergoing first-time PCI between 2003 and 2017 from the Western Denmark Heart Registry and followed them for up to 4 years. Follow-up started 15 months after PCI to enable assessment of medical treatment after 12 months. Using a Cox regression model, we computed weighted hazard ratios (HRw) of hospitalization for bleeding and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). Analyses comparing monotherapy vs. dual therapy included 3331 patients, and analyses comparing DOAC vs. VKA monotherapy included 1275 patients. Risks of hospitalization for bleeding [HRw 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75-1.09] and MACE (HRw 1.04, 95% CI 0.90-1.19) were similar with monotherapy and dual therapy. Similarly, risks of hospitalization for bleeding (HRw 1.27, 95% CI 0.84-1.92) and MACE (HRw 1.15, 95% CI 0.87-1.50) were equal with DOAC and VKA monotherapy. CONCLUSION: Our results support long-term OAC monotherapy beyond 1 year after PCI in patients with atrial fibrillation and suggest that DOAC monotherapy is as safe and effective as VKA monotherapy.

Thirteen-year trends in cardiovascular risk in men and women with chronic coronary syndrome.

AIMS: To examine combined and sex-specific temporal changes in risks of adverse cardiovascular events and coronary revascularization in patients with chronic coronary syndrome undergoing coronary angiography. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included all patients with stable angina pectoris and coronary artery disease examined by coronary angiography in Western Denmark from 2004 to 2016. Patients were stratified by examination year interval: 2004-2006, 2007-2009, 2010-2012, and 2013-2016. Outcomes were 2-year risk of myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, cardiac death, and all-cause death estimated by adjusted incidence rate ratios using patients examined in 2004-2006 as reference. A total of 29 471 patients were included, of whom 70% were men. The 2-year risk of myocardial infarction [2.8% vs. 1.9%, adjusted incidence rate ratio 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53-0.81], ischaemic stroke (1.8% vs. 1.1%, adjusted incidence rate ratio 0.48, 95% CI 0.37-0.64), cardiac death (2.1% vs. 0.9%, adjusted incidence rate ratio 0.38, 95% CI 0.29-0.51), and all-cause death (5.0% vs. 3.6%, adjusted incidence rate ratio 0.65, 95% CI 0.55-0.76) decreased from the first examination interval (2004-2006) to the last examination interval (2013-2016). Coronary revascularizations also decreased (percutaneous coronary intervention: 51.6% vs. 42.5%; coronary artery bypass grafting: 24.6% vs. 17.5%). Risk reductions were observed in both men and women, however, women had a lower absolute risk. CONCLUSION: The risk for adverse cardiovascular events decreased substantially in both men and women with chronic coronary syndrome from 2004 to 2016. These results most likely reflect the cumulative effect of improvements in the management of chronic coronary artery disease.

Effectiveness and Safety of Ticagrelor Implementation in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Cohort Study in Western Denmark.

BACKGROUND: Ticagrelor was introduced in Denmark in 2011 after randomised data showed its superiority over clopidogrel for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We assessed the effectiveness and safety of ticagrelor implementation in ACS patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: We identified PCI-treated ACS patients in Western Denmark who redeemed a P2Y12 inhibitor prescription within 14 days. Using Danish health registries, 1-year outcomes were compared before (2007-2010) and after (2012-2015) introduction of ticagrelor. Outcomes were MACE (death, myocardial infarction, and ischaemic stroke) and hospitalisation for bleeding. Inverse probability of treatment weights were used to estimate weighted incidence rate ratios (wIRRs). FINDINGS: We included 14,450 patients; 7,102 were treated in the earlier time period (99·9% clopidogrel) and 7,348 in the later time period (87·8% ticagrelor). Ticagrelor implementation was not associated with a clinically relevant difference in 1-year risk of MACE with 413 events in the ticagrelor period vs. 424 events in the clopidogrel period (cumulative incidence percentage [CIP] 5·6% vs. 6·0%; wIRR 1·06, 95% CI 0·92-1·22). The 1-year risk of bleeding was also similar between groups with 335 bleedings requiring hospitalisation in the ticagrelor period vs. 309 events in the clopidogrel period (CIP 4·6% vs. 4·4%; wIRR 1·05, 95% CI 0·89-1·23). Results were robust in patients above and below 70 years of age. INTERPRETATION: Implementation of ticagrelor was not associated with changes in risks of ischaemic or bleeding events in Danish PCI-treated ACS patients.

The epidemiology of herpes zoster in 226 children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Herpes zoster (HZ) is rare in healthy children, but may occur frequently and take a complicated course in children receiving chemotherapy. We determined the morbidity related to HZ in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). PROCEDURE: Medical records of 226 children diagnosed with ALL were reviewed. Of these, 160 were seropositive at the time of diagnosis. HZ eruptions during primary chemotherapy, during therapy for relapse and following bone marrow transplantation (BMT) were registered. RESULTS: A total of 90 eruptions were recorded: 63 first-time attacks and 27 recurrent episodes among 14 children. All eruptions were treated with acyclovir (ACV) and in 60% it was given intravenously. Cutaneous dissemination occurred in 11 cases, post herpetic neuralgia in five, visceral dissemination in none. During primary chemotherapy 47 children (29%) had HZ. The eruption rate was significantly higher in children on high risk protocols compared to children on standard/intermediate risk protocols (0.36 vs. 0.07/0.09 per year) and was related to intensity of chemotherapy. During therapy for relapse 7 of 29 (24%) had a total of 13 eruptions. Following BMT 9 of 26 (35%) had a total of 10 eruptions. CONCLUSION: Almost one third of the seropositive children had HZ during primary chemotherapy. Of those treated on high risk protocols more than half had one or more eruptions during the course of treatment. The risk of complicated HZ is small, but prolonged intensive chemotherapy can lead to considerable morbidity from repeated eruptions. Attempts to improve immunity by vaccination after attaining remission seem warranted.

Insulin-treated versus noninsulin-treated diabetes and risk of ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are known risk factors for ischemic stroke. Recent data, however, suggest that only insulin-treated DM is a risk factor for ischemic stroke among AF patients. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the risk of stroke in patients with insulin and noninsulin treated DM. METHODS: We included AF patients undergoing coronary angiography in Western Denmark between 2003 and 2016. Patients were categorized as 1) insulin treated DM, 2) noninsulin treated DM, or 3) nonDM patients. The main outcome was ischemic stroke >30 days after CAG. RESULTS: AF patients (n = 21,223) were included, of whom 17,181 (81%) did not have DM, 2890 (14%) had noninsulin-treated DM and 1152 (5%) had insulin-treated DM. Median follow-up was 5.3 years. Ischemic stroke rates were 0.83 per 100 person-years for nonDM, 1.19 for noninsulin-treated DM and 1.40 for insulin-treated DM. Insulin-treated DM (adjusted hazard ratio (HRadj) 1.48, 95% CI 1.15-1.91) and noninsulin-treated DM patients (HRadj 1.30, 95% CI 1.09-1.54) had higher risks of ischemic stroke than nonDM patients. There was no difference between insulin-treated DM and noninsulin-treated DM (HRadj 1.09, 95% CI 0.82-1.46). Stratification by coronary artery disease yielded comparable risk estimates. CONCLUSION: In patients with AF, DM increases the risk of ischemic stroke, regardless of treatment.

[Menorrhagia during oral anticoagulant therapy].

Menorrhagia is a common complication to oral anticoagulant therapy in premenopausal women. Clinical management of menorrhagia poses a clinical dilemma with the need of weighting bleeding risk against the risk of recurrent thrombosis. In this review, we describe the risk of menorrhagia during oral anticoagulant therapy, with emphasis on the differences between the specific anticoagulant drugs. We critically assess the treatment options for anticoagulant-associated menorrhagia, and we provide a treatment algorithm for the management of anticoagulant-associated menorrhagia.

Comorbidity and risk of venous thromboembolism after hospitalization for first-time myocardial infarction: A population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial infarction (MI) is a risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Although comorbidities affect MI prognosis, it is unclear whether they affect VTE risk after MI. OBJECTIVES: We examined the impact of comorbidity on VTE risk after MI. METHODS: We used nationwide population-based registries to identify first-time hospitalizations for MI and subsequent occurrence of VTE in Denmark (1995-2013). We included a comparison cohort from the general population matched 5:1 with MI patients by sex, age, and comorbidities. We computed 30-day and 1- to 12-month cumulative risks, rates, and hazard ratios of VTE. We also assessed the interaction between MI and comorbidity, defined as excess VTE risk in patients with both MI and comorbidity, by computing interaction contrasts and attributable fractions relating to the interaction. RESULTS: Thirty-day and 1- to 12-month VTE risks were 0.6% and 0.5% in the MI cohort (n = 160 338) and 0.03% and 0.3% in the comparison cohort (n = 792 384). The 30-day hazard ratio for VTE in the MI cohort was 23 (95% confidence interval, 20-27), which decreased during 1-year follow-up. Thirty days after MI, interactions between MI and comorbidity accounted for 16% and 39% of VTE rates in MI patients with low-to-moderate and high comorbidity, respectively. The interactions were driven primarily by hemiplegia and cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Thirty-day VTE risk was substantially increased after MI compared with the general population. Although the absolute VTE risk was low, comorbidity substantially increased this risk, especially hemiplegia and cancer. VTE prophylaxis might be indicated in such high-risk patients but warrants further investigation.

Diabetes is not a risk factor for myocardial infarction in patients without coronary artery disease: A study from the Western Denmark Heart Registry.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes is considered a risk factor for myocardial infarction. However, we have previously found that diabetes was not a short-term risk factor for myocardial infarction in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study of patients undergoing coronary angiography from 2003 to 2012 and followed them by cross-linking Danish health registries. Patients were stratified according to coronary artery disease and diabetes. Endpoints included myocardial infarction, cardiac death, all-cause death and coronary revascularization. RESULTS: 86,202 patients were included in total (diabetes: n = 12,652). Median follow-up was 8.8 years. Using patients with neither coronary artery disease nor diabetes as reference (cumulative myocardial infarction incidence 2.6%), the risk of myocardial infarction was low and not substantially increased for patients with diabetes alone (3.2%; hazard ratio 1.202, 95% confidence interval 0.996-1.451), was increased for patients with coronary artery disease alone (9.3%; hazard ratio 2.75, 95% confidence interval 2.52-3.01) and was highest for patients with both coronary artery disease and diabetes (12.3%; hazard ratio 3.79, 95% confidence interval 3.43-4.20). Similar associations were observed for cardiac death and coronary revascularization. CONCLUSION: Diabetes patients without coronary artery disease by coronary angiography have a low risk of myocardial infarction, not substantially increased compared to patients with neither coronary artery disease nor diabetes. In the presence of coronary artery disease, however, diabetes increases the risk of myocardial infarction.

Risk of Myocardial Infarction in Patients Without Angiographic Coronary Artery Disease Compared With the General Population.

We examined the 10-year risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and death in patients without obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) compared with the general population. We conducted a cohort study of every patient without obstructive CAD by coronary angiography (CAG) between 2003 and 2016 in Western Denmark. Patients were matched by gender and age with individuals from the general population of Western Denmark with no history of CAD. End points were MI and death. Ten-year risk differences in cumulative incidence proportions were computed, accounting for the competing risk of death in the case of MI. Unadjusted and adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRRs) were estimated using conditional Poisson regression. We included 46,467 patients and 234,654 individuals from the general population. Median follow-up was 7.7 years. The 10-year cumulative incidence of MI was 2.40% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.24 to 2.57) in patients without obstructive CAD in the CAG and 2.70% (95% CI 2.62 to 2.78) in the general population, with a reduced absolute 10-year risk (risk difference -0.30%, 95% CI -0.49 to -0.12) and a reduced aIRR (aIRR 0.70, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.77). Ten-year mortality was higher in patients without obstructive CAD in the CAG (21.44%, 95% CI 20.99 to 21.89) compared with the general population (17.25%, 95% CI 17.06 to 17.44). However, mortality rates were similar after adjustment (aIRR 1.00, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.02). In conclusion, the absence of obstructive CAD according to CAG is associated with a lower risk of MI than in the general population, and similar 10-year mortality.