Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Semin Pediatr Surg ; 33(4): 151439, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38986241

ABSTRACT

This review focuses on contemporary mechanical ventilator practices used in the initial management of neonates born with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). Both conventional and non-conventional ventilation modes in CDH are reviewed. Special emphasis is placed on the rationale for gentle ventilation and the current evidence-based clinical practice guidelines that are recommended for supporting these fragile infants. The interplay between CDH lung hypoplasia and other key cardiopulmonary elements of the disease, namely a reduced pulmonary vascular bed, abnormal pulmonary vascular remodeling, and left ventricular hypoplasia, are discussed. Finally, we provide insights into future avenues for mechanical ventilator research in CDH.


Subject(s)
Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital , Respiration, Artificial , Humans , Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital/therapy , Infant, Newborn , Respiration, Artificial/methods , Lung/abnormalities , Practice Guidelines as Topic
2.
J Perinatol ; 2024 May 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38796522

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Fetal Centers use imaging studies to predict congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) prognosis and the need for fetal therapy. Given improving CDH survival, we hypothesized that current fetal imaging severity predictions no longer reflect true outcomes and fail to justify the risks of fetal therapy. METHODS: We analyzed our single-center contemporary data in a left-sided CDH cohort (n = 58) by prognostic criteria determined by MRI observed-to-expected total fetal lung volumes: severe <25%, moderate 25-35%, and mild >35%. We compared contemporary survival to prior studies and the TOTAL trials. RESULTS: Contemporary survival was significantly higher than past studies for all prognostic classifications (mild 100% vs 80-94%, moderate 95% vs 59-75%, severe 79% vs 13-25%; P < 0.01), and to either control or fetal therapy arms of the TOTAL trials. CONCLUSIONS: Current fetal imaging criteria are overly pessimistic and may lead to unwarranted fetal intervention. Fetal therapies remain experimental. Future studies will require updated prognostic criteria.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL