Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale (Health-ITUES) and User-Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) for 3D Intraoperative Cognitive Navigation (ICON3DTM) System for Urological Procedures.

Backgound and objectives: In recent years, the adoption of 3D models for surgical planning and intraoperative guidance has gained a wide diffusion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgeons' perception and usability of ICON3DTM platform for robotic and laparoscopic urological surgical procedures. Materials and Methods: During the 10th edition of the Techno-Urology Meeting, surgeons and attendees had the opportunity to test the new ICON3DTM platform. The capability of the user to manipulate the model with hands/mouse, the software usability, the quality of the 3D model's reproduction, and the quality of its use during the surgery were evaluated with the Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale (Health-ITUES) and the User-Experience Questionnaire (UEQ). Results: Fifty-three participants responded to the questionnaires. Based on the answers to the Health-ITUES questionnaire, ICON3DTM resulted to have a positive additional value in presurgical/surgical planning with 43.4% and 39.6% of responders that rated 4 (agree) and 5 (strongly agree), respectively. Regarding the UEQ questionnaire, both mouse and infrared hand-tracking system resulted to be easy to use for 99% of the responders, while the software resulted to be easy to use for 93.4% of the responders. Conclusions: In conclusion, ICON3DTM has been widely appreciated by urologists thanks to its various applications, from preoperative planning to its support for intraoperative decision-making in both robot-assisted and laparoscopic settings.

[Malunion of the distal radius: 3D planning and performance of intra- and extra-articular corrective osteotomy]. / Malunion der distalen Radiusfraktur: 3-D-Planung und Durchführung von intra- und extraartikulären Korrekturosteotomien.

OBJECTIVE: Restoration of the original anatomy with reduction of both current symptoms and risk of posttraumatic osteoarthritis. INDICATIONS: Symptomatic intra- or extra-articular malunion due to limitation of movement and/or painful function, intra-articular step of > 1 mm, instability of the distal radioulnar joint. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Minimal deformity. Pre-existing osteoarthritis Knirk and Jupiter II or higher. Simpler surgical alternative, e.g., ulna shortening osteotomy. Smoking or advanced age are not contraindications. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Preoperative assessment and performance of a bilateral computed tomography (CT). Three-dimensional (3D) malposition analysis and calculation of the correction. Planning of the corrective osteotomy on the 3D model and creation of patient-specific drilling and sawing guides. Performing the 3D-guided osteotomy. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Early functional unloaded mobilization with the splint for 8 weeks until consolidation control with CT. RESULTS: Significant reduction of the step to < 1 mm (p ≤ 0.05) can be achieved with intra-articular corrections. In extra-articular corrective osteotomies, a mean residual rotational malalignment error of 2.0° (±â€¯2.2°) and a translational malalignment error of 0.6 mm (±â€¯0.2 mm) is achieved. Single-cut osteotomies in the shaft region can be performed to within a few degrees for rotation (e.g., pronation/supination 4.9°) and for translation (e.g., proximal/distal, 0.8 mm). After surgery, a mean residual 3D angle of 5.8° (SD 3.6°) was measured. Furthermore, surgical time for 3D-assisted surgery is significantly reduced compared to the conventional technique (140 ± 37 vs 108 ± 26 min; p < 0.05). Thus, the progression of osteoarthritis can be reduced in the medium term and improved mobility and grip strength are achieved. The clinical outcome parameters based on patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) and the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) scores are roughly comparable.

Accuracy of a guided implant system with milled surgical templates.

PURPOSE: This in vitro study analyzed the accuracy of a computer-assisted design (CAD)/computer-assisted manufacturing (CAM) guided implant surgery system by comparing linear, angular, and coronal deviations between the planned and final implant placement. METHODS: By using a fully guided surgery workflow, 32 dental implants were placed in 16 partially edentulous models. After virtual design of the restorations, radiological and CAD files were matched and implant positions were planned by using dedicated implant planning software (Galileo Implant version 1.9.2.). Templates were designed (Cerec Omnicam) and milled (Cerec MC XL) by using chairside workflow. Galileo Implant version 1.9.2. was used to evaluate accuracy. RESULTS: Mean horizontal and angular-coronal total deviation values were 0.2 mm (SD = 0.126) and 1.1º (SD = 0.834) respectively. Multivariate analysis of variance showed significant differences in horizontal and angular-coronal total deviation in the 32 implants (P = 0.0001). Multivariate analysis with one-factor interaction showed no statistical difference in implant position or implant type (P = 0.139) between eight maxilla models and eight jaw models. CONCLUSION: Horizontal and angular-coronal deviations of implants placed with chairside digital workflow were within the recommended safety margin for fully guided surgery.