Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Laryngoscope ; 2023 Dec 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38053413

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe the incidence of head and neck trauma related to electric bicycles and to characterize head and neck injury patterns seen in electric bicycle (eBike) users versus pedal bicyclists in the United States. METHODS: The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) was queried from 2009 to 2020 for patients with head and neck injuries related to electric and pedal bicycles. Extracted data included patient demographics, injury patterns, hospital admission, and helmet use. Univariate chi-squared analyses were performed to compare demographics and injury patterns between bicycle groups. Effect sizes were reported with Cramer V values (V). RESULTS: The incidence of eBike-related head and neck injuries increased from 2993 in 2009 to 9916 in 2020. Compared to pedal bicycle users, eBike users were more likely to have head injuries (60.4% vs. 52.0%) and fractures (10.9% vs. 6.0%), and were more likely to require hospitalization (20.6% vs. 10.4%). The effect size of helmet use was significantly greater in eBike users compared to pedal bicyclists when examining distributions of age group (V = 0.203 vs. V = 0.079), injury location (V = 0.220 vs. V = 0.082), and injury type (V = 0.162 vs. V = 0.059). Helmeted injuries in eBike users more commonly involved neck injuries and sprains, rather than head injuries and fractures. CONCLUSION: Head and neck trauma related to eBike use is increasing in the United States. Injury patterns and admission rates reflect greater injury severity in eBike users compared to pedal bicyclists. Helmet use may be particularly beneficial in mitigating head and neck injury in eBike users. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 2023.

2.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 169(6): 1523-1532, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37595108

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of age and frailty on 30-day outcomes following surgery for oral squamous cavity carcinoma (OSCC). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional analysis. SETTING: American College of Surgeons' National Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. METHODS: Patients who underwent OSCC resection were queried via NSQIP (2015-2020). Cases were stratified by age (18-65, 65-75, and older than 75) as well as by modified frailty index scores (mFI 0, mFI 1, and mFI 2+) for comparative analyses. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted to examine demographics, perioperative outcomes, and 30-day postoperative adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 3238 patients who underwent OSCC surgery were identified and categorized as nongeriatric ("NGA," age 18-65), younger geriatric ("YGA," age 65-75), and older geriatric ("OGA," age >75) adults. Compared to NGA, geriatric patients had higher the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, higher modified frailty index scores, and more comorbidities such as hypertension, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive disease, and diabetes (p < .001). YGAs and OGAs were also less likely to undergo neck dissection (p < .001), composite resection (p = .006), and free flap reconstruction compared to NGAs (p < .001). When controlling for confounders, age was not independently associated with an increased risk of poor outcomes. On the other hand, frailty was found to be independently associated with a higher risk of adverse events (odds ratio: 1.40 [1.15-1.70], p < .001 for mFI 1, odds ratio: 1.45 [1.04-2.02], p = .027 for mFI 2+). CONCLUSION: A higher mFI score, not older age, is associated with an increased risk of 30-day complications following OSCC surgery.


Subject(s)
Frailty , Neoplasms , Adult , Humans , Aged , Adolescent , Young Adult , Middle Aged , Frailty/complications , Frailty/epidemiology , Risk Assessment , Retrospective Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Risk Factors , Mouth , Neoplasms/complications
3.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 146(1): 41-51, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32590640

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nonsurgical rhinoplasty using filler injections has become a common procedure in cosmetic practices. This is offered to patients that prefer a temporary outcome or would like to avoid general anesthesia. In addition, it can be used in postrhinoplasty patients to correct nasal deformities or irregularities. This systematic review highlights common filler types and injection techniques, and associated patient satisfaction and complications to further guide practitioners. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using keywords and Medical Subject Headings search terms. PubMed, EmBase, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus were searched using the appropriate search terms. Data collected from each study included patient satisfaction and complications, in addition to injection material, location, and technique. RESULTS: Four thousand six hundred thirty-two studies were found based on search criteria. After full-text screening for inclusion and exclusion criteria, 23 studies were included. A total of 1600 patients underwent nonsurgical rhinoplasty, most commonly with hyaluronic acid (73.38 percent), followed by calcium hydroxyapatite (12.44 percent). Nearly 95 percent of patients were satisfied with results, and there were only 26 relatively minor complications reported. There were no reports of vascular complications such as skin necrosis or visual compromise. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the authors' review of the literature, nonsurgical rhinoplasty is an effective temporary alternative to traditional augmentation rhinoplasty for corrections of nasal shape with a high degree of patient satisfaction. Complications may be underreported, and thus further investigation is needed to better understand the true incidence of major complications related to vascular compromise.


Subject(s)
Dermal Fillers/therapeutic use , Rhinoplasty/methods , Biocompatible Materials/administration & dosage , Humans , Injections, Subcutaneous/methods , Patient Satisfaction
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL