ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Randomized, comparative studies evaluating augmented secondary intention healing (SIH) compared with conventional SIH in dermatologic surgery are limited. This study aimed to evaluate whether the use of a novel biomaterial enhances SIH, particularly in shortening time to complete re-epithelialization. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to elucidate whether a novel biomaterial containing gelatin, manuka honey, and hydroxyapatite enhances SIH when compared with conventional SIH for surgical defects after Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) on the head and distal lower extremities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven patients were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial. Patients undergoing MMS on the head or distal lower extremities were eligible for recruitment. After clear surgical margins were obtained post-MMS, patients were randomized to receive standard SIH or biomaterial enhanced SIH. Patients had regularly scheduled follow-ups with questionnaires at each visit until complete re-epithelialization was achieved. RESULTS: Overall, there was no significant difference in time to re-epithelialization between standard SIH and biomaterial-enhanced SIH. However, there was a significant decrease in pain scores and skin thickness in the biomaterial-enhanced SIH group. CONCLUSION: Biomaterial-enhanced SIH is noninferior to standard SIH and produces less pain and favorable skin thickness compared with standard SIH. ClinicalTrials.gov listing: NCT04545476.
Subject(s)
Honey , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Skin Neoplasms/surgery , Gelatin , Pilot Projects , Biocompatible Materials , Durapatite , Intention , Mohs Surgery/adverse effects , PainABSTRACT
Background: Electronic health records (EHR) are increasingly used for studying multimorbidities. However, concerns about accuracy, completeness, and EHRs being primarily designed for billing and administrative purposes raise questions about the consistency and reproducibility of EHR-based multimorbidity research. Methods: Utilizing phecodes to represent the disease phenome, we analyzed pairwise comorbidity strengths using a dual logistic regression approach and constructed multimorbidity as an undirected weighted graph. We assessed the consistency of the multimorbidity networks within and between two major EHR systems at local (nodes and edges), meso (neighboring patterns), and global (network statistics) scales. We present case studies to identify disease clusters and uncover clinically interpretable disease relationships. We provide an interactive web tool and a knowledge base combining data from multiple sources for online multimorbidity analysis. Findings: Analyzing data from 500,000 patients across Vanderbilt University Medical Center and Mass General Brigham health systems, we observed a strong correlation in disease frequencies (Kendall's τ = 0.643) and comorbidity strengths (Pearson ρ = 0.79). Consistent network statistics across EHRs suggest similar structures of multimorbidity networks at various scales. Comorbidity strengths and similarities of multimorbidity connection patterns align with the disease genetic correlations. Graph-theoretic analyses revealed a consistent core-periphery structure, implying efficient network clustering through threshold graph construction. Using hydronephrosis as a case study, we demonstrated the network's ability to uncover clinically relevant disease relationships and provide novel insights. Interpretation: Our findings demonstrate the robustness of large-scale EHR data for studying phenome-wide multimorbidities. The alignment of multimorbidity patterns with genetic data suggests the potential utility for uncovering shared biology of diseases. The consistent core-periphery structure offers analytical insights to discover complex disease interactions. This work also sets the stage for advanced disease modeling, with implications for precision medicine. Funding: VUMC Biostatistics Development Award, the National Institutes of Health, and the VA CSRD.
ABSTRACT
Importance: Natural language processing tools, such as ChatGPT (generative pretrained transformer, hereafter referred to as chatbot), have the potential to radically enhance the accessibility of medical information for health professionals and patients. Assessing the safety and efficacy of these tools in answering physician-generated questions is critical to determining their suitability in clinical settings, facilitating complex decision-making, and optimizing health care efficiency. Objective: To assess the accuracy and comprehensiveness of chatbot-generated responses to physician-developed medical queries, highlighting the reliability and limitations of artificial intelligence-generated medical information. Design, Setting, and Participants: Thirty-three physicians across 17 specialties generated 284 medical questions that they subjectively classified as easy, medium, or hard with either binary (yes or no) or descriptive answers. The physicians then graded the chatbot-generated answers to these questions for accuracy (6-point Likert scale with 1 being completely incorrect and 6 being completely correct) and completeness (3-point Likert scale, with 1 being incomplete and 3 being complete plus additional context). Scores were summarized with descriptive statistics and compared using the Mann-Whitney U test or the Kruskal-Wallis test. The study (including data analysis) was conducted from January to May 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: Accuracy, completeness, and consistency over time and between 2 different versions (GPT-3.5 and GPT-4) of chatbot-generated medical responses. Results: Across all questions (n = 284) generated by 33 physicians (31 faculty members and 2 recent graduates from residency or fellowship programs) across 17 specialties, the median accuracy score was 5.5 (IQR, 4.0-6.0) (between almost completely and complete correct) with a mean (SD) score of 4.8 (1.6) (between mostly and almost completely correct). The median completeness score was 3.0 (IQR, 2.0-3.0) (complete and comprehensive) with a mean (SD) score of 2.5 (0.7). For questions rated easy, medium, and hard, the median accuracy scores were 6.0 (IQR, 5.0-6.0), 5.5 (IQR, 5.0-6.0), and 5.0 (IQR, 4.0-6.0), respectively (mean [SD] scores were 5.0 [1.5], 4.7 [1.7], and 4.6 [1.6], respectively; P = .05). Accuracy scores for binary and descriptive questions were similar (median score, 6.0 [IQR, 4.0-6.0] vs 5.0 [IQR, 3.4-6.0]; mean [SD] score, 4.9 [1.6] vs 4.7 [1.6]; P = .07). Of 36 questions with scores of 1.0 to 2.0, 34 were requeried or regraded 8 to 17 days later with substantial improvement (median score 2.0 [IQR, 1.0-3.0] vs 4.0 [IQR, 2.0-5.3]; P < .01). A subset of questions, regardless of initial scores (version 3.5), were regenerated and rescored using version 4 with improvement (mean accuracy [SD] score, 5.2 [1.5] vs 5.7 [0.8]; median score, 6.0 [IQR, 5.0-6.0] for original and 6.0 [IQR, 6.0-6.0] for rescored; P = .002). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, chatbot generated largely accurate information to diverse medical queries as judged by academic physician specialists with improvement over time, although it had important limitations. Further research and model development are needed to correct inaccuracies and for validation.
Subject(s)
Artificial Intelligence , Physicians , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Reproducibility of Results , SoftwareABSTRACT
There has been a long pursuit for precise and reproducible glomerular quantification in the field of renal pathology in both research and clinical practice. Currently, 3D glomerular identification and reconstruction of large-scale glomeruli are labor-intensive tasks, and time-consuming by manual analysis on whole slide imaging (WSI) in 2D serial sectioning representation. The accuracy of serial section analysis is also limited in the 2D serial context. Moreover, there are no approaches to present 3D glomerular visualization for human examination (volume calculation, 3D phenotype analysis, etc.). In this paper, we introduce an end-to-end holistic deep-learning-based method that achieves automatic detection, segmentation and multi-object tracking (MOT) of individual glomeruli with large-scale glomerular-registered assessment in a 3D context on WSIs. The high-resolution WSIs are the inputs, while the outputs are the 3D glomerular reconstruction and volume estimation. This pipeline achieves 81.8 in IDF1 and 69.1 in MOTA as MOT performance, while the proposed volume estimation achieves 0.84 Spearman correlation coefficient with manual annotation. The end-to-end MAP3D+ pipeline provides an approach for extensive 3D glomerular reconstruction and volume quantification from 2D serial section WSIs.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Corticosteroid injections are a commonly used treatment for dermatologic pathologies. Although the injectable is often prepared with a local anesthetic, we hypothesize that patients receiving an injection with anesthetic will experience no decrease in pain at the time of injection. METHODS: Patients requiring a corticosteroid injection were prospectively randomized into two cohorts to receive a corticosteroid (triamcinolone acetonide) combined with either lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100 000 (anesthetic) or bacteriostatic normal saline. Both patient and clinician were blinded to the treatment arm. The primary outcome was pain associated with the injection measured using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) immediately following the injection. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were enrolled with 18 in the saline group and 13 in the lidocaine with epinephrine group. Pain scores were significantly higher for injections containing lidocaine with epinephrine versus saline (VAS 5.0 vs 2.0, p = .0056). CONCLUSIONS: For various dermatologic pathologies, corticosteroid injections are effective and have relatively little associated pain. Counterintuitively, we found that there is more injection-associated pain when lidocaine with epinephrine is included with the corticosteroid. Therefore, clinicians should omit this anesthetic or dilute corticosteroids with normal saline, rather than with lidocaine and epinephrine. This will minimize injection pain as well as decrease the risk of pharmacologic adverse reactions from an unnecessary additional medication. Due to the small sample size, additional research may be necessary for generalization to other indications. Clinicaltrials.gov listing: NCT03630198.
Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Local , Saline Solution , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Anesthetics, Local/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method , Epinephrine , Humans , Injections, Intralesional , Lidocaine , Pain/drug therapy , Pain/etiologyABSTRACT
Multi-modal learning (e.g., integrating pathological images with genomic features) tends to improve the accuracy of cancer diagnosis and prognosis as compared to learning with a single modality. However, missing data is a common problem in clinical practice, i.e., not every patient has all modalities available. Most of the previous works directly discarded samples with missing modalities, which might lose information in these data and increase the likelihood of overfitting. In this work, we generalize the multi-modal learning in cancer diagnosis with the capacity of dealing with missing data using histological images and genomic data. Our integrated model can utilize all available data from patients with both complete and partial modalities. The experiments on the public TCGA-GBM and TCGA-LGG datasets show that the data with missing modalities can contribute to multi-modal learning, which improves the model performance in grade classification of glioma cancer.
ABSTRACT
Cutaneous erythema is used in diagnosis and response assessment of cutaneous chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD). The development of objective erythema evaluation methods remains a challenge. We used a pre-trained neural network to segment cGVHD erythema by detecting changes relative to a patient's registered baseline photo. We fixed this change detection algorithm on human annotations from a single photo pair, by using either a traditional approach or by marking definitely affected ("Do Not Miss", DNM) and definitely unaffected skin ("Do Not Include", DNI). The fixed algorithm was applied to each of the remaining 47 test photo pairs from six follow-up sessions of one patient. We used both the Dice index and the opinion of two board-certified dermatologists to evaluate the algorithm performance. The change detection algorithm correctly assigned 80% of the pixels, regardless of whether it was fixed on traditional (median accuracy: 0.77, interquartile range 0.62-0.87) or DNM/DNI segmentations (0.81, 0.65-0.89). When the algorithm was fixed on markings by different annotators, the DNM/DNI achieved more consistent outputs (median Dice indices: 0.94-0.96) than the traditional method (0.73-0.81). Compared to viewing only rash photos, the addition of baseline photos improved the reliability of dermatologists' scoring. The inter-rater intraclass correlation coefficient increased from 0.19 (95% confidence interval lower bound: 0.06) to 0.51 (lower bound: 0.35). In conclusion, a change detection algorithm accurately assigned erythema in longitudinal photos of cGVHD. The reliability was significantly improved by exclusively using confident human segmentations to fix the algorithm. Baseline photos improved the agreement among two dermatologists in assessing algorithm performance.