Peri-operative outcomes following radical prostatectomy in the setting of advanced prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the peri-operative outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP) for locally advanced, node-positive, and metastatic prostate cancer (PCa), as determined through pathological staging, using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project. METHODS: We identified RP procedures performed between 2019 and 2021. Patients were stratified by pathological staging to compare the effect of locally advanced disease (T3-4), node positivity (N+) and metastasis (M+) vs localised PCa (T1-2 N0 M0). Baseline demographics and 30-day outcomes, including operating time, length of hospital stay (LOS), 30-day mortality, readmissions, reoperations, major complications, minor complications and surgery-specific complications, were compared between groups. RESULTS: Pathological staging data were available for 9276 RPs. Baseline demographics were comparable. There was a slightly higher rate of minor complications in the locally advanced cohort, but no significant difference in major complications, 30-day mortality, readmissions, or rectal injuries. Node positivity was associated with longer operating time, LOS, and some slightly increased rates of 30-day complications. RP in patients with metastatic disease appeared to be similarly safe to RP in patients with M0 disease, although it was associated with a longer LOS and slightly increased rates of certain complications. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with pathologically determined locally advanced, node-positive, and metastatic PCa, RP appears to be safe, and is not associated with significantly higher rates of 30-day mortality or major complications compared to RP for localised PCa. This study adds to the growing body of literature investigating the role of RP for advanced PCa; further studies are needed to better characterise the risks and benefits of surgery in such patients.

Timing of Kasai Procedure for Biliary Atresia: An Analysis of the Pediatric National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.

INTRODUCTION: Biliary atresia is a rare liver disease of unknown etiology affecting approximately 1 in 10,000 children. This disease initially presents as inflammatory obstruction of bile ducts leading to cholestasis and eventually fibrosis of hepatic tissue. Affected patients are ideally treated early with portoenterostomy (Kasai procedure) as age at surgery is an important prognostic factor for native liver survival and need for liver transplant. This study aimed to evaluate the age at which patients in the United States are receiving this procedure. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric database was used to identify patients between 2012 and 2021 who underwent a primary procedure of portoenterostomy. The age at time of surgery and perioperative analysis was performed. The data underwent simple descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Eight hundred twenty four patients were identified who underwent Kasai procedure. Four hundred seventy four (58.2%) were female with the predominant race being White (49.5%). The median age at surgery was 57 d old (interquartile range 41-71). Readmission and reoperation rates within 30 d were 30% and 15.2%, respectively. There were no deaths within 30 d. CONCLUSIONS: Within the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, the median age of pediatric patients undergoing Kasai procedure for biliary atresia in the United States exceeds the goal of 45 d. Further studies are needed to investigate factors that may affect time to diagnosis and time to Kasai procedure.

The 5-Factor Modified Frailty Index is a Concise and Effective Predictor of 30-Day Adverse Outcomes in Carotid Endarterectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Frailty is a clinically identifiable condition characterized by heightened vulnerability. The 5-item Modified Frailty Index provides a concise calculation of frailty that has proven effective in predicting adverse perioperative outcomes across a variety of surgical disciplines. However, there is a paucity of research examining the validity of 11-item Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) in carotid endarterectomy (CEA). This study aimed to investigate the association between mFI-5 and 30-day outcomes of CEA. METHODS: Patients underwent CEA were identified from American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program targeted database from 2012 to 2021. Patients with age<18 were excluded. Patients were stratified into four cohorts based on their mFI-5 scores: 0, 1, 2, or 3+. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare 30-day perioperative outcomes adjusting for preoperative variables with P value<0.1. RESULTS: Compared to controls (mFI-5 = 0), patients mFI-5 = 1 had higher risk of stroke (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.333, P = 0.02), unplanned operation (aOR = 1.38, P < 0.01), and length of stay (LOS) > 7 days (aOR = 0.814, P < 0.01). Patients with mFI-5 = 2 had higher stroke (aOR = 1.719, P < 0.01), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (aOR = 1.315, P = 0.01), sepsis (aOR = 2.243, P = 0.01), discharge not to home (aOR = 1.200, P < 0.01), 30-day readmission (aOR = 1.405, P < 0.01). Compared with controls, patients with mFI-5≥3 had higher mortality (aOR = 1.997 P = 0.02), MACE (aOR = 1.445, P = 0.03), cardiac complications (aOR = 1.901, P < 0.01), pulmonary events (aOR = 2.196, P < 0.01), sepsis (aOR = 3.65, P < 0.01), restenosis (aOR = 2.606, P = 0.02), unplanned operation (aOR = 1.69, P < 0.01), LOS>7 days (aOR = 1.425, P < 0.01), discharge not to home (aOR = 2.127, P < 0.01), and 30-day readmission (aOR = 2.427, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The mFI-5 is associated with 30-day mortality and complications including stroke, MACE, cardiac complications, pulmonary complications, sepsis, and restenosis. Additionally, elevated mFI-5 scores correlate with an increased likelihood of unplanned operations, extended LOS, discharge to facilities other than home, and 30-day readmissions, all of which could negatively impact long-term prognosis. Therefore, mFI-5 can serve as a concise yet effective metric of frailty in patients undergoing CEA.

Comparison of outcomes in small bowel surgery for Crohn's disease: a retrospective NSQIP review.

INTRODUCTION: Despite advances in medical therapy, approximately 33% of Crohn's disease (CD) patients will need surgery within 5 years after initial diagnosis. Several surgical approaches to CD have been proposed including small bowel resection, strictureplasty, and combined surgery with resection plus strictureplasty. Here, we utilize the American College of Surgeons (ACS) national surgical quality registry (NSQIP) to perform a comprehensive analysis of 30-day outcomes between these three surgical approaches for CD. METHODS: The authors queried the ACS-NSQIP database between 2015 and 2020 for all patients undergoing open or laparoscopic resection of small bowel or strictureplasty for CD using CPT and IC-CM 10. Outcomes of interest included length of stay, discharge disposition, wound complications, 30-day related readmission, and reoperation. RESULTS: A total of 2578 patients were identified; 87% of patients underwent small bowel resection, 5% resection with strictureplasty, and 8% strictureplasty alone. Resection plus strictureplasty (combined surgery) was associated with the longest operative time (p = 0.002). Patients undergoing small bowel resection had the longest length of hospital stay (p = 0.030) and the highest incidence of superficial/deep wound infection (44%, p = 0.003) as well as the highest incidence of sepsis (3.5%, p = 0.03). Small bowel resection was found to be associated with higher odds of wound complication compared to combined surgery (OR 2.09, p = 0.024) and strictureplasty (1.9, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that various surgical approaches for CD are associated with comparable outcomes in 30-day related reoperation and readmission, or disposition following surgery between all three surgical approaches. However, small bowel resection displayed higher odds of developing post-operative wound complications.

Preoperative neurologic comorbidity and unanticipated early postoperative reintubation: a multicentre cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The risk of respiratory complications is highest in the first 72 h post-surgery. Postoperative respiratory events can exacerbate pre-existing respiratory compromise and lead to reintubation of the trachea, particularly in patients with neurologic disorders. This study examined the association between neurologic comorbidities and unanticipated early postoperative reintubation in children. METHODS: This multicentre, 1:1 propensity score-matched study included 420 096 children who underwent inpatient, elective, noncardiac surgery at National Surgical Quality Improvement Program reporting hospitals in 2012-22. The primary outcome was unanticipated early postoperative reintubation within 72 h after surgery. The secondary outcome was prolonged postoperative mechanical ventilation, defined as ventilator use >72 h. We also evaluated 30-day mortality in patients requiring reintubation. RESULTS: Cerebral palsy was associated with the highest risk of early reintubation (adjusted relative risk [RRadj]: 1.97, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.44-2.69; P<0.01), followed by seizure disorders (RRadj: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.50-2.34; P<0.01), neuromuscular disorders (RRadj: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.41-2.19; P<0.01), and structural central nervous system abnormalities (RRadj: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.13-1.61; P<0.01). Unanticipated early postoperative reintubation was associated with an eight-times increased risk of 30-day mortality (adjusted hazard ratio: 8.1, 95% CI: 6.0-11.1; P<0.01). Risk of prolonged postoperative mechanical ventilation was also increased with neurologic comorbidities, particularly seizure disorders (RRadj: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.55-1.93; P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Children with neurologic comorbidities have an increased risk of unanticipated early postoperative reintubation and prolonged mechanical ventilation. Given the high mortality risk associated with these outcomes, children with neurologic comorbidities require heightened monitoring and risk assessment.

Perioperative outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a NSQIP analysis.

BACKGROUND: Studies comparing outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repairs have yielded conflicting results. We sought to analyze early postoperative complications between these approaches using a newly available NSQIP variable indicating robot use. METHODS: We queried the 2022 ACS NSQIP database for adult patients undergoing elective minimally invasive hiatal hernia repair. Chi-squared and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare cohort characteristics. Logistic, linear, and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to compare perioperative outcomes between the laparoscopic and robotic groups. RESULTS: We identified 4345 patients who underwent repair using a laparoscopic (2778 patients; 63.9%) or robotic (1567 patients; 36.1%) approach. Most (73.1%) were female, and the median age was 65 (IQR 55, 73). Patients who underwent robotic repair were younger (median age 64 vs 66), had a slightly higher body mass index (BMI; median 30.2 vs 29.9), and were more likely to have hypertension (53.0% vs 48.5%), all p < 0.01. On unadjusted analysis the robotic approach was associated with decreased 30-day mortality (0.0% vs 0.4%, p < 0.01). After adjusting for age, gender, race, BMI, and hypertension, the robotic approach was not associated with increased major complications (5.6% vs 5.1%, AOR 1.13, 95% CI 0.86, 1.49), minor complications (0.9% vs 1.5%, AOR 1.20, 95% CI 0.74, 1.93), or unplanned readmission (6.5% vs 5.5%, AHR 1.17, 95% CI 0.89, 1.54), all p ≥ 0.26. After adjusting for age and hypertension, the robotic cohort had an increased risk of myocardial infarction (AOR 2.53, 95% CI 1.01, 6.33, p = 0.048) and pulmonary embolism (AOR 2.76, 95% CI 1.17, 6.49, p = 0.02), although none resulted in 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic and laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repairs had similar overall complication and readmission rates. The robotic cohort had an increased risk of myocardial infarction and pulmonary embolism but no 30-day mortality. Current data support the use of both robotic and laparoscopic approaches for paraesophageal hernia repair.

Priority areas for outcomes improvement among older adults undergoing inpatient general surgery inclusive of geriatric-pertinent complications.

BACKGROUND: Comprehensive studies on priority areas for improving geriatric surgery outcomes, inclusive of geriatric-pertinent data, are limited. METHODS: The ACS NSQIP geriatric database (2014-2018) was used to abstract older adults (≥65 years) undergoing inpatient general surgery procedures. Thirty-day complication, functional decline, and mortality rates were analyzed, with a focus on two geriatric-pertinent complications: delirium and new/worsening pressure ulcers. RESULTS: There were 9062 patients; 41.9% were ≥75 years. Mean age was 73.9 years. The majority of patients were female (54.0%), White (77.7%), and had independent functional status before surgery (94.0%). Overall 30-day complication, functional decline, and mortality rates were 33.6%, 34.5%, and 3.5%, respectively; failure to the rescue rate was 9.7%. Including geriatric-pertinent complications increased the overall complication rate by 20.4%. Delirium emerged as the leading complication (11.9%), followed by bleeding (11.1%), and wound-related complications (10.1%); these three accounted for 53.7% of complications. Delirium and pressure ulcers were associated with a >50% rate of postoperative functional decline (52.0% and 71.4%, respectively); pressure ulcers were also notable for a 25.5% failure to the rescue rate. Both were also among complications most likely to occur following the 3 most common procedures (colorectal surgery, pancreatic resections, and exploratory laparotomy), which overall accounted for approximately 79.6% of complications, 73.4% of patients experiencing functional decline, and 82.3% of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Delirium is the leading complication among older adults undergoing inpatient surgery. Overall, a small number of complications and procedure groups account for most surgical morbidity and mortality among older adults and thus constitute priority areas for outcomes improvement.

The deimplementation of laboratory testing in low-risk patients as recommended by the American society of anesthesiologists: An ACS-NSQIP longitudinal analysis.

BACKGROUND: In 2012, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) published guidelines recommending against routine preoperative laboratory testing for low-risk patients to reduce unnecessary medical expenditures. The aim of this study was to assess the change in routine preoperative laboratory testing in low-risk versus higher-risk patients before and after release of these guidelines. METHODS: The ACS-NSQIP database, 2005-2018, was separated into low-risk versus higher-risk patients based upon a previously published stratification. The guideline implementation date was defined as January 2013. Changes in preoperative laboratory testing over time were compared between low- and higher-risk patients. A difference-in-differences model was applied. The primary outcome included any laboratory test obtained ≤90 days prior to surgery. RESULTS: Of 7,507,991 patients, 972,431 (13.0%) were defined as low-risk and 6,535,560 (87.0%) higher-risk. Use of any preoperative laboratory test declined in low-risk patients from 66.5% before to 59.6% after guidelines, a 6.9 percentage point reduction, versus 93.0%-91.9% in higher-risk patients, a 1.1 percentage point reduction (p < 0.0001, comparing percentage point reductions). After risk-adjustment, the adjusted odds ratio for having any preoperative laboratory test after versus before the guidelines was 0.77 (95% CI 0.76-0.78) in low-risk versus 0.93 (0.92-0.94) in higher-risk patients. In low-risk patients, lack of any preoperative testing was not associated with worse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: While a majority of low-risk patients continue to receive preoperative laboratory testing not recommended by the ASA, there has been a decline after implementation of guidelines. Continued effort should be directed at the deimplementation of routine preoperative laboratory testing for low-risk patients.

Mortality and failure-to-rescue after esophagectomy in the procedure-targeted National Surgical Quality Improvement Program registry.

BACKGROUND: The association between procedural volume and esophagectomy outcomes has been established, but the relationship between higher levels of care and esophagectomy outcomes has not been explored. This study aims to investigate whether hospital participation in the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) esophagectomy-targeted registry is associated with superior outcomes. METHODS: The 2016-2020 ACS NSQIP standard and esophagectomy-targeted registries were queried. Esophagectomy outcomes were analyzed overall and stratified by esophagectomy type (Ivor Lewis vs. transhiatal vs. 3-field McKeown). RESULTS: A total of 2181 and 5449 esophagectomy cases were identified in the standard and targeted databases (68% Ivor Lewis esophagectomy). The median age was 65 years and 80% were male. Preoperative characteristics were largely comparable. On univariate analysis, targeted hospitals were associated with lower mortality (2% vs. 4%, p < 0.01) and failure-to-rescue rates (11% vs. 17%, p < 0.01), higher likelihood of an optimal outcome (62% vs. 58%, p = 0.01), and shorter hospital stay (median 9 vs. 10 days, p < 0.01). On multivariable analysis, Ivor Lewis esophagectomy at targeted centers was associated with reduced odds of mortality [odds ratio (OR) 0.57 and 95% confidence intervals 0.35-0.90] and failure-to-rescue [OR 0.54 (0.33-0.90)] with no difference in serious morbidity or optimal outcome. There was no statistically significant difference in odds of mortality or failure to rescue in targeted versus standard centers when performing transhiatal or McKeown esophagectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Esophagectomy performed at hospitals participating in the targeted ACS NSQIP is associated with roughly half the risk of mortality compared to the standard registry. The factors underlying this relationship may be valuable in quality improvement.

Racial and ethnic disparity in national practice patterns for stress urinary incontinence surgery.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: There is a paucity of information assessing whether race/ethnicity is associated with differences in surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The primary objective was to assess for racial/ethnic disparities in SUI surgeries. Secondary objectives were to assess for surgical complication differences and trends over time. METHODS: Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, we conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of patients undergoing SUI surgery from 2010 to 2019. Chi-squared or Fisher's exact test and ANOVA were used for categorical and continuous variables respectively. Breslow day score and multinomial and multiple logistic regression models were used. RESULTS: A total of 53,333 patients were analyzed. Using White race/ethnicity and sling surgery as references, Hispanic patients underwent more laparoscopic surgeries (OR1.17 [CI 1.03, 1.33]) and anterior vesico-urethropexy/urethropexies (OR 1.97 [CI 1.66, 2.34]); Black patients underwent more anterior vesico-urethropexy/urethropexies (OR 1.49 [CI 1.07, 2.07]), abdomino-vaginal vesical neck suspensions (OR 2.19 [CI 1.05-4.55]), and inflatable urethral slings (OR 4.28 [CI 1.23-14.90]). White patients had lower rates of inpatient stay (p < 0.0001) and blood transfusion (p < 0.0001) compared with patients who were Black, indigenous, people of color (BIPOC). Over time, Hispanic and Black patients were more likely to undergo anterior vesico-urethropexy/urethropexies than White patients (RR 2.03:1 [CI 1.72-2.40]) and (RR 1.59 CI [1.15-2.20]) respectively. Adjusting for possible confounders, Hispanic and Black patients had a greater chance of having a nonsling surgery, 37% (p < 0.0001) and 44% (p = 0.0001) greater chances respectively. CONCLUSION: We observed racial/ethnic differences in SUI surgeries. Although causality cannot be proven here, our results confirm previous findings suggesting inequities in care.

Effect of Body Mass Index on Complications After Vaginal and Laparoscopic Apical Prolapse Surgery.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Obesity is increasing worldwide, and data are limited on how body mass index (BMI) affects surgical risk in pelvic organ prolapse. This study is aimed at evaluating the impact of obesity on outcomes after apical pelvic organ prolapse surgery. We hypothesize that obese patients have higher rates of postoperative complications. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2014 to 2018. Current Procedural Terminology codes identified subjects aged 18-89 who underwent apical prolapse repair, including vaginal colpopexy and laparoscopic or robotic sacrocolpopexy. Minor and major complications were analyzed using the World Health Organization BMI category. Regression analysis was performed to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: The total cohort was 24,718 with 15,137 vaginal colpopexy and 9,581 laparoscopic/robotic sacrocolpopexy. The average age was 60.1, 76.5% were white, 24.2% were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 3 or 4, and 44.7% had a major medical comorbidity. Eight hundred and eighty-five patients (5.4%) experienced a minor complication, 324 (2.0%) a major complication, and 1,167 (7.2%) any complication. There was no difference in any, major, or minor complication by BMI and this persisted after adjusting for age, race, ASA class, smoking, and surgical approach. CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference in complication rates after apical prolapse surgery by BMI regardless of age, race, ASA class, smoking use, and surgical approach. Patients and surgeons should be reassured that minimally invasive apical prolapse surgery is safe, with low complication rates. Randomized controlled trials are needed to verify these findings.

Evaluation of the American College of Surgeons risk calculator in hepatectomy for metastatic colorectal cancer in a Southeast Asian population.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the accuracy of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) calculator in predicting outcomes after hepatectomy for colorectal cancer (CRC) liver metastasis in a Southeast Asian population. METHODS: Predicted and actual outcomes were compared for 166 patients undergoing hepatectomy for CRC liver metastasis identified between 2017 and 2022, using receiver operating characteristic curves with area under the curve (AUC) and Brier score. RESULTS: The ACS-NSQIP calculator accurately predicted most postoperative complications (AUC > 0.70), except for surgical site infection (AUC = 0.678, Brier score = 0.045). It also exhibited satisfactory performance for readmission (AUC = 0.818, Brier score = 0.011), reoperation (AUC = 0.945, Brier score = 0.002), and length of stay (LOS, AUC = 0.909). The predicted LOS was close to the actual LOS (5.9 vs. 5.0 days, P = 0.985). CONCLUSION: The ACS-NSQIP calculator demonstrated generally accurate predictions for 30-day postoperative outcomes after hepatectomy for CRC liver metastasis in our patient population.

Perioperative risk predictors for gender affirming surgery in the NSQIP database.

INTRODUCTION: Gender affirming surgeries (GAS), such as phalloplasty (PLPs) and vaginoplasty (VGPs), are important aspects of medical care for transgender patients. Here, we aim to better characterize patient demographics and surgical outcomes for PLPs and VGPs using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). We hypothesized that frailty indices would be predictive of perioperative PLP and VGP risk and outcomes for PLPs and VGPs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Primary GAS, specifically PLPs and VGPs performed from 2006-2020 were identified in NSQIP. Baseline frailty was based on NSQIP's modified frailty index (mFI) and preoperative morbidity probability (morbprob) variable. RESULTS: Fifty-eight PLPs and 468 VGPs were identified. The overall 30-day complication rate for PLP was 26%, with 17% of total patients experiencing minor complications and 16% experiencing major complications. The overall, minor, and major complication rates for VGP were 14%, 7%, and 9% respectively. Readmissions and reoperations occurred in 7% PLP and 5% VGP patients. No deaths occurred in either group within 30 days. The mFI scores were not predictive of 30-day complications or LOS. NSQIP morbprob was predictive of 30-day complications for both PLP (OR 4.0, 95% CI 1.08-19.59, p = 0.038) and VGP (OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.46-3.97, p = 0.0005). NSQIP's morbprob was also predictive of extended LOS for PLP patients (6.3 ± 1.3 days, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: This study describes patient characteristics and complication rates of PLPs and VGPs. The NSQIP preoperative morbprob is an effective predictor of surgical complications and is better than the mFI.

Impact of operative approach and patient frailty on outcomes for aorto-iliac occlusive disease with critical limb threatening ischemia.

OBJECTIVES: Multiple treatment modalities exist for the management of aorto-iliac occlusive disease (AIOD) including endovascular (endo), extra-anatomic bypass (EAB), and anatomic bypass (AB). The goal of this study was to examine the impact of revascularization strategy and patient frailty on outcomes for AIOD in patients with critical limb threatening ischemia (CLTI). METHODS: Patients undergoing revascularization for CLTI and AIOD were identified from the NSQIP database over 5 years. Demographics, procedural characteristics, and outcomes were recorded. Modified frailty index (mFI-5) was calculated for each patient. Patients were compared based on the type of procedure and frailty (mFi>0.6). RESULTS: From 2017 to 2021, 1777 patients underwent revascularization for CLTI from AIOD. Patients were majority male (56%) with a mean age of 68. A total of 1346 patients (76%) underwent an open operation of which 669 were EAB. When endo (431 patients) was compared with open repair, endo was associated with a higher incidence of tissue loss at presentation (42% vs 33%, p < 0.001), lower rates of bleeding (6.5% vs 15.5%, p < 0.001), fewer MI/stroke (1.6% vs 4.6%, p = 0.004), and fewer wound complications (2.6% vs 11.2%, p < 0.001). There was no difference in re-intervention, amputation, or death based on frailty. For frail patients (184 patients), type of repair did not impact re-intervention, major amputation, or mortality, though there was increased MI/stroke with EAB and increased wound complications with AB/EAB. CONCLUSIONS: AIOD revascularization strategies for patients with CLTI have similar 30-day re-intervention, major amputation, and mortality rates. Endovascular repair has less surgical wound complications and is better suited for frail patients.

Smoking impacts outcomes in transcervical Zenker's diverticulectomy.

PURPOSE: There is sparse literature discussing the impact of smoking on postoperative outcomes following surgical treatment of Zenker's diverticulum. In this study, we seek to characterize differences in the management and outcomes of open Zenker's diverticulectomy based on patient smoking status. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This paper is a retrospective cohort review. The 2005-2018 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried for patients undergoing open Zenker's diverticulectomy. Chi-square and multivariable logistic regression were performed to determine statistical associations between postoperative outcomes and smoking status. RESULTS: Of the 715 identified patients, 70 (9.8 %) were smokers and 645 (91.2 %) were non-smokers. Smokers were younger than non-smokers (mean 63.9 vs. 71.7 years, p < 0.001) and more likely to have a prolonged operative time (20.0 % vs. 11.6 %, p = 0.044). On multivariable regression analysis controlling for demographics and comorbidities, smokers had greater odds than non-smokers for developing overall postoperative complications (OR: 2.776, p = 0.013), surgical infections (OR: 3.194, p = 0.039), medical complications (OR: 3.563, p = 0.011), and medical infections (OR: 1.247, p = 0.016). Smokers also had greater odds for requiring ventilation/intubation (OR: 8.508, p = 0.025) and having a prolonged postoperative stay (OR: 2.425, p = 0.030). CONCLUSION: In a cohort of patients undergoing transcervical Zenker's diverticulectomy, smokers are at increased risk for overall complications, medical complications, medical infections, surgical infections, prolonged postoperative stay, and ventilation/intubation.

A NSQIP study comparing surgical outcomes between primary and non-primary TEPs after total laryngectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Tracheoesophageal puncture with voice prosthesis (TEP) is considered the gold standard for voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy; however, there is debate as to whether it should be inserted concurrently with removal of the larynx (primary TEP), or as a separate, additional procedure at a later date (secondary TEP). We utilized the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database (NSQIP) to compare postoperative complications, readmission rates, and reoperation rates among individuals who underwent total laryngectomy with or without concurrent TEP placement. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (ACS-NSQIP) from 2012 to 2019. Patients were categorized into primary and non-primary TEP groups using a variation of CPT codes for total laryngectomy, tracheoesophageal prosthesis, and type of reconstruction. Univariate analyses were performed and significance was determined at p < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 1974 patients who underwent total laryngectomy were identified from the database: 1505 (77.3 %) in the non-primary TEP group and 442 (22.7 %) in the primary TEP group. Patients in the non-primary TEP group were more likely to have an ASA class greater than or equal to three (91.2 % primary vs. 84.6 % non-primary, p < 0.001). Patients in the non-primary TEP group were also more likely to require intraoperative or postoperative blood transfusions within the first 72 h of surgery (20.5 % non-primary vs. 15.3 % primary, p = 0.016). Both groups had similar rates of wound breakdown and dehiscence. There remained no significant difference based on type of reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that patients receiving primary TEPs are not at a greater risk of developing wound complications such as pharyngocutaneous fistulas in the 30-day postoperative period. This remained true when patients were stratified by type of flap reconstruction. Patients in the non-primary TEP group were more likely to have an ASA category of 3 or greater, which may explain why they experienced higher rates of complications such as blood transfusions intra-operatively or post-operatively.

Machine learning model outperforms the ACS Risk Calculator in predicting non-home discharge following primary total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Despite the increase in outpatient total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures, many patients are still discharged to non-home locations following index surgery. The ability to accurately predict non-home discharge (NHD) following TKAs has the potential to promote a reduction in associated adverse events and excess healthcare costs. This study aimed to evaluate whether a machine learning (ML) model could outperform the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Risk Calculator in predicting NHD following TKA, using the same set of clinical variables. We hypothesised that the ML model would outperform the ACS Risk Calculator. METHODS: Data from 365,240 patients who underwent a primary TKA between 2013 and 2020 were extracted from the ACS-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database and used to develop an artificial neural network (ANN) to predict discharge disposition following primary TKA. The ANN and ACS calculator were assessed and compared using discrimination, calibration and decision curve analysis. RESULTS: Age (>68 years), BMI (>35.5 kg/m2) and ASA Class (≥2) were found to be the most important variables in predicting NHD following TKA. When compared to the ACS calculator, the ANN model demonstrated a significantly superior ability to distinguish the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) among NHD patients and provided probability predictions well aligned with the true outcomes (AUCANN = 0.69, AUCACS = 0.50, p = 0.002, slopeANN = 0.85, slopeACS = 4.46, interceptANN = 0.04, and interceptACS = 0.06). CONCLUSION: Our findings support the hypothesis that machine learning models outperform the ACS Risk Calculator in predicting non-home discharge after TKA, even when constrained to the same clinical variables. Our findings underscore the potential benefits of integrating machine learning models into clinical practice for improving preoperative patient risk identification, optimisation, counselling and clinical decision-making. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Iatrogenic urinary injuries in colorectal surgery: outcomes and risk factors from a nationwide cohort.

BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic urinary injury (IUI) can lead to significant complications after colorectal surgery, especially when diagnosis is delayed. This study analyzes risk factors associated with IUI and delayed IUI among patients undergoing colorectal procedures. METHODS: Adults undergoing colorectal surgery between 2012 and 2021 were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP®) database. Multivariable regression analysis was used to determine risk factors and outcomes associated with IUI and delayed IUI. RESULTS: Among 566,036 patients, 5836 patients (1.0%) had IUI after colorectal surgery, of whom 236 (4.0%) had delayed IUI. Multiple preoperative risk factors for IUI and delayed IUI were identified, with disseminated cancer [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-1.5; p < 0.001] and diverticular disease [aOR 1.1, 95% CI 1.0-1.2; p = 0.009] correlated with IUI and increased body mass index [aOR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2-2.1; p = 0.003] and ascites [aOR 5.6, 95% CI 2.1-15.4; p = 0.001] associated with delayed IUI. Laparoscopic approach was associated with decreased risk of IUI [aOR 0.4, 95% CI 0.4-0.5; p < 0.001] and increased risk of delayed IUI [aOR 1.8, 95% CI 1.4-2.5; p < 0.001]. Both IUI and delayed IUI were associated with significant postoperative morbidity, with severe multiorgan complications seen in delayed IUI. CONCLUSIONS: While IUI occurs infrequently in colorectal surgery, unrecognized injuries can complicate repair and cause other negative postoperative outcomes. Patients with complex intra-abdominal pathology are at increased risk of IUI, and patients with large body habitus undergoing laparoscopic procedures are at increased risk of delayed IUI.

Impact of Postoperative COVID-19 Infection Status on Outcomes in Elective Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Although Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection causes major morbidity and mortality, it is unclear what the impact of postoperative COVID-19 infection is on 30-day outcomes after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). METHODS: There were 2,340 patients who underwent TJA in 2021, identified using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, with 925 total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients (39.5%) and 1,415 total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients (60.5%), overall. Propensity score matching was implemented using patient demographics and preoperative medical conditions to compare outcomes for postoperative COVID-19-positive and COVID-19-negative patients who underwent TKA or THA. RESULTS: Postoperative COVID-19-positive THA patients were found to have a significantly increased risk of pneumonia (odds ratio [OR] 42.57), sepsis (OR 12.77), readmission (OR 12.06), non-home discharge (OR 3.78), and longer length of stay (hazard ratio 1.62). Postoperative COVID-19-positive TKA patients had an increased risk of 30-day mortality (OR 14.17), superficial infection (OR 3.17), pneumonia (OR 34.68), unplanned intubation (OR 18.31), ventilator use for more than 48 hours (OR 18.31), pulmonary embolism (OR 11.98), urinary tract infection (OR 5.16), myocardial infarction (OR 16.02), deep vein thrombosis (OR 4.69), non-home discharge (OR 1.79), reoperation (OR 3.17), readmission (OR 9.61), and longer length of stay (hazard ratio 1.49). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who contracted COVID-19 within 30 days after TJA were at increased risk of mortalities, medical complications, readmissions, reoperations, and non-home discharges. It is important for orthopedic surgeons to understand these adverse outcomes to better counsel patients and mitigate these risks, particularly in higher risk populations.

Inconsistent Classification of "Outpatient" Surgeries Leads to Different Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty in Medicare Beneficiaries: A Critical Analysis.

BACKGROUND: With rising utilization of outpatient total hip arthroplasty (THA) in older patients including Medicare beneficiaries, the objective was to compare differences in definition including (1) patient demographics; (2) lengths of stay (LOS); and (3) outcomes of "outpatient" (stated status) versus "same-day discharge" (SDD) (actual LOS = 0 days) utilizing a nationwide database. METHODS: A national database from 2015 to 2019 was queried for Medicare-aged patients undergoing outpatient THA. Total outpatient THAs (N = 6,072) were defined in one of 2 ways: either "outpatient" by the hospital (N = 2,003) or LOS = 0 days (N = 4,069). Demographics, LOS, discharge destinations, and complications were compared between groups. Logistic regression models computed odds ratios (ORs) for factors leading to complications, readmissions, and nonhome discharges. P values < .008 were significant. RESULTS: Women (OR: 1.19, P = .002), diabetes mellitus (OR: 1.31, P = .003), general anesthesia (OR: 1.24, P = .001), and longer operative times (≥95 minutes) (OR: 1.82, P < .001) were associated with 'outpatient' designation versus SDD. Within the hospital-defined 'outpatient' cohort, 49.1% (983 of 2,003) were discharged the same day (LOS = 0 days), and 21.8% had LOS 2 or more days. The hospital-defined 'outpatient' cohort had greater odds of nonhome discharges (6.3 versus 2.8%; OR: 1.88, P < .001) compared to SDD surgeries. The incidence was higher for any complication among hospital-defined 'outpatient' designated patients compared to SDD (5.5 versus 3.9%, P = .007). CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient surgeries may be misleading and often do not correlate with SDD, as over 20% remain in the hospital 2 or more days. Investigators should quantitatively define the "outpatient" status by actual LOS to allow standardization and results comparison. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.