[Correlation between prognostic nutritional index and pleural thickness with survival time of epithelial malignant pleural mesothelioma patients].

Objective: To explore the role of prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and pleural thickness in the prognostic evaluation of patients with epithelial malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) . Methods: In April 2022, a retrospective analysis was conducted on the data and laboratory data of 41 patients with epithelial MPM admitted to the cardiothoracic surgery department of Chuxiong Yi Autonomous Prefecture People's Hospital from January 2018 to May 2021. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to evaluate the relationships between total survival time, clinical characteristics, PNI and pleural thickness in patients. Results: The 41 patients were mostly male (26 cases, 63.4%) , with a median age of 55 years old. The main clinical manifestations were chest pain (53.7%) , bloody pleural effusion (75.6%) , and chest pain combined with bloody pleural effusion (36.6%) . The median survival time of patients with different TNM stage, efficacy after 4 cycles of chemotherapy, PNI, maximum pleural thickness after chemotherapy (post max) , sum of post max in 3 zones after chemotherapy (post sum) were statistically different (χ(2)=3.89, 14.51, 15.33, 4.33, 12.05, P<0.05) . Compared with patients with high PNI and post sum<32.26 mm, MPM patients with low PNI and post sum≥32.26 mm have higher risk of death, and the differences were statistically significant (HR=1.52, 95%CI: 1.75-11.93, P=0.002; HR=1.70, 95%CI: 1.84-16.23, P=0.002) . Conclusion: PNI and post sum can be used to predict the prognosis of patients with epithelial MPM.

Clinicopathological features of radiological early malignant pleural mesothelioma with no apparent tumor or pleural thickening.

BACKGROUND: We occasionally encounter malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) of no apparent tumor or pleural thickening that is radiological early MPM. This study aimed to examine the clinicopathological outcomes of radiological early MPM. METHODS: Patients with MPM treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and planned surgery at the time of diagnosis between July 2004 and December 2019 were retrospectively examined. Pretreatment maximal pleural thickness of all patients was measured on chest computed tomography. We extracted and investigated the patients who exhibited a lack of pleural thickening or visible tumor, which was defined as radiological early MPM. Survival was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Of 296treated patients, 16 (5.4%) exhibited radiological early MPM. Fourteen (87.5%) of these patients underwent pleurectomy/decortication and 2 (12.5%) underwent extrapleural pneumonectomy. Pathological stage T1 disease was diagnosed in 14 (87.5%) patients; 2 (12.5%) exhibited pulmonary parenchymal invasion (pathological stage T2). Lymphatic invasion was detected in only 1 patient. Lymph node metastases and vascular invasion were not detected. Median follow-up was 42 months. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 40.7 and 56.1 months, respectively. The 3-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 84.8% and 83.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Radiological early MPM occurs in approximately 1 of every 20 patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery planned at the time of diagnosis in an experienced center. Radiological early MPM was associated with early pathological stage and long-term survival.

Pleural thickness after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a prognostic factor in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

OBJECTIVES: Definitive diagnosis of the T-component is sometimes challenging in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Pleural thickness has been reported to be a prognostic factor for MPM and is a potential T-component. METHODS: We conducted a historical cohort study of patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and curative-intent surgery as a multimodal treatment for MPM from January 2007 to June 2016. The maximum measurement of pleural thickness among 3 levels and the sum at each level determined using axial computed tomography imaging before and after NAC were termed as "max" and "sum," respectively. We assessed the association between pleural thickness and the primary and secondary end points of overall survival and recurrence-free survival. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier curve, log rank test, and multivariate Cox regression model. RESULTS: We enrolled 105 patients. We excluded 1 because of missing data; thus, the sample size was 104. The median follow-up period was 29.1 months with recurrence in 78 patients (70.3%) and death in 67 (60.4%). Max and sum ranged from pre (before NAC) values of 0 to 35 (median, 6.05) and 0 to 97 (median, 12.9) to post (after NAC) values of 0 to 30.8 (median, 4.25) and 0 to 67.0 (median, 9.25), respectively. Post values max and sum were associated with overall survival and recurrence-free survival. Post sum values were associated with recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.59; 95% confidence interval, 1.42-3.83) and death (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-4.52), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pleural thickness after NAC was an independent prognostic factor in patients who underwent multimodal treatment.