Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 48
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 32(3): 287-297, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36401739

ABSTRACT

Since pregnant and lactating women have historically been excluded from drug development trials, safety studies need to be conducted postapproval. This study evaluated FDA's Post Marketing Requirements for pregnancy and lactation studies from 2007 to 2020, and identified trends and potential future opportunities. The number of studies required to be conducted in the postmarketing setting was compared with the number of new drugs approved during the same time period. We excluded drugs that were approved for use in men, children, or postmenopausal women. Since 2007, there has been an increase in pregnancy and lactation studies required to be conducted postapproval. However, only 16% of drugs that may be used in females of reproductive potential were issued a postmarketing requirement for a pregnancy and/or lactation study. The most common type of required pregnancy safety study was a pregnancy registry (37%), followed by a descriptive pregnancy safety study (27%), and a retrospective cohort study (26%). In conclusion, there is a need for more comprehensive data collection in pregnant and lactating individuals to better inform prescribers and patients about the safety of medication use during pregnancy and lactation so that they can make a fully informed decision about medication use.


Subject(s)
Lactation , Product Surveillance, Postmarketing , Pregnancy , Male , Child , United States , Humans , Female , Retrospective Studies , United States Food and Drug Administration , Registries
2.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 147(6): 2009-2020, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33713765

ABSTRACT

Asthma is one of the most common underlying diseases in women of reproductive age that can lead to potentially serious medical problems during pregnancy and lactation. A group of key stakeholders across multiple relevant disciplines was invited to take part in an effort to prioritize, strategize, and mobilize action steps to fill important gaps in knowledge regarding asthma medication safety in pregnancy and lactation. The stakeholders identified substantial gaps in the literature on the safety of asthma medications used during pregnancy and lactation and prioritized strategies to fill those gaps. Short-term action steps included linking data from existing complementary study designs (US and international claims data, single drug pregnancy registries, case-control studies, and coordinated systematic data systems). Long-term action steps included creating an asthma disease registry, incorporating the disease registry into electronic health record systems, and coordinating care across disciplines. The stakeholders also prioritized establishing new infrastructures/collaborations to perform research in pregnant and lactating women and to include patient perspectives throughout the process. To address the evidence gaps, and aid in populating product labels with data that inform clinical decision making, the consortium developed a plan to systematically obtain necessary data in the most efficient and timely manner.


Subject(s)
Asthma/therapy , Lactation , Pregnancy Complications/therapy , Asthma/epidemiology , Breast Feeding , Case-Control Studies , Clinical Decision-Making , Disease Management , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Registries , Research , Research Design
3.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 85(4): 675-679, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30403304

ABSTRACT

Legislative initiatives have been successful in increasing the availability of approved therapies for paediatric patients. However, additional measures to ensure the timely completion of paediatric studies are necessary to further increase the number of medicines available to children. Over the last 3 years, international experts convened to revise the ICH E11 guideline on clinical investigations of medicinal products in paediatric populations to harmonize approaches to paediatric extrapolation, striving to reduce substantial differences between regions in the acceptance of data for global paediatric medicine development programmes. Several areas of therapeutics development in children, such as human immunodeficiency virus and partial-onset seizures, have been streamlined and require fewer children enrolled in clinical trials because of the appropriate application of paediatric extrapolation. Based on this experience, it is clear that for paediatric extrapolation strategies to reach their full potential there is the need to understand the quality and quantity of data, often collected in adult patients, that will inform the appropriateness of the use of paediatric extrapolation, as well as to identify gaps in knowledge with respect to disease pathophysiology, organ maturation or drug target ontogeny. The generation of information that enhances our current understanding of these gaps in knowledge can further decrease the need for larger, paediatric clinical trials and can increase the efficiency of paediatric therapeutics development as well as protect children from participation in unnecessary studies. We hope that this publication will increase awareness, input and support from all the stakeholders involved in paediatric therapeutics development.


Subject(s)
Clinical Trials as Topic/standards , Drug Approval , Guidelines as Topic , Research Design/standards , Age Factors , Child , European Union , Humans
4.
Pediatr Res ; 82(5): 727-732, 2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28853726

ABSTRACT

The conduct of clinical trials in small pediatric subspecialties such as pediatric nephrology is hampered by both clinical demands on the pediatric nephrologist and the small number of appropriate patients available for such studies. The American Society of Pediatric Nephrology Therapeutics Development Committee (TDC) was established to (1) identify the various stakeholders with interests and/or expertise related to clinical trials in children with kidney disease and (2) develop more effective partnerships among all parties regarding strategies for successful clinical trial development and execution. This article discusses the rationale, structure, and function of the TDC, the status of progress toward its goals, and the insights gained to date that may be useful for other subspecialties that face similar challenges.


Subject(s)
Clinical Trials as Topic/methods , Kidney Diseases/therapy , Nephrology/methods , Pediatrics/methods , Research Design , Age Factors , Child , Clinical Trials as Topic/standards , Consensus , Humans , Kidney Diseases/diagnosis , Kidney Diseases/epidemiology , Nephrology/standards , Pediatrics/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Research Design/standards , Stakeholder Participation , Treatment Outcome , Workflow
6.
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol ; 103(8): 718-20, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26223007

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Obtaining human pregnancy data to inform product labeling is important for drug and biological products. METHODS: Collection and analyses of safety data on their use during pregnancy is usually performed after approval. RESULTS: The Centers for Disease Control National Birth Defects Prevention Study has provided important data on the relationship between drug use in pregnancy and birth defects. CONCLUSION: The Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule will set new and improved standards for the inclusion of information about the use of prescription drugs and biological products during pregnancy; the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, along with other data sources, will be critical for providing safety data to inform product labeling.


Subject(s)
Abnormalities, Drug-Induced/etiology , Databases, Factual , Drug Labeling/legislation & jurisprudence , Lactation/drug effects , Population Surveillance , Prescription Drugs/adverse effects , United States Food and Drug Administration/legislation & jurisprudence , Abnormalities, Drug-Induced/epidemiology , Abnormalities, Drug-Induced/prevention & control , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology
7.
Pediatr Nephrol ; 30(2): 193-8, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25370779

ABSTRACT

At a recent meeting of international experts on clinical aspects of progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD), an extensive analysis of extant clinical trials was used to develop more effective and economical surrogate markers for CKD outcomes in adults. This article describes the reasons for this undertaking, the methods and conclusions of the meeting, and the relevance of these findings to pediatric nephrology.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers/analysis , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/pathology , Adult , Child , Disease Progression , Female , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Humans , Male , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome
9.
Res Social Adm Pharm ; 20(5): 531-538, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38413289

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Most breastfeeding individuals take at least one prescription drug, yet limited data from lactation studies are available to inform the safety of these drugs during breastfeeding. As a result, healthcare providers (HCPs) rely on available information about safety of drugs used during pregnancy or on personal experiences to inform prescribing/counseling decisions for breastfeeding individuals. To improve risk communication regarding drugs used during lactation, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration published the Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule (PLLR) in 2015, which added a narrative summary of available risk information to the lactation section of Prescribing Information (PI). Prior studies on labeling in PLLR format revealed that although HCPs found these details valuable, they regarded the narrative as too long to support decision-making during patient encounters. OBJECTIVE: This qualitative study's objective was to assess the utility of adding a concise summary to the Lactation subsection of PI to complement the narrative and succinctly communicate to busy HCPs a drug's risks when used during lactation. The concise summary consisted of a bolded headline, bulleted descriptions of available study findings and potential adverse reactions, and recommendations for risk mitigation. METHODS: Twenty-five online focus groups were conducted with five segments of HCPs to obtain their feedback on the concise summary and discuss their prescribing/counseling decisions for four fictitious prescription drugs including one vaccine. RESULTS: HCPs utilized the concise summary to make initial prescribing/counseling decisions. Many also used the labeling narrative for a comprehensive benefit-risk assessment. CONCLUSION: The findings indicate a need to continue to improve communication about safety of drugs used during lactation, and that the concise summary may help facilitate this communication. The study also highlights the need to educate HCPs about PI limitations when clinical data are lacking and the need to encourage clinical studies to be conducted to support actionable recommendations about use of prescription drugs during lactation.


Subject(s)
Lactation , Prescription Drugs , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Breast Feeding , Prescription Drugs/adverse effects , Focus Groups , Health Personnel
10.
Mol Genet Metab ; 109(4): 319-28, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23806236

ABSTRACT

A trans-National Institutes of Health initiative, Nutrition and Dietary Supplement Interventions for Inborn Errors of Metabolism (NDSI-IEM), was launched in 2010 to identify gaps in knowledge regarding the safety and utility of nutritional interventions for the management of inborn errors of metabolism (IEM) that need to be filled with evidence-based research. IEM include inherited biochemical disorders in which specific enzyme defects interfere with the normal metabolism of exogenous (dietary) or endogenous protein, carbohydrate, or fat. For some of these IEM, effective management depends primarily on nutritional interventions. Further research is needed to demonstrate the impact of nutritional interventions on individual health outcomes and on the psychosocial issues identified by patients and their families. A series of meetings and discussions were convened to explore the current United States' funding and regulatory infrastructure and the challenges to the conduct of research for nutritional interventions for the management of IEM. Although the research and regulatory infrastructure are well-established, a collaborative pathway that includes the professional and advocacy rare disease community and federal regulatory and research agencies will be needed to overcome current barriers.


Subject(s)
Diet , Metabolism, Inborn Errors/diet therapy , Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Dietary Supplements , Disease Management , Drug Administration Routes , Humans , Metabolism, Inborn Errors/genetics , Rare Diseases , United States
11.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 113(6): 1251-1257, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36645246

ABSTRACT

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) have robust collaboration and dialogue around the need for data and the inclusion of pregnant and lactating individuals in clinical trials. Despite this collaboration, the two agencies have their own standards for the format and content of labeling for these populations. To understand these differences, the pregnancy and lactation labeling sections for 31 approved drugs were compared, and trends were assessed for use of language concordance and discordance related to use during pregnancy and lactation between the 2 agencies. Further analysis evaluated the presence of human data included in the labeling. The EMA and the FDA had high discordance between pregnancy and lactation labeling language, in 68% and 71% of labeling, respectively, and only 10% of pregnancy labeling and 16% of lactation labeling include human data. Concordance in labeling language is not the norm but occurs when there is a sizeable body of human data, animal data suggesting a particular safety issue, drug mechanism of action information, or disease-specific considerations. This study highlights the need for more human data to inform prescribing decisions in these populations. The results also suggest that there is an opportunity for alignment in labeling across regions.


Subject(s)
Drug Labeling , Lactation , Pregnancy , Female , Animals , United States , Humans , United States Food and Drug Administration , Breast Feeding , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Drug Approval
12.
J Clin Pharmacol ; 63 Suppl 1: S159-S169, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37317496

ABSTRACT

The availability of clinical pharmacology and safety data regarding the use of prescription medications in pregnant and lactating individuals has been historically limited, despite significant efforts to improve the quantity and quality of the information in labeling. The Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule took effect on June 30, 2015, and updated information in labeling to more clearly describe available data to assist health care providers in counseling pregnant and lactating individuals. Additionally, the FDA published a revised draft guidance, "Clinical Lactation Studies: Considerations for Study Design," to provide pharmaceutical companies and investigators with information about how and when to conduct lactation studies. Clinical pharmacology information derived from lactation studies is important in determining the presence of medications in breast milk and counseling lactating individuals regarding the potential of medication exposure in the breast milk and its attendant risks to the breastfed infant. Examples of Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule labeling changes that resulted from dedicated clinical lactation studies for certain neuropsychiatric medications are described in this publication. These medications are discussed because neuropsychiatric conditions commonly affect women of reproductive potential, including lactating individuals. As the FDA guidance and these studies illustrate, bioanalytical method validation, study design, and data analysis considerations are essential for obtaining quality lactation data. Well-designed clinical lactation studies play an important role in informing product labeling that ultimately is useful to health care providers in making prescribing decisions with lactating individuals.


Subject(s)
Pharmacology, Clinical , Prescription Drugs , United States , Infant , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Lactation , Breast Feeding , Product Labeling , Prescription Drugs/adverse effects , Milk, Human
13.
Ther Innov Regul Sci ; 57(5): 1099-1103, 2023 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37389793

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The Pediatric Research Equity Act (PREA) gives the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authority to require pediatric studies for drug and biologics products under certain circumstances and to waive this requirement in some, or all, pediatric ages. When studies are waived for safety, PREA stipulates the safety issue must be described in labeling. This study assessed the rate of including waiver-related safety information in labeling. METHODS: FDA databases were reviewed to determine the number of safety-related pediatric study waivers and issued from December 2003 through August 2020, and corresponding labeling to establish when relevant safety information was included. Descriptive comparisons were conducted across Cohort 1: December 2003-2007, Cohort 2: 2008-2011, Cohort 3: 2012-2015, and Cohort 4: 2016-August 2020. RESULTS: One hundred sixteen safety waivers were issued [Cohort 1 (n = 1); Cohort 2 (n = 38), Cohort 3 (n = 37), and Cohort 4 (n = 40)] for 84 unique drugs or biologics. Most (106 of 116; 91%) waiver-related safety issues were described in labeling [Cohort 1 (1 of 1), Cohort 2 (33 of 38), Cohort 3 (33 of 37), and Cohort 4 (39 of 40)]. Safety waivers were most common in patients ≤ 17 years (n = 40) and least common in patients ≤ 6 months (n = 15). Products for infections (n = 32) were the most common group receiving safety waivers; 17 for non-antiviral anti-infective products including treatments for dermatologic infestations/infections, and 15 for antiviral products. CONCLUSION: The data confirm that FDA consistently describes waiver-related safety information in drug/biologic product labeling since the inception of PREA in December of 2003.


Subject(s)
Biological Products , Drug Labeling , United States , Child , Humans , United States Food and Drug Administration , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Biological Products/adverse effects , Antiviral Agents
14.
J Clin Pharmacol ; 63(2): 259-265, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36149807

ABSTRACT

The US Food and Drug Administration is committed to the development of effective antiviral regimens for pediatric patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), including infants and neonates. On April 25, 2022, the approved indication of remdesivir (RDV) was expanded to include pediatric patients 28 days and older and weighing at least 3 kg with positive results of direct severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 viral testing, who are: Hospitalized, or Not hospitalized and have mild to moderate COVID-19 and are at high risk for progression to severe COVID-19, including hospitalization or death. Given the similar course of COVID-19 in adults and pediatric patients, the approval of RDV for use in pediatric patients is supported by the safety and efficacy data from adequate and well-controlled phase 3 trials in adults and adolescents; and by the safety and pharmacokinetic data from a single-arm, open-label, phase 2/3 pediatric clinical trial of 53 pediatric patients at least 28 days of age and weighing at least 3 kg with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection and mild, moderate, or severe COVID-19. At the time of the April 25, 2022, approval action, the US Food and Drug Administration also revoked the emergency use authorization for RDV that previously covered this pediatric population. This article summarizes key issues and regulatory considerations involved in the RDV COVID-19 pediatric development program, including the evolution of the emergency use authorization issued for RDV as results from registrational studies became available, and discusses lessons learned.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Adolescent , Humans , Child , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , SARS-CoV-2 , Adenosine Monophosphate/adverse effects , Adenosine Monophosphate/pharmacokinetics , Alanine/adverse effects , Alanine/pharmacokinetics , Antiviral Agents/adverse effects , Antiviral Agents/pharmacokinetics
15.
J Clin Pharmacol ; 63(3): 307-313, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36150423

ABSTRACT

Pediatric extrapolation plays a key role in the availability of reliable pediatric use information in approved drug labeling. This review examined the use of pediatric extrapolation in studies submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration and assessed changes in extrapolation approaches over time. Pediatric studies of 125 drugs submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration that led to subsequent pediatric information in drug labeling between 2015 and 2020 were reviewed. The use of pediatric extrapolation for each drug was identified and categorized as "complete," "partial," or "no" extrapolation. Approaches to pediatric extrapolation of efficacy changed over time. Complete extrapolation of efficacy was the predominantly used approach. "Complete," "partial," or "no" extrapolation was used for 51%, 23%, and 26% of the drugs, respectively. This represents a shift in extrapolation approaches when compared to a previous study that evaluated pediatrics drug applications between 2009 and 2014, which found complete, partial, or no extrapolation was used for 34%, 29%, and 37% of the drugs, respectively. Pediatric extrapolation approaches may continue to shift as emerging science fills gap in knowledge of the fundamental assumptions underlying this scientific tool. The international community continues to collaborate on discussions of pediatric extrapolation of efficacy from adults and other pediatric subpopulations to optimize its use for pediatric drug development.


Subject(s)
Drug Development , Drug Labeling , Adult , United States , Child , Humans , United States Food and Drug Administration , Pharmaceutical Preparations
16.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol ; 18(8): 1101-1107, 2023 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37055225

ABSTRACT

Like all sick children, children with CKD need access to safe and effective medicines that have been formulated and examined specifically for them. Despite legislation in the United States and the European Union that either mandates or incentivizes programs for children, conducting trials to advance the treatment of children continues to prove to be a challenge for drug developers. This is also the case for drug development in children with CKD, where trials face challenges in recruitment and completion and where there remains a substantial time lag between initial approval of a medicinal product for use in adults and completion of studies that result in the addition of pediatric-specific labeling for the same indication. The Kidney Health Initiative commissioned a workgroup of diverse stakeholders ( https://khi.asn-online.org/projects/project.aspx?ID=61 ), including participants from the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency, to think carefully through the challenges in drug development for children with CKD and how to overcome them. This article provides an overview of the regulatory frameworks in the United States and the European Union that govern pediatric drug development, the current landscape of drug development and approval for children with CKD, the challenges in conduct and execution of these drug trials, and the progress that has been made to facilitate drug development for children with CKD.


Subject(s)
Drug Industry , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Adult , Child , Humans , United States , Drug Development , European Union , United States Food and Drug Administration , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/drug therapy , Drug Approval
17.
Ther Innov Regul Sci ; 57(1): 109-120, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36057747

ABSTRACT

Even with recent substantive improvements in health care in pediatric populations, considerable need remains for additional safe and effective interventions for the prevention and treatment of diseases in children. The approval of prescription drugs and biological products for use in pediatric settings, as in adults, requires demonstration of substantial evidence of effectiveness and favorable benefit-to-risk. For diseases primarily affecting children, such evidence predominantly would be obtained in the pediatric setting. However, for conditions affecting both adults and children, pediatric extrapolation uses scientific evidence in adults to enable more efficiently obtaining a reliable evaluation of an intervention's effects in pediatric populations. Bridging biomarkers potentially have an integral role in pediatric extrapolation. In a setting where an intervention reliably has been established to be safe and effective in adults, and where there is substantive evidence that disease processes in pediatric and adult settings are biologically similar, a 'bridging biomarker' should satisfy three additional criteria: effects on the bridging biomarker should capture effects on the principal causal pathway through which the disease process meaningfully influences 'feels, functions, survives' measures; secondly, the experimental intervention should not have important unintended effects on 'feels, functions, survives' measures not captured by the bridging biomarker; and thirdly, in statistical analyses in adults, the intervention's net effect on 'feels, functions, survives' measures should be consistent with what would be predicted by its level of effect on the bridging biomarker. A validated bridging biomarker has considerable potential utility, since an intervention's efficacy could be extrapolated from adult to pediatric populations if evidence in children establishes the intervention not only to be safe but also to have substantive effects on that bridging biomarker. Proper use of bridging biomarkers could increase availability of reliably evaluated therapies approved for use in pediatric settings, enabling children and their caregivers to make informed choices about health care.


Subject(s)
Caregivers , Adult , Child , Humans , Risk Assessment , Biomarkers
18.
J Clin Pharmacol ; 63 Suppl 1: S7-S17, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37317499

ABSTRACT

As pregnant individuals have traditionally been excluded from clinical trials, there is a gap in knowledge at the time of drug approval regarding safety, efficacy, and appropriate dosing for most prescription medications used during pregnancy. Physiologic changes in pregnancy can result in changes in pharmacokinetics that can impact safety or efficacy. This highlights the need to foster further research and collection of pharmacokinetic data in pregnancy to ensure appropriate drug dosing in pregnant individuals. Therefore, the US Food and Drug Administration and the University of Maryland Center of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation hosted a workshop on May 16 and 17, 2022, titled "Pharmacokinetic Evaluation in Pregnancy." This is a summary of the workshop proceedings.


Subject(s)
Drug Approval , Prescription Drugs , United States , Female , Pregnancy , Humans , United States Food and Drug Administration
19.
Arthritis Rheumatol ; 75(10): 1856-1866, 2023 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37067688

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Stakeholders met to address persistent challenges facing the development of therapeutics for polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA), which result in fewer approved therapies for children with pJIA than adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and long lag times from adult RA approval to pediatric labeling. Ensuring that new medications are authorized in a timely manner to meet the needs of JIA patients worldwide is critically important to multiple stakeholders. METHODS: The Food and Drug Administration in collaboration with the University of Maryland Center for Regulatory Science and Innovation held a public workshop entitled "Accelerating Drug Development for pJIA" on October 2, 2019, to address challenges surrounding access to new medications for children and adolescents with pJIA. Regulatory, academic, and industry stakeholders, as well as patient representatives, participated in the workshop, which consisted of 4 sessions, including panel discussions. RESULTS: The workshop facilitated broad public discussion of challenges facing the development of pJIA therapeutics, highlighting areas of need and outlining opportunities to expedite development, while underscoring the necessity of close collaboration between all stakeholders, including patients and families. CONCLUSION: This report summarizes key aspects of the workshop, including the appropriate application of innovative approaches to the development of pJIA therapeutics, including extrapolation, to address current challenges and provide timely access to newer safe and effective treatments. Long-term safety assessment is of pressing concern to stakeholders and cannot be fully extrapolated from adult studies but requires consistent postmarketing long-term follow-up.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Juvenile , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Adult , Adolescent , Humans , Child , Arthritis, Juvenile/drug therapy , Clinical Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome , Drug Development
20.
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet ; 160C(1): 30-9, 2012 Feb 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22253234

ABSTRACT

Pompe disease is a lysosomal storage disorder caused by deficiency in the enzyme acid α-glucosidase (GAA). Pompe disease is characterized by the accumulation of glycogen, predominantly in muscle tissue, leading to progressive muscle weakness, loss of motor, respiratory, and, in the infantile-onset form, cardiac function. Disease progression is highly variable depending on phenotype, but premature death due to respiratory complications occurs in most patients. Beginning in 2006, approved alglucosidase alfa enzyme replacement therapies [recombinant human (rh) GAA] have been available to treat Pompe patients. Treatment of classic infantile-onset patients, who manifest the severest form of the disease, with alglucosidase alfa (Myozyme®) has led to extended survival and an evolving understanding of the pathophysiology and course of the disease. Moreover, such treatment has brought to light the role of the immune response in abrogating the efficacy of rhGAA in classic infantile-onset patients with severe genetic mutations. Thus, optimization of treatment for such patients includes development and utilization of strategies to prevent or eliminate immune responses, including modulating the immune system (prophylactic and therapeutic immune tolerance induction regimens) and engineering the enzyme to be less immunogenic and more effective. Future research is also critical for evaluating and mitigating novel disease-associated pathologies uncovered by prolonged survival of infantile-onset patients including development of novel therapeutics, and for protein design strategies to increase delivery of enzyme replacement therapy to critical target tissues. Such efforts would be greatly bolstered by further development of predictive animal models and biomarkers to facilitate clinical trials and patient management. Published 2012. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.


Subject(s)
Glycogen Storage Disease Type II/physiopathology , Glycogen Storage Disease Type II/therapy , Immune Tolerance , Immunomodulation , alpha-Glucosidases/metabolism , Antibody Formation/immunology , Child , Child, Preschool , Disease Progression , Enzyme Replacement Therapy/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Immunity, Innate , Infant , Male , United States , alpha-Glucosidases/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL