ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is the second most common cancer worldwide with relatively low metastatic potential (2-5%). Developments in therapeutic options have highlighted the need to better identify high-risk patients who could benefit from closer surveillance, adjuvant therapies and baseline/follow-up imaging, while at the same time safely omitting low-risk patients from further follow-up. Controversy remains regarding the predictive performance of current cSCC staging systems and which methodology to adopt. OBJECTIVES: To validate the performance of four cSCC staging systems [American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition (AJCC8), Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH), Tübingen and Salamanca T3 refinement] in predicting metastasis using a nationwide cohort. METHODS: A nested case-control study using data from the National Disease Registration Service, England, 2013-2015 was conducted. Metastatic cSCC cases were identified using an algorithm to identify all potential cases for manual review. These were 1 : 1 matched on follow-up time to nonmetastatic controls randomly selected from 2013. Staging systems were analysed for distinctiveness, homogeneity, monotonicity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and c-index. RESULTS: We included 887 metastatic cSCC cases and 887 nonmetastatic cSCC controls. The BWH system showed the highest specificity [92.8%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 90.8-94.3%, PPV (13.2%, 95% CI 10.6-16.2) and c-index (0.84, 95% CI 0.82-0.86). The AJCC8 showed superior NPV (99.2%, 95% CI 99.2-99.3), homogeneity and monotonicity compared with the BWH and Tübingen diameter and thickness classifications (P < 0.001). Salamanca refinement did not show any improvement in AJCC8 T3 cSCC staging. CONCLUSIONS: We validated four cSCC staging systems using the largest nationwide dataset of metastatic cSCC so far. Although the BWH system showed the highest overall discriminative ability, PPV was low for all staging systems, which shows the need for further improvement and refining of current cSCC staging systems.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Neoplasms, Second Primary , Skin Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Neoplasm Staging , Neoplasms, Second Primary/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/pathologySubject(s)
Catheter Ablation/methods , Hot Temperature , Saphenous Vein/surgery , Steam , Varicose Veins/surgery , Animals , Sheep , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Lentigo maligna is an in situ melanoma which usually affects sun-damaged skin on the head and neck. In patients with lentigo maligna, the clinically visible demarcation often correlates poorly with the histopathologically confirmed demarcation. The standard treatment for lentigo maligna is excision with at least 5 mm margins. The key disadvantage of regular excision is the lack of histological margin control, resulting in non-radical excisions and a higher risk of recurrence. Micrographic surgery is indicated for patients with lentigo maligna because this technique is tissue-sparing and it offers absolute certainty concerning the presence of clear histological margins.