Transfusion-induced HLA sensitization in wait-list patients and kidney transplant recipients.

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) sensitization remains an impediment to successful solid organ transplantation, whether it be chances of receiving a transplant offer or subsequent transplant longevity. Current treatments targeting HLA antibodies lack long-term effectiveness; therefore, preventing HLA sensitization should remain a priority in all potential wait-list candidates and transplant recipients. Recent advances in the management of anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease may reduce the need for red cell transfusions. However, data from several anemia intervention studies of novel therapeutic agents have shown that a need for transfusion will remain. It has also been increasingly recognized that blood transfusions following kidney transplantation, especially in the peri-operative period, are common. Routine data on transfusion incidence, indications, and outcomes are not captured by most kidney and transplant registries across the globe. This restricts the evidence to inform both clinicians and patients on the clinical effects of transfusion, which have been considered both an allogeneic stimulus and to be immunomodulatory.This review aims to provide an update on what is currently known about transfusion-induced HLA sensitization in wait-list candidates and transplant recipients, summarizes where evidence is lacking, and demonstrates the distinct need for patient blood management guidelines in the field of kidney transplantation.

Application of HLA molecular level mismatching in ethnically diverse kidney transplant recipients receiving a steroid-sparing immunosuppression protocol.

Defining HLA mismatch at the molecular compared with the antigen level has been shown to be superior in predicting alloimmune responses, although data from across different patient populations are lacking. Using HLA-Matchmaker, HLA-EMMA and PIRCHE-II, this study reports on the association between molecular mismatch (MolMM) and de novo donor-specific antibody (dnDSA) in an ethnically diverse kidney transplant population receiving a steroid-sparing immunosuppression protocol. Of the 419 patients, 51 (12.2%) patients had dnDSA. De novo DSA were seen more frequently with males, primary transplants, patients receiving tacrolimus monotherapy, and unfavorably HLA-matched transplants. There was a strong correlation between MolMM load and antigen mismatch, although significant variation of MolMM load existed at each antigen mismatch. MolMM loads differed significantly by recipient ethnicity, although ethnicity alone was not associated with dnDSA. On multivariate analysis, increasing MolMM loads associated with dnDSA, whereas antigen mismatch did not. De novo DSA against 8 specific epitopes occurred at high frequency; of the 51 patients, 47 (92.1%) patients with dnDSA underwent a pretreatment biopsy, with 21 (44.7%) having evidence of alloimmune injury. MolMM has higher specificity than antigen mismatching at identifying recipients who are at low risk of dnDSA while receiving minimalist immunosuppression. Immunogenicity consideration is important, with more work needed on identification, especially across different ethnic groups.

Foreword: Preventing COVID-19 Among the Immunocompromised Population.

The COVID-19 pandemic represented 1 of the more significant and unique public health challenges facing the global community, particularly afflicting those with compromised immune systems. These immunocompromised individuals were readily recognized as a group at high risk of infection by SARS-CoV-2 and the associated severe outcomes of COVID-19. Although preventive strategies such as vaccination are important, initial clinical vaccine trials did not enroll immunocompromised individuals; in-depth evaluations of the safety, immunogenicity, and real-world outcomes associated with these vaccines were conducted in this population thereafter. As immunogenicity data of COVID-19 vaccination among this disparate group of individuals emerged, vaccination strategies were adapted to address outstanding challenges and further protect the entirety of this population. This 8-part journal supplement characterizes in-depth the mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination strategies across the spectrum of immunocompromised individuals, focusing on the ongoing approaches to challenges facing this group as the pandemic continues to evolve.

Application of the Banff Human Organ Transplant Panel to kidney transplant biopsies with features suspicious for antibody-mediated rejection.

The Banff Classification for Allograft Pathology includes the use of gene expression in the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) of kidney transplants, but a predictive set of genes for classifying biopsies with 'incomplete' phenotypes has not yet been studied. Here, we developed and assessed a gene score that, when applied to biopsies with features of AMR, would identify cases with a higher risk of allograft loss. To do this, RNA was extracted from a continuous retrospective cohort of 349 biopsies randomized 2:1 to include 220 biopsies in a discovery cohort and 129 biopsies in a validation cohort. The biopsies were divided into three groups: 31 that fulfilled the 2019 Banff Criteria for active AMR, 50 with histological features of AMR but not meeting the full criteria (Suspicious-AMR), and 269 with no features of active AMR (No-AMR). Gene expression analysis using the 770 gene Banff Human Organ Transplant NanoString panel was carried out with LASSO Regression performed to identify a parsimonious set of genes predictive of AMR. We identified a nine gene score that was highly predictive of active AMR (accuracy 0.92 in the validation cohort) and was strongly correlated with histological features of AMR. In biopsies suspicious for AMR, our gene score was strongly associated with risk of allograft loss and independently associated with allograft loss in multivariable analysis. Thus, we show that a gene expression signature in kidney allograft biopsy samples can help classify biopsies with incomplete AMR phenotypes into groups that correlate strongly with histological features and outcomes.

Steroid Sparing Maintenance Immunosuppression in Highly Sensitised Patients Receiving Alemtuzumab Induction.

This analysis reports on the outcomes of two different steroid sparing immunosuppression protocols used in the management of 120 highly sensitised patients (HSPs) with cRF>85% receiving Alemtuzumab induction, 53 maintained on tacrolimus (FK) monotherapy and 67 tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil (FK + MMF). There was no difference in the median cRF or mode of sensitisation between the two groups, although the FK + MMF cohort received more poorly matched grafts. There was no difference in one-year patient or allograft survival, however rejection free survival was inferior with FK monotherapy compared with FK + MMF at 65.4% and 91.4% respectively, p < 0.01. DSA-free survival was comparable. Whilst there was no difference in rates of BK between the cohorts, CMV-free survival was inferior in the FK + MMF group at 86.0% compared with 98.1% in the FK group, p = 0.026. One-year post-transplant diabetes free survival was 89.6% and 100.0% in the FK and FK + MMF group respectively, p = 0.027, the difference attributed to the use of prednisolone to treat rejection in the FK cohort, p = 0.006. We report good outcomes in HSPs utilising a steroid sparing protocol with Alemtuzumab induction and FK + MMF maintenance and provide granular data on immunological and infectious complications to inform steroid avoidance in these patient groups.

Diagnostic application of transcripts associated with antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant biopsies.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is reached using the Banff Classification for Allograft Pathology, which now includes gene expression analysis. In this study, we investigate the application of 'increased expression of thoroughly validated gene transcripts/classifiers strongly associated with AMR' as diagnostic criteria. METHOD: We used quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction for 10 genes associated with AMR in a retrospective cohort of 297 transplant biopsies, including biopsies that met the full diagnostic criteria for AMR, even without molecular data (AMR, n = 27), biopsies that showed features of AMR, but that would only meet criteria for AMR with increased transcripts [suspicious for AMR (AMRsusp), n = 49] and biopsies that would never meet criteria for AMR (No-AMR, n = 221). RESULTS: A 10-gene AMR score trained by a receiver-operating characteristic to identify AMR found 16 cases with a high score among the AMRsusp cases (AMRsusp-high) that had significantly worse graft survival than those with a low score (AMRsusp-low; n = 33). In both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis, the AMR 10-gene score was significantly associated with an increased hazard ratio (HR) for graft loss (GL) in the AMRsusp group (HR = 1.109, P = 0.004 and HR = 1.138, P = 0.012, respectively), but not in the whole cohort. Net reclassification index and integrated discrimination improvement analyses demonstrated improved risk classification and superior discrimination, respectively, for GL when considering the gene score in addition to histological and serological data, but only in the AMRsusp group, not the whole cohort. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that a gene score strongly associated with AMR helps identify cases at higher risk of GL in biopsies that are suspicious for AMR but do not meet full criteria.

Prevalence of frailty and cognitive impairment in older transplant candidates - a preview to the Kidney Transplantation in Older People (KTOP): impact of frailty on outcomes study.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation in older people has increased, however older transplant recipients experience mixed outcomes that invariably impacts on their quality of life. The increased vulnerability of older end stage kidney disease patients to frailty and cognitive impairment, may partially explain the differences in outcomes observed. The Kidney Transplantation in Older People (KTOP): impact of frailty on clinical outcomes study is an active clinical study aiming to explore the experience of older people waiting for and undergoing transplantation. In this manuscript we present the study protocol, the study cohort, and the prevalence of frailty and cognitive impairment identified at recruitment. METHODS: The KTOP study is a single centre, prospective, mixed methods, observational study. Recruitment began in October 2019. All patients aged 60 or above either active on the deceased donor waitlist or undergoing live donor transplantation were eligible for recruitment. Recruited participants completed a series of questionnaires assessing frailty, cognition, and quality of life, which are repeated at defined time points whilst on the waitlist and post-transplant. Clinical data was concurrently collected. Any participants identified as frail or vulnerable were also eligible for enrolment into the qualitative sub-study. RESULTS: Two hundred eight participants have been recruited (age 60-78). Baseline Montreal Cognitive Assessments were available for 173 participants, with 63 (36.4%) participants identified as having scores below normal (score < 26). Edmonton Frail Scale assessments were available for 184 participants, with 29 participants (15.8%) identified as frail (score ≥ 8), and a further 37 participants (20.1%) identified as being vulnerable (score 6-7). CONCLUSION: In the KTOP study cohort we have identified a prevalence of 36.4% of participants with MoCA scores suggestive of cognitive impairment, and a prevalence of frailty of 15.8% at recruitment. A further 20.1% were vulnerable. As formal testing for cognition and frailty is not routinely incorporated into the work up of older people across many units, the presence and significance of these conditions is likely not known. Ultimately the KTOP study will report on how these parameters evolve over time and following a transplant, and describe their impact on quality of life and clinical outcomes.

Longevity of SARS-CoV-2 immune responses in hemodialysis patients and protection against reinfection.

Patients with end stage kidney disease receiving in-center hemodialysis (ICHD) have had high rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Following infection, patients receiving ICHD frequently develop circulating antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, even with asymptomatic infection. Here, we investigated the durability and functionality of the immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients receiving ICHD. Three hundred and fifty-six such patients were longitudinally screened for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and underwent routine PCR-testing for symptomatic and asymptomatic infection. Patients were regularly screened for nucleocapsid protein (anti-NP) and receptor binding domain (anti-RBD) antibodies, and those who became seronegative at six months were screened for SARS-CoV-2 specific T-cell responses. One hundred and twenty-nine (36.2%) patients had detectable antibody to anti-NP at time zero, of whom 127 also had detectable anti-RBD. Significantly, at six months, 71/111 (64.0%) and 99/116 (85.3%) remained anti-NP and anti-RBD seropositive, respectively. For patients who retained antibody, both anti-NP and anti-RBD levels were reduced significantly after six months. Eleven patients who were anti-NP seropositive at time zero, had no detectable antibody at six months; of whom eight were found to have SARS-CoV-2 antigen specific T cell responses. Independent of antibody status at six months, patients with baseline positive SARS-CoV-2 serology were significantly less likely to have PCR confirmed infection over the following six months. Thus, patients receiving ICHD mount durable immune responses six months post SARS-CoV-2 infection, with fewer than 3% of patients showing no evidence of humoral or cellular immunity.

Humoral and T-cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients receiving immunosuppression.

OBJECTIVE: There is an urgent need to assess the impact of immunosuppressive therapies on the immunogenicity and efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. METHODS: Serological and T-cell ELISpot assays were used to assess the response to first-dose and second-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (with either BNT162b2 mRNA or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccines) in 140 participants receiving immunosuppression for autoimmune rheumatic and glomerular diseases. RESULTS: Following first-dose vaccine, 28.6% (34/119) of infection-naïve participants seroconverted and 26.0% (13/50) had detectable T-cell responses to SARS-CoV-2. Immune responses were augmented by second-dose vaccine, increasing seroconversion and T-cell response rates to 59.3% (54/91) and 82.6% (38/46), respectively. B-cell depletion at the time of vaccination was associated with failure to seroconvert, and tacrolimus therapy was associated with diminished T-cell responses. Reassuringly, only 8.7% of infection-naïve patients had neither antibody nor T-cell responses detected following second-dose vaccine. In patients with evidence of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection (19/140), all mounted high-titre antibody responses after first-dose vaccine, regardless of immunosuppressive therapy. CONCLUSION: SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are immunogenic in patients receiving immunosuppression, when assessed by a combination of serology and cell-based assays, although the response is impaired compared with healthy individuals. B-cell depletion following rituximab impairs serological responses, but T-cell responses are preserved in this group. We suggest that repeat vaccine doses for serological non-responders should be investigated as means to induce more robust immunological response.

High Prevalence of Asymptomatic COVID-19 Infection in Hemodialysis Patients Detected Using Serologic Screening.

BACKGROUND: Strategies to minimize the risk of transmission and acquisition of COVID-19 infection in patients with ESKD receiving in-center hemodialysis have been rapidly implemented across the globe. Despite these interventions, confirmed COVID-19 infection rates have been high in the United Kingdom. Prevalence of asymptomatic disease in an adult hemodialysis population has not been reported. Also, to our knowledge, the development of humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 has not been previously reported in this population. Although serologic testing does not provide information on the infectivity of patients, seroprevalence studies may enable investigation of exposure within dialysis units and hence, assessment of current screening strategies. METHODS: To investigate the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in a hemodialysis population, we used the Abbott IgG assay with the Architect system to test serum samples from 356 patients receiving in-center hemodialysis for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. RESULTS: Of 356 patients, 121 had been symptomatic when screened before a dialysis session and received an RT-PCR test; 79 (22.2% of the total study population) tested positive for COVID-19. Serologic testing of all 356 patients found 129 (36.2%) who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Only two patients with PCR-confirmed infection did not seroconvert. Of the 129 patients with SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, 52 (40.3%) had asymptomatic disease or undetected disease by PCR testing alone. CONCLUSIONS: We found a high seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in patients receiving in-center hemodialysis. Serologic evidence of previous infection in asymptomatic or PCR-negative patients suggests that current diagnostic screening strategies may be limited in their ability to detect acute infection.

Donor-specific antibodies detected by single antigen beads alone can help risk stratify patients undergoing retransplantation across a repeat HLA mismatch.

Whether reexposure to mismatched HLA antigens (RMM) in the setting of a negative crossmatch is associated with increased immunological risk remains an area of uncertainty. This is due to evidence derived predominantly from registry data, which lacks comprehensive information on alloantibody and rejection. In this study, we analyze the impact of low-level preformed donor-specific antibodies (DSA) against an RMM on transplant outcomes. From 1988 consecutive renal transplant recipients, we analyzed 179 patients undergoing retransplantation, of whom 55 had a RMM. All patients were crossmatch negative and preformed DSA were detected by single antigen beads alone. Multivariate analysis revealed that patients with preformed DSA against an RMM were independently at risk of antibody-mediated rejection (HR 8.70 [3.42-22.10], P < .0001) and death-censored allograft loss (HR 3.08 [1.17-8.14], P = .023). In addition, prior transplant nephrectomy (HR 2.04 [1.00-4.17], P = .0495) was also associated with allograft failure, whereas receiving a retransplant that was matched at HLA class II was associated with a favorable outcome (HR 0.37 [0.14-0.99], P = .047). In the absence of preformed DSA, an RMM was not associated with de novo DSA development, rejection, or allograft loss. In conclusion, an RMM portends increased immunological risk only in the presence of a preformed DSA in patients undergoing retransplantation.

Molecular assessment of antibody-mediated rejection in human pancreas allograft biopsies.

Pancreas transplant longevity is limited by immune rejection, which is diagnosed by graft biopsy using the Banff Classification. The histological criteria for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) are poorly reproducible and inconsistently associated with outcome. We hypothesized that a 34-gene set associated with antibody-mediated rejection in other solid organ transplants could improve diagnosis in pancreas grafts. The AMR 34-gene set, comprising endothelial, natural killer cell and inflammatory genes, was quantified using the NanoString platform in 52 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded pancreas transplant biopsies from 41 patients: 15 with pure AMR or mixed rejection, 22 with T cell-mediated rejection/borderline and 15 without rejection. The AMR 34-gene set was significantly increased in pure AMR and mixed rejection (P = .001) vs no rejection. The gene set predicted histological AMR with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC) of 0.714 (P = .004). The AMR 34-gene set was the only biopsy feature significantly predictive of allograft failure in univariate analysis (P = .048). Adding gene expression to DSA and histology increased ROC AUC for the prediction of failure from 0.736 to 0.770, but this difference did not meet statistical significance. In conclusion, assessment of transcripts has the potential to improve diagnosis and outcome prediction in pancreas graft biopsies.

Shared alloimmune responses against blood and transplant donors result in adverse clinical outcomes following blood transfusion post-renal transplantation.

De novo HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSA) following transplantation are associated with alloimmune injury and allograft failure. Blood transfusions are allogeneic, and when given posttransplant (PTBT) they may independently increase the risk of HLA antibody development. This study aims to analyze the development of HLA transfusion-specific antibodies (TSA) to blood donors of transfusions given posttransplant and examine the impact on clinical outcomes. A total of 244 blood donors of transfusions received by 86 transplant patients (46 who developed a DSA post transfusion and 40 who remained DSA negative) were HLA typed. De novo TSA developed against 150/244 (61.5%) blood donors. In 70/150 (46.7%) cases the TSA was of shared HLA antibody specificity with a DSA response in the recipient (DSA+ = TSA+). This occurred when there was a greater overall HLA match between the blood and transplant donor. DSA+ = TSA+ patients had increased risk of allograft failure (P = .0025) and AMR (P = .02) compared with the DSA+ ≠ TSA+ patients. To conclude, PTBT may elicit de novo HLA antibodies. Enhanced HLA matching between the blood and transplant donor is more likely to result in a DSA and TSA of shared antibody specificities. Transfusion avoidance or the use of HLA matched or selected blood may reduce this risk and improve outcomes.

Clinical-pathological correlations in post-transplant thrombotic microangiopathy.

AIMS: Post-transplant thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is a rare and clinically challenging finding in renal transplant biopsies. In addition to recurrent atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome, TMA in renal transplants is associated with various conditions, such as calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) treatment, antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), viral infections, sepsis, pregnancy, malignancies, and surgery. The therapeutic implications of this diagnosis are considerable. In order to better understand post-transplant TMA and to identify histological or clinical differences between associated causes, we conducted a multicentre retrospective study. METHODS AND RESULTS: Clinical parameters and transplant renal biopsy findings from 81 patients with TMA were analysed. Biopsies from 38 patients were also analysed with electron microscopy. On the basis of clinical-pathological correlation, TMA was attributed to a main aetiology, whenever possible. TMA occurred at a median of 30 days post-transplantation. Systemic features of TMA were present in only 18% of cases. Twenty-two per cent of cases were attributed to CNI and 11% to ABMR. Although other potentially contributing factors were found in 56% of patients, in most cases (63%) no clearly attributable cause of TMA was identified. Histological differences between groups were minimal. The detection of ultrastructural features that are usually associated with ABMR may help to establish ABMR as the cause of TMA. CONCLUSIONS: Although CNI and ABMR appear to be the main contributors to post-transplant TMA, the aetiology of most cases is probably multifactorial, and TMA cannot be unequivocally attributed to a single underlying aetiology. Morphological features of TMA are not discriminating, but electron microscopy may help to identify ABMR-associated TMA.

Allosensitization after transplant failure: the role of graft nephrectomy and immunosuppression - a retrospective study.

There are conflicting data about the role of transplant nephrectomy and immunosuppression withdrawal on the development of allosensitization and the impact on re-transplantation. We divided 109 first graft recipients into two groups according to whether they underwent nephrectomy (NX+, n = 61) or their graft was left in situ (NX-, n = 48). Sera were assessed for HLA-A/B/Cw/DR/DQ antibodies at the time of NX/transplant failure and after 3, 6, 12, 24 months. The NX+ group showed a higher rate of donor specific antibody (DSA) and non-DSA human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody production at all the time points. Multivariable analysis showed that nephrectomy was a strong, independent risk factor for the development of DSAs after 12 and 24 months (P = 0.005 and 0.008). In the NX- group, low tacrolimus levels correlated with DSA formation (AUC 0.817, P = 0.002; best cut-off level 2.9 ng/ml). Analysis with a standardized pool of UK donors showed a more difficult grade of HLA matchability following nephrectomy compared with the NX- group. Nephrectomy is followed by the long-term production of DSA and non-DSA HLA antibodies and negatively impacts on the chances of finding a HLA-compatible kidney. Tacrolimus levels ≥3 ng/ml are protective against the development of allosensitization and could facilitate re-transplantation in the NX- group.

Circulating complement factor H-related proteins 1 and 5 correlate with disease activity in IgA nephropathy.

IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is a common cause of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal failure, especially in young people. Due to a wide range of clinical outcomes and difficulty in predicting response to immunosuppression, we need to understand why and identify which patients with IgAN will develop progressive renal impairment. A deletion polymorphism affecting the genes encoding the complement factor H-related protein (FHR)-1 and FHR-3 is robustly associated with protection against IgAN. Some FHR proteins, including FHR-1 and FHR-5, antagonize the ability of complement factor H (fH), the major negative regulator of the complement alternative pathway, to inhibit complement activation on surfaces, a process termed fH deregulation. From a large cohort of patients, we demonstrated that plasma FHR-1 and the FHR-1/fH ratio were elevated in IgAN and associated with progressive disease. Plasma FHR-1 negatively correlated with eGFR but remained elevated in patients with IgAN with normal eGFR. Serum FHR5 was slightly elevated in IgAN but did not correlate with eGFR. Neither FHR5 levels nor the FHR-5/fH ratio was associated with progressive disease. However, higher serum FHR-5 levels were associated with a lack of response to immunosuppression, the presence of endocapillary hypercellularity, and histology scores of disease severity (the Oxford Classification MEST score). Thus, FHR-1 and FHR-5 have a role in IgAN disease progression.