Long-term impact of liver transplantation on respiratory function and nutritional status in children and adults with cystic fibrosis.

Early liver transplant (LT) has been advocated for patients with cystic fibrosis liver disease (CFLD) and evidence of deterioration in nutritional state and respiratory function to prevent further decline. However, the impact of single LT on long-term respiratory function and nutritional status has not been adequately addressed. We performed a retrospective analysis of the outcomes of 40 (21 adult/19 pediatric) patients with CFLD transplanted between 1987 and 2009 with median follow-up of 47.8 months (range 4-180). One and five-year actuarial survival rates were 85%/64% for adult and 90%/85% for pediatric LT cohorts, respectively. Lung function remained stable until 4 years (FEV(1) % predicted; pretransplant 48.4% vs. 45.9%, 4 years posttransplant) but declined by 5 years (42.4%). Up to 4 years posttransplant mean annual decline in FEV(1) % was lower (0.74%; p = 0.04) compared with the predicted 3% annual decline in CF patients with comorbidity including diabetes. Number of courses of intravenous antibiotics was reduced following LT, from 3.9/year pretransplant to 1.1/year, 5 years posttransplant. Body mass index was preserved posttransplant; 18.0 kg/m(2) (range 15-24.3) pretransplant versus 19.6 kg/m(2) (range 16.4-22.7) 5 years posttransplant. In conclusion, LT is an effective treatment for selected patients with cirrhosis due to CFLD, stabilizing aspects of long-term lung function and preserving nutritional status.

Is serum gentamicin level a good predictor of graft injury in intestinal transplantation?

INTRODUCTION: Following intestinal transplant (SBT), the early diagnosis and treatment of rejection is a major management aim. The diagnosis of rejection is based on histology of stomal biopsies. Oral gentamycin (2.5 mg/kg) was used for selective decontamination of the digestive system. Our hypothesis was that gentamycin might be absorbed in the presence of graft dysfunction. AIM: Our goal was to assess the correlation between serum gentamycin level and the health of the intestinal graft. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Among 33 SBT performed from 1993 to 2005, serum gentamycin levels were performed once weekly or more often when there was a suspicion of rejection. All data were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Adequate trough levels were achieved for only 23 patients, six of whom had histologically proven rejection and only one did not have a raised gentamycin content. Five patients with raised levels but no rejection included two with severe intestinal ischemia and three with bowel obstruction/ileus. Four of the five patients required laparotomies. CONCLUSION: We concluded that in our study raised serum gentamycin levels were a good predictor of rejection or significant injury to the graft.

Immunosuppressive drugs in paediatric liver transplantation.

Orthotopic liver transplantation is established treatment for children with acute and chronic liver failure. Despite advances in pre- and postoperative management, innovative surgical techniques and new immunosuppressive drugs, acute and chronic rejection remains a problem. In addition, well established adverse effects of commonly used immunosuppressive drugs are no longer accept able. More potent, but less toxic, immunosuppressive agents have been developed and some novel compounds are now entering routine practice. Cyclosporin was the cornerstone of immunosuppressive therapy until the introduction of its novel pharmaceutical form (Neoral) with improved bioavailability, lower inter- and intraindividual pharmacokinetic variability and improved graft survival. Recently, tacrolimus, a macrolide drug with a similar mode of action, but much higher potency, was introduced and, at present, is the only agent which can successfully replace cyclosporin as a first-line immunosuppressive drug. Mycophenolate mofetil has recently been approved for use in adult and paediatric renal transplant recipients. It has a similar mode of action to cyclosporin and tacrolimus, but acts at a later stage of the T cell activation pathway. Administration with standard immunosuppressive drugs reduces the incidence of acute rejection and enables cyclosporin and tacrolimus dose reduction, thus reducing the risk of associated toxic effects. Phase I and II trials with sirolimus (rapamycin), a macrolide antibiotic, have shown comparable immunosuppressive action, when administered in conjunction with standard immunosuppressants. Further clinical trials need to be carried out to establish efficacy, tolerability and pharmacokinetics in paediatric transplant recipients. Monoclonal antibody therapy (daclizumab and basiliximab) is an exciting new development whereby T cell proliferation is inhibited by selective blockade of interleukin (IL)-2 receptors. Preliminary results, when used in combination with a standard immunosuppressive regimen, are good with respect to incidence of acute graft rejection, host immune response and adverse effects. FTY720 is a novel synthetic immunosuppressive compound which induces a reduction in peripheral blood lymphocyte count through apoptotic T cell death or accelerated trafficking of T cells into lymphatic tissues. Experimental animal studies demonstrated synergistic action in combination with low dose cyclosporin or tacrolimus, potentiating their immunosuppressive effects. Further studies are being carried out to determine its potential for application in organ transplantation. Despite this rapid development of novel compounds, it will take many years before they may become part of standard protocols in paediatric transplantation medicine. Further development and research of efficacy and tolerability of existing drugs is, therefore, vital.

Management of end-stage central venous access in children referred for possible small bowel transplantation.

UNLABELLED: The 3-year survival after small bowel transplantation (SBTx) has improved to between 73% and 88%. Impaired venous access for parenteral nutrition can be an indication for SBTx in children with chronic intestinal failure. AIM: To report our experience in management of children with extreme end-stage venous access. SUBJECTS: The study consisted of 6 children (all boys), median age of assessment 27 months (range, 13-52 months), diagnosed with total intestinal aganglionosis (1), protracted diarrhea (1), and short bowel syndrome (4), of which gastroschisis (2) and malrotation with midgut volvulus (2) were the causes. All had a documented history of more than 10 central venous catheter insertions previously. All had venograms, and 1 child additionally had a magnetic resonance angiogram to evaluate venous access. Five of 6 presented with thrombosis of the superior vena cava (SVC) and/or inferior vena cava. METHODS: Venous access was reestablished as follows: transhepatic venous catheters (5), direct intra-atrial catheter via midline sternotomy (4), azygous venous catheters (2), dilatation of left subclavian vein after passage of a guide wire and then placing a catheter to reach the right atrium (1), radiological recanalization of the SVC and placement of a central venous catheter in situ (1), and direct puncture of SVC stump(1). Complications included serous pleural effusion after direct intra-atrial line insertion, which resolved after chest drain insertion (1), displacement of transhepatic catheter needing repositioning (2), and SVC stent narrowing requiring repeated balloon dilatation. OUTCOME: Four children with permanent intestinal failure on assessment were offered SBTx, 3 of which were transplanted and were established on full enteral nutrition; the family of 1 child declined the procedure. In the remaining 2 children in whom bowel adaptation was still a possibility, attempts were made to provide adequate central venous access as feeds and drug manipulations were undertaken. One of them received liver and SBTx nearly 3 years after presenting with end-stage central venous access, because attempts to achieve independence from parenteral nutrition had failed. The other child died immediately after a transhepatic venous catheter placement, possibly from a nutritional depletion syndrome as no physical cause of death was found. Direct intra-atrial catheters in transplanted children proved to be adequate for the management of uncomplicated transplantation, although the usual infusion protocol had to be modified considerably, and the lack of access would have been critical if massive blood transfusion had been required during the transplant procedure. CONCLUSION: It was possible to reestablish central venous access in all cases. However, this was time consuming and difficult to assemble a skilled team consisting of one of more: surgeon, cardiologist, interventional radiologist, and transplant anesthetist. Small bowel transplantation is easier and safer with adequate central venous access, and we advocate liaison with an SBTx center at an early stage.

Comparison of pharmacokinetics of Neoral and Sandimmune in stable pediatric liver transplant recipients.

Cyclosporine (Sandimmune; Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd) is an effective immunosuppressive drug, but its lipid formulation and variable absorption may expose children to the risk of rejection during episodes of gastroenteritis after liver transplantation. Neoral (Novartis) is a microemulsified form of cyclosporine that may be better absorbed. In this study, the pharmacokinetic profiles of Neoral and Sandimmune were compared in stable children after liver transplantation to evaluate whether Neoral is more predictably absorbed. Eight children, 6 boys and 2 girls, with a mean age of 4.5 years (range, 1.2-12) were studied between 4 and 12 months after liver transplantation. Pharmacokinetic profiles were performed on each child by using the same dose (mg/kg) of Neoral or Sandimmune. Tmax, Cmax, Ctrough, and the area under the curve (AUC) were calculated and side effects were documented in children taking either drug for more than 3 months. Mean peak cyclosporine levels were higher and were achieved significantly sooner with Neoral (Cmax 790.5 +/- 216.5 ng/mL, P =.06; Tmax 1.8 +/- 1.0 hr, P =.01) than with Sandimmune (Cmax 589.4 +/- 313 ng/mL, Tmax 2.5 +/- 1.7 hr), implying more rapid and better absorption. There was no significant difference in overall drug exposure (AUC) and 12-hour trough levels between the two formulations (P >.05). Children with Roux-en-Y loop biliary anastomosis taking Neoral, however, showed greater increases in AUC (mean increase = 37%) than those with duct-to-duct anastomosis (mean increase = 16%). There was no correlation between 12-hour trough level and AUC for either Neoral (r2 = 0.48) or Sandimmune (r2 = -0.08); however, for both drugs, AUC correlated very well with the 2-hour post-dose level (r2 = 0.68 and 0.7, respectively). Hirsutism was reported in 4 of 6 children on Neoral and may be associated with higher peak levels. Neoral is more consistently absorbed than Sandimmune in children after liver transplantation and may be more effective prophylaxis against rejection. Because of the increased peak levels and drug exposure, which may influence side effects, particularly in children with Sandimmune malabsorption, we recommend a 1:0.75 dose conversion ratio in patients being converted from Sandimmune to Neoral.

Efficacy of Neoral in the immediate postoperative period in children post-liver transplantation.

Cyclosporine (Sandimmune) is an effective immunosuppressive drug but may be poorly absorbed in the early postoperative period after liver transplantation, exposing the recipient to an increased risk for rejection. Neoral is a new oral formulation of cyclosporine that uses a mixture of surfactant, lipophilic, and hydrophilic solvents to permit microemulsification that leads to potentially better absorption. This oral drug has not been evaluated in children immediately posttransplantation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, bioavailability, and safety of Neoral during the first week post-liver transplantation in children. Twelve children, 8 boys and 4 girls, with a median age of 2.6 years (range, 1 to 8 years) were administered Neoral within 12 hours posttransplantation. Pharmacokinetic profiles were performed over a 12-hour period on each child on days 1, 3, and 5 and twice-daily trough levels were obtained on days 2, 4, 6, and 7. The maximum concentration (Cmax), time to reach Cmax (Tmax), 12-hour trough levels, and area under the curve were calculated, and rejection episodes and adverse events were documented over a 12-week period. Neoral was well absorbed, even on the first postoperative day. After the introduction of enteral feeding, the peak levels increased (Cmax, 655 ng/mL) and were achieved significantly sooner (Tmax, 2 hours). There was no significant difference in drug exposure between days 1, 3, and 5 (P > .05). The incidence of acute rejection was 25% and hypertension was reported in 4 of 12 patients during the first week. Neoral was well absorbed in the early post-liver transplantation period, provided effective immunosuppression, and was not associated with a high incidence of adverse events or toxicity. The introduction of enteral feeding improved absorption.

Long-term nutritional and neurodevelopmental outcome of liver transplantation in infants aged less than 12 months.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation is established treatment for children with end-stage liver disease and has a 5-year survival rate of 80% to 85%, even in infants under 12 months. Long-term outcome in nutritional rehabilitation and normal development is unknown. This study aimed to prospectively evaluate growth and psychoneurologic performance of children who undergo liver transplantation in infancy. METHODS: Twenty-five infants (18 girls, 7 boys) who underwent liver transplantation at less than 12 months of age (median age, 9 months) were evaluated for 4 years. Growth measurements were expressed as standard deviation scores (SDSs; mean +/- SEM), and psychoneurologic performance was assessed with the unrevised Griffiths Mental Ability Scales (normal range, 80-120). RESULTS: Four children died during the study (4-year survival, 84%). The children were malnourished before transplantation (SDSs: weight, -1.9 +/- 0.2; midarm muscle area, -0.93 +/- 0.3; midarm fat area, -1.52 +/- 0.3; and height, -0.95 +/- 0.3). Nutritional rehabilitation for all parameters occurred within 12 to 24 months after transplantation, which was most significant for weight (-1.1 +/- 0.2, P = 0.001), midarm muscle area (0.74 +/- 0.3, P = 0.001), and midarm fat area (-0.44 +/- 0.3, P = 0.01). There was some improvement in height (-0.72 +/- 0.3, P = 0.14), which was not significant, although infants who were severely stunted before transplantation (mean height standard deviation score [SDS] -2.46) showed significant catch-up at 1 year after transplantation (mean height SDS -1.2, P = 0.003). Psychoneurologic scores were within normal limits before transplantation and were maintained for the 4-year follow-up period, although individual scores varied during this period. Improved nutritional status was associated with increased muscle bulk and subsequent improvement in motor scores from 90.6 at initial assessment to 97.3 at 4 years (P = 0.28). There was a temporary reduction in social skills and eye-hand coordination in the first year, which may have been an effect of the hospital environment or cyclosporine immunosuppression. Language abilities also regressed during the first year, possibly related to the effect of nasogastric tube feeding in delaying normal speech development. CONCLUSIONS: Liver transplantation in infancy has not only a successful outcome but is also associated with long-term catch-up growth and nutrition and maintenance of normal development.

New perspective for the management of near-total or total intestinal aganglionosis in infants.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Extensive intestinal aganglionosis is rare. The diagnosis and treatment are known to be difficult and it had been considered to be fatal. The aim of this study was to review our experience with children with extensive intestinal aganglionosis. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was conducted in patients referred to the intestinal transplantation unit since 1993. Presentation and outcome were analysed looking at 2 groups who had either undergone previous subtotal intestinal resection (group I) or no or limited resection (group II). RESULTS: Eight children were selected (3 patients in group I and 5 in group II). Group I was remarkable in that patients all were referred early in age with progressing liver failure. Parents of one patient refused to accept transplantation as treatment, and he died one month later. Two noncirrhotic patients were maintained in the parenteral nutrition programme and currently progress well with enteral feedings. The other 5 patients underwent transplant, and 4 of 5 are alive after transplantation with a mean follow-up of 22.2 months (range 0.4 to 63.6). CONCLUSIONS: Subtotal resection of intestine at the time of diagnosis must be avoided. Conservative management with parenteral nutrition may be associated with long-term good outcome. Small bowel transplant may open new perspective in the management of patients with end-stage liver disease.