Surgical outcomes and predictive value for major complications of robot-assisted radical cystectomy of real-world data in a single institution in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to describe the surgical outcome of robot-assisted radical cystectomy and predictive factors for major complications in real-world clinical practice at a single institution in Japan. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 208 consecutive patients undergoing robot-assisted radical cystectomy at our institution between 2019 and 2023. Patient and disease characteristics, intraoperative details, and perioperative outcomes were reviewed. Postoperative complications were defined as minor complications (Clavien-Dindo grades 1-2) or major complications (grades 3-5). Predictors of complications were examined using multivariable logistic analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 147 men and 61 women, median age 70 years (interquartile range, 62-77), were included in this study. Median operative time and estimated blood loss were 8.4 h and 185 mL, respectively; 11 patients (5%) received intraoperative blood transfusions. For urinary diversions, ileal conduit, neobladder, and cutaneous ureterostomy were performed in 153 (74%), 49 (24%), and 6 (3%) patients, respectively. Urinary diversions were primarily performed with extracorporeal urinary diversion. In total, 140 complications occurred in 111 patients (53%) within 30 days. Of these patients, 31 major complications occurred in 28 patients, and one perioperative death (0.5%) with a postoperative cardiovascular event. Multivariable analysis showed only prolonged operative time (odds ratio: 4.34, 95% confidence interval: 1.82-10.35, p < 0.01) was the independent risk factor for major complications. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports surgical outcomes at our single institution. Prolonged operative time was a significant prognostic factor for major complications. As far as we know, this study reports the largest number of robot-assisted radical cystectomy cases at a single center in Japan.

Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index as a Predictor of Prognosis in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Nivolumab.

BACKGROUND: The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) has been reported as a screening tool to assess the nutrition-related risk with mortality in older patients and those with the various diseases. However, the prognostic value of GNRI in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients receiving nivolumab therapy remains unclear. METHODS: Fifty-six consecutive patients with mRCC receiving nivolumab between September 2013 and August 2020 at our institution were retrospectively analyzed. The survival outcomes and prognostic factors associated with overall survival (OS) were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Thirteen and forty-three patients were classified with low (GNRI < 92) and high (GNRI ≥ 92) GNRI, respectively. Patients with low GNRI demonstrated significantly shorter OS (P = 0.0002) than those with high GNRI. In multivariate analysis, GNRI at the time of nivolumab (P = 0.008) was extracted as the predictor for OS in addition to Karnofsky performance status (KPS) (P = 0.016). Integration of the GNRI into the International Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer Database Consortium (IMDC) risk classification improved the c-index from 0.761 to 0.833 (combination of GNRI with IMDC risk classification) and to 0.778 (substitution of GNRI with KPS in IMDC risk classification). CONCLUSIONS: GNRI was a significant prognostic biomarker in mRCC patients receiving nivolumab.

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for intermediate-risk prostate cancer: does ADT still have an impact in the dose-escalated external beam radiation therapy era?

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the effect of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) on the survival of intermediate-risk prostate cancer (IR-PCA) patients treated with dose-escalated external beam radiation therapy (DE-EBRT), and to determine the group that will benefit from ADT. METHODS: We analysed 620 IR-PCA patients treated with DE-EBRT at two institutions. Variables were adjusted using the stabilised inverse probability of treatment weighting method (sIPTW) between radiation therapy (RT) and RT plus ADT groups. Biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) rate and overall survival (OS) rate were compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard analysis (CPH) was conducted to detect unfavorable risk factors. RESULTS: This study included 405 patients; with 217 and 188 patients in the RT and RT plus ADT groups, respectively. The prescribed radiation dose was 78 Gy in 39 fractions. The median follow-up time was 82.0 months. After sIPTW-adjustment, 214.3 and 189.7 patients were assigned to the RT and RT plus ADT groups, respectively. The 7-year bRFS and OS were 89.3% and 94.6% in RT group and 92.3% and 91.0% in RT plus ADT group, respectively. Before and after sIPTW adjustment, no statistically significant differences were found in these endpoints between treatment groups. Multivariate CPH for bRFS revealed Gleason score (GS) 4 + 3 as an unfavorable risk factor, and ADT improved biochemical control of them. CONCLUSION: ADT may not always be effective in all Japanese IR-PCA patients treated with DE-EBRT, but it can improve biochemical control in patients with GS 4 + 3.

Renal function outcome after selective bladder-preserving tetramodality therapy consisting of maximal transurethral resection, induction chemoradiotherapy and consolidative partial cystectomy in comparison with radical cystectomy for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a two-centre retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare renal function (RF) outcomes after bladder-preserving tetramodal therapy against muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) to those after radical cystectomy (RC). METHODS: This study included 95 patients treated with tetramodal therapy consisting of transurethral bladder tumour resection, chemoradiotherapy and partial cystectomy (PC) and 300 patients treated with RC. The annual change in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was compared using the linear mixed model. Renal impairment was defined as a >25% decrease from the pretreatment eGFR, and renal impairment-free survival (RIFS) was calculated. The association between treatment type and renal impairment was assessed. RESULTS: The number of patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 8 (8.4%) in the tetramodal therapy group and 75 (25.0%) in the RC group. After the inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustments, the baseline characteristics were balanced between the treatment groups. The mean eGFR before treatment in tetramodal therapy and RC groups was 69.4 and 69.6 mL/min/1.73 m2 and declined with a slope of -0.7 and -1.5 mL/min/1.73 m2/year, respectively. The annual deterioration rate of post-treatment eGFR in the tetramodal therapy group was milder than in the RC group. The 5-year RIFS rate in the tetramodal therapy and the RC groups was 91.2 and 85.2%, respectively. Tetramodal therapy was an independent factor of better RIFS compared with RC. CONCLUSIONS: RF was better preserved after tetramodal therapy than after radical therapy; however, even after tetramodal therapy, the eGFR decreased, and a non-negligible proportion of patients developed renal impairment.

A phase II randomized trial of metastasis-directed therapy with alpha emitter radium-223 in men with oligometastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (MEDAL).

BACKGROUND: The significance of metastasis-directed therapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer has been widely discussed, and targeted therapy for progressive sites is a feasible option as a multidisciplinary treatment for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). When oligometastatic CRPC with only bone metastases progresses after targeted therapy, it tends to progress as multiple bone metastases. The progression of oligometastatic CRPC after targeted therapy may be due in part to the presence of micrometastatic lesions that, though undetected on imaging, were present prior to targeted therapy. Thus the systemic treatment of micrometastases in combination with targeted therapy for progressive sites is expected to enhance the therapeutic effect. Radium-223 dichloride (radium-223) is a radiopharmaceutical that selectively binds to sites of increased bone turnover and inhibits the growth of adjacent tumor cells by emitting alpha rays. Therefore, for oligometastatic CRPC with only bone metastases, radium-223 may enhance the therapeutic effect of radiotherapy for active metastases. METHODS: This phase II, randomized trial of Metastasis-Directed therapy with ALpha emitter radium-223 in men with oligometastatic CRPC (MEDAL) is designed to assess the utility of radium-223 in combination with metastasis-directed radiotherapy in patients with oligometastatic CRPC confined to bone. In this trial, patients with oligometastatic CRPC with three or fewer bone metastases on whole-body MRI with diffusion-weighted MRI (WB-DWI) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive radiotherapy for active metastases plus radium-223 or radiotherapy for active metastases alone. The prior use of androgen receptor axis-targeted therapy and prostate-specific antigen doubling time will be used as allocation factors. The primary endpoint will be radiological progression-free survival against progression of bone metastases on WB-DWI. DISCUSSION: This will be the first randomized trial to evaluate the effect of radium-223 in combination with targeted therapy in oligometastatic CRPC patients. The combination of targeted therapy for macroscopic metastases with radiopharmaceuticals targeting micrometastasis is expected to be a promising new therapeutic strategy for patients with oligometastatic CRPC confined to bone. Trial registration Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT) (jRCTs031200358); Registered on March 1, 2021, https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCTs031200358.

Real-world effectiveness of nivolumab and subsequent therapy in Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (POST-NIVO study): 36-month follow-up results of a clinical chart review.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the long-term effectiveness of nivolumab monotherapy and following subsequent therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in Japanese real-world settings. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective, observational study, with a 36-month follow-up, and conducted in Japanese patients with mRCC who initiated nivolumab monotherapy between 1 Feb 2017 and 31 Oct 2017. Endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: Of the 208 patients, 36.5% received nivolumab monotherapy as second-line, 30.8% as third-line, and 31.7% as fourth- or later-line therapy. By 36 months, 12.0% of patients continued nivolumab monotherapy; 88.0% discontinued, mainly because of disease progression (66.7%). The median (m) OS was not reached irrespective of treatment line, with a 36-month OS rate of 54.3% (second-line, 57.4%; third-line, 52.6%; fourth- or later-line, 52.9%). The ORR was 24.2% and five patients achieved complete response. The OS from first-line therapy was 8.9 years. In the 95 patients receiving therapy after nivolumab, 87.4% received vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors, with mOS and mPFS of 27.4 and 8.1 months, respectively. Irrespective of treatment line, the mOS was not reached in patients with International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) favorable or intermediate risk at mRCC diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: This 36-month real-world follow-up analysis showed a survival benefit of nivolumab monotherapy for patients with mRCC. The long-term effectiveness of sequential therapy from first-line therapy to therapy after nivolumab was also demonstrated. Additionally, nivolumab monotherapy was beneficial for patients with favorable IMDC risk at the time of mRCC diagnosis.

Predictive ability of prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging and biopsy for side-specific negative lymph node metastasis at radical prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer localization is reportedly associated with the laterality of lymph node metastasis. Thus, it may be feasible to predict side-specific lymph node metastasis (LNM) at radical prostatectomy (RP). To investigate whether multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and biopsy findings can predict side-specific negative LNM and to explore the feasibility of unilateral lymph node dissection (LND) at RP. METHODS: A total of 500 patients who were diagnosed with prostate cancer with prebiopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate and subsequent prostate biopsy and who underwent RP and extended LND without neoadjuvant treatment were enrolled. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, biopsy findings, and LNM were assessed for each side. The negative predictive value (NPV) of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging or biopsy or both for ipsilateral LNM was examined. RESULTS: LNM was found in 9.2% (46/500) and 15.6% (28/180) of patients in the overall and high-risk cohorts, respectively. Magnetic resonance imaging and biopsy findings were negative in 408 and 262 sides, respectively, in the overall cohort and 144 and 100 sides, respectively, in the high-risk cohort. The NPVs of magnetic resonance imaging, biopsy, and both for ipsilateral LNM were 98.3%, 98.5%, and 99.1%, respectively, in the overall cohort, and 95.8%, 97.1%, and 97.6%, respectively, in the high-risk cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral LND may be indicated based on side-specific LNM risk as assessed by prebiopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and biopsy.

Outcomes of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer: a single-institutional study.

BACKGROUND: There are few reports from Japan about the outcomes of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. This study was aimed at assessing the efficacy and toxicity of intensity-modulated radiation therapy in patients with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer. METHODS: We conducted a review of the data, retrieved from our institutional database, of patients who had received intensity-modulated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer at a radiation dose of 78 Gy in 39 fractions. Data of 201 patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer and 311 patients with high-risk prostate cancer were analyzed. RESULTS: The median follow-up period after the completion of intensity-modulated radiation therapy was 100 months (range, 24-154). The rates of cause-specific survival, overall survival, metastasis-free survival and biochemical recurrence-free survival in the intermediate-risk patients were 99, 95, 95 and 94% at 5 years and 99, 91, 90 and 86% at 8 years, respectively; the corresponding rates in the high-risk patients were 100, 97, 91 and 84% at 5 years and 96, 92, 84 and 76% at 8 years, respectively. The crude incidence of late grade 2-3 genitourinary toxicity was 28.1%, and that of late grade 3 genitourinary toxicity was 2.0%. The crude incidence of late grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicity was 5.1%, and there were no cases of late grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrated that intensity-modulated radiation therapy is effective for patients with localized intermediate-risk or high-risk prostate cancer while having minimal toxicity.

Real-world use of enzalutamide in men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in Japan.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study is to evaluate real-world effectiveness and safety of enzalutamide in men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) in Japan. METHODS: This was a retrospective evaluation of medical records from men in Japan who started enzalutamide treatment from November 1, 2014, to March 31, 2018, and received androgen deprivation therapy throughout. The primary endpoint was time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression. Secondary endpoints included PSA response rate, time to first use of new antineoplastic therapy, time to first use of cytotoxic chemotherapy, and enzalutamide treatment duration. An exploratory analysis of metastasis-free survival (MFS) was also performed. Adverse events (AEs) were analyzed to assess safety. RESULTS: Based on data from medical records of 205 men in Japan, median time to PSA progression was 27 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 19-not reached [NR]), with 82.5% and 52.0% of men achieving PSA response rates of ≥ 50% and ≥ 90%, respectively. Median time to first use of new antineoplastic therapy was 36 months (95% CI 27-NR) and median enzalutamide treatment duration was 13 months (interquartile range: 7-24). Median time to first use of cytotoxic chemotherapy was NR (95% CI 41-NR). Median MFS was 29 months (95% CI 23-35). In total, 51.7% of men experienced AEs, with malaise (18.5%), decreased appetite (10.7%), and nausea (4.9%) the most frequently reported. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate the real-world effectiveness and safety of enzalutamide in men with nmCRPC in Japan, further informing healthcare providers about available treatment options for this patient population.

Tumor shrinkage patterns of nivolumab monotherapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the tumor shrinkage patterns of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab monotherapy. METHODS: Forty-four consecutive patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab monotherapy (81 metastatic and four primary lesions) between September 2013 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The tumor shrinkage rate of individual visceral and lymph node metastatic lesions and the primary site lesions treated with nivolumab monotherapy, as well as the association between overall survival and pretreatment tumor size, were statistically assessed. RESULTS: Pretreatment tumor size for the total and individual target lesions, which included kidneys, lungs, pancreas, and lymph nodes, were not correlated with tumor shrinkage rate. The tumor shrinkage rate was found to have no significant association with pretreatment tumor size between any organ. In addition, there is no significant difference in tumor shrinkage rate between larger (>median value) and smaller (

Early C-reactive protein kinetics predict survival of patients with advanced urothelial cancer treated with pembrolizumab.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prognostic and predictive ability of early C-reactive protein (CRP) kinetics, dynamic changes in CRP levels, in patients with advanced urothelial cancer treated with pembrolizumab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 97 patients with advanced urothelial cancer treated with pembrolizumab in second-line or later settings. Patients were divided into three early CRP kinetics groups: non-elevated (baseline CRP < 5 mg/L), responder (baseline CRP ≥ 5 mg/L and CRP decreased below baseline at least once within 30 days), and non-responder (baseline CRP ≥ 5 mg/L and CRP never decreased to baseline within 30 days). Association between early CRP kinetics and pembrolizumab efficacy including objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. RESULTS: Based on early CRP kinetics, 40, 27, and 30 patients were classified as non-elevated, responder, and non-responder, respectively. ORR and DCR were 33% and 60% in non-elevated, 30% and 48% in responder, and 17% and 40% in non-responder; without a statistically significant difference. OS was significantly different among the non-elevated, responder, and non-responder groups (p < 0.01), with 1-year survival rates of 69%, 61%, and 31%, respectively. Early CRP kinetics could discriminate the OS of patients without objective response. Non-responder was an independent predictor for OS (HR 3.65, p < 0.01), as well as liver metastasis and ECOG PS ≥ 2. CONCLUSION: Early CRP kinetics is associated with survival of advanced urothelial cancer patients treated with pembrolizumab and could be a potential biomarker for clinical benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors.

External validation of the Briganti 2019 nomogram to identify candidates for extended pelvic lymph node dissection among patients with high-risk clinically localized prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to establish an external validation of the Briganti 2019 nomogram in a Japanese cohort to preoperatively evaluate the probability of lymph node invasion in patients with high-risk, clinically localized prostate cancer. METHODS: The cohort consisted of 278 patients with prostate cancer diagnosed using magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy who underwent radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection from 2012 to 2020. Patients were rated using the Briganti 2019 nomogram, which evaluates the probability of lymph node invasion. We used the area under curve of the receiver operating characteristic analysis to quantify the accuracy of the nomogram. RESULTS: Nineteen (6.8%) patients had lymph node invasion. The median number of lymph nodes removed was 18. The area under the curve for the Briganti 2019 was 0.71. When the cutoff was set at 7%, 84 (30.2%) patients with extended pelvic lymph node dissection could be omitted, and only 1 (1.2%) patient with lymph node invasion would be missed. Sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive values at the 7% cutoff were 94.7, 32.0, and 98.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This external validation showed that the Briganti 2019 nomogram was accurate, although there may still be scope for individual adjustments.

Clinical features and outcomes of metastatic pheochromocytoma treated by cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Cytotoxic chemotherapy, including cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and dacarbazine (CVD) therapy, is widely used to treat metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Because these diseases are rare, studies are needed to establish treatment strategies. This was a single-center and retrospective study to analyze the efficacy of chemotherapy for patients with metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma diagnosed in 1983-2020. Clinical characteristics, tumor volume response, biochemical response based on catecholamine level, overall survival, and progression-free survival were evaluated. Patients with a complete response or partial response in tumor volume or catecholamine level were classified as responders. Sixteen patients were administered chemotherapy for a median of 16.5 cycles (interquartile range, 10-42). The tumor volume response was classified as follows: partial response (N = 4), stable disease (N = 9), and progressive disease (N = 3) (disease control rate = 81%). The biochemical responses were as follows: complete response (N = 2), partial response (N = 5), no change (N = 3), and progressive disease (N = 1) (disease control rate = 91%). The 5-year survival rate was 50% (95% confidence interval [CI], 21-74%) and median overall survival was 4.4 years (95% CI, 2.4 years-not reached). Overall survival and progression-free survival between responders and nonresponders were not statistically different. One patient developed myelodysplastic syndrome during CVD therapy. In conclusion, chemotherapy achieved disease control among more than half of patients, although survival did not differ between responders and nonresponders. Further fundamental research and prospective trials are needed to analyze the efficacy of CVD therapy.

Japanese single-institution analysis of mitotane for patients with adrenocortical carcinoma.

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare malignancy with a poor prognosis. While mitotane is the only agent approved for ACC, clinical data are scarce, especially in the Asian population. We reviewed 10 patients with ACC who received mitotane as a single agent or in combination with other agents in our institution. Patient characteristics, clinical outcomes, and toxicities were analyzed. Mitotane was administered to 2 patients as an adjuvant therapy and to 8 patients for systemic control. In the latter 8 patients, 1 patient had locally advanced disease and 1 had metastatic disease at the time of initial diagnosis, whereas the other 6 patients experienced metastatic relapse at mitotane initiation. The administered regimen was mitotane alone in 7 patients, and mitotane plus cytotoxic chemotherapy in 3 patients. The initial daily mitotane dose was 3.0 g in 2 patients, 1.5 g in 7 patients, and 1.0 g in 1 patient. The median duration of treatment was 3.7 (range, 0.7-22.1) months. In 8 systemic cases, the median overall survival from chemotherapy initiation was 7.2 months, and only 1 patient survived over 1 year. The median interval from mitotane termination to death in systemic cases was 2.8 months, and the cause was progressive disease in 4 patients and toxicity (hallucination, mycobacteriosis, or liver injury) in 3 patients. As a second-line regimen, 2 systemic cases and 1 adjuvant case were enrolled in clinical trials. Our analysis exhibited extremely poor prognosis under mitotane-based regimens, and further treatment strategies are warranted to improve outcomes.

First-line combination chemotherapy with etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin for the treatment of disseminated germ cell cancer: Efficacy and feasibility in current clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles of first-line etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin and primary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim as first-line chemotherapy for disseminated germ cell cancer. METHODS: This study reviewed 154 consecutive patients with previously untreated disseminated germ cell cancer who received first-line etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin between 1995 and 2020. Of these, 54 patients were managed with primary prophylaxis using pegfilgrastim (primary prophylaxis group), and 100 were managed with the therapeutic use of short-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (non-primary prophylaxis group). RESULTS: The International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group classification identified 90 (58%)/40 (26%)/24 (16%) patients with good/intermediate/poor prognosis, respectively. Overall, 139 patients (90%) were disease free after etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin with/without post-chemotherapy surgery. The median relative dose intensity of etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin was 96%, and there was a significant difference between the primary prophylaxis and non-primary prophylaxis groups (100% vs 90%, P < 0.01). The 5-year salvage treatment-free and overall survival rates were 83% and 94%, respectively. In total, 138 patients (90%) developed grade 4 hematological toxicities, and there were no treatment-related deaths due to myelosuppression. Grade 4 neutropenia was less commonly observed in the primary prophylaxis group compared with the non-primary prophylaxis group (80% vs 95%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study of first-line etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin, and its sufficient efficacy and safety profiles are confirmed in current clinical practice. Primary prophylaxis using pegfilgrastim might further improve the feasibility of etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin.

Adult genitourinary sarcoma: The era of optional chemotherapeutic agents for soft tissue sarcoma.

OBJECTIVE: To report our institutional experience with treatment of primary genitourinary soft tissue sarcoma. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of adult soft tissue sarcoma patients treated between March 2005 and May 2019. The primary tumor sites included the prostate, kidney, urinary bladder and the paratesticular structures. RESULTS: A total of 19 patients - 16 men (84%) and three women (16%) - were enrolled in the study. The median age was 41 years (range 20-79 years). The most common primary site was the prostate (in eight patients; 42%), and prostatic sarcoma patients were younger than patients with sarcomas of other origins. The most common histological subtype was leiomyosarcoma (in five patients; 26%). The overall survival rates after 1, 3 and 5 years were 61.5%, 34.4% and 25.8%, respectively. The median survival time was 20.7 months (95% confidence interval 5.9-35.5 months). Univariate analysis showed that an absence of metastasis at diagnosis and complete surgical resection were predictive of favorable survival. In the chemotherapy group, the objective response rate was 20.5%. Pazopanib was administered to nine patients in the late-line setting, and the objective response rate was 11.1%; six grade ≥3 adverse events were observed in three patients. CONCLUSIONS: Inoperable metastatic genitourinary soft tissue sarcoma remains difficult to treat, as previously reported. Further investigation on this malignancy, including optimization of currently available antitumor drugs and the development of novel therapeutic agents, is required.

Oncological outcomes for patients with locally advanced prostate cancer treated with neoadjuvant endocrine and external-beam radiation therapy followed by adjuvant continuous/intermittent endocrine therapy in an open-label, randomized, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: To date, research has not determined the optimal procedure for adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (PCa) treated for 6 months with neoadjuvant ADT and external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT). METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, phase 3 trial enrolled 303 patients with locally advanced PCa between 2001 and 2006. Participants were treated with neoadjuvant ADT for 6 months. Then, 280 patients whose prostate-specific antigen levels were less than pretreatment levels and less than 10 ng/mL were randomized. All 280 participants were treated with 72 Gy of EBRT in combination with adjuvant ADT for 8 months. Thereafter, participants were assigned to long-term ADT (5 years in all; arm 1) or intermittent ADT (arm 2). The primary endpoint was modified biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) with respect to nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) progression, clinical relapse, or any cause of death. RESULTS: The median follow-up time after randomization was 8.2 years. Among the 136 and 144 men assigned to trial arms 1 and 2, respectively, 24 and 30 progressed to nmCRPC or clinical relapse, and 5 and 6 died of PCa. The 5-year modified bRFS rates were 84.8% and 82.8% in trial arms 1 and 2, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.132; 95% confidence interval, 0.744-1.722). CONCLUSIONS: Although modified bRFS data did not demonstrate noninferiority for arm 2, intermittent adjuvant ADT after EBRT with 14 months of neoadjuvant and short-term adjuvant ADT is a promising treatment strategy, especially in a population of responders after 6 months of ADT for locally advanced PCa.

Prognostic Significance of the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score in Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Nivolumab after Failure of Prior Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.

PURPOSE: The controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score, consisting of albumin, lymphocytes and total cholesterol, is a validated, objective tool for nutritional assessment. Patients with advanced cancer frequently have malnutrition in association with cachexia and chronic inflammation. We explored the prognostic significance of the CONUT score in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma receiving nivolumab. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 60 patients with stage IV renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab after failure of prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors at 2 cancer centers between 2016 and 2019. Associations of the CONUT score with progression-free survival, cancer specific survival and tumor shrinkage rate were assessed. RESULTS: The median (range) CONUT score was 2 (0-10). During followup periods 29 and 14 patients exhibited disease progression and died of cancer, respectively. Both progression-free survival and cancer specific survival were significantly stratified by CONUT scores of 0 to 1, 2 to 4 and 5 or more (p=0.002). A CONUT score of 5 or more (versus score 0 to 1) was independently associated with unfavorable progression-free survival (HR 5.18, p=0.003) and cancer specific survival (HR 15.34, p=0.014), as was the absence of prior nephrectomy (HR 4.23, p=0.004 and HR 6.57, p=0.001, respectively). C-indices of the CONUT score for predicting progression-free survival and cancer specific survival were 0.694 and 0.737, respectively. The CONUT score was significantly associated with the best response to nivolumab with the median tumor shrinkage rate of -23%, +8% and +24% for CONUT scores of 0 to 1, 2 to 4 and 5 or more, respectively (p=0.021). CONCLUSIONS: The CONUT score may be useful to predict the clinical outcomes and therapeutic response in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma receiving nivolumab.

Efficacy and safety profile of nivolumab for Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell cancer.

BACKGROUND: Nivolumab, which has a promising anti-tumor efficacy and a manageable safety profile, has being rapidly introduced in metastatic renal cell cancer therapy in Japan. We evaluated the efficacy and adverse events of nivolumab in real world clinical practice in Japan. METHODS: The medical records of 45 consecutive patients who started treatment with nivolumab, up to September 2018, were reviewed and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 22.3 months. The best responses were a complete response in three patients (8%), a partial response in 14 patients (36%), stable disease in 14 patients (36%), and progressive disease in eight patients (20%). The median progression-free survival period and 1 year progression-free survival rate were 14.9 months and 54.5%, respectively. The estimated overall survival period and 1-year and 2-year overall survival rates from initiation of nivolumab were not reached, and 91.1%, and 86.2%, respectively. Twenty-seven patients (60%) experienced adverse events including four (10%) severe adverse events (Grade 3 or 4). The most common adverse event was rash (n = 9, 20%). Five patients discontinued nivolumab therapy, because of an adverse event (Grade 3 diarrhea, one patient; Grade 2 fatigue, one patient; Grade 3 uveitis, two patients; and Grade 3 adrenal insufficiency, one patient). CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab has a relatively favorable efficacy and safety profile for Japanese metastatic renal cell cancer patients in clinical practice.

A multicenter retrospective study of nivolumab monotherapy in previously treated metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients: interim analysis of Japanese real-world data.

BACKGROUND: In a phase III clinical trial, CheckMate 025, treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) with nivolumab demonstrated superior efficacy over everolimus. However, as the clinical trial excluded patients with specific complications and poor performance status (PS), the effectiveness and safety of nivolumab in clinical practice, in which patients with various clinical complications are treated, is unclear. This study explored real-world nivolumab treatment in Japanese mRCC patients. METHODS: This is an interim analysis of a multicenter, non-interventional, medical record review study (minimum follow-up: 9 months). All eligible Japanese mRCC patients who first received nivolumab between February and October 2017 were included; data cut-off was April 2019. We analyzed nivolumab treatment patterns, efficacy (including overall survival, progression-free survival, objective response rate, and duration of response) and safety (including immune-related adverse events). RESULTS: Of 208 evaluable patients, 31.7% received nivolumab as fourth- or later line of treatment. At data cut-off, 26.9% of patients were continuing nivolumab treatment. The major reason for discontinuation was disease progression (n = 100, 65.8%). Median overall survival was not reached; the 12-month survival rate was 75.6%. Median progression-free survival was 7.1 months, the objective response rate was 22.6%, and median duration of response was 13.3 months. Patients who were excluded or limited in number in CheckMate 025, such as those with non-clear cell RCC or poor PS, also received benefits from nivolumab treatment. Immune-related adverse events occurred in 27.4% of patients (grade ≥ 3, 10.1%). CONCLUSION: Nivolumab was effective and well-tolerated in real-world Japanese mRCC patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000033312.