Traumaplasty: When and How to Perform Acute Arthroplasty for Fractures Around the Hip in the Elderly Patient.

Acute fractures around the hip are prevalent injuries associated with potentially devastating outcomes. The growing utilization of arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in the elderly is likely a result of improvements in reoperation rates and postoperative function. Compared to hemiarthroplasty, total hip arthroplasty is associated with a slight functional benefit that is unlikely noticeable for many patients, as well as minimal differences in complications and patient reported outcome measures. However, the evidence supporting cement use in femoral stem fixation is robust. Multiple high power randomized controlled trial-based studies indicate cement fixation brings more predictable outcomes and fewer reoperations. In the setting of acute acetabular fracture, total hip arthroplasty is a favorable approach for elderly patients and fracture patterns associated with increased risk of revision after open reduction and internal fixation. Variations in patient characteristics and fracture patterns demand careful consideration whenever selecting the optimal treatment. In fracture patient populations, comanagement is an important consideration when seeking to reduce complications and promote cost-effective quality care.

Good Short-Term Survivorship of Constrained Condylar Revision Knee Implants With Medial Pivot Kinematics: A Level IV Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: The need for revision total knee arthroplasty surgery is increasing worldwide, and, in many cases, a constrained implant is required to provide joint stability. The purpose of this study was to examine the early loosening and functional outcome of a novel constrained condylar (CCK) revision total knee system designed to have medial pivot (MP) kinematics. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed, collecting clinical data from all patients who underwent revision total knee arthroplasty using a novel MP CCK system with a minimum four-year clinical follow-up. Patient demographics, survivorship, complications, and Forgotten Joint Score were analyzed based upon chart review. RESULTS: There were 49 patients available for follow-up, who had a 100% survivorship free of aseptic loosening. All-cause revision survivorship was 92%. There were 4 patients who subsequently underwent rerevision. The causes for rerevision included periprosthetic joint infection in 2 patients, coronal plane instability in one patient, and a traumatic knee dislocation in one patient. There were 45 patients who completed the Forgotten Joint Score, who had an average of 49.8 (± 32.8, range 6.25 to 100). CONCLUSIONS: At 4 years, mid-term follow-up, this novel CCK revision total knee system designed to have MP kinematics had good patient-reported outcomes with no revision for aseptic loosening. Future studies should evaluate the mid- and long-term survivorship of this innovative implant.

Total Knee Arthroplasty Periprosthetic Joint Infection With Concomitant Extensor Mechanism Disruption and Soft-Tissue Defect: The Knee Arthroplasty Terrible Triad.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic infection (PJI) with concomitant extensor mechanism disruption (EMD) and soft-tissue defect-hereinafter termed the "Terrible Triad"-is a devastating complication following total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to define the surgical and clinical outcomes following management of a cohort of patients who have the Terrible Triad. METHODS: From 2000 to 2022, 127 patients underwent operative management for PJI alone, 25 for PJI with soft-tissue defects (defined as defects requiring flap reconstruction or being a factor contributing to the decision of performing above-knee amputation or arthrodesis), 14 for PJI with EMD, and 22 for the Terrible Triad. A composite outcome of infection status, range of motion, extensor lag, and ambulatory status at final follow-up was used to compare the proportion of patients in each group with a favorable overall knee outcome. Differences between groups were determined using one-way analyses of variance with post hoc Tukey's tests and Pearson's Chi-square tests or Fisher's exact tests with post hoc Bonferroni adjustments, where applicable. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated for comparison of the overall knee outcome between groups. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for patient mortality was performed. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 8.4 years and similar between groups (P = .064). Patients who had the Terrible Triad had a 45.5% incidence of above-knee amputation, or arthrodesis, and an 86.4% incidence of an unfavorable outcome. Compared to patients in the PJI group, patients in the PJI who had a soft-tissue defect (OR = 5.8, 95% CI [confidence interval] 2.2 to 15.7), PJI with EMD (OR = 3.7, 95%CI 1.0 to 12.9), and Terrible Triad groups (OR = 11.6, 95% CI 3.3 to 41.5) showed higher odds of an unfavorable knee outcome. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the total knee arthroplasty Terrible Triad is a dreaded diagnosis with poor outcomes. Clinicians and patients might consider early treatment with amputation or arthrodesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Hemiarthroplasty for Unstable Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures: A Matched Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Geriatric intertrochanteric fractures remain a major public health concern due to the considerable disability, morbidity, mortality, and health care costs associated with these injuries. The underlying poor bone quality and unstable nature of these fractures makes them difficult to treat. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures when compared to the traditional treatment options of open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). METHODS: A retrospective 1:1 matched cohort of 150 patients who had intertrochanteric fractures treated with either hemiarthroplasty or ORIF was developed using a local institutional database. Demographic, perioperative, and postoperative variables were collected with at least 1 year of patient follow-up. Statistical analyses were performed with use of Student's t-tests, chi-square tests, and analysis of variance. RESULTS: Unstable intertrochanteric fractures treated with ORIF were associated with significantly more blood loss and an increased need for revision surgery. This effect was most pronounced in Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification type 31.A3 fractures, as patients treated with ORIF experienced significantly slower postoperative mobilization, increased blood loss, increased readmission, and revision surgery rates. Hemiarthroplasty was associated with an increased risk of greater trochanter escape, which did not appear to effect outcomes in this subset of patients. CONCLUSION: Hemiarthroplasty may improve outcomes for patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures. The benefit of this technique is likely maximized in Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association type 31.A3 fractures. It remains a good option in the hands of experienced surgeons.

2023 American College of Rheumatology and American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Clinical Practice Guideline for the Optimal Timing of Elective Hip or Knee Arthroplasty for Patients With Symptomatic Moderate-to-Severe Osteoarthritis or Advanced Symptomatic Osteonecrosis With Secondary Arthritis for Whom Nonoperative Therapy Is Ineffective.

OBJECTIVE: To develop evidence-based consensus recommendations for the optimal timing of hip and knee arthroplasty to improve patient-important outcomes including, but not limited to, pain, function, infection, hospitalization, and death at 1 year for patients with symptomatic and radiographic moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis or advanced symptomatic osteonecrosis with secondary arthritis of the hip or knee who have previously attempted nonoperative therapy, and for whom nonoperative therapy was ineffective, and who have chosen to undergo elective hip or knee arthroplasty (collectively referred to as TJA). METHODS: We developed 13 clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, outcomes (PICO) questions. After a systematic literature review, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to rate the quality of evidence (high, moderate, low, or very low), and evidence tables were created. A Voting Panel, including 13 physicians and patients, discussed the PICO questions until consensus was achieved on the direction (for/against) and strength (strong/conditional) of the recommendations. RESULTS: The panel conditionally recommended against delaying TJA to pursue additional nonoperative treatment including physical therapy, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, ambulatory aids, and intraarticular injections. It conditionally recommended delaying TJA for nicotine reduction or cessation. The panel conditionally recommended delay for better glycemic control for patients who have diabetes mellitus, although no specific measure or level was identified. There was consensus that obesity by itself was not a reason for delay, but that weight loss should be strongly encouraged, and the increase in operative risk should be discussed. The panel conditionally recommended against delay in patients who have severe deformity or bone loss, or in patients who have a neuropathic joint. Evidence for all recommendations was graded as low or very low quality. CONCLUSION: This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations regarding the optimal timing of TJA in patients who have symptomatic and radiographic moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis or advanced symptomatic osteonecrosis with secondary arthritis for whom nonoperative therapy was ineffective to improve patient-important outcomes, including pain, function, infection, hospitalization, and death at 1 year. We acknowledge that the evidence is of low quality primarily due to indirectness and hope future research will allow for further refinement of the recommendations.

The influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on total hip and knee arthroplasty in Ontario: a population-level analysis.

BACKGROUND: The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on elective orthopedic surgery have yet to be reported at the population level in Canada. We sought to detail the effect of the pandemic on patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and on surgeons with respect to surgical volume, wait times and health care quality. METHOD: We compared patient length of hospital stay, revisions, readmissions and emergency department presentations between pre-pandemic (April 2019 to February 2020) and postpandemic (April 2020 to February 2021) cohorts of patients who underwent inpatient THAs or TKAs. Wait times for THA and TKA in Ontario were similarly collected. RESULTS: Case volumes for THA and TKA decreased by 30% during the pandemic. There were significantly fewer medically complex cases during this time period (p < 0.001). Length of hospital stay was reduced from 2.2 to 1.8 days (p < 0.001). Patients were less likely to visit the emergency department within 30 days of surgery (p < 0.001). Patients who underwent TKA were also more likely to be discharged directly home (p = 0.025). There was no difference in rate of revision surgery or readmission within 30 days. The proportion of patients meeting the standard benchmark wait time in Ontario was significantly lower (p < 0.001). The corresponding wait time to treatment increased significantly (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on elective THA and TKA case volumes and wait times was significant. Patients having surgery during the pandemic were less medically complex, had shorter length of hospital stays and had significantly less health care utilization.

Impact of outpatient total hip or knee replacement on informal caregivers at home: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Although total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) offer significant cost savings to our health care system, the degree to which the burden of postoperative care has been transferred onto the informal caregiver is often overlooked. We performed a scoping review to identify the characteristics and factors that contribute to the burden of care experienced after outpatient THA and TKA. METHODS: We systematically searched electronic literature databases according to scoping review guidelines from inception to June 2021 for articles reporting the experiences of informal caregivers providing care for patients having undergone outpatient THA or TKA. Our review included English-language studies that sought to elucidate the impact on caregivers in the acute postoperative period (up to 6 wk after surgery). RESULTS: Our search yielded 1423 unique articles, which were screened for inclusion. We removed 310 duplicate records and excluded another 1099 articles because they did not meet the inclusion criteria for full-text screening with relevancy. We thus assessed 14 articles for full-text review, and none were found to meet our inclusion criteria. CONCLUSION: We found no published data pertaining to the burden borne by informal caregivers who provide perioperative care to patients who have undergone ambulatory THA or TKA. Further research is needed to identify, quantify and determine the modifiability of the various characteristics and factors that contribute to caregiver burden in the outpatient setting.

Quality indicators in primary elective total hip and knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) represent a significant portion of healthcare spending and are high-priority for quality improvement initiatives. This study aims to develop quality indicators (QIs) in the care of primary elective THA and TKA patients. These QIs serve a number of purposes including documentation of the quality of care, objective comparisons of institutions/providers, facilitating pay-for-performance initiatives, and supporting accountability, regulation, and accreditation. METHODS: A guideline-based approach, initially described by Kötter et al., was utilized. Eight clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) were evaluated for candidate indicators (CIs). CIs with high-quality evidence and consensus statements were extracted. Eighteen additional CIs were included from previous work that evaluated quality improvement databases. Each CI and supporting evidence was submitted for independent review by an expert panel. The RAND Corporation-University of California, Los Angeles (RAND/UCLA) appropriateness methodology was utilized and items were rated based on validity, reliability, and feasibility of measurement. After two rounds of ratings and ranking, a final ranked list of QIs was obtained. RESULTS: Fifty-six CIs were identified from the literature and CPGs or proposed by the expert panel. Two rounds of voting resulted in 12 total QIs that were deemed appropriate measures of high-quality care. The final 12 QIs were ranked by order of importance: use of peri-operative tranexamic acid, infusion of prophylactic antibiotics prior to inflation of tourniquet, appropriate post-operative venous thromboembolic prophylaxis, complication rate, rate of secondary procedure, readmission rate, early mobilization, average change of pre- to one year post-operative functional status, use of multimodal analgesia, use of neuraxial anesthesia, use of peri-articular injection in TKA, and use of pre-operative PO analgesia. CONCLUSION: This study is an expert opinion based on parameters observed in modern and high-quality academic settings. Twelve QIs are proposed to assess the quality of care in the peri-operative management of primary elective THA and TKA patients.

Complications and early recovery following hip hemiarthroplasty through the direct anterior approach: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Minimizing complications is an important focus in hip hemiarthroplasty (HHA) for femoral neck fracture (FNF) patients given the associated high morbidity and mortality rates. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the clinical and functional outcomes associated with the direct anterior approach (DAA) compared to other surgical approaches used for HHA. METHODS: Studies evaluating HHA-treated FNFs using the DAA were compared through meta-analysis to all other surgical approaches combined and as distinct subgroups. Outcomes included overall complication rate, mortality rate, dislocation rate, reoperation rate, periprosthetic fracture rate, infection rate, length of stay (LOS), mobility, perioperative blood loss, operative time, and postoperative pain. RESULTS: Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria, totaling 2,018 HHAs. DAA significantly reduced the overall complication rate (odds ratio (OR) = 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57 to 0.94, p = 0.01), dislocation rate (OR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.77, p = 0.01), and LOS (mean difference (MD) = -1.31 days, 95% CI - 2.12 to - 0.50, p = 0.002). Findings from studies that were not appropriate for meta-analysis were qualitatively summarized and suggested improved mobility and reduced postoperative pain with the DAA. Significant differences were not detected in any of the remaining outcomes. CONCLUSION: The DAA HHA appears to be safer, reduces hospital stay, and may improve early functional recovery. This article supports the DAA HHA as a safe option for the management of displaced intracapsular FNFs.

Do Adhesive Drapes Have an Effect on Infection Rates in Orthopaedic Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Adhesive surgical drapes are purported to reduce the rates of surgical site infection. Despite that, international surgical guidelines generally recommend against the use of such drapes; however, this is primarily based on nonorthopaedic evidence. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Does the use of adhesive drapes decrease the risk of wound contamination? (2) Does intraoperative drape peeling (intentional or inadvertent) increase the risk of wound contamination? (3) Does the use of adhesive drapes decrease the risk of surgical site infection? METHODS: A systematic review of the MEDLINE and Embase databases was performed according to the Cochrane Handbook methods for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published since 2000 and comparing adhesive drapes with controls. All databases were searched from inception to March 1, 2021. A pooled meta-analysis was performed, where possible. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool was used to assess risk of bias among the included studies. From among 417 search results, five eligible RCTs were identified and included, all of which were published between 2018 and 2020. There were a total of 2266 patients, with 1129 (49.8%) in the adhesive drape groups, and 1137 (50.2%) in the control groups. The studies included hip and knee surgery trials (n = 3 trials; 1020 patients in intervention groups and 1032 patients in control groups) as well as trials on shoulder arthroscopy (n = 1 trial; 65 patients in the intervention group and 61 patients in the control group) and lumbar spine surgery (n = 1 trial; 44 patients in each group). The data for all three outcomes (wound contamination, impact of intraoperative peeling, and surgical site infection) revealed low heterogeneity based on random-effects models (I2 = 14%, 0%, and 0%, respectively). RESULTS: Based on data from pooled wound swab culture results from four studies, a reduction in wound contamination was associated with the use of adhesive drapes (odds ratio 0.49 [95% CI 0.34 to 0.72]; p < 0.001). The available evidence was inconclusive to determine whether intraoperative drape peeling (intentional or inadvertent) influenced the risk of wound contamination. Three studies did not report on this outcome, one study found an increased infection rate with drape peel back, and another study found a reduced treatment effect of adhesive drapes when peel back occurred in a subgroup analysis. The two studies that analyzed surgical site infections reported no infections in either arm; therefore, we could not answer the question of whether adhesive drapes affect risk of surgical site infection. CONCLUSION: The findings of this review suggest that adhesive drapes, including those with antimicrobial properties, decrease the risk of wound contamination during orthopaedic procedures. In circumstances where drape adhesion is compromised and peel back occurs at the wound edge, there is an increased risk of wound contamination with the use of adhesive drapes. The best currently available evidence is indeterminate as to the effect of adhesive drapes on the risk of surgical site infections; however, if used, care should be taken to avoid or minimize drape peel back. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study.

Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Postpolio Syndrome: A Matched Cohort Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with postpolio syndrome (PPS) may be afflicted by hip arthritis in either the paralytic or contralateral limb. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) may be considered in these patients. However, short-term and long-term outcomes following THA in PPS patients remain poorly characterized. METHODS: The PearlDiver MHip administrative database was queried for patients undergoing THA. Patients with a diagnosis of PPS were matched 1:4 with control patients on the basis of age, gender, and comorbidity burden. Incidence of postoperative adverse events and readmission in the 90 days following surgery and occurrence of revision arthroplasty in the five-year postoperative period were assessed between the two cohorts. RESULTS: In total, 1,519 PPS patients were matched to 6,076 control patients without PPS. After controlling for patient demographics and comorbidities, PPS patients demonstrated higher 90-day odds of urinary tract infection (odds ratio [OR] = 1.34, P = .016), pneumonia (OR = 2.07, P < .001), prosthetic dislocation (OR = 1.63, P = .018), and readmission (OR = 1.49, P = .002). Five years following surgery, 94.7% of the PPS cohort remained revision-free, compared to 96.7% of the control cohort (P = .001). CONCLUSION: Compared to patients without PPS, patients with PPS demonstrated a higher incidence of urinary tract infection, pneumonia, prosthetic dislocation, and hospital readmission. In addition, five-year incidence of revision arthroplasty was significantly higher among the PPS cohort. In light of these increased risks, special considerations should be made in both preoperative planning and postoperative surveillance of PPS patients undergoing THA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

The Use of Rifampin in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication of total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Rifampin is an antibiotic with the ability to penetrate bacterial biofilms, and thus has been considered as a potentially important adjunct in the prevention and treatment of PJI. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate and summarize the use of rifampin in TJA, particularly in the context of PJI. METHODS: A literature search of all relevant electronic databases was performed. All comparative studies assessing the use of rifampin in the context of TJA were included. Descriptive data are reported, and a meta-analysis was performed using all studies which compared the addition of rifampin to standard care in treating PJI. RESULTS: A total of 33 studies met inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis of 22 studies comparing the addition of rifampin to standard care for treating PJI found a significant reduction in failure rates (26.0% vs 35.9%; odds ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.43-0.86). The protective effect of rifampin was maintained in studies which included exchange arthroplasty as a treatment strategy, but not in studies only using an implant retention strategy. Among studies reporting adverse events of rifampin, there was a 20.5% adverse event rate. CONCLUSION: Overall, rifampin appears to confer a protective effect against treatment failure following PJI. This treatment effect is particularly pronounced in the context of exchange arthroplasty. Further high-level evidence is needed to clarify the exact indications and doses of rifampin which can most effectively act as an adjunct in the treatment of PJI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Level I-III Studies.

Optimizing the surgical instrument tray to immediately increase efficiency and lower costs in the operating room.

BACKGROUND: Surgical trays are often poorly configured and can be ongoing sources of frustration and excess costs. We conducted an observational study to determine if the use of a customized mathematical inventory optimization model would result in a greater reduction in the number of instruments on a surgical tray than a clinician review of the tray. METHODS: Utilization of instruments on the major orthopedic tray at a large academic hospital was documented over 80 procedures. Processes in the medical device reprocessing department and operating room were observed to comprehensively quantify all associated costs. Results of the observations were applied to a customized mathematical model to determine the ideal tray configuration. For comparison, a clinician review was also performed. RESULTS: The mathematical model alone produced an ideal tray size of 47 instruments, a reduction of 41 instruments from the original size of 88 instruments (47% reduction). This represented $34 440 in annual savings. In contrast, the clinician review alone suggested an ideal tray size of 67 instruments (23% reduction), representing $17 640 in annual savings. When clinicians were provided with the additional information from the model, they reduced the tray size to 51 instruments (42% reduction), producing $31 870 in savings. The mathematical model yielded an additional 22% instrument reduction and $14 230 in savings compared with clinician review alone. CONCLUSION: Our mathematical model is generalizable and can be applied to all specialties and hospitals to determine optimal tray configuration. As such, the financial implications are broad; at our institution, application to all surgical trays would result in $205 000 of savings annually. Surgeons and managers looking to streamline surgical trays should consider this evidence-based approach.

Reducing Acute Hospitalization Length of Stay After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Quality Improvement Study.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of bundled funding for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has motivated hospitals to improve quality of care while minimizing costs. The aim of our quality improvement project is to reduce the acute hospitalization length of stay to less than 2 days and decrease the percentage of TKA patients discharged to inpatient rehabilitation using an enhanced recovery after surgery bundle. METHODS: This study used a before-and-after design. The pre-intervention period was January to December 2017 and the post-intervention period was January 2018 to August 2019. A root cause analysis was performed by a multidisciplinary team to identify barriers for rapid recovery and discharge. Four new interventions were chosen as part of an improvement bundle based on existing local practices, literature review, and feasibility analysis: (1) perioperative peripheral nerve block; (2) prophylactic antiemetic medication; (3) avoidance of routine preoperative urinary catheterization; and (4) preoperative patient education. RESULTS: The pre-intervention and post-intervention groups included 232 and 383 patients, respectively. Mean length of stay decreased from 2.82 to 2.13 days (P < .001). The need for inpatient rehabilitation decreased from 20.2% to 10.7% (P = .002). Mean 24-hour oral morphine consumption decreased from 60 to 38 mg (P < .001). The percentage of patients experiencing moderate-to-severe pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting within the first 24 hours decreased by 25% and 15%, respectively (P < .001). Thirty-day emergency department visits following discharge decreased from 12.9% to 7.3% (P = .030). CONCLUSION: Significant improvements in the recovery of patients after TKA were achieved by performing a root cause analysis and implementing a multidisciplinary, patient-centered enhanced recovery after surgery bundle. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Evaluation of the Medial Stabilized Knee Design Using Data From National Joint Registries and Current Literature.

BACKGROUND: Various designs of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have provided satisfactory outcomes for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis for many years. The aim of the study is to evaluate the success and failure rate of the medial stabilized (MS) TKA design through national joint registries and the current literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses was carried out through PubMed and MEDLINE database. The international registries analyzed included the National Joint Registry, the Australian Orthopedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, the Dutch Arthroplasty Register, the New Zealand Orthopedic Association Joint Registry, and the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative. We are reporting descriptive data which include means and percentages of survival rates and revision rates and number of years after the primary procedure. The revision rates and the cumulative revision rates are reported separately for each MS implant. RESULTS: Our detailed review identified 5 of 12 registries and 25 of 550 studies reporting on the survivorship of an MS TKA design. There were a total of 3684 procedures between the 25 studies, with an average survivorship free of aseptic loosening of 99% at 6.9 years. There are 26,693 (2.5%) MS TKAs in the current National Joint Registry with a mean cumulative revision rate of 2.63% at 5 years, 3.35% at 10 years, and 4.6% at 15 years. The Australian Orthopedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry provides survivorship data on 19,249 (2.9%) MS TKAs, with a mean cumulative revision rate of 3.34% at 5 years, 7.4% at 10 years, and 8.1% at 15 years. The Dutch Arthroplasty Register contains survivorship data on 1490 MS designs and a mean revision rate of these implants is 0.8% at 1 year, 5.95% at 5 years, and 9.8% at 10 years. The Evolution MP is the only implant reported in the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative and has a revision rate of 2.28% at 3 years. CONCLUSION: The MS TKA design has comparable results to traditional TKA designs across several joint registries and 25 studies in the literature.

Total hip arthroplasty in patients with fibrous dysplasia: a modern update.

Background: Fibrous dysplasia (FD) results from an abnormality in lamellar bone formation and most frequently involves the proximal femur. This can lead to the development of osteoarthritis requiring total hip arthroplasty (THA). Such cases are challenging, and there is a lack of information guiding best management. As such, we devised a study assessing the outcomes and complications in patients with FD undergoing THA with modern implant technology, and we outlined our preferred surgical technique. Methods: A search of our institutional arthroplasty database was performed to identify patients who underwent THA for FD between January 2001 and July 2018 at Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto, Canada. Data regarding implants used and the use of allograft material or metal augments or both were obtained. Complications and revision requirements were noted. Radiographic and clinical leg length discrepancies were assessed. Results: A total of 10 hips in 9 patients who underwent THA for FD were identified. Mean follow-up time was 6.0 years (range 0.5 to 10.3 yr). The majority of patients underwent THA using uncemented femoral and acetabular components with large femoral heads on highly cross-linked polyethylene liners. Most cases (80% of hips) required allograft to the proximal femur. A single complication requiring revision was noted. In 90% of hip surgeries, the patient required transfusion of packed red blood cells. Mean radiographic and clinical leg length discrepancies were 0.9 cm (range -2.4 to 2.4 cm) and 0.9 cm (range -4 to 0 cm), respectively. Conclusion: Contrary to previous reports, low complication and revision rates were observed with cementless components and routine use of allograft material. The challenging nature of such cases warrants use of an experienced arthroplasty treatment team.

Contexte: La dysplasie fibreuse (DF) découle d'une anomalie de la formation de l'os lamellaire et affecte le plus souvent le fémur proximal. Elle peut aussi aboutir à l'arthrose qui nécessitera une arthroplastie totale de la hanche (ATH). Or, ces cas sont complexes car on manque d'information sur la meilleure façon de les traiter. Nous avons donc conçu une étude afin d'évaluer l'issue et les complications chez les patients atteints de DF qui subissent une ATH au moyen de techniques d'implants modernes, et nous indiquons la technique chirurgicale que nous privilégions. Méthodes: Nous avons interrogé la base de données de notre établissement sur les arthroplasties pour recenser les patients ayant subi une ATH en raison de la DF entre janvier 2001 et juillet 2018 à l'Hôpital du Mont-Sinaï de Toronto, au Canada. Nous avons obtenu les données sur les implants utilisés et le recours à du matériel de comblement à base d'allogreffes ou de métal ou les deux. Nous avons consigné les complications et les cas où une révision a été nécessaire. Nous avons évalué les inégalités de longueur des membres inférieurs aux plans clinique et radiographique. Résultats: En tout, 10 hanches chez 9 patients ont fait l'objet d'une ATH en raison de la DF. Le suivi moyen a duré 6,0 ans (de 0,5 à 10,3 ans). La majorité des patients ont subi une ATH avec des prothèses à composants fémoraux et acétabulaires non cimentés dotées de têtes fémorales volumineuses, sur des revêtements de polyéthylène hautement réticulé. La plupart des cas (80 % des hanches) ont nécessité une allogreffe au fémur proximal. Une seule complication nécessitant une révision a été notée. Dans 90 % des chirurgies de la hanche, les patients ont eu besoin de transfusions de culots globulaires. Les inégalités cliniques et radiographiques moyennes de la longueur des membres inférieurs ont été de 0,9 cm (entre ­2,4 et 2,4 cm) et de 0,9 cm (de ­4 à 0 cm), respectivement. Conclusion: Contrairement à de précédents rapports, les taux de complications et de révisions observés ont été faibles avec les composants non cimentés et l'utilisation de routine d'allogreffes. La nature complexe de ces cas justifie que l'on fasse appel à une équipe chevronnée pour l'arthroplastie.

Revision total knee arthroplasty for patellar dislocation in patients with malrotated TKA components.

PURPOSE: Patellar dislocation is a serious complication leading to patient morbidity following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The cause can be multifactorial. Extensor mechanism imbalance may be present and result from technical errors such as malrotation of the implants. We sought to understand the reasons for post-arthroplasty patellar dislocation and the clinical outcomes of patients in whom it occurs. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study assessing the outcomes of revision surgery for patellar dislocation in patients with component malrotation in both primary and revision TKAs. Patient demographics, dislocation etiology, presurgical deformity, intraoperation component position, complications, reoperation, and Knee Society Scores (KSS) were collected. RESULTS: Twenty patients (21 knees) were identified. The average time from primary arthroplasty to onset of dislocation was 33.6 months (SD 44.4), and the average time from dislocation to revision was 3.38 months (SD 2.81). Seventeen knees (80.9%) had internal rotation of the tibial component and seven knees (33.3%) had combined internal rotation of both the femoral and tibial components. Fifteen knees (71.4%) were treated with a condylar constrained implant at the time of revision, and five knees were converted to a hinged prosthesis. The average follow-up time was 56 months. During this time, one patient (4.54%) had a recurrent dislocation episode, requiring further surgery. At final follow up, the mean KSS was 86.2. CONCLUSION: Revision TKA following patellar dislocation for patients with malrotated components was associated with high success rates. After revision surgery, patients had a low recurrence of patellar dislocation, low complication rates, and excellent functional outcomes.

Association between socioeconomic deprivation and surgical complications in adults undergoing ankle fracture fixation: a population-based analysis

Background: Few studies have investigated the outcomes of surgical fracture care among socially deprived patients despite the increased incidence of fractures and the inequality of care received in this group. We evaluated whether socioeconomic deprivation affected the complications and subsequent management of marginalized/homeless patients following surgery for ankle fracture. Methods: In this retrospective, population-based cohort study involving 202 hospitals in Ontario, Canada, we evaluated 45 444 patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for ankle fracture performed by 710 different surgeons between Jan. 1, 1994, and Dec. 31, 2011. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the association between deprivation and shorter-term outcomes within 1 year (implant removal, repeat ORIF, irrigation and débridement owing to infection, and amputation). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess longer-term outcomes up to 20 years (ankle fusion and ankle arthroplasty). Results: A higher level of deprivation was associated with an increased risk of irrigation and débridement (quintile 5 v. quintile 1: odds ratio [OR] 2.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25­3.67, p = 0.0054) and amputation (quintile 4 v. quintile 1: OR 3.56, 95% CI 1.01­12.4, p = 0.0466). It was more common for less deprived patients to have their hardware removed (quintile 5 v. quintile 1: OR 0.822, 95% CI 0.76­0.888, p < 0.0001). There was no correlation between marginalization and subsequent revision ORIF, ankle fusion, or ankle arthroplasty. Conclusion: Marginalized patients are at a significantly increased risk of infection and amputation following surgical treatment of ankle fractures. However, these complications are still extremely uncommon among this group. Socioeconomic deprivation should not prohibit marginalized patients from receiving surgery for unstable ankle fractures.

Contexte: Malgré l'incidence accrue des fractures et les inégalités dans la prestation des soins chez les patients au statut socio-économique précaire, peu d'études se sont penchées sur les résultats de la chirurgie pour fracture chez cette population. Nous avons voulu vérifier si une situation socio-économique précaire influait sur les complications et la prise en charge subséquente des patients marginalisés/itinérants après une chirurgie pour fracture de la cheville. Méthodes: Au cours de cette étude de cohorte rétrospective basée dans la population regroupant 202 hôpitaux en Ontario, au Canada, nous avons évalué 45 444 patients ayant subi une réduction ouverte avec fixation interne (ROFI) pour fracture de la cheville, effectuée par 710 chirurgiens différents entre le 1er janvier 1994 et le 31 décembre 2011. Des modèles de régression logistique multivariée ont servi à évaluer le lien entre le statut précaire et les résultats à court terme (au cours de l'année) (retrait de l'implant, réintervention pour ROFI, irrigation et débridement en raison d'une infection, et amputation). Des modèles d'analyse multivariée à risques proportionnels de Cox ont servi à évaluer les résultats à plus long terme, jusqu'à 20 ans (fusion de la cheville et arthroplastie de la cheville). Résultats: Le risque d'irrigation et débridement (quintile 5 c. quintile 1 : rapport des cotes [RC] 2,14, intervalle de confiance [IC] de 95 % 1,25­3,67, p = 0,0054) et d'amputation (quintile 4 c. quintile 1 : RC 3,56, IC de 95 % 1,01­12,4, p = 0,0466) était proportionnel à la précarité de la situation des individus. Les patients moins défavorisés étaient moins susceptibles de se faire retirer leurs implants (quintile 5 c. quintile 1 : RC 0,822, IC de 95 % 0,76­0,888, p < 0,0001). On n'a observé aucune corrélation entre la marginalisation et une réintervention pour ROFI, fusion de la cheville ou arthroplastie de la cheville. Conclusion: Les patients marginalisés sont exposés à un risque significativement plus élevé d'infection et d'amputation après un traitement chirurgical pour fracture de la cheville. Cependant, de telles complications demeurent extrêmement rares chez cette population. Un statut socioéconomique précaire ne devrait pas empêcher les patients marginalisés de recevoir une chirurgie lors de fractures instables de la cheville.