Midterm outcomes of endovascular treatment for infected aortic aneurysms: Single center experience.

OBJECTIVE: The standard treatment of infected aortic aneurysms is open surgical repair but mortality rates remain high with the common cause of death being sepsis. Endovascular treatment of infected aortic aneurysms is another option and here we report the midterm outcomes of endovascular treatment for infected aortic aneurysms. METHODS: Thirty-four patients with infected aortic aneurysms underwent endovascular and hybrid repair between December 2012 and June 2021. The patients were evaluated for early and midterm outcomes including postoperative mortality, morbidity, recurrent aortic infection, and midterm survival. RESULTS: There were 34 patients who presented with infected aortic aneurysms with a mean age of 66.7 years (range, 26-89). Most of the patients presented with abdominal pain (94.1%) and fever (50.0%). The rate of positive blood culture for organisms was 32.4%. Salmonella was the most common organism. The procedures for treatment were endovascular repair using straight endograft, aorto-uni-iliac (AUI) endograft, bifurcated endograft, and thoracic endograft. Other procedures were endovascular repair with sandwich technique, chimney or periscope technique, and hybrid operation. The rate of in-hospital mortality and morbidity were 11.8% and 17.6%, respectively. Mean follow-up time was 21 months (range, 1-70). During the follow-up period, 7 (23.3%) patients had recurrent infection of aortic aneurysms and 5 patients required reoperation. Four patients died from septicemia and one patient died from cardiac disease. Male patients were more likely to have recurrent infection compared to females. The cumulative survival at 1 year and 2 years were 86.3% and 80.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective review of the endovascular treatment in the patients who presented with infected aortic aneurysms showed acceptable early and midterm outcomes.

Early outcomes of native and graft-related abdominal aortic infection managed with orthotopic xenopericardial grafts.

OBJECTIVE: Reconstruction of infected aortic cases has shifted from extra-anatomic to in situ. This study reports the surgical strategy and early outcomes of abdominal aortic reconstruction in both native and graft-related aortic infection with in situ xenopericardial grafts. METHODS: Included in the analysis are 21 consecutive patients (mean age, 69 years; 20 male) who underwent abdominal xenopericardial in situ reconstruction of native aortic infection (4) and endovascular (4) or open (13) graft aortic infection between July 2017 and September 2019. All repairs were performed on an urgent basis, but none were ruptured. All patients were followed up with clinical and biologic evaluation, ultrasound at 3 months, and computed tomography scan at 6 months and 1 year. RESULTS: Technical success was 100%; 8 patients were treated with xenopericardial tubes and 13 with bifurcated grafts. Thirty-day mortality was 4.7% (one death due to pneumonia with respiratory hypoxic failure in critical care.). Six patients (28%) developed acute kidney injury, four (19%) requiring temporary dialysis; five fully recovered and one died. Four patients (19%) required a return to the operating room. After a median follow-up of 14 months (range, 1-26 months), overall mortality was 19% (n = 4). Two patients presented with recurrent sepsis after reconstruction, leading to death due to multiorgan failure. Other patients (17/21) have discontinued antibiotics with no evidence of recurrence of infection clinically, radiologically, or on blood tests. Computed tomography scans at 1 year demonstrated no stenosis or graft dilation and one asymptomatic left graft branch thrombosis. Primary patency is 95%. CONCLUSIONS: In situ xenopericardial aortic reconstruction is a safe and effective management strategy for both native and graft-related abdominal aortic infection with good short-term results. The graft demonstrates appropriate resistance to infection such that reliable eradication of infection in this vascular bed is possible. Longer follow-up is required in future studies to determine the durability of the reconstruction and need for reinterventions.

Results of cryopreserved arterial allograft replacement for thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic infections.

BACKGROUND: Primary and secondary thoracic aortic infections are rare but associated with high morbidity and mortality. There is currently no consensus on their optimal treatment. Arterial allografts have been shown to be resistant to bacterial colonization. Complete excision of infected material, especially synthetic grafts, combined with in situ aortic repair is considered the best treatment of abdominal aortic infections. The aim of this study was to assess the management of thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic infections using arterial allografts. METHODS: Between January 2009 and December 2017, all patients with thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic native or graft infections underwent complete excision of infected material and in situ arterial allografting. The end points were the early mortality and morbidity rates and early and late rates of reinfection, graft degeneration, and graft-related morbidity. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients with a mean age of 65.6 ± 9.2 years were included. Twenty-one (60%) cases experienced graft infections and 14 (40%) experienced native aortic infections. Eight (22.8%) patients had visceral fistulas: 5 (14.4%) prosthetic-esophageal, 1 (2.8%) prosthetic-bronchial, 1 (2.8%) prosthetic-duodenal, and 1 (2.8%) native aortobronchial. In 12 (34.3%) cases, only the descending thoracic aorta was involved; in 23 (65.7%) cases, the thoracoabdominal aorta was involved. Fifteen (42.8%) patients died during the first month or before discharge: 5 of hemorrhage, 4 of multiorgan failure, 3 of ischemic colitis, 2 of pneumonia, and 1 of anastomotic disruption. Eleven (31.5%) patients required early revision surgery: 6 (17.1%) for nongraft-related hemorrhage, 3 (8.6%) for colectomy, 1 (2.9%) for proximal anastomotic disruption, and 1 (2.9%) for tamponade. One (2.9%) patient who died before discharge experienced paraplegia. One (2.9%) patient experienced stroke. Six (17.1%) patients required postoperative dialysis. Among them, four died before discharge. The mean length of stay in the intensive care unit was 11 ± 10.5 days; the mean length of hospital stay was 32 ± 14 days. During a mean follow-up of 32.3 ± 23.7 months, three allograft-related complications occurred in survivors (15% of late survivors): one proximal and one distal false aneurysm with no evidence of reinfection and one allograft-enteric fistula. The 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 49.3% and 42.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although rare, aortic infections are highly challenging. Surgical management includes complete excision of infected tissues or grafts. Allografts offer a promising solution to aortic graft infection because they appear to resist reinfection; however, the grafts must be observed indefinitely because of the risk of late graft complications.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus portends a poor prognosis after endovascular repair of mycotic aortic aneurysms and aortic graft infections.

OBJECTIVE: Mycotic aortic aneurysms and aortic graft infections (aortic infections [AIs]) are rare but highly morbid conditions. Open surgical repair is the "gold standard" treatment, but endovascular repair (EVR) is increasingly being used in the management of AI because of the lower operative morbidity. Multiple organisms are associated with AI, and bacteriology may be an important indication of mortality. We describe the bacteriology and associated outcomes of a group of patients treated with an EVR-first approach for AI. METHODS: All patients who underwent EVR for native aortic or aortic graft infections between 2005 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Primary end points were 30-day mortality and overall mortality. The primary exposure variable was bacteria species. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine association with mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to estimate survival. RESULTS: A total of 2038 EVRs were performed in 1989 unique and consecutive patients. Of those, 27 patients had undergone EVR for AI. Thirteen presented ruptured (48%). Eighteen (67%) were hemodynamically unstable. Ten had a gastrointestinal bleed (37%), whereas others presented with abdominal pain (33%), fever (22%), chest or back pain (18.5%), and hemothorax (3.7%). Twenty patients had a positive blood culture (74%), with the most common organism being methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolated in 37% (10). Other organisms were Escherichia coli (3), Staphylococcus epidermidis (2), Streptococcus (2), Enterococcus faecalis (1), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (1), and Klebsiella (1). Thirteen patients had 4 to 6 weeks of postoperative antibiotic therapy, six of whom died after therapy. Fourteen were prescribed lifelong therapy; 10 died while receiving antibiotics. On univariate analysis for mortality, smoking history (P = .061) and aerodigestive bleeding on presentation (P = .109) approached significance, whereas MRSA infection (P = .001) was strongly associated with increased mortality. On multivariate analysis, MRSA remained a strong, independent predictor of mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 93.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-4643; P = .023). Overall 30-day mortality was 11%, all MRSA positive. At mean follow-up of 17.4 ± 28 months, overall mortality was 59%. Overall survival at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years was 49%, 31%, and 23%. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated that MRSA-positive patients had a significantly lower survival compared with other pathogens (1-year, 20% vs 71%; 5-year, 0% vs 44%; P = .0009). CONCLUSIONS: In our series of AI, the most commonly isolated organism was MRSA. MRSA is highly virulent and is associated with increased mortality compared with all other organisms, regardless of treatment. Given our results, EVR for MRSA-positive AI was not a durable treatment option.

Systematic review of native and graft-related aortic infection outcome managed with orthotopic xenopericardial grafts.

OBJECTIVE: Limited data are available on the use of xenopericardium in the treatment of native and graft-related aortic infections. The aim of this review was to assess outcomes of neoaortic reconstruction using xenopericardium in this challenging group of patients. METHODS: Studies involving xenopericardial graft reconstruction to treat native and aortic graft infections were systematically searched and reviewed (Embase, Medline, and Cochrane databases) for the period of January 2007 to December 2017. RESULTS: A total of 4 studies describing 71 patients treated for aortic graft (n = 54) and native aortic (n = 17) infections were included; 25 patients (35%) were operated on in an acute setting. The technical success rate was 100%. The mean 30-day mortality was 25% (range, 7.7%-31%). Only one death (1.4%) was linked to the operator-made pericardial tube graft (acute postoperative bleeding from proximal anastomosis). Septic multiorgan failure was the most common cause of perioperative death (72% [13/18]). Among the 53 patients who survived, only 3 presented with recurrent infection (5.7%), so 70.4% of patients were alive after intervention without evidence of infection (50/71). During follow-up, 2 false aneurysms (3.7% [2/53]), 1 early rupture (1.4% [1/71]), and 2 cases (3.7% [2/53]) of late rupture were reported. Other causes of late deaths unrelated to the aortic xenopericardial repair were not reported in the different series. The early reintervention rate was 1.4% (1/71), treated by open repair for rupture. The late reintervention rate was 7.5% (4/53) with thoracic endovascular aortic repair in three patients (one false aneurysm and two ruptures) and open repair in one patient (one false aneurysm). There were no cases of early or late graft thrombosis. One-year mortality rate was 38% but only 4.2% were related to the aortic repair using orthotopic xenopericardium (one early and two late ruptures). CONCLUSIONS: These data confirm the high morbidity of native and graft-related aortic infections and provide insight into the results of orthotopic xenografts as a treatment alternative. Larger series and longer follow-up will be required to compare the role of operator-made pericardial tube graft with other treatment options in infected fields.

Branched xenopericardial roll graft replacement of an infected aortic arch graft.

Which graft material is the optimal graft material for the treatment of aortic graft infections is still a matter of controversy. We used a branched xenopericardial roll graft to replace an infected aortic arch graft as a "rescue" operation. The patient is alive and well 37 months postoperatively without recurrence of the infection and any surgical complication. This procedure may have the possibility to serve as an option for the treatment of aortic arch graft infection.

Recent Results of In Situ Abdominal Aortic Reconstruction with Cryopreserved Arterial Allograft.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate treatment outcomes of in situ abdominal aortic reconstruction with cryopreserved arterial allograft (CAA) for patients with abdominal aortic infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was conducted of patients who underwent in situ aortic reconstruction using CAA for primary, secondary, or prosthetic infection of the abdominal aorta between May 2006 and July 2015, at a single institution. Clinical presentation, indications for treatment, procedural details, early post-operative mortality and morbidity, late death, and graft related complications during the follow up period were investigated. Patient survival and event free survival (any death or re-operation) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (male, n = 20, 80%; mean age, 70.2 ± 8.7 years) underwent in situ abdominal aortic reconstruction (48% aortic, 52% aorto-bi-iliac) with vessel size and ABO matched CAA for treatment of abdominal aortic infection caused by infected abdominal aortic aneurysm (n = 15), aortic prosthesis infection (n = 7), aortic reconstruction with concomitant colon resection (n = 2), and primary suppurative aortitis (n = 1). The median follow up was 19.1 months (range 1-73 months). There were seven post-operative deaths including two (8%) early (<30 days) and five (20%) late deaths There were three (12%) graft related complications including thrombotic occlusion of the CAA, aneurysmal dilatation, and aorto-enteric fistula. Three years after CAA implantation, patient survival was 74% and the event free survival was 58%. CONCLUSIONS: It is believed that in situ abdominal aortic reconstruction with CAA is a useful option for treating primary, secondary, or prosthetic infection of the abdominal aorta.

Urgent or Emergent Endovascular Aortic Repair of Infective Aortitis.

Background: Aortitis is a rare inflammation of the aorta. It can be classified as infective, non-infective, or idiopathic. Infective aortitis can debut as an acute aortic syndrome that needs urgent or emergent treatment. Historically, these kinds of patients have been preferably treated by open surgery, with subsequent lack of information about the endovascular repair. The aim of the present study is to report the results of our experience with the urgent or emergent endovascular repair of infective aortitis with acute presentation. Methods: All consecutive urgent or emergent endovascular repairs, performed between January 2019 and January 2024 for the treatment of infective aortitis, were included. The inclusion criteria were clinical, laboratory, and radiological findings recognized as aortitis risk factors. Patients with graft or endograft infection, aortic fistulae, and mycotic aneurysm were excluded. Primary endpoints were technical success and 30-day and follow-up survival. Early and late major adverse events, any changes in lesion morphology over time, and need for re-intervention were also assessed. Results: A total of 15 patients (14 males and 1 female) with a mean age of 74.2 ± 8.3 were included. All the subjects were treated by endovascular means in an urgent or emergent setting because of a rapidly growing aneurysm, symptomatic lesion, or contained or free aortic rupture. The diagnosis of infective aortitis was confirmed postoperatively by positive blood cultures in all the patients. A rapidly growing or symptomatic lesion was noted in all 15 subjects. Among these there were six (40%) contained and two (13%) free aneurysm ruptures. The endovascular techniques performed were as follows: four thoracic-EVAR (TEVAR), three off-the-shelf branched-EVAR (BEVAR), one Chimney-EVAR (Ch-EVAR), six EVAR with bifurcated graft, and one EVAR with straight tube graft. Technical success was achieved in 100% of the patients. Two patients (13%) died within 30 days after the index procedure. No case of early aortic-related mortality was registered. During a mean follow-up of 31.6 ± 23.1 months (range 1-71), no further death or major adverse event was registered among the remaining 13 alive patients. Re-interventions were performed in three cases (20%). Aneurysm's shrinkage > 5 mm or stability was noted in 10 of the 13 patients who survived the early period after repair. Conclusions: Despite the relative reluctance to use an endograft in an infected area, in our experience the endovascular approach resulted to be feasible, safe, and effective in the treatment of infective aortitis with acute presentation, with acceptable peri-operative and mid-term follow-up outcomes. Further studies are needed to confirm our results.

Aorto-iliac aneurysm infected by Brucella: distinctive presentation patterns of a rare entity.

There is currently a lack of information on presentation patterns and the appropriate investigation and treatment of aortic brucellosis. Herein a case affecting the iliac component of an aorto-iliac aneurysm, managed successfully with in situ graft repair, is reported. A review of the literature identified 25 cases, with the infrarenal abdominal aorta (65%) followed by the ascending thoracic aorta (23%) being mostly affected; only our case involved the iliacs. Aortic brucellosis affected mostly older men, caused pain more often than fever (in 73% and 57%, respectively), and involved frequently the spine or the aortic valve (n = 14, 56%). Preoperative diagnosis was made more often in the presence of fever (67% versus 18% in afebrile patients, P = 0.021). In situ aneurysm repair in the form of open (54%) or endovascular (8%) grafting was mostly performed. Mortality was 12% and graft infection was 13% at two years. In conclusion, aortic brucellosis has unique presentation patterns, usually affecting an abnormal or aneurysmal aorta and/or due to a contiguous spinal or aortic valve infection. Acute symptomatology with pain and/or fever occurs very often and should raise suspicion for aortic infection. Despite the seriousness of aortic involvement, mortality and reinfection rates are within acceptable levels.

Management and Outcome of Non-Aneurysmal Primary Aortic Infection.

INTRODUCTION: Aortic infection without prior intervention or aneurysm is exceedingly rare. We report the presentation, diagnosis, management, and outcome of patients with this unusual entity. METHODS: Retrospective chart and imaging review of patients with primary aortic infection. RESULTS: 5 patients (3 male, mean age 71.2 years) presented between 2014 and 2022. All had abdominal, back, or flank pain. Four had constitutional symptoms. All were evaluated with a complete blood count; 3 had leukocytosis. Both serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were elevated in the 4 patients evaluated with these tests. All were studied with peripheral blood culture on the first hospital day prior to any antibiotic administration. Blood culture was positive in only 1 patient. Computed tomography (CT) scan showed periaortic inflammation without aneurysm in all. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) was obtained in 3 and a radiolabeled leukocyte single-photon emission CT (SPECT) scan was performed in 2. All demonstrated periaortic concentration of the radioisotope consistent with inflammation or infection. Intraoperative cultures were positive in 3. One patient who had a negative intraoperative culture was examined with broad range polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and DNA sequencing which identified a causative bacterium. The other patient with a negative intraoperative culture had periaortic abscess but was on antibiotics preoperatively, potentially confounding the culture. All patients underwent in-situ repair with rifampin impregnated polyester (N = 2), cryopreserved aortic allograft (N = 2), or autogenous femoral vein (N = 1). No patient developed recurrent infection or aortic related complications following surgery with an average follow up of 31.8 months (range 8-88 months). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with primary aortic infection present similarly with the triad of abdominal or back pain, laboratory markers of infection, and imaging demonstrating periaortic inflammation. Patients were treated successfully with in-situ repair. Preoperative identification of a causative organism was difficult, and PCR may be useful to help identify an organism.

Early and late outcomes of surgical repair of mycotic aortic aneurysms: A 30-year experience.

OBJECTIVE: Mycotic aortic aneurysm and its associated complications are often catastrophic. In this study, we examined the early and late outcomes of surgical repair of mycotic aortic aneurysm at our center over the last 3 decades. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our prospectively maintained aortic surgery database with supplemental adjudication of medical records. Aortic infection was confirmed through clinical, radiological, intraoperative, pathological, and treatment evidence. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients (median age, 68 years; interquartile range, 62-74) who underwent surgical repair of a mycotic aortic aneurysm between 1992 and 2021 were included. Almost all patients (n = 72; 96%) presented with symptoms, including 26 patients (35%) with rupture, and many underwent urgent or emergency repair (n = 64; 85%). Sixty-one patients underwent open repair, and 14 patients underwent hybrid or endovascular repair. Infection-specific adjunct techniques included rifampin-soaked grafts (n = 16), omental pedicle flaps (n = 21), and antibiotic irrigation catheters (n = 8). There were 15 early deaths (20%), including 10 of the 26 patients (38%) who presented with rupture; however, persistent stroke, paraplegia or paraparesis, and renal failure necessitating dialysis were uncommon (each <5%). Almost all early survivors (52/60; 87%) were discharged with long-term antibiotic therapy. Estimated survival at 2, 6, and 10 years was 55.7% ± 5.8%, 39.0% ± 5.7%, and 26.9% ± 5.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of patients with mycotic aortic aneurysm present with rupture and generally require urgent or emergency repair. Operative mortality and complications are common, especially for patients who present with rupture, and late survival is poor.

Q fever vertebral osteomyelitis among adults: a case series and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Q fever osteoarticular infections are a rare complication of the chronic form of Q fever. We aimed to characterize chronic Q fever vertebral osteomyelitis through our experience and a review of the literature. METHODS: Four adult patients with Q fever vertebral osteomyelitis diagnosed in a tertiary hospital in northern Israel between 2016 to 2020 are described. In addition, a 30 years' literature review of Q fever vertebral osteomyelitis, characterizing predisposing factors, clinical presentation, course of disease, treatment and outcomes, was performed. RESULTS: Thirty-four adult patients with Q fever vertebral osteomyelitis were identified. The vast majority were male (30/34, 88%) with a mean age of 67.2 ± 10 years. Involvement of the adjacent aorta, likely the origin of the infection, was observed in 23/34 (68%) of the patients, usually among patients with aortic graft or aneurysm. Clinical presentation was insidious and fever was frequently absent. Delayed diagnosis for months to years after symptoms onset was frequently reported. Vascular infections were managed with or without extraction of the infected aneurysm/aorta and graft placement. The outcome was variable with limited follow-up data in most cases. Patients were usually treated with prolonged antimicrobial therapy, most commonly doxycycline and hydroxychloroquine combination therapy. CONCLUSION: Q fever should be included in the differential diagnosis of vertebral osteomyelitis in endemic settings, in particular when concomitant adjacent vascular infection exists.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Nontraumatic Aortic Disease.

Nontraumatic aortic disease can be caused by a wide variety of disorders including congenital, inflammatory, infectious, metabolic, neoplastic, and degenerative processes. Imaging examinations such as radiography, ultrasound, echocardiography, catheter-based angiography, CT, MRI, and nuclear medicine examinations are essential for diagnosis, treatment planning, and assessment of therapeutic response. Depending upon the clinical scenario, each of these modalities has strengths and weaknesses. Whenever possible, the selection of a diagnostic imaging examination should be based upon the best available evidence. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment. The purpose of this document is to assist physicians select the most appropriate diagnostic imaging examination for nontraumatic aortic diseases.

In situ revascularization with rifampicin-soaked silver polyester graft for aortic infection: Results of a retrospective monocentric series of 18 cases.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the short and long-term results of in situ prosthetic graft treatment using rifampicin-soaked silver polyester graft in patients with aortic infection. MATERIAL AND METHOD: All the patients surgically managed in our center for an aortic infection were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was the intra-hospital mortality, secondary outcomes were limb salvage, persistent or recurrent infection, prosthetic graft patency, and long-term survival. RESULTS: From January 2004 to December 2015, 18 consecutive patients (12 men and 6 women) were operated on for aortic infection. Six mycotic aneurysms and 12 prosthetic infections, including 8 para-entero-prosthetic fistulas, were treated. In 5 cases, surgery was performed in emergency. During the early postoperative period, we performed one major amputation and two aortic infections were persistent. Intra-hospital mortality was 27.7%. The median follow-up among the 13 surviving patients was 26 months. During follow-up, none of the 13 patients presented reinfection or bypass thrombosis. CONCLUSION: This series shows that in situ revascularization with rifampicin-soaked silver polyester graft for aortic infection have results in agreement with the literature in terms of intra-hospital mortality with a low reinfection rate.

Aortic penetration due to a fish bone: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Aortoesophageal fistula (AEF) caused by an esophageal foreign body is a life-threatening crisis, with rapid progress and high mortality. The first case of AEF was reported in 1818, but the first successfully managed case was not until 1980. Although there have been some reports on this condition, in most cases, the aorta was invaded and corroded due to its adjacent relationship with the esophagus and subsequent mediastinitis. To date, few reports have described an aortic wall directly penetrated by a sharp foreign body, likely because this type of injury is extremely rare and most patients cannot receive timely treatment. Here, we present a rare case of a fish bone that directly pierced the aorta via the esophagus. CASE PRESENTATION: A 31-year-old female experienced poststernum swallowing pain after eating a meal of fish. Gastroscope showed a fishbone-like foreign body had penetrated the esophagus wall. Computed tomography revealed that the foreign body had directly pierced the aorta to form an AEF. Surgery was successfully performed to repair the aorta and esophagus. The postoperation and follow-up was uneventful. CONCLUSIONS: For the treatment of foreign bodies in the esophagus, we should be alert of the possibility of AEFs. The effective management of AEFs requires early diagnosis and intervention, as well as long-term treatment and follow-up, which still has a long way to go.

Inflammatory diseases of the aorta: Part 1: Non-infectious aortitis.

Aortitis is a term which encompasses inflammatory changes to the aortic wall from various pathogenic etiologies. Large vessel vasculitis, such as Takayasu arteritis and giant cell arteritis represent the most common entities; however, there is also an association with other rheumatological diseases. Chronic idiopathic periaortitis represents a distinct disease entity and infectious aortitis is a rare but life-threatening disease. Due to the diverse clinical pictures vascular surgeons often face a significant challenge in terms of making an accurate initial diagnosis. Treatment requires an interdisciplinary approach. This article describes the pathogenesis of the various forms of aortitis as well as the diagnostic methods and treatment approaches.

Acute Conditions Caused by Infectious Aortitis.

UNLABELLED: Infection of the aorta is rare but potentially very dangerous. Under normal circumstances the aorta is very resistant to infections. Following some afflictions, the infection can pass to the aorta from blood or the surrounding tissues. The authors present their 5-year experience with therapy of various types of infections of the abdominal aorta. METHODS: In the 5-year period between January 2008 and December 2012, the Surgical Clinic of the University Hospital in Pilsen treated 17 patients with acute infection of the abdominal aorta. They included 9 males and 8 females. The mean age was 73.05 years (58-90). The most common pathogens were Salmonella (7), Staphylococcus aureus (2), Klebsiella pneumoniae (1), Listeria monocytogenes (1), and Candida albicans (1). Two cases included mixed bacteria and no infectious agent was cultured in three cases. In 14 cases (82.6%) we decided on an open surgical solution, i.e., resection of the affected abdominal aorta, extensive debridement, and vascular reconstruction. In all of these 14 cases we decided on in situ reconstruction. Twelve cases were treated using silver-impregnated prostheses. An antibiotic impregnated graft was used in one case and fresh aortic allograft in one case. In one case (5.9%) we decided on an endovascular solution, i.e., insertion of a bifurcation stent graft and prolonged antibiotic therapy. In two cases (11.8%) we decided on conservative treatment, as both patients refused any surgical therapy. RESULTS: Morbidity was 47.2% (8 patients). In one case we had to perform reoperation of a patient on the 15th postoperative day to evacuate the postoperative hematoma. The 30-day mortality was 5.9% (1 patient). The hospital mortality was 11.8% (2 patients). One patient died on the 42nd postoperative day due to multiorgan failure following resection of perforated aortitis. During follow-up (average 3.5 years), we had no case of infection or thrombosis of the vascular prosthesis. CONCLUSION: Patients with mycotic aneurysms or acute aortitides face a high risk of death. One can legitimately expect an increase of "aortic infections" to parallel the increase of immunocompromised individuals. Surgical procedures for infectious aortitis are always demanding and require excellent interdisciplinary cooperation, but, as this experience shows, can lead to midterm survival.

Surgical strategy for aorta-related infection†.

OBJECTIVES: This report describes our experience with surgical management of aorta-related infections. METHODS: From November 1999 to April 2013, 70 patients underwent surgical management for aorta-related infection, including aortobronchial fistula in 12 patients, aorto-oesophageal fistula in 14 and aortoduodenal fistula in 4. The location of infection was aortic root to arch in 22 patients, descending aorta in 29, thoraco-abdominal aorta in 12 and abdominal aorta in 7. Forty-seven patients had infections of the native aorta and 23 had postoperative graft infections. In situ replacement [bridge thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR); n = 1] was performed in 45 patients, endovascular aortic repair in 18 and extra-anatomical bypass (bridge TEVAR; n = 2) in 7. Omental flap was installed in 29 patients and a pedicled latissimus dorsi muscle flap was used in 3. Since 2008, we have been trying to resect not only the infected tissues, but also the surrounding aneurysmal wall as well. RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 17.1% (12/70). Late death occurred in 15 patients. Overall survival at 3 years was 60.1 ± 6.7%. Freedom from infection-related death of patients who had in situ graft replacement, endovascular repair or extra-anatomical bypass at 3 years was 88.5 ± 4.9, 75.2 ± 10.9 or 14.3 ± 13.2%, respectively (P < 0.01). In situ graft replacement provided a better freedom from aortic event (recurrent infection and reintervention) at 3 years compared with endovascular repair (85.6 ± 5.5 vs 61.8 ± 12.5%, P = 0.029). Freedom from infection-related death at 3 years improved significantly from 61.1 ± 9.7 (before 2008) to 84.7 ± 5.8% (since 2008) (P = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment for aorta-related infection is still associated with high mortality and morbidity. However, our current strategy, which is aggressive surgical management, including resection of infected tissues, extensive debridement, in situ graft replacement of the aorta and omental or muscle installation provided a better patient survival.