Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 52
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
2.
Pediatr Radiol ; 51(13): 2498-2506, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34532817

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In children exposed to multiple computed tomography (CT) exams, performed with varying z-axis coverage and often with tube current modulation, it is inaccurate to add volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) to obtain cumulative dose values. OBJECTIVE: To introduce the patient-size-specific z-axis dose profile and its dose line integral (DLI) as new dose metrics, and to use them to compare cumulative dose calculations against conventional measures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all children with 2 or more abdominal-pelvic CT scans performed from 2013 through 2019, we retrospectively recorded all series kV, z-axis tube current profile, CTDIvol, dose-length product (DLP) and calculated SSDE. We constructed dose profiles as a function of z-axis location for each series. One author identified the z-axis location of the superior mesenteric artery origin on each series obtained to align the dose profiles for construction of each patient's cumulative profile. We performed pair-wise comparisons between the peak dose of the cumulative patient dose profile and ΣSSDE, and between ΣDLI and ΣDLP. RESULTS: We recorded dose data in 143 series obtained in 48 children, ages 0-2 years (n=15) and 8-16 years (n=33): ΣSSDE 12.7±6.7 and peak dose 15.1±8.1 mGy, ΣDLP 278±194 and ΣDLI 550±292 mGy·cm. Peak dose exceeded ΣSSDE by 20.6% (interquartile range [IQR]: 9.9-26.4%, P<0.001), and ΣDLI exceeded ΣDLP by 114% (IQR: 86.5-147.0%, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Our methodology represents a novel approach for evaluating radiation exposure in recurring pediatric abdominal CT examinations, both at the individual and population levels. Under a wide range of patient variables and acquisition conditions, graphic depiction of the cumulative z-axis dose profile across and beyond scan ranges, including the peak dose of the profile, provides a better tool for cumulative dose documentation than simple summations of SSDE. ΣDLI is advantageous in characterizing overall energy absorption over ΣDLP, which significantly underestimated this in all children.


Subject(s)
Pelvis , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiation Dosage , Retrospective Studies
5.
Skeletal Radiol ; 48(2): 275-283, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30069585

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Radiographic bone age assessment (BAA) is used in the evaluation of pediatric endocrine and metabolic disorders. We previously developed an automated artificial intelligence (AI) deep learning algorithm to perform BAA using convolutional neural networks. We compared the BAA performance of a cohort of pediatric radiologists with and without AI assistance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six board-certified, subspecialty trained pediatric radiologists interpreted 280 age- and gender-matched bone age radiographs ranging from 5 to 18 years. Three of those radiologists then performed BAA with AI assistance. Bone age accuracy and root mean squared error (RMSE) were used as measures of accuracy. Intraclass correlation coefficient evaluated inter-rater variation. RESULTS: AI BAA accuracy was 68.2% overall and 98.6% within 1 year, and the mean six-reader cohort accuracy was 63.6 and 97.4% within 1 year. AI RMSE was 0.601 years, while mean single-reader RMSE was 0.661 years. Pooled RMSE decreased from 0.661 to 0.508 years, all individually decreasing with AI assistance. ICC without AI was 0.9914 and with AI was 0.9951. CONCLUSIONS: AI improves radiologist's bone age assessment by increasing accuracy and decreasing variability and RMSE. The utilization of AI by radiologists improves performance compared to AI alone, a radiologist alone, or a pooled cohort of experts. This suggests that AI may optimally be utilized as an adjunct to radiologist interpretation of imaging studies to improve performance.


Subject(s)
Age Determination by Skeleton/methods , Artificial Intelligence , Bone Diseases, Metabolic/diagnostic imaging , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Adolescent , Algorithms , Child , Child, Preschool , Deep Learning , Female , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies
6.
Am J Hum Genet ; 97(2): 291-301, 2015 Aug 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26235987

ABSTRACT

Congenital anomalies of the kidneys and urinary tract (CAKUT) are the most common cause of chronic kidney disease in the first three decades of life. Identification of single-gene mutations that cause CAKUT permits the first insights into related disease mechanisms. However, for most cases the underlying defect remains elusive. We identified a kindred with an autosomal-dominant form of CAKUT with predominant ureteropelvic junction obstruction. By whole exome sequencing, we identified a heterozygous truncating mutation (c.1010delG) of T-Box transcription factor 18 (TBX18) in seven affected members of the large kindred. A screen of additional families with CAKUT identified three families harboring two heterozygous TBX18 mutations (c.1570C>T and c.487A>G). TBX18 is essential for developmental specification of the ureteric mesenchyme and ureteric smooth muscle cells. We found that all three TBX18 altered proteins still dimerized with the wild-type protein but had prolonged protein half life and exhibited reduced transcriptional repression activity compared to wild-type TBX18. The p.Lys163Glu substitution altered an amino acid residue critical for TBX18-DNA interaction, resulting in impaired TBX18-DNA binding. These data indicate that dominant-negative TBX18 mutations cause human CAKUT by interference with TBX18 transcriptional repression, thus implicating ureter smooth muscle cell development in the pathogenesis of human CAKUT.


Subject(s)
Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental/genetics , Genes, Dominant/genetics , Muscle, Smooth/embryology , Mutation/genetics , T-Box Domain Proteins/genetics , Ureter/embryology , Urinary Tract/abnormalities , Base Sequence , Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay , Exome/genetics , HEK293 Cells , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Immunoprecipitation , Microscopy, Fluorescence , Molecular Sequence Data , Pedigree , Sequence Analysis, DNA
7.
Radiology ; 284(1): 219-227, 2017 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28212059

ABSTRACT

Purpose To determine diagnostic reference ranges on the basis of the size of a pediatric patient's chest and to develop a method to estimate computed tomographic (CT) scanner-specific mean size-specific dose estimates (SSDEs) as a function of patient size and the radiation output of each CT scanner at a site. Materials and Methods The institutional review boards of each center approved this retrospective, HIPAA-compliant, multicenter study; informed consent was waived. CT dose indexes (SSDE, volume CT dose index, and dose length product) of 518 pediatric patients (mean age, 9.6 years; male patients, 277 [53%]) who underwent CT between July 1, 2012, and June 30, 2013, according to the guidelines of the Quality Improvement Registry in CT Scans in Children were retrieved from a national dose data registry. Diagnostic reference ranges were developed after analysis of image quality of a subset of 111 CT examinations to validate image quality at the lower bound. Pediatric dose reduction factors were calculated on the basis of SSDEs for pediatric patients divided by SSDEs for adult patients. Results Diagnostic reference ranges (SSDEs) were 1.8-3.9, 2.2-4.5, 2.7-5.1, 3.6-6.6, and 5.5-8.4 mGy for effective diameter ranges of less than 15 cm, 15-19 cm, 20-24 cm, 25-29 cm, and greater than or equal to 30 cm, respectively. The fractions of adult doses (pediatric dose reduction factors) used within the consortium for patients with lateral dimensions of 8, 11, 14, 17, 20, 23, 26, 29, 32, 35, and 38 cm were 0.29, 0.33, 0.38, 0.44, 0.50, 0.58, 0.66, 0.76, 0.87, 1.0, and 1.15, respectively. Conclusion Diagnostic reference ranges developed in this study provided target ranges of pediatric dose indexes on the basis of patient size, while the pediatric dose reduction factors of this study allow calculation of unique reference dose indexes on the basis of patient size for each of a site's CT scanners. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.


Subject(s)
Radiation Dosage , Radiography, Thoracic/standards , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/standards , Body Size , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Reference Values , Retrospective Studies
10.
Pediatr Radiol ; 45(5): 634-9, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25655370

ABSTRACT

The incidental detection of small lung nodules in children is a vexing consequence of an increased reliance on CT. We present an algorithm for the management of lung nodules detected on CT in children, based on the presence or absence of symptoms, the presence or absence of elements in the clinical history that might explain these nodules, and the imaging characteristics of the nodules (such as attenuation measurements within the nodule). We provide suggestions on how to perform a thoughtfully directed and focused search for clinically occult extrathoracic disease processes (including malignant disease) that may present as an incidentally detected lung nodule on CT. This algorithm emphasizes that because of the lack of definitive information on the natural history of small solid nodules that are truly detected incidentally, their clinical management is highly dependent on the caregivers' individual risk tolerance. In addition, we present strategies to reduce the prevalence of these incidental findings, by preventing unnecessary chest CT scans or inadvertent inclusion of portions of the lungs in scans of adjacent body parts. Application of these guidelines provides pediatric radiologists with an important opportunity to practice patient-centered and evidence-based medicine.


Subject(s)
Health Communication , Incidental Findings , Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Lung Neoplasms/prevention & control , Solitary Pulmonary Nodule/diagnostic imaging , Solitary Pulmonary Nodule/prevention & control , Child, Preschool , Humans , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Risk , Solitary Pulmonary Nodule/therapy , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
11.
Pediatr Radiol ; 45(5): 628-33, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25655369

ABSTRACT

No guidelines are in place for the follow-up and management of pulmonary nodules that are incidentally detected on CT in the pediatric population. The Fleischner guidelines, which were developed for the older adult population, do not apply to children. This review summarizes the evidence collected by the Society for Pediatric Radiology (SPR) Thoracic Imaging Committee in its attempt to develop pediatric-specific guidelines.Small pulmonary opacities can be characterized as linear or as ground-glass or solid nodules. Linear opacities and ground-glass nodules are extremely unlikely to represent an early primary or metastatic malignancy in a child. In our review, we found a virtual absence of reported cases of a primary pulmonary malignancy presenting as an incidentally detected small lung nodule on CT in a healthy immune-competent child.Because of the lack of definitive information on the clinical significance of small lung nodules that are incidentally detected on CT in children, the management of those that do not have the typical characteristics of an intrapulmonary lymph node should be dictated by the clinical history as to possible exposure to infectious agents, the presence of an occult immunodeficiency, the much higher likelihood that the nodule represents a metastasis than a primary lung tumor, and ultimately the individual preference of the child's caregiver. Nodules appearing in children with a history of immune deficiency, malignancy or congenital pulmonary airway malformation should not be considered incidental, and their workup should be dictated by the natural history of these underlying conditions.


Subject(s)
Incidental Findings , Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Solitary Pulmonary Nodule/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Child, Preschool , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Practice Guidelines as Topic
13.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 202(4): 872-9, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24660719

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: There are limited data available on the use of i.v. contrast media for CT studies in the pediatric population. The purpose of this study is to determine the practice patterns of i.v. contrast media usage for pediatric CT by members of the Society for Pediatric Radiology (SPR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: SPR members were surveyed regarding the use of i.v. contrast media for pediatric CT studies. Questions pertained to information required before administering i.v. contrast media, types of central catheters for injecting i.v. contrast media, injection rates based on angiocatheter size and study type, and management of i.v. contrast media extravasation. RESULTS: The response rate of 6% (88/1545) represented practice patterns of 26% (401/1545) of the SPR membership. Most respondents thought the following clinical information was mandatory before i.v. contrast media administration: allergy to i.v. contrast media (97%), renal insufficiency (97%), current metformin use (72%), significant allergies (61%), diabetes (54%), and asthma (52%). Most administered i.v. contrast media through nonimplanted central venous catheters (78%), implanted venous ports (78%), and peripherally inserted central catheters (72%). The most common maximum i.v. contrast media injection rates were 5.0 mL/s or greater for a 16-gauge angiocatheter, 4.0 mL/s for an 18-gauge angiocatheter, 3.0 mL/s for a 20-gauge angiocatheter, and 2.0 mL/s for a 22-gauge angiocatheter. For soft-tissue extravasation of i.v. contrast media, 95% elevate the affected extremity, 76% use ice, and 45% use heat. CONCLUSION: The results of this survey illustrate the collective opinion of a subset of SPR members relating to the use of i.v. contrast media in pediatric CT, providing guidelines for clinical histories needed before i.v. contrast media, maximum i.v. contrast injection rates for standard angiocatheters, contrast media injection rates for specific CT studies, and management of i.v. contrast media soft-tissue extravasation.


Subject(s)
Contrast Media/administration & dosage , Pediatrics/standards , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Humans , Injections, Intravenous , Societies, Medical , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
14.
Pediatr Radiol ; 44 Suppl 3: 515-8, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25304714

ABSTRACT

The theory of radiation carcinogenesis has been debated for decades. Most estimates of the radiation risks from CT have been based on extrapolations from the lifespan follow-up study of atomic bomb survivors and on follow-up studies after therapeutic radiation, using the linear no-threshold theory. Based on this, many population-based projections of induction of future cancers by CT have been published that should not be used to estimate the risk to an individual because of their large margin of error. This has changed recently with the publication of three large international cohort follow-up studies, which link observed cancers to CT scans received in childhood. A fourth ongoing multi-country study in Europe is expected to have enough statistical power to address the limitations of the prior studies. The United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) report released in 2013 specifically addresses variability in response of the pediatric population exposed to ionizing radiation. Most authorities now conclude that there is enough evidence to link future cancers to the radiation exposure from a single CT scan in childhood but that cancer risk estimates for individuals must be based on the specifics of exposure, age at exposure and absorbed dose to certain tissues. Generalizations are not appropriate, and the communication of the CT risk to individuals should be conducted within the framework of personalized medicine.


Subject(s)
Informed Consent , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/epidemiology , Patient Education as Topic , Precision Medicine/statistics & numerical data , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/statistics & numerical data , Child , Evidence-Based Medicine , Female , Humans , Internationality , Male , Prevalence , Risk Assessment/methods
15.
Pediatr Radiol ; 44 Suppl 3: 525-33, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25304716

ABSTRACT

In order to personalize the communication of the CT risk, we need to describe the risk in the context of the clinical benefit of CT, which will generally be much higher, provided a CT scan has a well-established clinical indication. However as pediatric radiologists we should be careful not to overstate the benefit of CT, being aware that medico-legal pressures and the realities of health care economics have led to overutilization of the technology. And even though we should not use previously accumulated radiation dose to a child as an argument against conducting a clinically indicated scan (the "sunk-cost" bias), we should consider patients' radiation history in the diagnostic decision process. As a contribution to future public health, it makes more sense to look for non-radiating alternatives to CT in the much larger group of basically healthy children who are receiving occasional scans for widely prevalent conditions such as appendicitis and trauma than to attempt lowering CT use in the smaller group of patients with chronic conditions with a limited life expectancy. When communicating the CT risk with individual patients and their parents, we should acknowledge and address their concerns within the framework of informed decision-making. When appropriate, we may express the individual radiation risk, based on estimates of summated absorbed organ dose, as an order of magnitude rather than as an absolute number, and compare this with the much larger natural cancer incidence over a child's lifetime, and with other risks in medicine and daily life. We should anticipate that many patients cannot make informed decisions on their own in this complex matter, and we should offer our guidance while maintaining respect for patient autonomy. Proper documentation of the informed decision process is important for future reference. In concert with our referring physicians, pediatric radiologists are well-equipped to tackle the complexities associated with the communication of CT risk, a task that often falls upon us, and by becoming more involved in the diagnostic decision process we can add value to the health care system.


Subject(s)
Informed Consent , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/prevention & control , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Pediatrics/organization & administration , Precision Medicine/methods , Radiology/organization & administration , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Child , Evidence-Based Medicine , Female , Humans , Internationality , Male , Physician's Role , Physician-Patient Relations , Prevalence , Risk Assessment/methods , United States
17.
Pediatr Cardiol ; 35(1): 171-9, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23872908

ABSTRACT

Cardiac CT angiography (cCTA) has become an established method for the assessment of congenital heart disease. However, the potential harmful effects of ionizing radiation must be considered, particularly in younger, more radiosensitive patients. In this study, we sought to assess the temporal change in radiation doses from pediatric cCTA during an 8-year period at a tertiary medical center. This retrospective study included all patients ≤18 years old who were referred to electrocardiography (ECG)-gated cCTA for the assessment of congenital heart disease or inflammatory disease (Kawasaki disease) from November 2004 to September 2012. During the study period, 95 patients were scanned using 3 different scanner models-64-slice multidetector CT (64-MDCT) and first- (64-DSCT) and second-generation (128-DSCT) dual-source CT-and 3 scan protocols-retrospective ECG-gated helical scanning (RG), prospective ECG-triggered axial scanning (PT), or prospective ECG-triggered high-pitch helical scanning (HPH). Effective dose (ED) was calculated with the dose length product method with a conversion factor (k) adjusted for age. ED was then compared among scan protocols. Image quality was extracted from clinical cCTA reports when available. Overall, 94 % of scans were diagnostic (80 % for 64-slice MDCT, 93 % for 64-slice DSCT, and 97 % for 128-slice DSCT).With 128-DSCT, median ED (1.0 [range 0.6-2.0] mSv) decreased by 85.8 % and 66.8 % compared with 64-MDCT (6.8 [range 2.9-13.6] mSv) and 64-DSCT (2.9 [range 0.9-4.1] mSv), respectively. With HPH, median ED (0.9 [range 0.6-1.8] mSv) decreased by 59.4 % and 85.4 % compared with PT (2.2 [range 0.9-3.4] mSv) and RG (6.1 [range 2.5-10.6] mSv). cCTA can now be obtained at very low radiation doses in pediatric patients using the latest dual-source CT technology in combination with prospective ECG-triggered HPH acquisition.


Subject(s)
Angiography , Heart Defects, Congenital/diagnostic imaging , Mucocutaneous Lymph Node Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Radiation, Ionizing , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Adolescent , Angiography/adverse effects , Angiography/methods , Angiography/standards , Child, Preschool , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Electrocardiography , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Radiographic Image Enhancement , Radiologic Health/methods , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/adverse effects , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/standards , United States
18.
J Pediatr Neurol ; 12(4): 183-193, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25798046

ABSTRACT

Although lenticulostriate vasculopathy (LSV) was first detected on a cranial ultrasound nearly 30 years ago, its clinical implications and significance remain unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the inter-rater reliability of cranial ultrasound readings of LSV, and to explore relationships with potential antecedents and developmental correlates in extremely low gestational age newborns. Of the 1506 infants enrolled during the years 2002-2004, 1450 had at least one set of ultrasound scans evaluated for LSV and 939 had all three sets. To evaluate the inter-rater agreement for identifying LSV, we compared readings from two independent radiologists on days 1-4, 5-14, and on or after day 15. We then evaluated the relationships between LSV and maternal, antenatal, and postnatal characteristics. Our results showed that kappa values were 0.18, 0.33, and 0.36 on days 1-4, days 5-14, and day 15 or greater. Infants who were identified as LSV positive by two readers had higher Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology-II (an illness severity indicator), higher rates of tracheal infection and bacteremia, lower partial pressure of arterial oxygen and pH levels on 2 of the first 3 postnatal days, and they were more likely to have a lower psycho-motor development index at age 2 years. Positive agreement on the presence of LSV was low, as was the kappa value, an index of inter-rater reliability. Infants with high illness severity scores and their correlates were at increased risk of developing LSV, while those who develop LSV appear to be at increased risk of motor dysfunction.

20.
Radiology ; 268(1): 208-18, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23513245

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To develop diagnostic reference ranges (DRRs) and a method for an individual practice to calculate site-specific reference doses for computed tomographic (CT) scans of the abdomen or abdomen and pelvis in children on the basis of body width (BW). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This HIPAA-compliant multicenter retrospective study was approved by institutional review boards of participating institutions; informed consent was waived. In 939 pediatric patients, CT doses were reviewed in 499 (53%) male and 440 (47%) female patients (mean age, 10 years). Doses were from 954 scans obtained from September 1 to December 1, 2009, through Quality Improvement Registry for CT Scans in Children within the National Radiology Data Registry, American College of Radiology. Size-specific dose estimate (SSDE), a dose estimate based on BW, CT dose index, dose-length product, and effective dose were analyzed. BW measurement was obtained with electronic calipers from the axial image at the splenic vein level after completion of the CT scan. An adult-sized patient was defined as a patient with BW of 34 cm. An appropriate dose range for each DRR was developed by reviewing image quality on a subset of CT scans through comparison with a five-point visual reference scale with increments of added simulated quantum mottle and by determining DRR to establish lower and upper bounds for each range. RESULTS: For 954 scans, DRRs (SSDEs) were 5.8-12.0, 7.3-12.2, 7.6-13.4, 9.8-16.4, and 13.1-19.0 mGy for BWs less than 15, 15-19, 20-24, 25-29, and 30 cm or greater, respectively. The fractions of adult doses, adult SSDEs, used within the consortium for patients with BWs of 10, 14, 18, 22, 26, and 30 cm were 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, and 0.9, respectively. CONCLUSION: The concept of DRRs addresses the balance between the patient's risk (radiation dose) and benefit (diagnostic image quality). Calculation of reference doses as a function of BW for an individual practice provides a tool to help develop site-specific CT protocols that help manage pediatric patient radiation doses.


Subject(s)
Radiography, Abdominal/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Adolescent , Chi-Square Distribution , Child , Child, Preschool , Contrast Media , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Radiation Dosage , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Reference Values , Registries , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL