Comparison of the efficacy of the convex side short fusion combined with concave side single growing rod technique and the traditional bilateral growing rod technique in the treatment of early onset scoliosis.

OBJECTIVES: The application of a growing rod technique can retain the growth and development potential of the spine and thorax while controlling the progression of scoliosis deformity. Theoretically, convex side short fusion combined with a concave side single growing rod technique can significantly reduce the asymmetric growth of the spine in the vertex region in most patients. However, the final clinical outcome of various techniques is yet to be clearly determined and compared between studies. Therefore, we compared the efficacy of these two growing rod techniques in treating early onset scoliosis. METHODS: In a retrospective study of 152 EOS patients seen between 2013.1 and 2019.12, 36 cases of EOS patients were selected for inclusion. Among the 36 cases, 11 cases were treated with convex side short fusion combined with a concave side single growing rod technique, group (A) The remaining 25 cases were treated with traditional bilateral growing rod technique, group (B) Age, gender, etiology, follow-up time, Cobb angle of main curve, T1-S1 height, coronal trunk shift, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), Cobb angle of thoracic kyphosis at last follow-up, and Cobb angle at proximal junction kyphosis of the first and last post-operation follow-up were recorded. In addition, internal fixation related complications, infection, nervous system complications were recorded as well. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between group A and group B in preoperative age, Cobb angle of main curve, coronal trunk shift, T1-S1 height, SVA, Cobb angle of thoracic kyphosis (p > 0.05). However, at the last follow-up (Group A, mean 4.4 ± 1.01 years; Group B, mean 3.6 ± 0.01 years) the Cobb angle of the main curve was less and T1-S1 height greater in group A compared with group B (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between group A and group B in the correction rate of the Cobb angle of the main curve or the growth rate of T1-S1 height (p > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the coronal imbalance ratio, thoracic kyphosis abnormality ratio, or the occurrence PJK ratio between group A and group B at the last follow-up (p > 0.05), but the sagittal imbalance ratio and internal fixation abnormality ratio were higher in group A than in the group B (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: During the treatment of EOS, both the convex side short fusion combined with concave side single growing rod technique and traditional bilateral growing rod technique can correct the Cobb angle of main curve with no significant hindering of the spinal growth observed. The traditional bilateral growing rod technique has advantages in control of the sagittal balance of the spine, and the complications associated with internal fixation were lower.

Robot-assisted Temporary Hemiepiphysiodesis With Eight-plates for Lower Extremity Deformities in Children.

PURPOSE: This study was performed to compare the radiographic results of robot-assisted and traditional methods of treating lower extremity deformities (LEDs). METHODS: From January 2019 to February 2022, 55 patients with LEDs were treated by temporary hemiepiphysiodesis with eight-plates. They were divided into a robot group and a freehand group. The fluoroscopy time and operation time were recorded. The accuracy of screw placement was measured after the operation using the following parameters: coronal entering point (CEP), sagittal entering point (SEP), and angle between the screw and epiphyseal plate (ASEP). The limb length discrepancy (LLD) and femorotibial angle (FTA) were measured before the operation, after the operation, and at the last follow-up. Patients were followed up for 12 to 24 months, and the radiographic results of the 2 groups were compared. RESULTS: Among the 55 patients with LEDs, 36 had LLD and 19 had angular deformities. Seventy-six screws were placed in the robot group and 85 in the freehand group. There was no difference in the CEP between the 2 groups ( P >0.05). The robot group had a better SEP (2.96±1.60 vs. 6.47±2.80 mm) and ASEP (3.46°±1.58° vs. 6.92°±3.92°) than the freehand group ( P <0.001). At the last follow-up, there was no difference in the LLD or FTA improvement between the two groups ( P >0.05). The incidence of complications was significantly lower in the robot group than in the freehand group (0/27 vs. 5/28, P <0.05). CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted temporary hemiepiphysiodesis with eight-plates is a safe and effective method for treating LEDs in children. Robotic placement of screws is superior to freehand placement with respect to the entering position and direction. Although the correction effect for LLD and angular deformity is similar, screw dislocation is less common when using robot assistance. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level-III. Retrospective comparative study.

Surgical treatment for congenital vertebral anomalies with bilateral bifid intrathoracic rib in association: A series of five cases.

Background: Congenital scoliosis is often associated with costal deformities, of which a bilateral bifid intrathoracic rib is very rare. The aim of this study was to retrospectively summarize the clinical manifestations, imaging characteristics, treatment strategies, and postoperative outcomes of five patients with bilateral bifid intrathoracic rib. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the imaging findings and medical records of five pediatric patients (two girls, three boys) with bilateral bifid intrathoracic rib who were surgically treated for congenital kyphoscoliosis (mean age = 8 years). The clinical manifestations, imaging characteristics, treatment strategies, and postoperative outcome were summarized. Results: Four of five patients showed abnormalities from birth. All five patients presented with kyphoscoliosis and a fused vertebral body or lamina. The bilateral bifid intrathoracic rib was located at T2-3 in three patients, T7 in one patient, and T10 in one patient. Various congenital spinal deformities and multiple system malformations were present in all five patients. Three patients had preoperative neurological deficits. For corrective surgery, one patient received a traditional growing rod implantation, one patient underwent resection of a bony septum, and three patients underwent spinal osteotomy. One patient suffered complete paralysis of the lower limbs after surgery. Conclusion: Bilateral bifid intrathoracic rib is a rare anomaly that typically occurs in patients with serious kyphoscoliosis. Bilateral bifid intrathoracic rib patients show similar clinical and radiological characteristics and are likely to exhibit neurological deficits before or following corrective surgery. Spinal surgeons should be aware of the high risk of permanent neurological complications related to surgery in these patients. Level of evidence: level IV.

Associated injuries and complications in pediatric pelvic fractures requiring hospitalization: A series of 315 cases.

Purpose: Pediatric pelvic fractures are uncommon. This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics of pediatric pelvic fractures requiring hospitalization and analyze their correlation with associated injuries and complications. Methods: Data from 315 pediatric pelvic fracture patients admitted to our hospital from January 2006 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Sex, age, modified Torode-Zieg classification, abbreviated injury scale score, injury severity score, mortality, and concomitant injuries were analyzed. Results: Of the 285 (90.5%) cases of combined injuries, most injuries occurred in the abdomen (64.8%) and lower extremities (47.6%), followed by the chest (45.4%) and head (34.6%). A total of 78 patients (24.8%) were transferred to the intensive care unit. In total, 94 patients (29.8%) had complications during hospitalization. There were differences based on injury mechanism (p = 0.001), with the highest complication rate in the fall injury group (32 cases (46.4%)). Approximately 51.4% of patients received surgical treatment for problems that were not related to pelvic fractures. Among these, 30.2% necessitated surgical intervention on the lower limbs. Abdominal surgery was necessary in 19.0% of patients. Conclusions: Children who have pelvic fractures frequently require hospitalization due to the presence of severe injuries in other areas of their bodies. IIIB pelvic fractures frequently occur in conjunction with more severe abdominal injuries; therefore, the prompt management of cavity and organ injuries is of particular importance. Blood transfusion and injury severity score were associated risk factors for intensive care unit admission.

Is it necessary to extend fusion to L4 when correcting pediatric L5-S1 spondylolisthesis?

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate whether extending fusion to L4 is imperative in the surgical treatment of pediatric L5-S1 spondylolisthesis. METHODS: This retrospective analysis encompassed 68 pediatric cases of dysplastic L5-S1 spondylolisthesis who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery at two hospitals. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the upper instrumented vertebra (group L4 and group L5). Data were collected from medical records and radiological images obtained preoperatively and at last follow-up. Radiographic parameters including slip percentage (SP), lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence (PI), Spinal Deformity Study Group dysplastic lumbosacral angle (SDSG-LSA), pelvic tilt (PT), Dubousset's lumbosacral angle (Dub-LSA), sacral slope (SS), and severity index (SI) were measured. Surgery-related data and complication data were also collected. The incidence rates of complications were compared, including those of neurological deficit, adjacent-segment instability (ASI), and other complications. ASI was defined as progression of slippage > 3 mm or posterior opening > 5° in the adjacent segment. Clinical outcomes were assessed with the numeric rating scale (NRS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores. The follow-up period for all patients lasted a minimum of 2 years. RESULTS: Among all 68 patients, group L4 consisted of 15 patients and group L5 comprised 53 patients. The patients included in both groups had comparable baseline demographic characteristics and radiographic parameters. Postoperative SP and SDSG-LSA were significantly lower in group L5 (p < 0.05). No other postoperative radiographic differences were observed between groups. One patient in group L4 and 3 patients in group L5 experienced transient neurological deficits (p > 0.05). There were 13 cases of ASI in group L5 compared with none in group L4 (24.5% vs 0%, p > 0.05). Of the 13 patients with ASI, 4 underwent revision surgery due to L4-5 level instability and clinical symptoms. The remaining individuals exhibited no symptoms, and regular annual follow-up assessments are being conducted for all patients. The NRS and ODI scores at final follow-up did not exhibit any significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Fusion to L5 could achieve comparable satisfactory results to fixation to L4, albeit with increased likelihood of ASI. Extension of fusion to L4 may not be necessary for most patients with pediatric L5-S1 spondylolisthesis.

Safety and effectiveness of halo gravity traction combined with traditional growing rods in severe early-onset scoliosis with neurofibromatosis type 1.

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1) scoliosis can be difficult to treat without early detection. Correcting deformities while considering long-term growth in early-onset scoliosis (EOS) treatment is important. This study was performed to establish the safety and effectiveness of halo gravity traction (HGT) with traditional growing rods (TGRs) in NF-1 EOS. We retrospectively reviewed a cohort of 15 children (7 boys and 8 girls; mean age, 5.61 years) diagnosed with NF-1 EOS from October 2016 to March 2021. All patients underwent HGT before growing rod implantation. The growing rods were lengthened every 9-12 months, with a follow-up of 2-7 years. Cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis (TK), trunk shift (TS), sagittal vertebral axis and T1-S1 height were measured before operation, after traction, after operation and at last follow-up. Complications were also recorded. Fifteen patients with NF-1 EOS were treated with an average traction weight of 10.00 kg. After 29.20 days of HGT, the Cobb angle improved from 99.10° to 62.60°, TK from 79.33° to 55.04°, TS from 31.05 to 17.71 mm, sagittal vertebral axis from 42.07 to 25.63 mm and T1-S1 height from 27.50 to 29.70 cm (P < 0.05 for all). Postoperatively, compared with post-traction, the Cobb angle was 52.40° (P = 0.002) and TK was 44.54° (P = 0.004). No complications occurred during traction. Growing rod dislocation occurred in one patient and growing rod breakage in one patient. HGT combined with TGRs was well-tolerated and effective for treating severe NF-1 EOS. It significantly corrected the Cobb angle and TK, restored trunk balance, and increased spinal height with few complications.

The Evolution of Curve Patterns in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis during Chêneau Brace Treatment.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This retrospective study analyzed bracing outcomes in AIS patients, focusing on curve pattern changes and brace efficacy. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effectiveness of the Chêneau brace across different curve patterns and to evaluate the tendencies in curve evolution during treatment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) presents diverse curve patterns, each responding differently to bracing. Understanding these variations is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies. METHODS: The study included 177 AIS patients treated with Chêneau orthoses, categorized based on curve patterns as per the main curve and modified Lenke (mLenke) classifications. We compared patients according to curve patterns and assessed changes in curve magnitude and pattern before and after treatment. RESULTS: Over an average follow-up of 28.1±10.7 months, the primary curve magnitude decreased from 28.8±6.6° to 25.9±10.5°. Significant reductions were observed in mLenke V and VI patients (P<0.05). Patients with main lumbar curves showed better initial in-brace correction and curve control compared with those with main thoracic curves (P<0.05). In single-curve patterns, binary logistic regression indicated that mLenke V patients demonstrated higher rates of curve control compared with mLenke I patients (P<0.05). No significant differences were found in double-curve patterns between mLenke III and VI (P>0.05). At the final follow-up, thoracolumbar/lumbar curves improved significantly in mLenke III and VI patients (P<0.05), while thoracic curves did not (P>0.05). Furthermore, at the last follow-up, the proportions of mLenke I, II, and IV increased, while mLenke III, V, and VI decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Bracing outcomes were more favorable in patients with main lumbar curves than those with main thoracic curves. However, no significant differences were found in patients with double-curve patterns. Thoracic curves exhibited a higher progression risk compared with thoracolumbar/lumbar curves within the same curve pattern. During bracing, a tendency for primary curves to shift proximally was noted.

Determining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) and Responsiveness of the Chinese Version of Zurich Chronic Middle Ear Inventory (ZCMEI-21-Chn): A Prospective Multicenter Study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to establish the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and assess the responsiveness of the Chinese version of Zurich Chronic Middle Ear Inventory (ZCMEI-21-Chn). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective multicenter study. SETTING: Four Chinese tertiary referral centers admitting patients nationwide. PATIENTS: 230 adult patients with chronic otitis media (COM) undergoing tympanoplasty. INTERVENTION: Patients were required to complete the ZCMEI-21-Chn to measure health-related quality of life both preoperatively and postoperatively. An anchor-based method was used to determine the MCID of the derivative cohort by including the Global Rating of Change Questionnaire as an anchor. The generalizability and consistency with functional outcomes of the MCID estimates were externally examined in a validation cohort using a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: A total of 161 and 69 patients were included in the derivative and validation cohort. The mean preoperative and postoperative ZCMEI-21-Chn total scores were 28.4 (standard deviation [SD] 14.5) and 17.5 (SD 12.6). The mean change in ZCMEI-21-Chn score was 10.9 (SD 14.3, p < 0.001). The MCIDs of the ZCMEI-21-Chn for improvement and deterioration were estimated at 13 (SD 13.0) and -7 (SD 12.9), accordingly. For patients who have reported an improved health-related quality of life, a cutoff value of 15.6 dB HL for elevation of the air-conducted hearing threshold was noticed. However, change of clinical importance judged according to MCID and Japan Otological Society criteria disagreed with each other, notably with a Cohen's kappa ( κ ) of 0.14 ( p = 0.21) in the validation cohort. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to establish the MCID of a COM-specific questionnaire in Chinese. For the COM population undergoing surgical intervention, MCID values of 13 for improvement and -7 for deterioration are recommended. The results were externally validated to be generalizable to nationwide usage, yet distinguishable from the audiological criteria. The availability of the MCID greatly adds to the clinical utility of the ZCMEI-21-Chn by enabling a clinically meaningful interpretation of its score changes.