Drugst.One - a plug-and-play solution for online systems medicine and network-based drug repurposing.

In recent decades, the development of new drugs has become increasingly expensive and inefficient, and the molecular mechanisms of most pharmaceuticals remain poorly understood. In response, computational systems and network medicine tools have emerged to identify potential drug repurposing candidates. However, these tools often require complex installation and lack intuitive visual network mining capabilities. To tackle these challenges, we introduce Drugst.One, a platform that assists specialized computational medicine tools in becoming user-friendly, web-based utilities for drug repurposing. With just three lines of code, Drugst.One turns any systems biology software into an interactive web tool for modeling and analyzing complex protein-drug-disease networks. Demonstrating its broad adaptability, Drugst.One has been successfully integrated with 21 computational systems medicine tools. Available at https://drugst.one, Drugst.One has significant potential for streamlining the drug discovery process, allowing researchers to focus on essential aspects of pharmaceutical treatment research.

Broadcasters, receivers, functional groups of metabolites, and the link to heart failure by revealing metabolomic network connectivity.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Blood-based small molecule metabolites offer easy accessibility and hold significant potential for insights into health processes, the impact of lifestyle, and genetic variation on disease, enabling precise risk prevention. In a prospective study with records of heart failure (HF) incidence, we present metabolite profiling data from individuals without HF at baseline. METHODS: We uncovered the interconnectivity of metabolites using data-driven and causal networks augmented with polygenic factors. Exploring the networks, we identified metabolite broadcasters, receivers, mediators, and subnetworks corresponding to functional classes of metabolites, and provided insights into the link between metabolomic architecture and regulation in health. We incorporated the network structure into the identification of metabolites associated with HF to control the effect of confounding metabolites. RESULTS: We identified metabolites associated with higher and lower risk of HF incidence, such as glycine, ureidopropionic and glycocholic acids, and LPC 18:2. These associations were not confounded by the other metabolites due to uncovering the connectivity among metabolites and adjusting each association for the confounding metabolites. Examples of our findings include the direct influence of asparagine on glycine, both of which were inversely associated with HF. These two metabolites were influenced by polygenic factors and only essential amino acids, which are not synthesized in the human body and are obtained directly from the diet. CONCLUSION: Metabolites may play a critical role in linking genetic background and lifestyle factors to HF incidence. Revealing the underlying connectivity of metabolites associated with HF strengthens the findings and facilitates studying complex conditions like HF.

Cluster analysis identifies novel real-world lung disease-pulmonary hypertension subphenotypes: implications for treatment response.

Background: Clinical trials repurposing pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) therapies to patients with lung disease- or hypoxia-pulmonary hypertension (PH) (classified as World Health Organization Group 3 PH) have failed to show a consistent benefit. However, Group 3 PH clinical heterogeneity suggests robust phenotyping may inform detection of treatment-responsive subgroups. We hypothesised that cluster analysis would identify subphenotypes with differential responses to oral PAH therapy. Methods: Two k-means analyses were performed on a national cohort of US veterans with Group 3 PH; an inclusive model (I) of all treated patients (n=196) and a haemodynamic model (H) limited to patients with right heart catheterisations (n=112). The primary outcome was organ failure or all-cause mortality by cluster. An exploratory analysis evaluated within-cluster treatment effects. Results: Three distinct clusters of Group 3 PH patients were identified. In the inclusive model (C1I n=43, 21.9%; C2I n=102, 52.0%; C3I n=51, 26.0%), lung disease and spirometry drove cluster assignment. By contrast, in the haemodynamic model (C1H n=44, 39.3%; C2H n=43, 38.4%; C3H n=25, 22.3%), right heart catheterisation data surpassed the importance of lung disease and spirometry. In the haemodynamic model, compared to C3H, C1H experienced the greatest hazard for respiratory failure or death (HR 6.1, 95% CI 3.2-11.8). In an exploratory analysis, cluster determined treatment response (p=0.006). Conclusions regarding within-cluster treatment responses were limited by significant differences between select variables in the treated and untreated groups. Conclusions: Cluster analysis identifies novel real-world subphenotypes of Group 3 PH patients with distinct clinical trajectories. Future studies may consider this methodological approach to identify subgroups of heterogeneous patients that may be responsive to existing pulmonary vasodilatory therapies.

Polygenic and transcriptional risk scores identify chronic obstructive pulmonary disease subtypes.

Rationale: Genetic variants and gene expression predict risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but their effect on COPD heterogeneity is unclear. Objectives: Define high-risk COPD subtypes using both genetics (polygenic risk score, PRS) and blood gene expression (transcriptional risk score, TRS) and assess differences in clinical and molecular characteristics. Methods: We defined high-risk groups based on PRS and TRS quantiles by maximizing differences in protein biomarkers in a COPDGene training set and identified these groups in COPDGene and ECLIPSE test sets. We tested multivariable associations of subgroups with clinical outcomes and compared protein-protein interaction networks and drug repurposing analyses between high-risk groups. Measurements and Main Results: We examined two high-risk omics-defined groups in non-overlapping test sets (n=1,133 NHW COPDGene, n=299 African American (AA) COPDGene, n=468 ECLIPSE). We defined "High activity" (low PRS/high TRS) and "severe risk" (high PRS/high TRS) subgroups. Participants in both subgroups had lower body-mass index (BMI), lower lung function, and alterations in metabolic, growth, and immune signaling processes compared to a low-risk (low PRS, low TRS) reference subgroup. "High activity" but not "severe risk" participants had greater prospective FEV 1 decline (COPDGene: -51 mL/year; ECLIPSE: - 40 mL/year) and their proteomic profiles were enriched in gene sets perturbed by treatment with 5-lipoxygenase inhibitors and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Conclusions: Concomitant use of polygenic and transcriptional risk scores identified clinical and molecular heterogeneity amongst high-risk individuals. Proteomic and drug repurposing analysis identified subtype-specific enrichment for therapies and suggest prior drug repurposing failures may be explained by patient selection.