Computer-aided diagnostic screen for Congenital Central Hypoventilation Syndrome with facial phenotype.

BACKGROUND: Congenital Central Hypoventilation Syndrome (CCHS) has devastating consequences if not diagnosed promptly. Despite identification of the disease-defining gene PHOX2B and a facial phenotype, CCHS remains underdiagnosed. This study aimed to incorporate automated techniques on facial photos to screen for CCHS in a diverse pediatric cohort to improve early case identification and assess a facial phenotype-PHOX2B genotype relationship. METHODS: Facial photos of children and young adults with CCHS were control-matched by age, sex, race/ethnicity. After validating landmarks, principal component analysis (PCA) was applied with logistic regression (LR) for feature attribution and machine learning models for subject classification and assessment by PHOX2B pathovariant. RESULTS: Gradient-based feature attribution confirmed a subtle facial phenotype and models were successful in classifying CCHS: neural network performed best (median sensitivity 90% (IQR 84%, 95%)) on 179 clinical photos (versus LR and XGBoost, both 85% (IQR 75-76%, 90%)). Outcomes were comparable stratified by PHOX2B genotype and with the addition of publicly available CCHS photos (n = 104) using PCA and LR (sensitivity 83-89% (IQR 67-76%, 92-100%). CONCLUSIONS: Utilizing facial features, findings suggest an automated, accessible classifier may be used to screen for CCHS in children with the phenotype and support providers to seek PHOX2B testing to improve the diagnostics. IMPACT: Facial landmarking and principal component analysis on a diverse pediatric and young adult cohort with PHOX2B pathovariants delineated a distinct, subtle CCHS facial phenotype. Automated, low-cost machine learning models can detect a CCHS facial phenotype with a high sensitivity in screening to ultimately refer for disease-defining PHOX2B testing, potentially addressing gaps in disease underdiagnosis and allow for critical, timely intervention.

Thermal ablation versus hepatic resection for colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases: a propensity score matching study.

OBJECTIVES: Several studies have compared the efficacy of hepatic resection (HR) and thermal ablation (TA) for unresectable tumors; however, results remain inconsistent. Most cohorts in previous studies were heterogeneous groups of synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) and extrahepatic metastases. This retrospective study aimed to compare the therapeutic efficacy between TA and HR in synchronous CRLM without extrahepatic metastases. METHODS: Cases with initially synchronous CRLM without extrahepatic metastases between January 2007 and December 2018 were enrolled. Of the 448 cases, 346 received HR and 102 TA. Propensity score matching with a 1:1 ratio was used to improve the comparability between the HR and TA groups. Technical success, complications, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared before and after matching. RESULTS: All patients achieved technical success. Major complication rates in the HR and TA groups were, respectively, 36.7% and 8.8% (p < 0.001). Before matching, the 5-year OS and DFS (p = 0.004 and p = 0.020, respectively) were significantly higher in the HR group than in the TA group. After matching, no significant difference in the 5-year OS and DFS was found between the groups (p = 0.770 and p = 0.939, respectively). Local tumor progression rate was significantly higher in the TA group both before (p = 0.027) and after (p = 0.029) matching. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with CRC with synchronous CRLM, TA and HR provide comparable OS and DFS. TA is preferable if complete ablation is predicted. KEY POINTS: • Thermal ablation and hepatic resection provide comparable overall survival and disease-free survival. • Thermal ablation is a safe and effective treatment for patients with colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases and has a lower major complication rate and higher repeatability than hepatic resection. • Thermal ablation is preferable if complete ablation is predicted.

Comparison of long-term outcomes between Lynch sydrome and sporadic colorectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most common hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) syndrome. Comparison of prognosis between LS and sporadic CRC (SCRC) were rare, with conflicting results. This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes between patients with LS and SCRC. METHODS: Between June 2008 and September 2018, a total of 47 patients were diagnosed with LS by genetic testing at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. A 1:2 propensity score matching was performed to obtain homogeneous cohorts from SCRC group. Thereafter, 94 SCRC patients were enrolled as control group. All of enrolled patients received curative surgeries and standardized postoperative monitoring. The long-term survival rates between the two groups were compared, and the prognostic factors were also analyzed. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival rate of LS group was 97.6%, which was significantly higher than of 82.6% for SCRC group (χ2 = 4.745, p = 0.029). The 5-year recurrence free survival rate showed no significant differences between the two groups (78.0% for LS group vs. 70.6% for SCRC patients; χ2 = 1.260, p = 0.262). The 5-year tumor free survival rates in LS group was 62.1% for LS patients, which were significantly lower than of 70.6% for SCRC group (χ2 = 4.258, p = 0.039). Subgroup analysis of recurrent patients show that the LS group had longer overall survival than the SCRC group after combined chemotherapy. By multivariate analysis, we found that tumor recurrence of primary CRC [Risk ratio (95% (confidence interval): 48.917(9.866-242.539); p < 0.001] and late TNM staging [Risk ratio (95% (confidence interval): 2.968(1.478-5.964); p = 0.002] were independent risk factors for OS. CONCLUSION: LS patients have better long-term survival prognosis than SCRC patients, even though the two groups have statistically comparable recurrence free survival. Combined chemotherapy is an effective treatment for LS patients who developed primary CRC recurrence. Standardized postoperative monitoring for LS patients may enable detection of metachronous tumors at earlier stages, which was a guarantee of a favorable prognosis despite lower tumor free survival.

The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on colorectal cancer patients: a single-center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Since December 2019, China has experienced a public health emergency from the coronavirus disease, which has become a pandemic and is impacting the care of cancer patients worldwide. This study evaluated the impact of the pandemic on colorectal cancer (CRC) patients at our center and aimed to share the lessons we learned with clinics currently experiencing this impact. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data on CRC patients admitted between January 1, 2020 and May 3, 2020; the control group comprised patients admitted between January 1, 2019 and May 3, 2019. RESULTS: During the pandemic, outpatient volumes decreased significantly, especially those of nonlocal and elderly patients, whereas the number of patients who received chemotherapy and surgery remained the same. During the pandemic, 710 CRC patients underwent curative resection. The proportion of patients who received laparoscopic surgeries was 49.4%, significantly higher than the 39.5% during the same period in 2019. The proportion of major complication during the pandemic was not significantly different from that of the control group. The mean hospital stay was significantly longer than that of the control group. CONCLUSIONS: CRC patients confirmed to be infection-free can receive routine treatment. Using online medical counseling and appropriate identification, treatment and follow-up can be effectively maintained. Adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy should not be discontinued. Endoscopic polypectomy, elective, palliative, and multidisciplinary surgeries can be postponed, while curative surgery should proceed as usual. For elderly CRC patients, endoscopic surgery and neoadjuvant radiotherapy are recommended.