Concurrent nimotuzumab and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for elderly patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Because of the common physical condition, reduced organ function, and comorbidities, elderly patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) are often underrepresented in clinical trials. The optimal treatment of elderly patients with locally advanced NPC remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of concurrent nimotuzumab combined with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in elderly patients with locally advanced NPC. We conducted a single-arm, phase II trial for elderly patients with stage III-IVA NPC (according to UICC-American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM classification, 8th edition). All patients received concurrent nimotuzumab (200 mg/week, 1 week prior to IMRT) combined with IMRT. The primary end-point was complete response (CR) rate. The secondary end-points were survival, safety, and geriatric assessment. Between March 13, 2017 and November 12, 2018, 30 patients were enrolled. In total, 20 (66.7%) patients achieved CR, and objective response was observed in 30 (100.0%) patients 1 month after radiotherapy. The median follow-up time was 56.05 months (25th-75th percentile, 53.45-64.56 months). The 5-year locoregional relapse-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, cancer-specific survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival were 89.4%, 86.4%, 85.9%, 76.5%, and 78.8%, respectively. Grade 3 mucositis occurred in 10 (33%) patients and grade 3 pneumonia in 3 (10%) patients. Concurrent nimotuzumab combined with IMRT is effective and well-tolerated for elderly patients with locally advanced NPC.

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy alone compared with intensity-modulated radiotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy in intermediate-risk nasopharyngeal carcinoma : A prospective multicenter phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the clinical benefit of adding concurrent chemotherapy to intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients with an intermediate risk (stage II and T3N0M0). METHODS: A multicenter phase II randomized trial was conducted in intermediate-risk NPC patients. Enrolled patients were previously untreated and aged ranged from 18 to 70 years without severe coexisting diseases. Patients were randomly assigned to receive IMRT alone or IMRT+concurrent chemotherapy (CC; three cycles of 80 mg/m2 cisplatin every 3 weeks). Primary endpoint was defined as 3­year progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-associated toxicity. We registered this study with Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (CliCTR1800017132; registered July 13, 2018, study start July 13, 2018). RESULTS: From November 2015 to July 2019, 42 patients with stage II and T3N0M0 NPC were enrolled; 20 patients received IMRT alone while 22 patients received IMRT+CC. After a median of 58 months of follow-up, we estimated the 3­year PFS rates as 90% (IMRT group) and 86.4% (IMRT+CC group; hazard ratio 1.387, 95% confidence interval 0.240-8.014; P = 0.719). The 3­year PFS, OS, and cumulative DMFS and LRRFS showed no significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, the IMRT group displayed a lower incidence of nausea/vomiting, leucopenia, and dry mouth than the IMRT+CC group. CONCLUSION: Adding CC to IMRT provided no survival benefit but increased treatment-associated toxicities in patients with intermediate-risk NPC.

Analysis of patients with parotid recurrence after parotid-sparing IMRT for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: case series and review of the literature.

PURPOSE: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is the standard treatment approach for nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC). IMRT enables effective sparing of the parotid glands and reduces the risk of xerostomia, a common complication of head and neck irradiation. Nevertheless, it is essential to determine whether the parotid-sparing IMRT (ps-IMRT) technique yields increased intra-/periparotid recurrence rates, which constitutes the main purpose of this study. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of NPC that received definitive chemoradiotherapy/radiotherapy (CRT/RT) between 1991 and 2021 were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with intra-/periparotid recurrence were detected and prognostic factors for recurrence were sought. RESULTS: A total of 746 patients were evaluated. Two-dimensional (2D)-RT was applied to 541, 3D conformal RT (3D-CRT) to 10, and ps-IMRT to 195 patients. After a median 85-month follow-up, one (0.18%) patient who received 2D-RT and four (2%) patients who received ps-IMRT experienced an intra-/periparotid recurrence. The median time to intra-/periparotid recurrence was 11.9 months. All patients had been diagnosed with a metastatic lymph node > 2 cm at level II of the ipsilateral neck. In addition, all recurrences occurred on the same side as the positive neck at the time of diagnosis. The 3­year overall survival, locoregional recurrence-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival rates were 80%, 40%, and 60%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Intra-/periparotid recurrence is extremely rare in NPC. However, it is still possible to identify and characterize particular risk factors, which include a metastatic lymph node at level II, particularly > 2 cm, and multinodal disease at the time of diagnosis.

Comparing long-term efficacy and safety of GP versus TPF sequential chemoradiotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of GP and TPF sequential chemotherapy regimens in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC). METHODS: From 2005 to 2016, a total of 408 LA-NPC patients treated with GP or TPF sequential chemoradiotherapy were retrospectively included. Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was employed to balance the baseline variables. Survival outcomes and acute toxicities were compared between both groups. RESULTS: A total of 230 patients were selected by 1:1 PSM. At a median follow-up of 91 months, no significant differences were observed between the matched GP and TPF groups regarding 5-year overall survival, progression-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and locoregionally relapse-free survival (83.4% vs. 83.4%, P = 0.796; 75.6% vs. 68.6%, P = 0.301; 86.7% vs. 81.1%, P = 0.096; and 87.4% vs. 87.2%, P = 0.721). Notable disparities in adverse effects were identified, with higher incidences of grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in the GP group while grade 3/4 leukopenia and neutropenia in the TPF group. Though not recorded in our cohort, combined with the FAERS database, thrombotic adverse reactions are a concern for the GP regimen, while the TPF regimen requires vigilance for life-threatening adverse reactions such as septic shock, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and laryngeal edema. CONCLUSION: No significant difference in long-term outcomes was observed between the GP and TPF sequential chemotherapy regimens for LA-NPC. Differences in adverse effects should be noted when choosing the regimen.

Is clinical target volume necessary for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with 4D-CT intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

BACKGROUND: A dosimetric evaluation is still lacking in terms of clinical target volume (CTV) omission in stage III patients treated with 4D-CT Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT). METHODS: 49 stage III NSCLC patients received 4D-CT IMRT were reviewed. Target volumes and organs at risk (OARs) were re-delineated. Four IMRT plans were conducted retrospectively to deliver different prescribed dose (74 Gy-60 Gy), and with or without CTV implementation. Dose and volume histogram (DVH) parameters were collected and compared. RESULTS: In the PTV-g 60 Gy plan (PTV-g refers to the PTV generated from the internal gross tumor volume), only 5 of 49 patients had the isodose ≥ 50 Gy line covering at least 95% of the PTV-c (PTV-c refers to the PTV generated from the internal CTV) volume. When the prescribed dose was elevated to 74 Gy to the PTV-g, 33 of 49 patients could have the isodose ≥ 50 Gy line covering at least 95% of the PTV-c volume. In terms of OARs protection, the SIB-IMRT plan showed the lowest value of V5, V20, and mean dose of lung, had the lowest V55 of esophagus, and the lowest estimated radiation doses to immune cells (EDIC). The V20, V30, and mean dose of heart was lower in the simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) IMRT (SIB-IMRT) plan than that of the PTV-c 60 Gy plan. CONCLUSIONS: CTV omission was not suitable for stage III patients when the prescribed dose to PTV-g was 60 Gy in the era of 4D-CT IMRT. CTV omission plus high dose to PTV-g (74 Gy for example) warranted further exploration. The SIB-IMRT plan had the best protection to normal tissue including lymphocytes, and might be the optimal choice.

Simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) combined with nimotuzumab for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): A phase II clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of concurrent simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) combined with nimotuzumab in the treatment of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC). METHODS: Eligible patients were histologically proven to have locally advanced ESCC, and were unable to tolerate or refuse concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Enrolled patients underwent concurrent SIB-IMRT in combination with nimotuzumab. SIB-IMRT: For the planning target volume of clinical target volume (PTV-C), the prescription dose was 50.4 Gy/28fractions, 1.8 Gy/fraction, 5fractions/week, concurrently, the planning target volume of gross tumor (PTV-G) undergone an integrated boost therapy, with a prescription dose of 63 Gy/28fractions, 2.25 Gy/fraction, 5 fractions/week. Nimotuzumab was administered concurrently with radiotherapy, 200 mg/time, on D1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36, with a total accumulation of 1200 mg through intravenous infusion. The primary endpoint of the study was the safety and efficacy of the combined treatment regimen, and the secondary endpoints were 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year local control and survival outcomes. RESULTS: (1) From December 2018 to August 2021, 35 patients with stage II-IVA ESCC were enrolled and 34 patients completed the full course of radiotherapy and the intravenous infusion of full-dose nimotuzumab. The overall completion rate of the protocol was 97.1%. (2) No grade 4-5 adverse events occurred in the entire group. The most common treatment-related toxicity was acute radiation esophagitis, with a total incidence of 68.6% (24/35). The incidence of grade 2 and 3 acute esophagitis was 25.7% (9/35) and 17.1% (6/35), respectively. The incidence of acute radiation pneumonitis was 8.6% (3/35), including one case each of Grades 1, 2, and 3 pneumonitis. Adverse events in other systems included decreased blood cells, hypoalbuminemia, electrolyte disturbances, and skin rash. Among these patients, five experienced grade 3 electrolyte disturbances during the treatment period (three with grade 3 hyponatremia and two with grade 3 hypokalemia). (3) Efficacy: The overall CR rate was 22.8%, PR rate was 71.4%, ORR rate was 94.2%, and DCR rate was 97.1%.(4) Local control and survival: The 1-, 2-, and 3-year local control (LC) rate, progression-free survival(PFS) rate, and overall survival(OS) rate for the entire group were 85.5%, 75.4%, and 64.9%; 65.7%, 54.1%, and 49.6%; and 77.1%, 62.9%, and 54.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of SIB-IMRT and nimotuzumab for locally advanced esophageal cancer demonstrated good feasibility, safety and efficacy. It offered potential benefits in local control and survival. Acute radiation esophagitis was the primary treatment-related toxicity, which is clinically manageable. This comprehensive treatment approach is worthy of further clinical exploration (ChiCTR1900027936).

Incorporating intensity modulated total body irradiation into a Children's Oncology Group trial: Rationale, techniques, and safeguards.

Historically, total body irradiation (TBI) has been delivered using static, parallel opposed photon beams (2D-TBI). Recently, centers have increasingly used intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) techniques for TBI. Relative to 2D-TBI, IMRT can reduce doses to critical organs (i.e., lungs and kidneys) while delivering myeloablative doses to the rest of the body, so it may decrease the risk of toxicity while maintaining oncologic outcomes. Despite these potential benefits, delivering TBI using IMRT introduces new challenges in treatment planning and delivery. We describe the extensive experience with IMRT-based TBI at Stanford University and City of Hope Cancer Center. These groups, and others, have reported favorable clinical outcomes and have developed methods to optimize treatment planning and delivery. A critical next step is to evaluate the broader adoption of this approach. Therefore, IMRT-based TBI will be incorporated into a prospective, multi-institutional Children's Oncology Group study with careful procedures and safeguards in place.

Cost-effectiveness of intraoperative radiation therapy versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy for the treatment of early breast cancer: a disinvestment analysis.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant radiotherapy represents a key component in curative-intent treatment for early-stage breast cancer patients. In recent years, two accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) techniques are preferred for this population in our organization: electron-based Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) and Linac-based External Beam Radiotherapy, particularly Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Recently published long-term follow-up data evaluating these technologies have motivated a health technology reassessment of IORT compared to IMRT. METHODS: We developed a Markov model to simulate health-state transitions from a cohort of women with early-stage breast cancer, after lumpectomy and adjuvant APBI using either IORT or IMRT techniques. The cost-effectiveness from a private health provider perspective was assessed from a disinvestment point of view, using life-years (LYs) and recurrence-free life-years (RFLYs) as measure of benefits, along with their respective quality adjustments. Expected costs and benefits, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were reported. Finally, a sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness using lower IORT local recurrence and metastasis rates in IORT patients, and if equipment maintenance costs are removed. RESULTS: IORT technology was dominated by IMRT in all cases (i.e., fewer benefits with greater costs). Despite small differences were found regarding benefits, especially for LYs, costs were considerably higher for IORT. For sensitivity analyses with lower recurrence and metastasis rates for IORT, and scenario analyses without equipment maintenance costs, IORT was still dominated by IMRT. CONCLUSIONS: For this cohort of patients, IMRT was, at least, non-inferior to IORT in terms of expected benefits, with considerably lower costs. As a result, IORT disinvestment should be considered, favoring the use of IMRT in these patients.

Evaluation of the conformity of intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy using AAPM TG 119 protocol.

The aim of this work was to evaluate the conformity of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and verify the accuracy of the planning and delivery system used in this work based on the AAPM TG-119 protocol. The Eclipse 13.6 treatment planning system (TPS) was used to plan the TG-119 test suite, which included four test cases: MultiTarget, Prostate, Head/Neck, and C-Shape for IMRT and VMAT techniques with 6 MV and 10 MV acceleration voltages. The results were assessed and discussed in terms of the TG-119 protocol and the results of previous studies. In addition, point dose and planar dose measurements were done using a semiflex ion chamber and an electronic portal imaging device (EPID), respectively. The planned doses of all test cases met the criteria of the TG-119 protocol, except those for the spinal cord of the C-Shape hard case. There were no significant differences between the treatment planning doses and the doses given in the TG-119 report, with p-values ranging from 0.974 to 1 (p > 0.05). Doses to the target volumes were similar in the IMRT and VMAT plans, but the organs at risk (OARs) doses were different depending on the test case. The planning results showed that IMRT is more conformal than VMAT in certain cases. For the point dose measurements, the confidence limit (CLpoint) of 0.030 and 0.021 were better than the corresponding values of 0.045 and 0.047 given in the TG-119 report for high-dose and low-dose areas, respectively. Regarding the planar dose measurements, the CLplanar value of 0.38 obtained in this work was lower than that given in the TG-119 report (12.4). It is concluded that the dosimetry measurements performed in this study showed better confidence limits than those provided in the TG 119 report. IMRT remains more conformal in certain circumstances than the more progressive VMAT. When selecting the method of delivering a dose to the patient, several factors must be considered, including the radiotherapy technique, energy, treatment site, and tumour geometry.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for prostate cancer: a dosimetric comparison of IMRT and VMAT using flattening filter and flattening filter-free beams.

This retrospective study was performed to evaluate plan quality and treatment delivery parameters of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer. The study utilized different isocentric modulated techniques: intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using 6 MV flattening filter (FF) and 10 MV flattening filter-free beams (FFF). Fifteen retrospective prostate cancer patients were selected for this study. Sixty plans were created with an SBRT-prescribed dose of 36.25 Gy delivered in five fractions. Planning target volume (PTV) coverage, plan quality indices, doses delivered to organs at risk (OARs), and treatment delivery parameters were compared for all plans. It turned out that VMAT plans, particularly those using the FFF beam, provided superior target conformality and a steeper dose gradient as compared to IMRT plans. Additionally, VMAT plans showed better OARs sparing compared to IMRT plans. However, IMRT plans delivered a lower maximum dose to the target than VMAT plans. Importantly, the VMAT plans resulted in reduced treatment delivery parameters, including beam on time (BOT), monitor unit (MU), and modulation factor (MF), compared to IMRT plans. Furthermore, a statistically significant difference was observed in BOT and mean body dose between FF and FFF beams, with FFF beams showing superior performance. Considering all results, VMAT using 10 MV (FFF) is suggested for treating prostate cancer patients with SBRT. This offers the fastest delivery in addition to maintaining the highest plan quality.

Impact of flattening filter-free beams on remaining volume at risk in lung cancer treatment.

Modern radiotherapy machines offer a new modality, like flattening filter-free beam (FFF), which is used especially in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to reduce treatment time. The remaining volume at risk (RVR) is known as undefined normal tissue, and assists in evaluating late effects such as carcinogenesis. This study aimed to compare the effects of flattening and un-flattened beams on RVR in lung cancer treated by conventional doses using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Twenty-three lung cancer patients with a prescribed dose of 60 Gy delivered in 30 fractions were selected retrospectively. Four treatment plans were generated for each case (VMAT FF, VMAT FFF, IMRT FF and IMRT FFF). Mean doses to RVR and volumes that received low doses (V15Gy, V10Gy and V5Gy) were introduced as RVR evaluation parameters. Variance percentage comparison between flattening filter (FF) and FFF for the RVR evaluation parameters gave 2.38, 1.10, 1.80 and 2.22 for VMAT, and 1.73, 1.18, 1.62 and 1.81 for IMRT. In contrast, VMAT and IMRT RVR evaluation parameters resulted in variance percentage differences of 10.29, 5.02, - 8.84 and - 4.82 for FF, and 11.18, 4.96, - 8.59 and - 4.48for FFF. It is concluded that in terms of RVR evaluation parameters, FFF is clinically beneficial compared to FF for RVR, due to the decrease in mean RVR dose and low-dose irradiated RVR volume. Furthermore, VMAT is preferred in the mean RVR dose and V15Gy, while IMRT is better in V10Gy and V5Gy for RVR.

Patterns of failure in patients with nasopharyngeal cancer of Northeastern region of India: a retrospective observational study.

PURPOSE: We aimed to analyze patterns of failure and disease volume-treatment outcomes in patients with Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated with definitive radiation with or without concurrent chemotherapy at a tertiary cancer centre in northeast India. METHODS: From February 2018 to February 2022, 99 histopathologically proved non-metastatic NPC patients treated with curative-intent RT with or without chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. Locally advanced patients received neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate the impact of various prognostic factors on locoregional free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The log-rank test and Kaplan-Meir curves compared outcome variables based on ROC analysis-classified tumor volume. RESULTS: During a median follow up of 25.4 months (17.3-39.2), 35(35.4%) patients developed recurrence. Twenty-three patients developed locoregional failures, of which 11 were in-field; 12 patient showed an out-field failure. The 3-year LRFS, DMFS, PFS and OS was 71.10%, 70.90%, 64.10% and 74.10% respectively. There was statistically significant difference in LRFS according to T staging (p < 0.0001). Gross tumor volume (GTVp) and gross nodal volume (GTVn) were an independent prognostic factor for OS, PFS, LRFS and DMFS. The cut-off volumes for GTVp and GTVn for distant metastases and locoregional failure, respectively, were found to be 13 and 22.7 mL and 3.7 and 39.2 mL, respectively, by ROC curve analysis. Based on this, 99 patients were divided into three subgroups. OS demonstrated significant differences among patients in different volume subgroups for GTVp (p = 0.03) and GTVn (p = 0.00024). CONCLUSIONS: For NPC patients who undergo curative IMRT, primary tumour and nodal volumes are independent prognostic indicators. GTVp and GTVn are highly predictive of local control, distant metastases, disease-free survival, and overall survival. This justifies their use as quantitative prognostic indicator for NPC.

An IMRT planning technique for treating whole breast or chest wall with regional lymph nodes on Halcyon and Ethos.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: Field size limitations on Halcyon and Ethos treatment machines largely preclude use of the conventional monoisocentric three-field technique for breast/chest wall and regional lymph nodes. We present an alternative, IMRT-based planning approach that facilitates treatment on Halcyon and Ethos while preserving plan quality. MATERIALS/METHODS: Eight breast and regional node cases (four left-sided, four right-sided) were planned for an Ethos machine using a 15-17 field IMRT technique. Institutional plan quality metrics for CTV and PTV coverage and OAR sparing were assessed. Five plans (four right-sided, one left-sided) were also planned using a hybrid 3D multisocenter technique. CTV coverage and OAR sparing were compared to the IMRT plans. Eclipse scripting tools were developed to aid in beam placement and plan evaluation through a set of dosimetric scorecards, and both are shared publicly. RESULTS: On average, the IMRT plans achieved breast CTV and PTV coverage at 50 Gy of 97.9% and 95.7%, respectively. Supraclavicular CTV and PTV coverages at 45 Gy were 100% and 95.5%. Axillary lymph node CTV and PTV coverages at 45 Gy were 100% and 97.1%, and IMN CTV coverage at 45 Gy was 99.2%. Mean ipsilateral lung V20 Gy was 19.3%, and average mean heart dose was 1.6 Gy for right-sided cases and 3.0 Gy for left-sided. In comparison to the hybrid 3D plans, IMRT plans achieved higher breast and supraclavicular CTV coverage (99.9% vs. 98.6% and 99.9% vs. 93.4%), higher IMN coverage (99.6% vs. 78.2%), and lower ipsilateral lung V20 Gy (19.6% vs. 28.2%). CONCLUSION: Institutional plan quality benchmarks were achieved for all eight cases using the IMRT-based planning approach. The IMRT-based planning approach offered superior conformity and OAR sparing than a competing hybrid 3D approach.

Identifying dose constraints for the parotid ducts to minimize patient-reported xerostomia: Is conventional mean dose sparing of the parotid glands sufficient?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to identify dose constraints for the parotid ducts that limit patient-reported xerostomia and estimate whether these constraints are achieved during conventional parotid gland sparing radiation therapy (PGS-RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-eight oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients were treated prospectively on trial with MRI sialography-guided parotid duct sparing radiation therapy (PDS-RT). PDS-RT explicitly minimizes dose to the parotid ducts in addition to PGS-RT. Parotid duct dose constraints were identified that distinguished patients reporting high and low rates of xerostomia. Atlas-based parotid duct contours were generated on a retrospective cohort of similar patients where the parotid ducts were not contoured nor explicitly spared to estimate the dose received by the parotid ducts during PGS-RT. RESULTS: Patients whose intraglandular parotid ducts or total parotid ducts were planned for a mean dose < 14 Gy and < 12 Gy, respectively, reported significantly (p < 0.01) lower rates of xerostomia at 6 and 12 months post-RT. Patients receiving PDS-RT had average total and intraglandular duct doses of 11.6  and 13.6 Gy, respectively, compared to an estimated 23.8  and 22.1 Gy, for those receiving PGS-RT (p < 0.01). Only 6% (6/108) and 20% (22/108) of patients receiving PGS-RT were estimated to meet the dose constraints for the total ducts and intraglandular ducts, respectively. CONCLUSION: Parotid duct dose thresholds exist that appear to distinguish patients with and without xerostomia. The identified dose thresholds are frequently not met in PGS-RT plans. In addition to reducing the dose to the parotid gland(s), parotid duct sparing may also further reduce xerostomia.

Deep-neural network approaches for predicting 3D dose distribution in intensity-modulated radiotherapy of the brain tumors.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to reduce treatment planning time by predicting the intensity-modulated radiotherapy 3D dose distribution using deep learning for brain cancer patients. "For this purpose, two different approaches in dose prediction, i.e., first only planning target volume (PTV) and second PTV with organs at risk (OARs) as input of the U-net model, are employed and their results are compared." METHODS AND MATERIALS: The data of 99 patients with glioma tumors referred for IMRT treatment were used so that the images of 90 patients were regarded as training datasets and the others were for the test. All patients were manually planned and treated with sixth-field IMRT; the photon energy was 6MV. The treatment plans were done with the Collapsed Cone Convolution algorithm to deliver 60 Gy in 30 fractions. RESULTS: The obtained accuracy and similarity for the proposed methods in dose prediction when compared to the clinical dose distributions on test patients according to MSE, dice metric and SSIM for the Only-PTV and PTV-OARs methods are on average (0.05, 0.851, 0.83) and (0.056, 0.842, 0.82) respectively. Also, dose prediction is done in an extremely short time. CONCLUSION: The same results of the two proposed methods prove that the presence of OARs in addition to PTV does not provide new knowledge to the network and only by defining the PTV and its location in the imaging slices, does the dose distribution become predictable. Therefore, the Only-PTV method by eliminating the process of introducing OARs can reduce the overall designing time of treatment by IMRT in patients with glioma tumors.

A robust treatment planning approach for chest motion in postmastectomy chest wall intensity modulated radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: Chest wall postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) should consider the effects of chest wall respiratory motion. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of robustness planning intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for respiratory movement, considering respiratory motion as a setup error. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study analyzed 20 patients who underwent PMRT (10 left and 10 right chest walls). The following three treatment plans were created for each case and compared. The treatment plans are a planning target volume (PTV) plan (PP) that covers the PTV within the body contour with the prescribed dose, a virtual bolus plan (VP) that sets a virtual bolus in contact with the body surface and prescribing the dose that includes the PTV outside the body contour, and a robust plan (RP) that considers respiratory movement as a setup uncertainty and performs robust optimization. The isocenter was shifted to reproduce the chest wall motion pattern and the doses were recalculated for comparison for each treatment plan. RESULT: No significant difference was found between the PP and the RP in terms of the tumor dose in the treatment plan. In contrast, VP had 3.5% higher PTV Dmax and 5.5% lower PTV V95% than RP (p < 0.001). The RP demonstrated significantly higher lung V20Gy and Dmean by 1.4% and 0.4 Gy, respectively, than the PP. The RP showed smaller changes in dose distribution affected by chest wall motion and significantly higher tumor dose coverage than the PP and VP. CONCLUSION: We revealed that the RP demonstrated comparable tumor doses to the PP in treatment planning and was robust for respiratory motion compared to both the PP and the VP. However, the organ at risk dose in the RP was slightly higher; therefore, its clinical use should be carefully considered.

Evaluating AAPM-TG-218 recommendations: Gamma index tolerance and action limits in IMRT and VMAT quality assurance using SunCHECK.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to improve the safety and accuracy of radiotherapy by establishing tolerance (TL) and action (AL) limits for the gamma index in patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using SunCHECK software, as per AAPM TG-218 report recommendations. METHODS: The study included 125 patients divided into six groups by treatment regions (H&N, thoracic and pelvic) and techniques (VMAT, IMRT). SunCHECK was used to calculate the gamma passing rate (%GP) and dose error (%DE) for each patient, for the planning target volume and organs at risk (OARs). The TL and AL were then determined for each group according to TG-218 recommendations. We conducted a comprehensive analysis to compare %DE among different groups and examined the relationship between %GP and %DE. RESULTS: The TL and AL of all groups were more stringent than the common standard as defined by the TG218 report. The TL and AL values of the groups differed significantly, and the values for the thoracic groups were lower for both VMAT and IMRT. The %DE of the parameters D95%, D90%, and Dmean in the planning target volume, and Dmean and Dmax in OARs were significantly different. The dose deviation of VMAT was larger than IMRT, especially in the thoracic group. A %GP and %DE correlation analysis showed a strong correlation for the planning target volume, but a weak correlation for the OARs. Additionally, a significant correlation existed between %GP of SunCHECK and Delta4. CONCLUSION: The study established TL and AL values tailored to various anatomical regions and treatment techniques at our institution. Establishing PSQA workflows for VMAT and IMRT offers valuable clinical insights and guidance. We also suggest developing a standard combining clinically relevant metrics with %GP to evaluate PSQA results comprehensively.

Feasibility of determining external beam radiotherapy dose using LuSy dosimeter.

INTRODUCTION: Radiation dose measurement is an essential part of radiotherapy to verify the correct delivery of doses to patients and ensure patient safety. Recent advancements in radiotherapy technology have highlighted the need for fast and precise dosimeters. Technologies like FLASH radiotherapy and magnetic-resonance linear accelerators (MR-LINAC) demand dosimeters that can meet their unique requirements. One promising solution is the plastic scintillator-based dosimeter with high spatial resolution and real-time dose output. This study explores the feasibility of using the LuSy dosimeter, an in-house developed plastic scintillator dosimeter for dose verification across various radiotherapy techniques, including conformal radiotherapy (CRT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A new dosimetry system, comprising a new plastic scintillator as the sensing material, was developed and characterized for radiotherapy beams. Treatment plans were created for conformal radiotherapy, IMRT, VMAT, and SRS and delivered to a phantom. LuSy dosimeter was used to measure the delivered dose for each plan on the surface of the phantom and inside the target volumes. Then, LuSy measurements were compared against an ionization chamber, MOSFET dosimeter, radiochromic films, and dose calculated using the treatment planning system (TPS). RESULTS: For CRT, surface dose measurement by LuSy dosimeter showed a deviation of -5.5% and -5.4% for breast and abdomen treatment from the TPS, respectively. When measuring inside the target volume for IMRT, VMAT, and SRS, the LuSy dosimeter produced a mean deviation of -3.0% from the TPS. Surface dose measurement resulted in higher TPS discrepancies where the deviations for IMRT, VMAT, and SRS were -2.0%, -19.5%, and 16.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The LuSy dosimeter was feasible for measuring radiotherapy doses for various treatment techniques. Treatment delivery verification enables early error detection, allowing for safe treatment delivery for radiotherapy patients.

Dose-rate dependence and IMRT QA suitability of EBT3 radiochromic films for pulse reduced dose-rate radiotherapy (PRDR) dosimetry.

BACKGROUND: Pulsed reduced dose rate (PRDR) is an emerging radiotherapy technique for recurrent diseases. It is pertinent that the linac beam characteristics are evaluated for PRDR dose rates and a suitable dosimeter is employed for IMRT QA. PURPOSE: This study sought to investigate the pulse characteristics of a 6 MV photon beam during PRDR irradiations on a commercial linac. The feasibility of using EBT3 radiochromic film for use in IMRT QA was also investigated by comparing its response to a commercial diode array phantom. METHODS: A plastic scintillator detector was employed to measure the photon pulse characteristics across nominal repetition rates (NRRs) in the 5-600 MU/min range. Film was irradiated with dose rates in the 0.033-4 Gy/min range to study the dose rate dependence. Five clinical PRDR treatment plans were selected for IMRT QA with the Delta4 phantom and EBT3 film sheets. The planned and measured dose were compared using gamma analysis with a criterion of 3%/3 mm. EBT3 film QA was performed using a cumulative technique and a weighting factor technique. RESULTS: Negligible differences were observed in the pulse width and height data between the investigated NRRs. The pulse width was measured to be 3.15 ± 0.01 µ s $\mu s$ and the PRF was calculated to be 3-357 Hz for the 5-600 MU/min NRRs. The EBT3 film was found to be dose rate independent within 3%. The gamma pass rates (GPRs) were above 99% and 90% for the Delta4 phantom and the EBT3 film using the cumulative QA method, respectively. GPRs as low as 80% were noted for the weighting factor EBT3 QA method. CONCLUSIONS: Altering the NRRs changes the mean dose rate while the instantaneous dose rate remains constant. The EBT3 film was found to be suitable for PRDR dosimetry and IMRT QA with minimal dose rate dependence.

Portability of IMRT QA between matched linear accelerators.

PURPOSE: To determine if patient-specific IMRT quality assurance can be measured on any matched treatment delivery system (TDS) for patient treatment delivery on another. METHODS: Three VMAT plans of varying complexity were created for each available energy for head and neck, SBRT lung, and right chestwall anatomical sites. Each plan was delivered on three matched Varian TrueBeam TDSs to the same Scandidos Delta4 Phantom+ diode array with only energy-specific device calibrations. Dose distributions were corrected for TDS output and then compared to TPS calculations using gamma analysis. Round-robin comparisons between measurements from each TDS were also performed using point-by-point dose difference, median dose difference, and the percent of point dose differences within 2% of the mean metrics. RESULTS: All plans had more than 95% of points passing a gamma analysis using 3%/3 mm criteria with global normalization and a 20% threshold when comparing measurements to calculations. The tightest gamma analysis criteria where a plan still passed > 95% were similar across delivery systems-within 0.5%/0.5 mm for all but three plan/energy combinations. Median dose deviations in measurement-to-measurement comparisons were within 0.7% and 1.0% for global and local normalization, respectively. More than 90% of the point differences were within 2%. CONCLUSION: A set of plans spanning available energies and complexity levels were delivered by three matched TDSs. Comparisons to calculations and between measurements showed dose distributions delivered by each TDS using the same DICOM RT-plan file meet tolerances much smaller than typical clinical IMRT QA criteria. This demonstrates each TDS is modeled to a similar accuracy by a common class (shared) beam model. Additionally, it demonstrates that dose distributions from one TDS show small differences in median dose to the others. This is an important validation component of the common beam model approach, allowing for operational improvements in the clinic.