Edaravone Dexborneol Versus Edaravone Alone for the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Comparative Trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Edaravone dexborneol, comprised of 2 active ingredients, edaravone and (+)-borneol, has been developed as a novel neuroprotective agent with synergistic effects of antioxidant and anti-inflammatory in animal models. The present clinical trial aimed at testing the effects of edaravone dexborneol versus edaravone on 90-day functional outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, comparative, phase III clinical trial was conducted at 48 hospitals in China between May 2015 and December 2016. Inclusion criteria included patients diagnosed as AIS, 35 to 80 years of age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Score between 4 and 24, and within 48 hours of AIS onset. AIS patients were randomized in 1:1 ratio into 2 treatment arms: 14-day infusion of edaravone dexborneol or edaravone injection. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with modified Rankin Scale score ≤1 on day 90 after randomization. RESULTS: One thousand one hundred sixty-five AIS patients were randomly allocated to the edaravone dexborneol group (n=585) or the edaravone group (n=580). The edaravone dexborneol group showed significantly higher proportion of patients experiencing good functional outcomes on day 90 after randomization, compared with the edaravone group (modified Rankin Scale score ≤1, 67.18% versus 58.97%; odds ratio, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.12-1.81]; P=0.004). The prespecified subgroup analyses indicated that a greater benefit was observed in female patients than their male counterparts (2.26, 1.49-3.43 versus 1.14, 0.85-1.52). CONCLUSIONS: When edaravone dexborneol versus edaravone was administered within 48 hours after AIS, 90-day good functional outcomes favored the edaravone dexborneol group, especially in female patients. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02430350.

Impact of Infection on the Risk of Recurrent Stroke Among Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Infection occurs commonly in patients with acute ischemic stroke. We aimed to investigate the association of infection with short- and long-term risk of recurrent stroke in patients with ischemic stroke. METHODS: Data were derived from ischemic stroke patients in 2 stroke registries: the CSCA (Chinese Stroke Center Alliance) program recorded medical data during hospitalization, and the CNSR-III (Third China National Stroke Registry) recorded the medical data during hospitalization and finished 1-year follow-up. Associations of infection (pneumonia or urinary tract infection) during hospitalization with recurrent stroke in short (during hospitalization) and long term (since 30 days to 1 year after stroke onset) were analyzed. Short-term outcomes were analyzed with logistic models and long-term outcomes with Cox models. RESULTS: In the CSCA (n=789 596), the incidence of infection during hospitalization reached 9.6%. Patients with infection had a higher risk of stroke recurrence during hospitalization compared with patients without infection (10.4% versus 5.2%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.70 [95% CI, 1.65-1.75]; P<0.0001). In the CNSR-III (n=13 549), the incidence of infection during hospitalization was 6.5%. Infection during hospitalization was significantly associated with short-term risk of recurrent stroke (7.4% versus 3.9%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.05-1.86]; P=0.02) but not with long-term risk of recurrent stroke (7.2% versus 5.2%; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.16 [95% CI, 0.88-1.52]; P=0.30). CONCLUSIONS: Infection was an independent risk factor for high risk of early stroke recurrence during hospitalization, but we have not found its sustained effect on long-term recurrent risk in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Low LDL-C level and intracranial haemorrhage risk after ischaemic stroke: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Treat Stroke to Target trial has confirmed the benefit of targeting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) of <1.8 mmol/L in patients who had an ischaemic stroke (IS). However, haemorrhagic risk brought by this target level (<1.8 mmol/L) or even lower level (<1.4 mmol/L) of LDL-C should also be concerned. In this study, we aimed to demonstrate whether low LDL-C could increase the intracranial haemorrhage risk following IS. METHODS: Patients who had an IS from China Stroke Center Alliance programme with complete baseline information were prospectively enrolled. 793 572 patients who had an IS were categorised into 6 groups according to LDL-C level (<1.40 mmol/L, 1.40-1.79 mmol/L, 1.80-2.59 mmol/L, 2.60-2.99 mmol/L, 3.00-4.89 mmol/L, ≥4.90 mmol/L). The study outcome was defined as intracranial haemorrhage identified during hospitalisation. Logistic regression model was used to examine the association between different LDL-C levels and risk of intracranial haemorrhage. RESULTS: Compared with patients of LDL-C=1.80-2.59 mmol/L, both subgroups of LDL-C<1.40 mmol/L and LDL-C=1.40-1.79 mmol/L showed significantly higher risk of intracranial haemorrhage (OR=1.26, 95% CI=1.18 to 1.35; OR=1.22, 95% CI=1.14 to 1.30, respectively). Interaction effect was found to exist between the subgroups of intravenous thrombolytic therapy (p=0.04), rather than the subgroups of age, sex and body mass index. Moreover, the sensitivity analyses indicated that even patients who had an IS with minor stroke still suffered from the increased intracranial haemorrhage risk related to low LDL-C level. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients who had an IS, the low LDL-C level (<1.4 mmol/L or <1.8 mmol/L) at baseline is associated with increased risk of intracranial haemorrhage during acute stage. While actively lowering LDL-C level for patients who had an IS, clinicians should also concern about the haemorrhagic risk associated with low LDL-C level.

Effects of individual and integrated cumulative burden of blood pressure, glucose, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and C-reactive protein on cardiovascular risk.

AIM: This study aimed to demonstrate the impact of cumulative burden of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) on risk of cardiovascular events (CVEs). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 34 959 participants were enrolled who participated in the four surveys during 2006-2013. Cumulative CVRF burden was calculated as number of years (2006-2013) multiplied by the values of CVRFs including systolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose (FBG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP). The primary outcome was defined as the CVE during 2012-2017, including ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality. During 4.62 (±0.71) years follow-up on average, there were 2118 (6.06%) CVE, including 847 (2.42%) ischaemic stroke, 221 (0.63%) myocardial infarction, and 1185 (3.39%) all-cause mortality. Higher cumulative burden of individual CVRF was significantly associated with increased risk of outcomes, except for LDL-C for all-cause mortality, FBG for myocardial infarction, and hs-CRP for ischaemic stroke. In Cox proportional hazards model, compared with the group, of the lower quartile of integrated cumulative burden, the hazard ratio (95% confidence intervals) of the upper quartile was 2.45 (2.03-2.94) for CVE, 3.65 (2.68-4.96) for ischaemic stroke, 4.51 (2.19-9.27) for myocardial infarction, and 1.73 (1.36-2.21) for all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the correlation between cumulative burden of CVRFs and cardiovascular risk, except for cumulative burden of hs-CRP and ischaemic stroke. Thus, our study suggests the necessity to extend the observation duration of CVRFs in order to elucidate the life-course cumulative effect.

Effect of Low Diastolic Blood Pressure to Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attacks Under Different Systolic Blood Pressure Levels.

Background: In the context of recently updated strategies of pressure management, there is a paucity of evidence on the effect of diastolic blood pressure (DBP) level on adverse events among stroke patients. This study aimed to examine the effect of low DBP (<60 mmHg) under different levels of systolic blood pressure (SBP) on the risk of composite events and stroke recurrence among patients with ischemic stroke (IS) or transient ischemic attack (TIA). Material and Methods: This study was conducted in 2,325 patients with IS or TIA. DBP values were categorized into <60, 60-70, 70-80 (reference), 80-90, and ≥90 mmHg in the main sample and were further categorized as <60 and ≥60 mmHg (reference) when patients were stratified according to SBP levels (<140, <130, and <120 mmHg). The outcomes were defined as recurrent stroke and cumulative composite events (defined as the combination of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal congestive heart failure, and death) at 1 year. Results: During 1 year of follow-up, a total of 95 composite events and 138 stroke recurrences were identified. The patients with low DBP showed a significantly higher risk of composite events [hazard ratio (HR) = 4.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.54-8.52], especially the elderly patients (≥60 years); however, this result was not observed for stroke recurrence (HR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.46-1.74). With the reduction of the SBP levels, the proportion of patients with low DBP increased (6.87, 12.67, and 34.46%), and the risk for composite events persisted. Conclusions: Along with the new target levels of SBP suggested by updated criteria, there is a trend for DBP to be reduced to a harmfully low level, which was associated with an increased risk of composite events among patients with IS or TIA.