ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) have led to improved health and work productivity among people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). OBJECTIVES: To describe trajectories of recent DMT use and their association with sickness absence and/or disability pension (SADP) among PwMS in Sweden. METHODS: A longitudinal register-based study was conducted among 1395 PwMS with treatment start in 2014/2015. While DMT use over 5 years was assessed using sequence analysis resulting in four clusters, a 7-year (Y-2 toY4) trend of SADP was analyzed using zero-inflated negative binomial regression. RESULTS: Four clusters of DMT use trajectories were identified: long-term non-high-efficacy (483, 34.6%), long-term high-efficacy (572, 41%), escalation (221, 15.8%), and discontinuation (119, 8.5%). Progressive MS and higher expanded disability status scale scores were associated with the escalation, long-term high-efficacy, or discontinuation clusters. PwMS in the long-term high-efficacy and escalation clusters had higher likelihood of being on SADP. However, PwMS initiating high-efficacy DMTs demonstrated steeper decline in SADP than others. CONCLUSION: Using sequence analysis, this study showed recent DMT use trajectories among PwMS where initiation of high-efficacy DMTs has become more common. The trend of SADP was stable and lower in those using non-high-efficacy DMTs and larger improvements were shown in those initiating high-efficacy DMTs.
Subject(s)
Azides , Multiple Sclerosis , Humans , Multiple Sclerosis/therapy , Sweden , Pensions , Longitudinal StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: We assessed the relationship between the multiple sclerosis (MS) disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) and healthcare use. METHODS: Persons with MS (aged ⩾18 years) were identified using linked population-based health administrative data in four Canadian provinces and were followed from the most recent of their first MS/demyelinating event or 1 January 1996 until the earliest of death, emigration, or study end (31 December 2017 or 31 March 2018). Prescription records captured DMD exposure, examined as any DMD, then by generation (first-generation (the injectables) or second-generation (orals/infusions)) and individual DMD. The associations with subsequent all-cause hospitalizations and physician visits were examined using proportional means model and negative binomial regression. RESULTS: Of 35,894 MS cases (72% female), mean follow-up was 12.0 years, with person-years of DMD exposure for any, or any first- or second-generation DMD being 63,290, 54,605 and 8685, respectively. Any DMD or any first-generation DMD exposure (versus non-exposure) was associated with a 24% lower hazard of hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio, aHR: 0.76; 95% confidence intervals (CIs): 0.71-0.82), rising to 29% for the second-generation DMDs (aHR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.58-0.88). This ranged from 18% for teriflunomide (aHR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.67-1.00) to 44% for fingolimod (aHR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.36-0.87). In contrast, DMD exposure was generally not associated with substantial differences in physician visits. CONCLUSION: Findings provide real-world evidence of a beneficial relationship between DMD exposure and hospitalizations.
Subject(s)
Multiple Sclerosis , Aged , Canada/epidemiology , Female , Fingolimod Hydrochloride/therapeutic use , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Multiple Sclerosis/drug therapy , Multiple Sclerosis/epidemiology , Patient Acceptance of Health CareABSTRACT
Osteoarthritis (OA) can be defined as the result of pathological processes of various etiologies leading to damage to the articular structures. Although the mechanism of degenerative changes has become better understood due to the plethora of biochemical and genetic studies, the drug that could stop the degenerative cascade is still unknown. All available forms of OA therapy are based on symptomatic treatment. According to actual guidelines, comprehensive treatment of OA should always include a combination of various therapeutic options aimed at common goals, which are pain relief in the first place, and then the improvement of function. Local treatment has become more common practice, which takes place between rehabilitation and pharmacological treatment in the hierarchy of procedures. Only in the case of no improvement and the presence of advanced lesions visible in imaging tests, should surgery be considered. Currently, an increasing number of studies are being published suggesting that intra-articular injections may be as effective or even more effective than non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and result in fewer systemic adverse events. The most commonly used preparations are hyaluronic acid (HA), glucocorticosteroids (GS), and also platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in recent years. This review aims to present the mechanism of action and clinical effectiveness of different pharmacological options in relieving pain and improving functions in OA as well as the emerging approach in intra-articular treatment with PRP.
Subject(s)
Osteoarthritis/drug therapy , Animals , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/chemistry , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Humans , Injections, Intra-Articular , Osteoarthritis/complications , Pain/etiology , Platelet-Rich Plasma/chemistryABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Idiopathic sclerosing orbital inflammatory syndrome (ISOIS) is a rare, progressive and hard to control disease. There is a deep gap of evidence regarding application of disease-modifying drugs (DMD) regimen as a potentially effective treatment for orbital inflammatory diseases. We aimed to report the results of using DMDs and discuss the concept of applying this modality of treatment in patients with ISOIS. METHODS: This was a prospective interventional case series conducted in a tertiary university-based hospital. Biopsy proven patients with active ISOIS were included. Systematic criteria were developed to define and measure disease activity and monitor response to treatment. A DMD regimen including an anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF alpha) agent plus azathioprine and low-dose corticosteroids were used. Comprehensive ophthalmic, orbital and systemic assessments were performed during each visit. RESULTS: Five eligible patients with primary ISOIS were included. Mean age was 34.20 (SD = 13.33, range 19-53) years. Three had unilateral and two had bilateral involvement. Four had diffuse orbital involvement pattern and progressive worsening of visual functions, reduced extraocular motility and proptosis. In one patient the disease was localized to extraocular muscle and lacrimal gland. Disease activity was decreased and stabilized after DMDs regimen in all patients. Mean follow up was 32.80 (SD = 30.80, range: 12-86) months. CONCLUSION: Biologic DMD (b-DMD) including anti-TNF alpha, corticosteroid and azathioprine were effective in decreasing disease activity and could change course of the disease. This study supports the concept of using b-DMD regimen in treatment of ISOIS.
Subject(s)
Azathioprine , Orbital Pseudotumor , Adult , Azathioprine/therapeutic use , Humans , Middle Aged , Orbital Pseudotumor/diagnostic imaging , Orbital Pseudotumor/drug therapy , Prospective Studies , Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors , Young AdultABSTRACT
Osteoarthritis (OA) can be treated using either a pharmacological or non-pharmacological approach, or a combination of both. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the efficacy of crystalline glucosamine sulfate (CGS) in patients with knee OA. This open-label prospective study (with a 12-month follow-up) included 111 patients of both genders suffering from knee OA, who attended the Special Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases in Novi Sad, Serbia during the 2011-2013 period. Patients were divided into the experimental (n=52) and the control (n=59) group. While the former was prescribed CGS 1500 mg/day, the latter was treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) according to the standard protocol. The efficacy of both treatment modes was assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Lequesne index, along with the radiological findings which involved knee joint space width (JSW) measurements. One year following the initial assessment, all patients reported pain intensity reduction; however, those in the CGS group experienced significantly lower pain intensity when compared with controls. At the end of the study, no reduction in the progression of joint structure damage (p>0.5) was noted in either group. Thus, while CGS demonstrated symptomatic efficacy, it failed to delay the progression of knee OA.
Subject(s)
Glucosamine , Osteoarthritis, Knee , Female , Humans , Male , Follow-Up Studies , Glucosamine/therapeutic use , Osteoarthritis, Knee/drug therapy , Prospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
SS is usually described as having severe fatigue, dryness, diffuse pain, glandular swelling, and various extraglandular (systemic) manifestations. Clinical trials have generally failed because the vast majority of enrolled patients had no extraglandular manifestations at the time of enrolment but suffered from fatigue, dryness and pain that did not significantly respond to the study medication. A number of hypotheses on the pathogenesis of pSS have been put forward, including disturbances of innate and adaptive immunity as well as abnormalities of the interface between immune disorders and the neuro-endocrine system related to lacrimal and secretory gland dysfunction. Thus, future therapies must be designed for improvement of the symptoms of dry eyes and dry mouth, extraglandular disease, and fatigue and cognitive deficits. Given the inadequacies and limitations of current treatment options, we suggest that innovative directions involving interactions with neuroscientists and neuropsychiatrists together or combined with new immune targeting may be hold promise for better treating pSS.
Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Sjogren's Syndrome/drug therapy , Humans , Sjogren's Syndrome/immunologyABSTRACT
During the last decade we experienced a surge in the number of glucose lowering agents that can be used to treat patients with type 2 diabetes. Especially important are the discoveries that sodium glucose co-transporter type 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) improve patients' cardiovascular and renal outcomes. Accordingly, various medical associations have updated their guidelines for the treatment of diabetes in this new era. Though not agreeing on every issue, these position-statements generally share a detailed and often complex workflow that may be too complicated for the busy and overworked primary care setting, where the majority of patients with type 2 diabetes are managed in many countries. Other guidelines, generally those from the cardiology associations focus primarily on the population of patients with high risk for or pre-existing cardiovascular disease, which represent only the minority of patients with type 2 diabetes. We believe that we should re-define SGLT2i and GLP-1 RA as diabetes/disease modifying drugs (DMDs) given the recent evidence of their cardiovascular and renal benefits. Based on this definition we have designed a SIMPLE approach in order to assist primary care teams in selecting the most appropriate therapy for their patients. We believe that most subjects newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes should initiate early combination therapy with metformin and a prognosis changing DMD. The decision whether to use GLP-1 RA or SGLT2i should be made based on specific patient's risk factors and preferences. Importantly, DMDs are known to have a generally safe side-effect profile, with lower risk for hypoglycemia and weight gain, further promoting their wider usage. Early combination therapy with DMDs may improve the multiple pathophysiological abnormalities responsible for type 2 diabetes and its complications, thus resulting in the greatest long term benefits.
Subject(s)
Blood Glucose/drug effects , Decision Support Techniques , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Glycemic Control , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Biomarkers/blood , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Clinical Decision-Making , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis , Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor/agonists , Glycated Hemoglobin/metabolism , Glycemic Control/adverse effects , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/adverse effects , Hypoglycemic Agents/classification , Incretins/therapeutic use , Patient Selection , Primary Health Care , Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Terminology as Topic , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
The risk of infection associated with immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) has been increasingly addressed in recent scientific literature. A modified Delphi consensus process was conducted to develop clinically relevant, evidence-based recommendations to assist physicians with decision-making in relation to the risks of a wide range of infections associated with different DMDs in patients with MS. The current consensus statements, developed by a panel of experts (neurologists, infectious disease specialists, a gynaecologist and a neuroradiologist), address the risk of iatrogenic infections (opportunistic infections, including herpes and cryptococcal infections, candidiasis and listeria; progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy; human papillomavirus and urinary tract infections; respiratory tract infections and tuberculosis; hepatitis and gastrointestinal infections) in patients with MS treated with different DMDs, as well as prevention strategies and surveillance strategies for the early identification of infections. In the discussion, more recent data emerged in the literature were taken into consideration. Recommended risk reduction and management strategies for infections include screening at diagnosis and before starting a new DMD, prophylaxis where appropriate, monitoring and early diagnosis.
Subject(s)
Multiple Sclerosis , Consensus , Delphi Technique , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents , Multiple Sclerosis/drug therapy , NeurologistsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In multiple sclerosis (MS), up to 57% of white matter lesions are chronically active. These slowly expanding lesions (SELs) contribute to disability progression. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare fingolimod and natalizumab effects on progressive linearly enlarging lesions (i.e. SELs), a putative biomarker of smouldering inflammation. METHODS: Relapsing-remitting MS patients starting fingolimod (n = 24) or natalizumab (n = 28) underwent 3T brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at baseline, months 6, 12 and 24. SELs were identified among baseline-visible lesions showing ⩾ 12.5% of annual increase, calculated by linearly fitting the Jacobian of the nonlinear deformation field between timepoints obtained combining T1- and T2-weighted scans. SEL burden, magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) and T1 signal intensity were compared using linear models. RESULTS: The prevalences of fingolimod (75%) and natalizumab patients (46%) with ⩾ 1 SEL were not significantly different (adjusted-p = 0.08). Fingolimod group had higher SEL number and volume (adjusted-p ⩽ 0.047, not false discovery rate (FDR) survived). In both groups, SELs versus non-SELs showed lower MTR and T1 signal intensity (adjusted-p ⩽ 0.01, FDR-survived). Longitudinally, non-SEL MTR increased in both treatment groups (adjusted-p ⩽ 0.005, FDR-survived). T1 signal intensity decreased in SELs with both treatments (adjusted-p ⩽ 0.049, FDR-survived in fingolimod group) and increased in natalizumab non-SELs (adjusted-p = 0.03, FDR-survived). CONCLUSION: The effects of natalizumab and fingolimod on SEL occurrence seem modest, with natalizumab being slightly more effective. Both treatments may promote reparative mechanisms in stable or chronic inactive lesions.
Subject(s)
Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting , Multiple Sclerosis , Fingolimod Hydrochloride/therapeutic use , Humans , Multiple Sclerosis/diagnostic imaging , Multiple Sclerosis/drug therapy , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/diagnostic imaging , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/drug therapy , Natalizumab/therapeutic use , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) have been evaluated in pediatric patients in observational studies demonstrating a similar, even better clinical effect compared to adults, with a similar safety. Only fingolimod has been tested in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and is approved for pediatric multiple sclerosis (ped-MS). Numerous methodological, practical, and ethical issues underline that RCTs are difficult to conduct in ped-MS. This also creates a lack of safety information. To facilitate the availability of new agents in ped-MS, we encourage to develop a different approach based on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies to yield information on optimal doses and implementation of obligatory registries to obtain information on safety as primary endpoint.
Subject(s)
Immunosuppressive Agents , Multiple Sclerosis , Adult , Child , Fingolimod Hydrochloride/therapeutic use , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Multiple Sclerosis/drug therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Since decision making about treatment with disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) is preference sensitive, shared decision making between patient and healthcare professional should take place. Patient decision aids could support this shared decision making process by providing information about the disease and the treatment options, to elicit the patient's preference and to support patients and healthcare professionals in discussing these preferences and matching them with a treatment. Therefore, a prototype of a patient decision aid for MS patients in the Netherlands-based on the principles of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) -was developed, following the recommendations of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards. MCDA was chosen as it might reduce cognitive burden of considering treatment options and matching patient preferences with the treatment options. RESULTS: After determining the scope to include DMDs labelled for relapsing-remitting MS and clinically isolated syndrome, users' informational needs were assessed using focus groups (N = 19 patients) and best-worst scaling surveys with patients (N = 185), neurologists and nurses (N = 60) to determine which information about DMDs should be included in the patient decision aid. Next, an online format and computer-based delivery of the patient decision aid was chosen to enable embedding of MCDA. A literature review was conducting to collect evidence on the effectiveness and burden of use of the DMDs. A prototype was developed next, and alpha testing to evaluate its comprehensibility and usability with in total thirteen patients and four healthcare professionals identified several issues regarding content and framing, methods for weighting importance of criteria in the MCDA structure, and the presentation of the conclusions of the patient decision aid ranking the treatment options according to the patient's preferences. Adaptations were made accordingly, but verification of the rankings provided, validation of the patient decision aid, evaluation of the feasibility of implementation and assessing its value for supporting shared decision making should be addressed in further development of the patient decision aid. CONCLUSION: This paper aimed to provide more transparency regarding the developmental process of an MCDA-based patient decision aid for treatment decisions for MS and the challenges faced during this process. Issues identified in the prototype were resolved as much as possible, though some issues remain. Further development is needed to overcome these issues before beta pilot testing with patients and healthcare professionals at the point of clinical decision-making can take place to ultimately enable making conclusions about the value of the MCDA-based patient decision aid for MS patients, healthcare professionals and the quality of care.
Subject(s)
Multiple Sclerosis , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Decision Making , Decision Support Techniques , Humans , Multiple Sclerosis/drug therapy , Netherlands , Patient PreferenceABSTRACT
Osteoarthritis (OA) is currently the most widespread musculoskeletal condition and primarily affects weight-bearing joints such as the knees and hips. Importantly, knee OA remains a multifactorial whole-joint disease, the appearance and progression of which involves the alteration of articular cartilage as well as the synovium, subchondral bone, ligaments, and muscles through intricate pathomechanisms. Whereas it was initially depicted as a predominantly aging-related and mechanically driven condition given its clear association with old age, high body mass index (BMI), and joint malalignment, more recent research identified and described a plethora of further factors contributing to knee OA pathogenesis. However, the pathogenic intricacies between the molecular pathways involved in OA prompted the study of certain drugs for more than one therapeutic target (amelioration of cartilage and bone changes, and synovial inflammation). Most clinical studies regarding knee OA focus mainly on improvement in pain and joint function and thus do not provide sufficient evidence on the possible disease-modifying properties of the tested drugs. Currently, there is an unmet need for further research regarding OA pathogenesis as well as the introduction and exhaustive testing of potential disease-modifying pharmacotherapies in order to structure an effective treatment plan for these patients.
Subject(s)
Osteoarthritis, Knee/physiopathology , Osteoarthritis, Knee/therapy , ADAMTS Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors , Animals , Biological Products/pharmacology , Bone Remodeling/drug effects , Bone Remodeling/physiology , Cartilage, Articular/drug effects , Cartilage, Articular/physiopathology , Cathepsin K/antagonists & inhibitors , Diet , Exercise/physiology , Humans , Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation , Osteoarthritis, Knee/drug therapy , Platelet-Rich Plasma , Synovitis/drug therapy , Synovitis/etiology , Wnt Proteins/antagonists & inhibitorsABSTRACT
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is usually diagnosed between twenty and forty years of age, when people often plan to have children. A lot has been said about the effect of pregnancy on the course of MS. The individual factors responsible for the disease modifying effect of pregnancy are not well determined. Having MS neither affects the fertility or the course of pregnancy itself. During pregnancy, many women find that their symptoms stay the same or even improve. Epidural and spinal analgesia appear to be safe and in general are not contraindicated for patients with MS. The management of disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) in pregnancy is a new issue for consideration in the clinical practice. There is limited information available into the safety of DMT use during pregnancy, especially for the most recent ones. In general, discontinuation of DMTs is recommended before conception to minimize risk of fetal harm. Women with very active MS before pregnancy who stop second-line treatments may show an increase in disease activity during pregnancy. Therefore, it might be discussed to maintain patients on DMTs until pregnancy is confirmed, and sometimes throughout pregnancy, to avoid a rebound of disease activity and severe relapses during pregnancy in very active patients.
Subject(s)
Multiple Sclerosis , Pregnancy Complications , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , RecurrenceABSTRACT
The key aspect of the classification of neurodegenerative diseases is the histopathological detection of certain proteins in the brain. The various disease entities are distinguished with respect to the type of detected protein and with respect to the configuration and localization of the corresponding protein aggregates. Aggregates of alpha-synuclein (ASYN) are the defining hallmark of several neurodegenerative disorders termed synucleinopathies. The most well-known diseases in this spectrum are Parkinson's disease (PD) with neuronal detection of Lewy bodies, dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), with additional detection of beta-amyloid and multiple system atrophy (MSA), where ASYN aggregates are found in glia cells in the form of Papp-Lantos inclusions. ASYN has been identified as a key target for the development of therapeutic approaches to synucleinopathies given its central role in the pathophysiology of these diseases. Current treatment strategies can be roughly classified into six groups: 1) lowering ASYN expression (antisense therapy), 2) inhibition of formation of toxic ASYN aggregates (aggregation inhibitors, chelators), 3) dissolving or removal of intracellular or extracellular toxic AYSN aggregates (active and passive immunotherapy, aggregation inhibitors), 4) enhancement of cellular clearance mechanisms (autophagy, lysosomal microphagy) for removal of toxic forms of alpha-synuclein, 5) modulation of neuroinflammatory processes and 6) neuroprotective strategies. This article summarizes the current therapeutic approaches and sheds light on promising future treatment approaches.
Subject(s)
Neurodegenerative Diseases , Parkinson Disease , Synucleinopathies , Humans , Neurodegenerative Diseases/diagnosis , Neurodegenerative Diseases/genetics , Neurodegenerative Diseases/therapy , Neurons , Parkinson Disease/diagnosis , Parkinson Disease/genetics , Parkinson Disease/therapy , alpha-Synuclein/geneticsABSTRACT
Chronic inflammatory disorders, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), are associated with a twofold increase in the incidence of sudden cardiac death (SCD) compared with the healthy population. Although this is partly explained by an increased prevalence of coronary artery disease, growing evidence suggests that ischemia alone cannot completely account for the increased risk. The present review explores the mechanisms of cardiac electrophysiological remodeling in response to chronic inflammation in RA. In particular, it focuses on the roles of nonischemic structural remodeling, altered cardiac ionic currents, and autonomic nervous system dysfunction in ventricular arrhythmogenesis and SCD. It also explores whether common genetic elements predispose to both RA and SCD. Finally, it evaluates the potential dual effects of disease-modifying therapy in both diminishing and promoting the risk of ventricular arrhythmias and SCD.
Subject(s)
Arrhythmias, Cardiac/physiopathology , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/complications , Action Potentials , Animals , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/etiology , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/pathology , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/etiology , Humans , Ventricular RemodelingABSTRACT
In this population-based cohort study on comparative osteoporotic fracture risks between different biologic disease-modifying drugs among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), we did not find a significant difference in the risk of osteoporotic fractures between RA patients receiving TNF inhibitors versus abatacept or tocilizumab. INTRODUCTION: We aimed to investigate the comparative risk of osteoporotic fractures between rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who initiated TNF inhibitors (TNFis) versus abatacept or tocilizumab. METHODS: Using the Korea National Health Insurance Service datasets from 2002 to 2016, RA patients who initiated TNFis, abatacept, or tocilizumab were identified. The primary outcome was a composite end point of non-vertebral fractures and hospitalized vertebral fractures; secondary outcomes were two components of the primary outcome and fractures occurring at the humerus/forearm. Propensity score (PS) matching with a variable ratio up to 10 TNFi initiators per 1 comparator drug initiator was used to adjust for > 50 baseline confounders. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of fractures comparing TNFi initiators to abatacept and to tocilizumab by Cox proportional hazard models stratified by a matching ratio. RESULTS: After PS-matching, 2307 TNFi initiators PS-matched on 588 abatacept initiators, and 2462 TNFi initiators on 640 tocilizumab initiators were included. A total of 77 fractures occurred during a mean follow-up of 454 days among TNFi and abatacept initiators and 83 fractures during 461 days among TNFi and tocilizumab initiators. The PS-matched HR (95% CI) was 0.91 (0.48-1.71) comparing TNFi versus abatacept initiators, and 1.00 (0.55-1.83) comparing TNFi versus tocilizumab initiators. Analysis on vertebral and non-vertebral fractures showed similar results. CONCLUSIONS: In this nationally representative cohort, we did not find a significant difference in the risk of fractures between TNFi initiators versus abatacept or tocilizumab among RA patients.
Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Biological Products , Osteoporotic Fractures , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/complications , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Biological Products/adverse effects , Cohort Studies , Humans , Osteoporotic Fractures/chemically induced , Osteoporotic Fractures/epidemiology , Republic of Korea , Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/antagonists & inhibitorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To investigate the relation of age at disease onset and clinical outcomes across the lifespan from adolescence in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) on disease-modifying therapy (DMT). METHODS: We analysed data from the Swiss Association for Joint Tasks of Health Insurers database containing data from 14 718 patients with MS. Patients were included in this analysis when they were on DMT for at least 1 year. The influence of age at disease onset on future relapses and disability worsening was explored using multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models. RESULTS: Data from 9705 patients with MS were analysed. Pediatric-onset MS patients (n = 236) had higher relapse rates and marginally slower disability worsening rates compared with adult-onset MS (n = 9469). The risk of relapses was highest in childhood and decreased continuously to about 35 years of age. It remained stable for about a decade and then again continuously decreased. In contrast, disability worsening hazards remained stable from childhood to about 32 years of age and then increased sharply around the age of 45 years. CONCLUSIONS: Age is an important factor independently affecting clinical outcomes in MS. This should be considered when designing clinical trials or choosing DMT.
Subject(s)
Disabled Persons , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Disease Progression , Humans , Immunomodulation , Middle Aged , RecurrenceABSTRACT
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a common progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by loss of striatal-projecting dopaminergic neurons of the ventral forebrain, resulting in motor and cognitive deficits. Despite extensive efforts in understanding PD pathogenesis, no disease-modifying drugs exist. Recent advances in cell reprogramming technologies have facilitated the generation of patient-derived models for sporadic or familial PD and the identification of early, potentially triggering, pathological phenotypes while they provide amenable systems for drug discovery. Emerging developments highlight the enhanced potential of using more sophisticated cellular systems, including neuronal and glial co-cultures as well as three-dimensional systems that better simulate the human pathophysiology. In combination with high-throughput high-content screening technologies, these approaches open new perspectives for the identification of disease-modifying compounds. In this review, we discuss current advances and the challenges ahead in the use of patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells for drug discovery in PD. We address new concepts implicating non-neuronal cells in disease pathogenesis and highlight the necessity for functional assays, such as calcium imaging and multi-electrode array recordings, to predict drug efficacy. Finally, we argue that artificial intelligence technologies will be pivotal for analysis of the large and complex data sets obtained, becoming game-changers in the process of drug discovery.
Subject(s)
Drug Discovery/methods , Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells/pathology , Neurons/pathology , Parkinson Disease/pathology , Animals , Coculture Techniques/methods , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical/methods , Humans , Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells/drug effects , Neurons/drug effects , Parkinson Disease/drug therapyABSTRACT
Very recent data from cohorts, such as that of the French Observatory of Multiple Sclerosis (OFSEP) and the MSBase cohort, are the subject of new statistical analyses using propensity scores that enable the matching of relapses frequency, EDSS, age, and sex ratio in patient populations for comparisons with each other, which reduces selection biases. The first data from these cohorts revealed a decline in transition to secondary progressive MS with the most effective disease-modifying drugs currently available, especially when these drugs were used early in the disease. However, these studies remain limited regarding the number of patients, the duration of follow-up, the use of imperfect methodologies, and the level of evidence remains low. The Gothenburg cohort in Sweden, which has been followed since the 1950s, found that 14% of benign non-progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) never evolved to secondary progression after more than 45 years of evolution. EDSS 7 was reached after 48 years of disease (median), and 50% evolved to secondary progressive MS after 15 years (consistent with data from the historic London, Ontario cohort). These data demonstrate that most people living with MS evolve without treatment to a significant long-term disability and that this evolution is closely linked to secondary progression (more than the relapse frequency). Benign forms appear as MS that never passes into secondary progressive MS. Recent data demonstrate that the delay until transition to secondary progression (more than 30 years in the MSBase cohort) and the delay in reaching EDSS 6 decreased since the introduction of disease-modifying drugs 20 years ago. However, randomized placebo-controlled trials do not last more than 2 or 3 years, and many biases may be involved in long-term follow-up studies: worsening patients who are lost to follow-up ("informative censoring" bias: only good responders to treatment remain primarily under the same long-term treatment and are followed); changes in the populations in the most recent studies with a lower rate of relapse and lower progression of disability at the beginning of the disease prior to initiating treatments; and environmental changes that remain largely misunderstood and may contribute to a natural evolution towards less severe disease.
Subject(s)
Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Multiple Sclerosis/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/classification , Interferons/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Sclerosis/epidemiology , Multiple Sclerosis/pathology , Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive/epidemiology , Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive/prevention & control , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/epidemiology , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/prevention & control , Pharmaceutical Preparations/classification , Recurrence , Time FactorsABSTRACT
5q-associated spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) has so far been a causally untreatable disease, which leads to severe, progressive physical restrictions due to the loss of spinal motor neurons. However, the monogenetic cause of the relatively short coding "survival motor neuron" (SMN) 1 gene sequence and the presence of almost identical gene copies, the SMN2 genes, offer favorable conditions for the development of new therapeutic approaches. While previously only supportive and palliative therapies could be used, new disease-modifying drugs are now available for the first time. Nusinersen, an antisense oligonucleotide (ASO), is the first drug that has received approval in Germany to treat SMA. Further therapeutic approaches such as the so-called "small molecules" or the gene replacement therapy are currently still being tested in clinical studies or are already waiting for approval by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). In this article, the most important disease-modifying drugs of SMA, the associated studies and their challenges are presented.