ABSTRACT
The gut microbiota is increasingly considered to play a key role in human immunity and health. The aging process alters the microbiota composition, which is associated with inflammation, reactive oxygen species (ROS), decreased tissue function, and increased susceptibility to age-related diseases. It has been demonstrated that plant polysaccharides have beneficial effects on the gut microbiota, particularly in reducing pathogenic bacteria abundance and increasing beneficial bacteria populations. However, there is limited evidence of the effect of plant polysaccharides on age-related gut microbiota dysbiosis and ROS accumulation during the aging process. To explore the effect of Eucommiae polysaccharides (EPs) on age-related gut microbiota dysbiosis and ROS accumulation during the aging process of Drosophila, a series of behavioral and life span assays of Drosophila with the same genetic background in standard medium and a medium supplemented with EPs were performed. Next, the gut microbiota composition and protein composition of Drosophila in standard medium and the medium supplemented with EPs were detected using 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis and quantitative proteomic analysis. Here, we show that supplementation of Eucommiae polysaccharides (EPs) during development leads to the life span extension of Drosophila. Furthermore, EPs decreased age-related ROS accumulation and suppressed Gluconobacter, Providencia, and Enterobacteriaceae in aged Drosophila. Increased Gluconobacter, Providencia, and Enterobacteriaceae in the indigenous microbiota might induce age-related gut dysfunction in Drosophila and shortens their life span. Our study demonstrates that EPs can be used as prebiotic agents to prevent aging-associated gut dysbiosis and reactive oxidative stress.
Subject(s)
Drosophila , Dysbiosis , Humans , Animals , Aged , Drosophila/metabolism , Reactive Oxygen Species/metabolism , Dysbiosis/drug therapy , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Proteomics , Polysaccharides/pharmacology , Aging , Enterobacteriaceae , Life ExpectancyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Bao-Gan-Xing-Jiu-Wan (BGXJW) is a clinical experience-based Chinese herbal formula. Its efficacy, pharmacological safety, targeted function, process quality, and other aspects have met the evaluation standards and the latest requirements of preparations. It could prevent and alleviate the symptoms of drunkenness and alcoholic liver injury clinically. The present work aims to elucidate whether BGXJW could protect against drunkenness and alcoholic liver disease in mice and explore the associated mechanism. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We used acute-on-chronic (NIAAA) mice model to induce alcoholic steatosis, and alcohol binge-drinking model to reappear the drunk condition. BGXJW at indicated doses were administered by oral gavage respectively to analyze its effects on alcoholic liver injury and the associated molecular mechanisms. RESULTS: BGXJW had no cardiac, hepatic, renal, or intestinal toxicity in mice. Alcoholic liver injury and steatosis in the NIAAA mode were effectively prevented by BGXJW treatment. BGXJW increased the expression of alcohol metabolizing enzymes ADH, CYP2E1, and ALDH2 to enhance alcohol metabolism, inhibited steatosis through regulating lipid metabolism, counteracted alcohol-induced upregulation of lipid synthesis related proteins SREBP1, FASN, and SCD1, meanwhile it enhanced fatty acids ß-oxidation related proteins PPAR-α and CPT1A. Alcohol taken enhanced pro-inflammatory TNF-α, IL-6 and down-regulated the anti-inflammatory IL-10 expression in the liver, which were also reversed by BGXJW administration. Moreover, BGXJW significantly decreased the blood ethanol concentration and alleviated drunkenness in the alcohol binge-drinking mice model. CONCLUSIONS: BGXJW could effectively relieve drunkenness and prevent alcoholic liver disease by regulating lipid metabolism, inflammatory response, and alcohol metabolism.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUNDS: Drug induced liver injury (DILI) is sometimes similar to autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) in serology and histology. Clinicians empirically screened DILI with significant autoimmune characteristics to implement clinical intervention. We tried to characterize DILI with autoantibodies by metabolomics. METHODS: Untargeted metabolomics coupled with pattern recognition approaches were performed on sera samples including AIH (n = 59), DILI with autoantibodies (DILIAb+, n = 68), and DILI without autoantibodies (DILIAb-, n = 75). The differential metabolites and fingerprint metabolites between AIH and DILIAb- were screened by orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis and hierarchical clustering respectively. RESULTS: Of the 388 annotated differential metabolites between AIH and DILIAb-, 74 fingerprint metabolites were screened. The eigenmetabolite compressed from the fingerprint possessed high discrimination efficacy (AUC:0.891; 95 %CI, 0.838-0.944). In the fingerprint-based PCA model, AIH and DILIAb- were separated into three regions: the "pure region" of AIH (Region 1), the "pure region" of DILIAb- (Region 3), the mixture region of AIH and DILIAb- (Region 2). After incorporated into the PCA model, DILIAb+ samples were distributed into the three regions, indicating that DILIAb+ samples had different etiological tendencies. Moreover, the fingerprint-based radar model verified the results of PCA model characterizing DILIAb+. Notably, the antibody titers of DILIAb+ in the three regions did not differ significantly, while the response rates for glucocorticoids were obviously different. The metabolic difference among DILIAb+ in different regions mainly lies in energy metabolism. CONCLUSIONS: In terms of metabolic signature, DILIAb+ may not be a community of same pathogenesis, including AIH-inclined parts. Which deserves further study.