Anterior cruciate ligament femoral side retained stump technique reduces enlargement of the femoral bone tunnel after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Enlargement of the bone tunnel has become an unavoidable early complication after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, whether it is a single or double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Preservation of the ACL stump in ACL reconstruction reduces enlargement of the bone tunnel. The purpose of this study was to investigate the question of whether single-bundle ACL reconstruction using the ACL femoral side retained stump technique reduces enlargement of the femoral tunnel. METHODS: Forty patients who underwent single-bundle reconstruction of the ACL were included in this study. The patients were categorized into a Remnant preservation group (Group R) and the Non-remnant preservation group (Group N). In the Remnant preservation group, a high-flexion femoral side retained stump technique was used intraoperatively for the establishment of the femoral side bone tunnel, and in the Non-remnant preservation group, the conventional femoral positioning method was used (we used a femoral positioning drill for localization and drilling of the femoral bone tunnel), and MRI of the operated knee joints was performed at 6 months postoperatively. We measured the internal diameter of the femoral bone tunnel at 5 mm from the intra-articular outlet of the femoral bone tunnel on an MRI scan image perpendicular to the femoral bone tunnel. The size of the tunnel was compared between the intraoperative drilling of the bone tunnel and the size of the bone tunnel at 6 months postoperatively. Postoperative clinical assessment was Lysholm score. RESULTS: After a 6-month follow-up of 40 patients, the diameter of the femoral tunnel at a distance of 5 mm from the inner opening of the femoral tunnel was 10.96 ± 0.67 mm and 10.11 ± 0.62 mm in patients of group N and group R, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).The diameter of the femoral tunnel at 6 months postoperatively in group N and group R compared to the intraoperative bone tunnel increased by 2.58 ± 0.24 mm and 1.94 ± 0.31 mm, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).The femoral tunnel enlargement rates of group N and group R were 30.94 ± 3.00% and 24.02 ± 5.10%, respectively, and the differences were significant (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: ACL femoral side retained stump technique does not sacrifice the ideal location of the femoral tunnel and is able to preserve the possible benefits of the ACL stump: reduced femoral tunnel enlargement.

Significant anterior enlargement of femoral tunnel aperture after hamstring ACL reconstruction, compared to bone-patellar tendon-bone graft.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to retrospectively compare the enlargement and migration of the femoral tunnel aperture after anatomic rectangular tunnel anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with a bone-patella tendon-bone (BTB) or hamstring tendon (HT) graft using three-dimensional (3-D) computer models. METHODS: Thirty-two patients who underwent ACL reconstruction and postoperative computed tomography (CT) at 3 weeks and 6 months were included in this study. Of these, 20 patients underwent ACL reconstruction with a BTB graft (BTBR group), and the remaining 12 with an HT graft (HTR group). The area of the femoral tunnel aperture was extracted and measured using a 3-D computer model generated from CT images. Changes in the area and migration direction of the femoral tunnel aperture during this period were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: In the HTR group, the area of the femoral tunnel aperture was significantly increased at 6 months compared to 3 weeks postoperatively (P < 0.05). The average area of the femoral tunnel aperture at 6 months postoperatively was larger by 16.0 ± 12.4% in the BTBR group and 41.9 ± 22.2% in the HTR group, relative to that measured at 3 weeks postoperatively (P < 0.05). The femoral tunnel aperture migrated in the anteroinferior direction in the HTR group, and only in the inferior direction in the BTBR group. CONCLUSIONS: The femoral tunnel aperture in the HTR group was significantly more enlarged and more anteriorly located at 6 months after ACL reconstruction, compared to the BTBR group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Can the outside-in half-tunnel technique reduce femoral tunnel widening in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A CT study.

BACKGROUND: There are different techniques for drilling the femoral tunnel in the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), but their influence in the bone tunnel enlargement in unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare two different surgical techniques for evaluating femoral tunnel enlargement in ACLR. The hypothesis was that tunnel placement using the outside-in technique leads to less tunnel enlargement compared to the transtibial technique. METHODS: Forty-four patients treated for ACLR between March 2013 and March 2014 were prospectively enrolled in this study. According to the surgical technique, subjects were assigned to Group A (Out-in) or Group B (Transtibial). All patients underwent CT examination in order to evaluate the femoral tunnel enlargement at four different levels. Moreover, all patients were evaluated with the Lachman test and pivot shift test, and the KT1000 arthrometer was used to measure the anterior laxity of the knee. A subjective evaluation was performed using the 2000 International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee score, Lysholm knee score and Tegner activity scale. All patients were assessed after 24 months of follow-up. RESULTS: At the final follow-up, there were statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in femoral tunnel enlargement between the two groups at all four femoral levels in favor of the out-in group. No statistical significant differences were found in the objective and subjective clinical outcomes between the two groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In ACLR with a suspension system, the outside-in technique leads to less enlargement of the femoral tunnel lower than the transtibial technique.

3D Computed Tomography Evaluation of Morphological Changes in the Femoral Tunnel After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstring Tendon Graft for Recurrent Patellar Dislocation.

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) for recurrent lateral patellar dislocation is gaining popularity. However, the morphological changes in the femoral tunnel after MPFL reconstruction are still not fully documented. PURPOSE: This study used 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomography to evaluate morphological changes in the femoral tunnel after MPFL reconstruction with hamstring tendon graft to investigate factors affecting the phenomenon and to elucidate whether it is associated with clinical outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Twenty-three patients with recurrent patellar dislocation were prospectively enrolled in this study. The patients included 6 males and 17 females with a mean age of 24 years (range, 14-53). The MPFL was reconstructed by creating 2 patellar bone sockets and 1 femoral bone socket anatomically under X-ray control, and the semitendinosus autograft was fixed with cortical suspension devices. Computed tomography scans obtained 3 weeks and 1 year after surgery were reconstructed into 3D constructs with a volume analyzer. Cross-sectional areas (CSAs) of the aperture and inside the femoral tunnel were compared between the 2 time points. Likewise, the location of tunnel walls and center of the femoral tunnel footprint were evaluated. Relationships were assessed between femoral tunnel morphological changes and potential risk factors-such as age, body mass index, sex, femoral tunnel positioning, patellar height, sulcus angle, congruence angle, lateral tilt angle, degree of trochlear dysplasia, lateral deviation of the tibial tubercle, and Kujala score. RESULTS: No patient reported recurrence of patellar dislocation during the follow-up period. The CSA of the femoral tunnel aperture enlarged by 41.1% ± 34.7% ( P < .01). The center, anterior border, and proximal border of the femoral tunnel significantly shifted in the anterior direction ( P < .01). The distal border significantly shifted in both anterior and distal directions ( P < .01). Patella alta was associated with distal migration of the tunnel center ( P < .05). Morphological changes were not associated with other risk factors or Kujala score. CONCLUSION: The CSA of the femoral tunnel aperture enlarged, and the tunnel aperture migrated anteriorly with time after MPFL reconstruction. Risk factors for patellar dislocation other than patella alta did not influence morphological changes of the femoral tunnel.