Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Surg Endosc ; 36(7): 5424-5430, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34816306

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic disparities have been associated with outcomes in many medical conditions. The association of socioeconomic status (SES) with readmissions after ventral and inguinal hernia repair has not been well studied on a national level. This study aims to evaluate the association of SES with readmission as a significant outcome in patients undergoing ventral and inguinal hernia repair. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed evaluating patients undergoing ventral hernia and inguinal hernia repair with 1:1 propensity score matching using the Nationwide Readmissions Database (2016-2017). Both 30- and 90-day readmissions were examined. After matching, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed using confounding variables including hospital setting, comorbidities, urgency of repair, sociodemographic status, and payer. Likelihood of readmission was reported in odds ratio form. RESULTS: Readmission rates were 11.56% (24,323 out of 210,381) and 17.94% (30,893 out of 172,210) for 30- and 90-day readmissions, respectively. Patients with Medicaid and in the lower income quartile were more likely to present in an emergent fashion for hernia repair. After matching, a multivariate logistic regression analysis showed socioeconomic status (OR 1.250 and 1.229) was a statistically significant independent predictor of readmission at 30 and 90 days, respectively. Inversely, factors associated with the least likely chance of readmission were a laparoscopic approach (OR 0.646 and 0.641), elective admission (OR 0.824 and 0.779), and care in a teaching hospital (OR 0.784 and 0.798). CONCLUSION: SES is an independent predictor of readmission at 30 and 90 days following open and laparoscopic ventral and inguinal hernia repair. Patients with a lower socioeconomic status were more likely to undergo hernia repair in the emergent setting. Efforts toward mitigating SES disparities by potentially promoting MIS techniques, enhancing access to elective cases, and systematic approaches to perioperative care for this disadvantaged population can potentially enhance overall hernia outcomes.


Subject(s)
Hernia, Inguinal , Hernia, Ventral , Laparoscopy , Hernia, Inguinal/complications , Hernia, Ventral/surgery , Herniorrhaphy/methods , Humans , Laparoscopy/methods , Patient Readmission , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Social Class , United States/epidemiology
2.
Surg Clin North Am ; 98(5): 1059-1072, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30243447

ABSTRACT

Lower gastrointestinal bleeding entails a range of severity and a multitude of options for localization and control of bleeding. With experience in trauma, critical care, endoscopy, and definitive surgical interventions, general surgeons are equipped to manage this condition in various clinical settings. This article examines traditional and emerging options for bleeding localization and control available to general surgeons.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/diagnosis , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology , Lower Gastrointestinal Tract , Computed Tomography Angiography , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Endovascular Procedures , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/therapy , Humans
3.
Am J Surg ; 214(1): 14-18, 2017 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27823754

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recent literature suggests the majority of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage does not require intervention. One recently described clinical decision rule was sensitive in identifying patients requiring critical care interventions in an urban setting. We sought to validate its effectiveness in our predominately rural setting. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted of adult patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage. The rule, based on age, initial Glasgow coma scale score, and presence of a non-isolated head injury, was applied to externally validate the previously reported findings. RESULTS: In our population, the rule displayed a sensitivity of 0.923, specificity of 0.251, positive predictive value of 0.393, and negative predictive value of 0.862. The area under curve was 0.587. While our population has a similar adjusted head injury severity score as that from which the rule was developed, significant differences in age and intracranial hemorrhage pattern were noted. CONCLUSIONS: The rule displayed decreased performance in our population, most likely secondary to differences in age and intracranial hemorrhage patterns. Prospective evaluation and cost-savings analysis are appropriate subsequent steps for the rule.


Subject(s)
Decision Support Techniques , Intensive Care Units , Intracranial Hemorrhage, Traumatic/epidemiology , Patient Admission , Age Factors , Blood Alcohol Content , Female , Glasgow Coma Scale , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Kansas/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Systole , Trauma Centers
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL