ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Smokers are at increased risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D), but the underlying mechanisms are unclear. We investigated if the smoking-T2D association is mediated by alterations in the metabolome and assessed potential interaction with genetic susceptibility to diabetes or insulin resistance. METHODS: In UK Biobank (n = 93,722), cross-sectional analyses identified 208 metabolites associated with smoking, of which 131 were confirmed in Mendelian Randomization analyses, including glycoprotein acetyls, fatty acids, and lipids. Elastic net regression was applied to create a smoking-related metabolic signature. We estimated hazard ratios (HR) of incident T2D in relation to baseline smoking/metabolic signature and calculated the proportion of the smoking-T2D association mediated by the signature. Additive interaction between the signature and genetic risk scores for T2D (GRS-T2D) and insulin resistance (GRS-IR) on incidence of T2D was assessed as relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI). FINDINGS: The HR of T2D was 1·73 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1·54 - 1·94) for current versus never smoking, and 38·3% of the excess risk was mediated by the metabolic signature. The metabolic signature and its mediation role were replicated in TwinGene. The metabolic signature was associated with T2D (HR: 1·61, CI 1·46 - 1·77 for values above vs. below median), with evidence of interaction with GRS-T2D (RERI: 0·81, CI: 0·23 - 1·38) and GRS-IR (RERI 0·47, CI: 0·02 - 0·92). INTERPRETATION: The increased risk of T2D in smokers may be mediated through effects on the metabolome, and the influence of such metabolic alterations on diabetes risk may be amplified in individuals with genetic susceptibility to T2D or insulin resistance.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Insulin Resistance , Smoking , Humans , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/genetics , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Smoking/adverse effects , Smoking/genetics , Cross-Sectional Studies , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Insulin Resistance/genetics , Adult , Aged , Mendelian Randomization Analysis , Metabolome/genetics , Risk Factors , MetabolomicsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The distribution of fat and muscle mass in different regions of the body can reflect different pathways to mortality in individuals with diabetes. Therefore, we investigated the associations between whole-body and regional body fat and muscle mass with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and non-CVD mortality in type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: Within the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2006, 1417 adults aged ≥50 years with T2D were selected. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was used to derive whole-body, trunk, arm, and leg fat mass and muscle mass indices (FMI and MMI). Mortality data until 31 December 2019 were retrieved from the National Death Index. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated from Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: A total of 1417 participants were included in this study (weighted mean age [standard error]: 63.7 [0.3] years; 50.5% female). Over a median follow-up of 13.6 years, 797 deaths were recorded (371 CVD-related and 426 non-CVD deaths). Higher FMI in the arm was associated with increased risk of non-CVD mortality (fourth quartile [Q4] vs. first quartile [Q1]: HR 1.82 [95% CI 1.13-2.94]), whereas higher FMI in the trunk or leg was not significantly associated with CVD or non-CVD mortality. Conversely, higher arm MMI was associated with a lower risk of both CVD (Q4 vs. Q1: HR 0.51 [95% CI 0.33-0.81]) and non-CVD (Q4 vs. Q1: HR 0.56 [95% CI 0.33-0.94]) mortality. There was a significant interaction between smoking status and arm FMI on non-CVD mortality (P for interaction = 0.007). Higher arm FMI was associated with a higher risk of non-CVD mortality among current or former smokers (Q4 vs. Q1: HR 2.67 [95% CI 1.46-4.88]) but not non-smokers (Q4 vs. Q1: HR 0.85 [95% CI 0.49-1.47]). CONCLUSIONS: Fat mass and muscle mass, especially in the arm, are differently associated with CVD and non-CVD mortality in people with T2D. Our findings underscore the predictive value of body compositions in the arm in forecasting mortality among older adults with T2D.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Childhood-onset type 1 diabetes (T1D) is associated with perinatal factors, but data related to adult-onset T1D are scarce. This study aimed at investigating the association between early-life factors and adult-onset T1D in a Swedish nationwide cohort and family-based study. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We included 1,813,415 individuals aged ≥18 years, born in Sweden 1983 to 2002, followed until 2020. T1D diagnosis (n = 3,283) was identified from the National Diabetes, Patient and Prescribed Drugs Registers, and perinatal exposures were obtained from the Medical Birth Register. We performed Cox proportional hazard (hazard ratio [95% CI]) regression with mutual adjustment for perinatal exposures, sex, birth year, and parental sociodemographic background and history of diabetes. We also compared T1D risks among siblings' groups identified from the Multiple Generation Register. RESULTS: The incidence rate of adult-onset T1D was 18.8 per 100,000 person-years. Year of birth (1.06 [1.01-1.10], per five additional years) and history of maternal (4.10 [3.09-5.43]) and paternal (6.24 [5.10-7.64]) T1D were associated with a higher incidence of adult-onset T1D, whereas female sex (0.69 [0.64-0.74]) and having parents born outside Sweden were associated with a lower incidence. Regarding perinatal exposures, only non-full-term birth (<39 weeks vs. ≥39 weeks) was associated with a higher incidence of adult-onset T1D (1.12 [1.04-1.22]). The sibling cohort results were consistent with the full cohort analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Perinatal factors seem to play a minor role in the development of adult-onset T1D compared with childhood-onset T1D, suggesting that triggers or accelerators of autoimmunity occurring later in life are more significant.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Type 1 diabetes in children is known to be highly heritable, but much less is known about the heritability of adult-onset type 1 diabetes. Thus, our objective was to compare the familial aggregation and heritability of type 1 diabetes in adults and children. METHODS: This Swedish nationwide register-based cohort study included individuals born from Jan 1, 1982, to Dec 31, 2010, identified through the Medical Birth Register who were linked to their parents, full siblings, half siblings, and cousins through the Multi-Generation Register (MGR). We excluded multiple births, deaths within the first month of life, individuals who could not be linked to MGR, or individuals with contradictory information on sex. Information on diagnoses of type 1 diabetes was retrieved by linkages to the National Diabetes Register and National Patient Register (1982-2020). Individuals with inconsistent records of diabetes type were excluded. We estimated the cumulative incidence and hazard ratios (HRs) of type 1 diabetes in adults (aged 19-30 years) and children (aged 0-18 years) by family history of type 1 diabetes and the heritability of adult-onset and childhood-onset type 1 diabetes based on tetrachoric correlations, using sibling pairs. FINDINGS: 2 943 832 individuals were born in Sweden during the study period, 2 832 755 individuals were included in the analysis of childhood-onset type 1 diabetes and 1 805 826 individuals were included in the analysis of adult-onset type 1 diabetes. 3240 cases of adult-onset type 1 diabetes (median onset age 23·4 years [IQR 21·1-26·2]; 1936 [59·7%] male and 1304 [40·2%] female) and 17 914 cases of childhood-onset type 1 diabetes (median onset age 9·8 years [6·2-13·3]; 9819 [54·8%] male and 8095 [45·2%] female) developed during follow-up. Having a first-degree relative with type 1 diabetes conferred an HR of 7·21 (95% CI 6·28-8·28) for adult-onset type 1 diabetes and 9·92 (9·38-10·50) for childhood-onset type 1 diabetes. The HR of developing type 1 diabetes before the age 30 years was smaller if a first-degree relative developed type 1 diabetes during adulthood (6·68 [6·04-7·39]) rather than during childhood (10·54 [9·92-11·19]). Similar findings were observed for type 1 diabetes in other relatives. Heritability was lower for adult-onset type 1 diabetes (0·56 [0·45-0·66]) than childhood-onset type 1 diabetes (0·81 [0·77-0·85]). INTERPRETATION: Adult-onset type 1 diabetes seems to have weaker familial aggregation and lower heritability than childhood-onset type 1 diabetes. This finding suggests a larger contribution of environmental factors to the development of type 1 diabetes in adults than in children and highlights the need to identify and intervene on such factors. FUNDING: Swedish Research Council, the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, Swedish Diabetes Foundation, and the China Scholarship Council.