ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To determine among general practitioners (GPs) the most common clinical findings that raised concern for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and necessitated an orthopedic outpatient referral. In addition, we assessed the sensitivity and specificity of the most common of these clinical findings. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a multicenter retrospective review of all referrals by GPs to local orthopedic outpatient departments for DDH over a 12-month period. All patients had undergone pelvic radiographs, and the acetabular index (AI) was measured. The AI was used as a reference test to assess the accuracy of the clinical examination in diagnosing DDH. Sensitivity and specificity of each clinical sign was calculated. RESULTS: Twenty-six of 174 (14.9%) referred patients were diagnosed with DDH, defined as an AI score > 30. The most common indication for referral, per the GP letter was asymmetrical skin folds (97 patients, 45.8%), followed by hip click (42 patients, 19.8%), and limb shortening (34 patients, 16%). Sensitivities and specificities, respectively, among findings were asymmetric skin folds 46.2% (95% CI 26.6%-66.6%) and 42.6% (95% CI 34.5%-51.0%), hip click 23.1% (95% CI 9.0%-43.6%) and 75.7% (95% CI 67.9%-82.3%), limb shortening 30.8% (95% CI 14.3%-51.8%) and 82.4% (75.3%-88.2%), and reduced abduction 19.2% (95% CI 6.6%-39.4%) and 91.9% (95% CI 86.3%-95.7%). Using logistic regression analysis, no clinical sign was found to be a statistically significant indicator of an abnormal AI. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical examination by GPs does not reliably detect radiographically-defined DDH. None of the clinical findings by the GP showed an acceptable level of sensitivity. Absence of reduced abduction and limb shortening are relevant negatives given the high level of specificity of these signs.
Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , General Practice/standards , Hip Dislocation/diagnosis , Physical Examination/standards , Referral and Consultation , Cohort Studies , Female , General Practice/trends , General Practitioners/standards , General Practitioners/trends , Hip Dislocation/epidemiology , Hip Dislocation/therapy , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Physical Examination/trends , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methodsABSTRACT
Cerebral Palsy (CP) describes a heterogenous group of non-progressive disorders of posture or movement, causing activity limitation, due to a lesion in the developing brain. CP is an umbrella term for a heterogenous condition and is, therefore, descriptive rather than a diagnosis. Each case requires detailed consideration of etiology. Our understanding of the underlying cause of CP has developed significantly, with areas such as inflammation, epigenetics and genetic susceptibility to subsequent insults providing new insights. Alongside this, there has been increasing recognition of the multi-organ dysfunction (MOD) associated with CP, in particular in children with higher levels of motor impairment. Therefore, CP should not be seen as an unchanging disorder caused by a solitary insult but rather, as a condition which evolves over time. Assessment of multi-organ function may help to prevent complications in later childhood or adulthood. It may also contribute to an improved understanding of the etiology and thus may have an implication in prevention, interventional methods and therapies. MOD in CP has not yet been quantified and a scoring system may prove useful in allowing advanced clinical planning and follow-up of children with CP. Additionally, several biomarkers hold promise in assisting with long-term monitoring. Clinicians should be aware of the multi-system complications that are associated with CP and which may present significant diagnostic challenges given that many children with CP communicate non-verbally. A step-wise, logical, multi-system approach is required to ensure that the best care is provided to these children. This review summarizes multi-organ dysfunction in children with CP whilst highlighting emerging research and gaps in our knowledge. We identify some potential organ-specific biomarkers which may prove useful in developing guidelines for follow-up and management of these children throughout their lifespan.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnoea is common in children and, if untreated, can lead to multiple medical sequelae. The Childhood Adenotonsillectomy Trial demonstrated benefit from early surgical intervention, but rapid access to such treatment is not always available. AIMS: To examine the recent literature on non-surgical aspects of the management of paediatric obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). METHODS: The English language literature was searched for articles on the conservative management of OSA. RESULTS: In mild cases of OSA, intra-nasal steroids and other anti-inflammatory medications may give relief in mild cases of OSA, but the long-term safety of these treatments has not been established. Weight loss in obese children has been shown to be effective in selected patients but is limited in practice. Non-invasive ventilation may be effective but compliance can be a major obstacle. Oral appliances are effective by stenting the pharyngeal airway, but research in this area is limited. CONCLUSIONS: There are number of potential, if not proven, alternative management strategies for children with OSA, which could be considered in the absence of early surgical intervention.