Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 208(4): 933-939, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28199152

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesize that radiologists' estimated percentage likelihood assessments for the presence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive cancer may predict histologic outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred fifty cases categorized as BI-RADS category 4 or 5 at four University of California Medical Centers were retrospectively reviewed by 10 academic radiologists with a range of 1-39 years in practice. Readers assigned BI-RADS category (1, 2, 3, 4a, 4b, 4c, or 5), estimated percentage likelihood of DCIS or invasive cancer (0-100%), and confidence rating (1 = low, 5 = high) after reviewing screening and diagnostic mammograms and ultrasound images. ROC curves were generated. RESULTS: Sixty-two percent (156/250) of lesions were benign and 38% (94/250) were malignant. There were 26 (10%) DCIS, 20 (8%) invasive cancers, and 48 (19%) cases of DCIS and invasive cancer. AUC values were 0.830-0.907 for invasive cancer and 0.731-0.837 for DCIS alone. Sensitivity of 82% (56/68), specificity of 84% (153/182), positive predictive value (PPV) of 66% (56/85), negative predictive value (NPV) of 93% (153/165), and accuracy of 84% ([56 + 153]/250) were calculated using an estimated percentage likelihood of 20% or higher as the prediction threshold for invasive cancer for the radiologist with the highest AUC (0.907; 95% CI, 0.864-0.951). Every 20% increase in the estimated percentage likelihood of invasive cancer increased the odds of invasive cancer by approximately two times (odds ratio, 2.4). For DCIS, using a threshold of 40% or higher, sensitivity of 81% (21/26), specificity of 79% (178/224), PPV of 31% (21/67), NPV of 97% (178/183), and accuracy of 80% ([21 + 178]/250) were calculated. Similarly, these values were calculated at thresholds of 2% or higher (BI-RADS category 4) and 95% or higher (BI-RADS category 5) to predict the presence of malignancy. CONCLUSION: Using likelihood estimates, radiologists may predict the presence of invasive cancer with fairly high accuracy. Radiologist-assigned estimated percentage likelihood can predict the presence of DCIS, albeit with lower accuracy than that for invasive cancer.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology , Clinical Competence/statistics & numerical data , Radiologists/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , California/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Observer Variation , Prevalence , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
2.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 205(1): 215-21, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26102402

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Radiation associated with breast imaging is a sensitive issue, particularly for women who undergo mammography as a screening measure to detect breast cancer. Misinformation and misunderstanding regarding the risks associated with ionizing radiation have created heightened public concern and fear, which may result in avoidance of diagnostic procedures. The objectives of this study were to ascertain patients' knowledge and opinion of ionizing radiation as a whole and specifically in mammography, as well as to determine common misunderstandings and points of view that may affect women's decisions about whether to have a mammogram. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over a 9-month period, a total of 1725 patients presenting for a mammogram completed a 25-point questionnaire focused on the following: general knowledge of radiation dose in common imaging modalities, the amount of radiation associated with a mammogram relative to five radiation benchmarks, and patients' opinions of the involvement of radiation in their health care. RESULTS: Although 65% of the women receiving a mammogram responded that they had been informed of the risks and benefits of the examination, 60% overestimated the radiation in a mammogram. CONCLUSION: Efforts should be made to accurately inform women of the risks and benefits of mammography, specifically highlighting the low dose of mammographic ionizing radiation and providing objective facts to ensure that they are making an informed decision regarding screening.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Mammography , Radiation Dosage , Adult , Breast Neoplasms, Male/diagnostic imaging , Cross-Sectional Studies , Educational Status , Female , Humans , Male , Mass Screening , Patient Education as Topic , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Breast J ; 19(1): 41-8, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23186174

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to compare direct health care costs for two competing diagnostic strategies for probably benign breast lesions detected by ultrasound in young women. We developed a decision analytic model and performed a cost minimization analysis comparing ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted core biopsy and conservative short-term diagnostic ultrasound follow-up. Relative probabilities for diagnostic outcomes were derived from pooled analysis of the medical literature. Direct health care costs were estimated using United States national average figures from calendar year 2010. Deterministic sensitivity analyses were conducted, as well as a first-order Monte Carlo simulation to confirm cost differences between the two strategies. The conservative short-term imaging follow-up strategy ($639.55 average cost per patient) was the most economical strategy compared to immediate vacuum-assisted core biopsy ($879.55 average cost per patient). Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the preferred strategy is most dependent on the probabilities of detecting change in appearance on follow-up ultrasound, having a benign finding on immediate core biopsy, and finding cancer on a biopsy triggered by an interval change in ultrasound appearance. The model was also sensitive to the costs of vacuum-assisted core biopsy and diagnostic ultrasound. Conservative imaging follow-up of BIRADS 3 breast masses by ultrasound is cost saving compared to immediate vacuum-assisted core biopsy, with a potential of saving more than one-third of overall costs associated with the diagnostic work-up of such lesions. Watchful waiting with short-term interval follow-up ultrasounds will spare women from unnecessary procedures and spare the United States health care system from unnecessary direct health care costs.


Subject(s)
Biopsy, Needle/economics , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast/pathology , Decision Support Techniques , Direct Service Costs , Adult , Biopsy, Needle/methods , Breast Neoplasms/economics , Decision Trees , Female , Humans , Monte Carlo Method , Probability , Ultrasonography, Interventional/economics , Watchful Waiting/economics
4.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 136(3): 899-906, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23129174

ABSTRACT

To characterize patients' willingness to donate a biospecimen for future research as part of a breast cancer-related biobank involving a general screening population. We performed a prospective cross-sectional study of 4,217 women aged 21-89 years presenting to our facilities for screening mammogram between December 2010 and October 2011. This HIPAA-compliant study was approved by our institutional review board. We collected data on patients' interest in and actual donation of a biospecimen, motivators and barriers to donating, demographic information, and personal breast cancer risk factors. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify patient-level characteristics associated with an increased likelihood to donate. Mean patient age was 57.8 years (SD 11.1 years). While 66.0 % (2,785/4,217) of patients were willing to donate blood or saliva during their visit, only 56.4 % (2,378/4,217) actually donated. Women with a college education (OR = 1.27, p = 0.003), older age (OR = 1.02, p < 0.001), previous breast biopsy (OR = 1.23, p = 0.012), family history of breast cancer (OR = 1.23, p = 0.004), or a comorbidity (OR = 1.22, p = 0.014) were more likely to donate. Asian-American women were significantly less likely to donate (OR = 0.74, p = 0.005). The major reason for donating was to help all future patients (42.3 %) and the major reason for declining donation was privacy concerns (22.3 %). A large proportion of women participating in a breast cancer screening registry are willing to donate blood or saliva to a biobank. Among minority participants, Asian-American women are less likely to donate and further qualitative research is required to identify novel active recruitment strategies to insure their involvement.


Subject(s)
Biological Specimen Banks , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Mammography , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biological Specimen Banks/statistics & numerical data , Breast Neoplasms/ethnology , Breast Neoplasms/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Educational Status , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Privacy , Young Adult
6.
Acad Radiol ; 24(1): 60-66, 2017 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27793579

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to determine the inter-observer agreement among academic breast radiologists when using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lesion descriptors for suspicious findings on diagnostic mammography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten experienced academic breast radiologists across five medical centers independently reviewed 250 de-identified diagnostic mammographic cases that were previously assessed as BI-RADS 4 or 5 with subsequent pathologic diagnosis by percutaneous or surgical biopsy. Each radiologist assessed the presence of the following suspicious mammographic findings: mass, asymmetry (one view), focal asymmetry (two views), architectural distortion, and calcifications. For any identified calcifications, the radiologist also described the morphology and distribution. Inter-observer agreement was determined with Fleiss kappa statistic. Agreement was also calculated by years of experience. RESULTS: Of the 250 lesions, 156 (62%) were benign and 94 (38%) were malignant. Agreement among the 10 readers was strongest for recognizing the presence of calcifications (k = 0.82). There was substantial agreement among the readers for the identification of a mass (k = 0.67), whereas agreement was fair for the presence of a focal asymmetry (k = 0.21) or architectural distortion (k = 0.28). Agreement for asymmetries (one view) was slight (k = 0.09). Among the categories of calcification morphology and distribution, reader agreement was moderate (k = 0.51 and k = 0.60, respectively). Readers with more experience (10 or more years in clinical practice) did not demonstrate higher levels of agreement compared to those with less experience. CONCLUSIONS: Strength of agreement varies widely for different types of mammographic findings, even among dedicated academic breast radiologists. More subtle findings such as asymmetries and architectural distortion demonstrated the weakest agreement. Studies that seek to evaluate the predictive value of certain mammographic features for malignancy should take into consideration the inherent interpretive variability for these findings.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast/pathology , Calcinosis/pathology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology , Mammography/standards , Radiologists/standards , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biopsy , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Calcinosis/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/diagnostic imaging , Clinical Competence/standards , Female , Health Facilities , Humans , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Retrospective Studies
7.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 10(12): 918-23, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24295941

ABSTRACT

Our understanding of the biology of breast cancer has dramatically expanded over the past decade, revealing that breast cancer is a heterogeneous group of diseases. This new knowledge can generate insights to improve screening performance and the management of ductal carcinoma in situ. In this article, the authors review the current state of the science of breast cancer and tools that can be used to improve screening and risk assessment. They describe several opportunities to improve clinical screening: (1) radiologists interpreting mammograms should aim to differentiate between the risk for invasive cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ to better assess the time frame for disease progression and the need for and optimal timing of biopsy; (2) imaging features associated with low risk, slow-growing cancer versus high risk, fast-growing cancer should be better defined and taught; and (3) as we learn more about assessing an individual's risk for developing breast cancer, we should incorporate these factors into a strategy for personalized screening to maximize benefit and minimize harm.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/prevention & control , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/prevention & control , Early Detection of Cancer , Mammography/methods , Radiographic Image Enhancement/methods , Female , Humans , Risk Assessment/methods
8.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18835588

ABSTRACT

Little attention has been focused on the effect of anthropogenic compounds that disrupt the endocrine systems in crustaceans. Consequently, this study investigated the effects of the juvenile hormone analogue (JHA), Fenoxycarb on selected physiological and developmental processes of the zoeal stages in the European lobster, Homarus gammarus. Chronic exposure to Fenoxycarb (50microg L(-1)) resulted in a significant (p < 0.05) reduction in moult frequency and size at moult. Fenoxycarb exposure extended zoeal duration between zoea I to II (p<0.05) and resulted in total inhibition of the moult from zoea II to III. Significantly greater rates of O2 uptake were observed in Fenoxycarb-exposed larvae in comparison with controls (p<0.05). All rates of O2 uptake decreased significantly between 7 and 12d of exposure (p<0.05). At 12d, exposure to the solvent control no longer influenced rates of O2 uptake, but it was not possible to attribute increased O2 uptake to Fenoxycarb exposure directly, as treated individuals did not moult beyond zoea III. The low exposure concentrations of Fenoxycarb, comparable to those used in plant protection, resulted in endocrine disrupted responses in H. gammarus (albeit with little clear, demonstrable effect on metabolism) a finding that could have important ecological and commercial implications.


Subject(s)
Endocrine Disruptors/toxicity , Insecticides/toxicity , Molting/drug effects , Nephropidae/drug effects , Oxygen Consumption/drug effects , Phenylcarbamates/toxicity , Water Pollutants, Chemical/toxicity , Animals , Larva/drug effects , Larva/growth & development , Larva/metabolism , Nephropidae/embryology , Nephropidae/growth & development , Nephropidae/metabolism , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL