Pretransplant Right Ventricular Dysfunction Is Associated With Increased Mortality After Heart Transplantation: A Hard Inheritance to Overcome.

BACKGROUND: Right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) is a major issue in patients with advanced heart failure because it precludes the implantation of left ventricular assist device, usually leaving heart transplantation (HTx) as the only available treatment option. The pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) is a hemodynamic parameter integrating information of right ventricular function and of pulmonary circulation. Our aim is to evaluate the association of preoperative RVD, hemodynamically defined as a low PAPi, with post-HTx survival. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive adult HTx recipient at 2 Italian transplant centers between 2000 and 2018 with available data on pre-HTx right heart catheterization were included retrospectively. RVD was defined as a value of PAPi lower than the 25th percentile of the study population. The association of RVD with the 1-year post-HTx mortality and other secondary end points were evaluated. Multivariate logistic regression was used to adjust for clinical and hemodynamic variables. Analyses stratified by pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) status (≥3 Woods units vs <3 Woods units) were also performed. Among 657 HTx recipients (female 31.1%, age 53 ± 11 years), patients with pre-HTx RVD (PAPi of <1.68) had significantly lower 1-year survival rates (77.8% vs 87.1%, P = .005), also after adjusting for estimated glomerular filtration rate, total bilirubin, PVR, serum sodium, inotropes, and mechanical circulatory support at HTx (hazard ratio 2.0, 95% confidence interval, 1.3-3.1). RVD was also associated with post-HTx renal replacement therapy (hazard ratio 2.0, 95% confidence interval 1.05-3.30) and primary graft dysfunction (hazard ratio 1.7, , 95% confidence interval 1.02-3.30). When stratifying patients by estimated PVR status, RVD was associated with worse 1-year survival among patients with normal PVR (76.9% vs 88.3%, P = .003), but not in those with increased PVR (78.6% vs 83.2%, P = .49). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative RVD, evaluated through PAPi, is associated with mortality and morbidity after HTx, providing incremental prognostic value over traditional clinical and hemodynamic parameters.

Incremental Value of Global Longitudinal Strain to Michigan Risk Score and Pulmonary Artery Pulsatility Index in Predicting Right Ventricular Failure Following Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

BACKGROUND: The incremental utility of right ventricular (RV) strain on predicting right ventricular failure (RVF) following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, beyond clinical and haemodynamic indices, is not clear. METHODS: Two hundred and forty-six (246) patients undergoing LVAD implantation, who had transthoracic echocardiograms pre and post LVAD, pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPI) measurements and Michigan risk score, were included. We analysed RV global longitudinal strain (GLS) using speckle tracking echocardiography. RVF following LVAD implantation was defined as the need for medical support for >14 days, or unplanned RV assist device insertion after LVAD implantation. RESULTS: Mean preoperative RV-GLS was -7.8±2.8%. Among all, 27% developed postoperative RVF. A classification and regression tree analysis identified preoperative Michigan risk score, PAPI and RV-GLS as important parameters in predicting postoperative RVF. Eighty per cent (80%) of patients with PAPI <2.1 developed postoperative RVF, while only 4% of patients with PAPI >6.8 developed RVF. For patients with a PAPI of 2.1-3.2, having baseline Michigan risk score >2 points conferred an 81% probability of subsequent RVF. For patients with a PAPI of 3.3-6.8, having baseline RV-GLS of -4.9% or better conferred an 86% probability of no subsequent RVF. The sensitivity and specificity of this algorithm for predicting postoperative RVF were 67% and 93%, respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.87. CONCLUSION: RV-GLS has an incremental role in predicting the development of RVF post-LVAD implantation, even after controlling for clinical and haemodynamic parameters.

Prognostic Impact of the Pulmonary Artery Pulsatility Index in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure and Severe Mitral Regurgitation Undergoing Percutaneous Edge-to-Edge Repair.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary artery (PA) pulsatility index (PAPi), calculated as (PA systolic pressure - PA diastolic pressure)/right atrial pressure, emerged as a novel predictor of right ventricular failure in patients with acute inferior myocardial infarction, advanced heart failure, and severe pulmonary hypertension. However, the prognostic utility of PAPi in transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR) using the MitraClip® system has never been tested. OBJECTIVE: To assess the prognostic impact of PAPi in patients with severe functional mitral regurgitation (MR) and chronic heart failure (CHF) undergoing TMVR. METHODS: Consecutive patients with severe functional MR (grade 3+ or 4+) and CHF who underwent successful TMVR (MR ≤2+ at discharge) were enrolled and divided into 3 groups according to PAPi (A: low PAPi ≤2.2; B: intermediate PAPi 2.21-3.99; C: high PAPi ≥4.0). The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality and rehospitalization due to CHF during a mean follow-up period of 16 ± 4 months. The impact of PAPi on prognosis was assessed by a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and a multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis investigating independent predictors for outcome. RESULTS: 78 patients (A: n = 27, B: n = 28, C: n = 23) at high operative risk (logistic EuroSCORE [European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation] 18.8 vs. 21.5 vs. 20.6%; nonsignificant) were enrolled. Mean PAPi was 1.6 ± 0.41 vs. 2.9 ± 0.53 vs. 6.8 ± 3.5; p < 0.001). Patients with low PAPi showed significantly higher rates of early rehospitalization for heart failure at the 30-day follow-up (14.9 vs. 7.1 vs. 4.3%; p = 0.04). In the long term, a significantly lower event-free survival for the combined primary endpoint was observed in the low PAPi group (44.4 vs. 25.0 vs. 20.3%; log-rank p = 0.016). ROC curve analysis revealed that optimal sensitivity and specificity were achieved using a PAPi cutoff of 2.46 (sensitivity 83%, specificity 78.3%, area under the curve 0.82 [0.64-0.99]; p = 0.01). In Cox regression analysis, PAPi ≤2.46 was an independent predictor for the combined primary endpoint (hazard ratio 2.85; 95% confidence interval 1.15-7.04; p = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: PAPi is strongly associated with clinical outcome among patients with CHF and functional MR undergoing TMVR. A PAPi value ≤2.46 predicts a worse prognosis independent of other important clinical, echocardiographic, and hemodynamic factors. Therefore, PAPi may serve as a new parameter to improve patient selection for TMVR.

Impact of implantation time on early function of cardiac transplant.

BACKGROUND: Data on out-of-ice implantation ischemia in heart transplant are scarce. We examined implantation time's impact on allograft dysfunction. METHODS: We conducted a single-site retrospective review of all primary adult heart transplants from June 2012 to August 2019 for implantation warm ischemic time (WIT), defined as first atrial stitch to aortic crossclamp removal. Univariate regression was used to assess the relationship of perioperative variables to primary graft dysfunction (PGD) and to pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) at postoperative hour 24. A threshold of p < .10 was set for the inclusion of covariates in multivariate regression. Secondary analyses evaluated for consistency among alternative criteria for allograft dysfunction. A post hoc subgroup analysis examined WIT effect in prolonged total ischemia of 240 min or longer. RESULTS: Complete data were available for 201 patients. Baseline characteristics were similar between patients who did and did not have WIT documented. In univariate analysis, female gender, longer total ischemic time (TIT), longer bypass time, greater blood transfusions, and pretransplant intensive care unit (ICU) care were associated with PGD, whereas longer bypass time was associated with worse PAPi and pretransplant ICU care was associated with better PAPi. In multivariate analysis, longer bypass time predicted PGD, and worse PAPi and preoperative ICU admission predicted PGD and better PAPi. Results did not differ in secondary or subgroup analyses. CONCLUSIONS: This study is one of few examining the functional impact of cardiac implantation ischemia. Results suggest allograft implantation time alone may not impact postoperative graft function, which was driven by intraoperative bypass duration and by preoperative ICU care, instead.

Low Pulmonary Artery Pulsatility Index Is Associated With Adverse Outcomes in Ambulatory Patients With Advanced Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: The pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) is a composite measure of right heart function, and low PAPi is associated with increased likelihood of mortality in patients hospitalized with cardiogenic shock. Our aim was to determine how PAPi correlates with other measures of right heart function and whether PAPi is associated with outcomes in ambulatory outpatients with advanced heart failure. METHODS: We assessed 673 consecutive ambulatory outpatients for heart transplantation over 10 years. The median age was 52 years, 72% were male, and dilated cardiomyopathy was the most common cause. All patients underwent detailed assessment, including right heart catheterization, and PAPi was calculated. The coprimary endpoints were death, urgent heart transplantation and mechanical circulatory support. RESULTS: Median PAPi was 2.2 (interquartile range 1.42-3.62), and variation was predominantly due to variation in right atrial pressure. PAPi was well correlated with the right atrial pressure to pulmonary capillary wedge pressure ratio (rho -0.766) but less well correlated with the right ventricular stroke work index (rho 0.561) and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (rho 0.292). Patients in the lowest PAPi quartile (0.16-1.41) had lower event-free survival at 1 year (68.7%) and 3 years (45.6%) compared with all other PAPi quartiles (log rank P = 0.0286). CONCLUSIONS: PAPi offers a composite measure of right heart function that differs from other right heart catheter or echocardiographic measures. A PAPi of less than 1.41 is associated with adverse clinical outcomes in ambulatory outpatients with advanced heart failure.

Efficacy of Pulmonary Artery Pulsatility Index as a Measure of Right Ventricular Dysfunction in Stable Phase of Dilated Cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) in the setting of left ventricular (LV) myocardial damage is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, and the pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) is a novel hemodynamic index shown to predict RVD in advanced heart failure. However, it is unknown whether PAPi can predict the long-term prognosis of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) even in the mild to moderate phase. This study aimed to assess the ability of PAPi to stratify DCM patients without severe symptoms.Methods and Results:Between April 2000 and March 2018, a total of 162 DCM patients with stable symptoms were evaluated, including PAPi, and followed up for a median of 4.91 years. The mean age was 50.9±12.6 years and the mean LV ejection fraction (EF) was 30.5±8.3%. When divided into 2 groups based on median value of PAPi (low, L-PAPi [<3.06] and high, H-PAPi [≥3.06]), even though there were no differences in B-type natriuretic peptide or pulmonary vascular resistance, the probability of cardiac event survival was significantly higher in the L-PAP than in the H-PAP group by Kaplan-Meier analysis (P=0.018). Furthermore, Cox's proportional hazard regression analysis revealed that PAPi was an independent predictor of cardiac events (hazard ratio: 0.782, P=0.010). CONCLUSIONS: Even in patients identified with DCM in the mild to moderate phase, PAPi may help stratify DCM and predict cardiac events.

Use of Pulmonary Artery Pulsatility Index in Cardiac Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated whether the pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) collected before and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is predictive and diagnostic of new onset right ventricular (RV) failure in the elective cardiac surgical population. DESIGN: This was a prospective observational study of patients who underwent cardiac surgery between 2017 and 2019. SETTING: Weill Cornell Medicine, a single large academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: The study comprised 119 patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Cardiopulmonary bypass, transesophageal echocardiography, pulmonary artery catheter, and elective cardiac surgery. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Echocardiographic and hemodynamic data were collected at 2 time points: pre-CPB and post-chest closure/post-CPB. Patients with and without post-CPB RV dysfunction fractional area of change (<35%) were compared, and receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed. One hundred and nineteen patients undergoing elective surgery-coronary artery bypass grafting (23%), aortic valve replacement (21%), aortic surgery (19%), and combined surgery (37%)-were evaluated. Post-CPB RV dysfunction was associated with lower pre-CPB PAPi values (2.0 ± 1.0 v 2.5 ± 1.2; p = 0.001 and p = 0.03) and higher pre-CPB central venous pressure (8.3 ± 3.6 and 6.9 ± 2.7; p = 0.003 and p = 0.02, respectively). Pre-CPB PAPi (0.98 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.96-0.99]), end systolic area (0.99 [95% CI 0.98-0.99]), and end diastolic area (1.01 [95% CI 1.001-1.02]) were independently associated with RV dysfunction in multivariable modeling, with a lower PAPi and end systolic area and higher end diastolic area demonstrating a greater risk of RV dysfunction post-CPB (post-CPB area under the curve for PAPi 0.80 [95% CI 0.71-0.88; sensitivity = 0.68, specificity = 0.93, optimal cutoff = 1.9]). CONCLUSIONS: PAPi measured pre-CPB is a potential predictor and marker of post-CPB RV dysfunction and may have diagnostic utility in cardiac surgery. Additional, large-scale studies are needed to confirm this finding.

Comprehensive non-invasive haemodynamic assessment in acute decompensated heart failure-related cardiogenic shock: a step towards echodynamics.

AIMS: Haemodynamic assessment can be determinant in phenotyping cardiogenic shock (CS) and guiding patient management. Aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between echocardiographic and invasive assessment of haemodynamics in acute decompensated heart failure-related CS (ADHF-CS). METHODS AND RESULTS: All consecutive ADHF-CS patients (SCAI shock stage ≥B) undergoing right heart catheterization (RHC) between 2020 and 2022 were prospectively enrolled. Patients underwent echocardiography 30 min before RHC. The evaluated haemodynamic parameters and their echocardiographic estimates ('e') comprised cardiac index (CI), wedge pressure (WP), pulmonary artery pressures (PAP), cardiac power output (CPO) and pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi). Hundred and one ADHF-CS patients (56 ± 11 years, 64% SCAI shock stage C, left ventricular ejection fraction 29 ± 5%) were included. Good correlation was found for CI, systolic PAP, RAP, and CPO (Pearson r > 0.8 for all), moderate correlation for ePAPi (r = 0.67) and PVR (r = 0.51), while estimation of WP was weak. The sensitivity and specificity of eCI to identify low output state (CI ≤2.2 L/min/m2) were 0.97 and 0.73, respectively, those of eWP for elevated filling pressures (WP >15 mmHg) were 0.84 and 0.55, those of ePAPs for PAPs ≥35 mmHg were 0.87 and 0.63, those of eCPO for CPO <0.6 W were 0.76 and 0.85, those of ePAPi for PAPi <1.85 were 0.89 and 0.92. Echocardiographic phenotyping of CS showed a good agreement with invasive classification (K value 0.457, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Echocardiographic estimation of haemodynamics and subsequent phenotypization of CS is feasible with good agreement with invasive evaluation.

Pulmonary artery elastance as a predictor of hospital mortality in heart failure cardiogenic shock.

AIMS: The initial bundle of cares strongly affects haemodynamics and outcomes in acute decompensated heart failure cardiogenic shock (ADHF-CS). We sought to characterize whether 24 h haemodynamic profiling provides superior prognostic information as compared with admission assessment and which haemodynamic parameters best predict in-hospital death. METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients with ADHF-CS and with available admission and 24 h invasive haemodynamic assessment from two academic institutions were considered for this study. The primary endpoint was in-hospital death. Regression analyses were run to identify relevant predictors of study outcome. We included 127 ADHF-CS patients [65 (inter-quartile range 52-72) years, 25.2% female]. Overall, in-hospital mortality occurred in 26.8%. Non-survivors were older, with greater CS severity. Among admission variables, age [odds ratio (OR) = 1.06; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02-1.11; Padj = 0.005] and CPIRAP (OR = 0.62 for 0.1 increment; 95% CI: 0.39-0.95; Padj = 0.034) were found significantly associated with in-hospital death. Among 24 h haemodynamic univariate predictors of in-hospital death, pulmonary elastance (PaE) was the strongest (area under the curve of 0.77; 95% CI: 0.68-0.86). PaE (OR = 5.98; 95% CI: 2.29-17.48; Padj < 0.001), pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi, OR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.62-0.92; Padj = 0.013) and age (OR = 1.06; 95% CI: 1.02-1.11; Padj = 0.010) were independently associated with in-hospital death. Best cut-off for PaE was 0.85 mmHg/mL and for PAPi was 2.95; cohort phenotyping based on these PaE and PAPi thresholds further increased in-hospital death risk stratification; patients with 24 h high PaE and low PAPi exhibited the highest in-hospital mortality (56.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary artery elastance has been found to be the most powerful 24 h haemodynamic predictor of in-hospital death in patients with ADHF-CS. Age, 24 h PaE, and PAPi are independently associated with hospital mortality. PaE captures ventricular (RV) afterload mismatch and PAPi provides a metric of RV adaptation, thus their combination generates four distinct haemodynamic phenotypes, enhancing in-hospital death risk stratification.

Pre-operative pulmonary artery pulsatility index does not predict mortality post-cardiac transplantation.

AIMS: The pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) is a novel haemodynamic marker that has previously been shown to predict right ventricular dysfunction and mortality in patients with pulmonary hypertension and advanced heart failure. Utility of the PAPi in predicting outcomes post-cardiac transplantation is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the prognostic significance of PAPi against pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) for the predication of morbidity and all-cause mortality post-transplantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients who underwent cardiac transplantation over a 6 year period were studied. Pre-operative right heart catheter data was obtained. The PAPi was calculated as follows: (systolic pulmonary artery pressure [sPAP] - diastolic pulmonary artery pressure [dPAP])/right atrial (RA) pressure. One hundred fifty-eight patients with a mean age of 49 ± 14 years were studied (43 with a pre-transplant left ventricular assist device [LVAD]). Three patients were excluded due to missing data. In the non-LVAD group, there was no significant difference in PAPi or PVR, nor was there any association with post-operative outcome (including stratification by natural history sub-type; all P > 0.05). In the LVAD group, there was no association with PAPi and post-operative outcome; however, PVR was predictive of post-operative mortality (mortality: 2.8 ± 1.3 WU vs. alive: 1.7 ± 0.7 WU; P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The PAPi was not able to discriminate mortality outcomes for patients post-cardiac transplantation. Pulmonary vascular resistance remains a marker of mortality in an LVAD cohort bridged to transplant (central illustration).

A systematic review and physiology of pulmonary artery pulsatility index in left ventricular assist device therapy.

OBJECTIVES: Right heart failure (RHF) is a major complication following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) has been evaluated as a haemodynamic marker for RHF, but PAPi is dependent on pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). We conducted a systematic review to assess the relationship between PAPi and RHF and death in patients undergoing LVAD implantation and examined the relationship between PAPi cut-off and PVR. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL and manually screened retrieved references to identify all clinical studies reporting PAPi in adult patients with a durable LVAD. Eligibility criteria were prespecified and 2 reviewers independently screened and extracted data; the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess quality of non-randomized studies. This study was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021259009). RESULTS: From 283 unique records, we identified 16 studies reporting haemodynamic assessment in 20 634 adult patients with an implanted durable LVAD. Only 2 studies reported on mortality and in both, a lower PAPi was significantly associated with death. Fifteen studies reported RHF data and, in 10 studies, a lower PAPi was significantly associated with RHF. Six studies reported on PAPi cut-offs ranging from 0.88 to 3.3; and the cut-offs were directly related to PVR (r = 0.6613, P = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Lower PAPi was associated with RHF and death following LVAD implantation, but a single PAPi cut-off cannot be defined, as it is dependent on PVR.

Prognostic value of pulmonary artery pulsatility index in chronic heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: The co-existence of right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) in heart failure patient with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is an independent maker of poor prognosis. A novel right ventricular hemodynamic composite measure is the pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi), which is the pulmonary artery pressure gradient ratio. It is a strong predictor of RVD in patients with acute inferior myocardial infarction and patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. However, little is known about its prognostic value in patients with HFrEF. METHODS: Between September 2010 and July 2013, 172 patients with HFrEF admitted to the tertiary hospital were included in this analysis. We carried out a cardiac catheterisation for each patient, at baseline. Subsequently, we evaluated both PAPi and the other hemodynamic parameters with longitudinal follow-up of adverse outcomes such as cardiac mortality, LVAD, and heart transplantation (HTx). RESULTS: During a median follow-up period of 52 months we observed 50 cardiac deaths, 12 LVAD implantations and 10 HTx. A threshold for PAPi value of 2.82 was ascertained (Area: 0.76, p < 0.001, CI: 0.67-0.85, sensitivity 67%, specificity 69%). After dividing the study population into two groups, PAPi ≤2.82 and PAPi >2.82, no significant difference was demonstrated with respect to the aetiology of heart failure (ischaemic HFrEF p = 0.29 and non-ischaemic HFrEF p = 0.29). In Cox regression survival analysis, PAPi was an independent predictor of cardiac death (hazard ratio 0.73 [95% confidence interval 0.53-0.99], p = 0.045). CONCLUSION: In patients with HFrEF, a low PAPi value (<2.82) was associated with increased cardiac mortality risk.

A Novel Hemodynamic Index of Post-operative Right Heart Dysfunction Predicts Mortality in Cardiac Surgical Patients.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to investigate whether mortality following cardiac surgery was associated with the pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi): pulmonary artery pulse pressure divided by central venous pressure (CVP), and a novel index: mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) minus CVP. METHODS: This retrospective analysis investigated all cardiac surgery patients in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons registry at a single academic medical center from January 2017 through March 2020 (n = 1510). The primary and secondary outcomes were mortality at 1 year and serum creatinine increase during index surgical admission, respectively. CVP, mPAP, PAPi, mPAP-CVP gradient, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and cardiac index (CI) were sampled continually from invasive hemodynamic monitors post-operatively. Associations with mortality were tested with univariate and multivariate analyses. The relationship with serum creatinine was investigated with Pearson's correlation at alpha = .05. RESULTS: One-year mortality was observed in 44/1200 patients (3.7%). On univariate analysis, mortality was associated with minimums for mPAP, MAP, and CI and maximums for CVP, mPAP, PAPi, mPAP-CVP gradient, and CI (all P < .10). Model selection revealed that the only independently predictive parameters were minimum MAP (AOR = .880 [.819-.944]), maximum mPAP-CVP gradient (AOR = 1.082 [1.031-1.133]), and maximum CI (AOR = 1.421 [.928-2.068]), with model c-statistic = .770. A maximum mPAP-CVP gradient >20.5 predicted mortality with 54.5% sensitivity and 79.30% specificity, maintaining significance on survival analysis (P < .001). Peak increase in serum creatinine from baseline demonstrated a weak association with all parameters (max |r| = .33). CONCLUSIONS: Mortality was not predicted by the post-operative PAPi; rather, it was independently predicted by the mPAP-CVP gradient, MAP, and CI.

Is Pulmonary Artery Pulsatility Index (PAPi) a Predictor of Outcome after Pulmonary Endarterectomy?

Background: Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) is the gold standard therapy for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Traditionally, pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) represents the main prognostic factor after surgery. The pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) has been proposed for the assessment of RV in advanced heart failure, but it has never been applied in CTEPH patients. The aim of the present study is to describe PAPi in patients who underwent PEA, before and after surgery, and to define its predictive impact on postoperative outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 188 consecutive adult patients who underwent PEA, between December 2003 and December 2021. PAPi was calculated for 186 patients and reported. Patients were partitioned in two groups using median preoperative PAPi as cutoff value: Group 1 with PAPi ≤ 8.6 (n = 94) and Group 2 with PAPi > 8.6 (n = 92). The propensity-score-matched analysis identified 67 pairs: Early outcomes were compared between two groups. Results: Mean preoperative PAPi was 10.3 ± 7.2. Considering matched populations, no differences emerged in terms of postoperative hemodynamics; Group 1 demonstrated higher 90-day mortality significance (10.4% vs. 3.0%, p = 0.082); the need for mechanical circulatory support (MCS) was similar, but successful weaning was unlikely (25% vs. 85.7%, p = 0.032). Conclusions: Mean PAPi in the CTEPH population is higher than in other diseases. Low PAPi (≤8.6) seems to be associated with lower postoperative survival and successful weaning from MCS.

Pulmonary artery pulsatility index as a predictor of right ventricular failure in left ventricular assist device recipients: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: It is critical to identify patients at increased risk of right ventricular failure (RVF) before left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) is a hemodynamic parameter that is a specific measure of right ventricular function and may better identify LVAD recipients at risk for RVF. This systematic review analyzes the predictive value of preoperative PAPi to RVF in the setting of LVAD implantation. METHODS: Databases were searched for all studies reporting on PAPi and RVF after LVAD implantation. Data collected included: number of patients, patient characteristics, incidences of RVF, PAPi, central venous pressure (CVP), CVP/pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, and right ventricular stroke work index. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies (4,756 patients) were included in this review. The incidence of RVF was found to be 27.48% (1,307 patients). The weighted mean (standard deviation) of preoperative PAPi associated with RVF vs No RVF was 2.17 (2.36) and 2.87 (3.21), respectively. When comparing LVAD recipients with RVF and No RVF, patients who developed RVF had a significantly lower preoperative PAPi by a WMD (95% CI) of -0.74 [-1.00, -0.49] (p < .001). The remaining variables (CVP; CVP/pulmonary capillary wedge pressure; tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion; and right ventricular stroke work index) were also confirmed as predictors of RVF after LVAD implantation. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review demonstrates the utility of PAPi as a clinical predictor of RVF after LVAD implantation. Based on our findings, we recommend that PAPi be used in conjunction with traditional hemodynamic parameters when risk stratifying LVAD recipients for RVF.

Prediction of right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation: role of vasodilator challenge.

AIMS: Pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) is an indicator of right ventricular (RV) function and an independent predictor of right ventricular failure (RVF) following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Administration of vasodilator challenge during right heart catheterization (RHC) could reduce RV workload allowing a better assessment of its functional reserve. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients undergoing LVAD implantation at our Institution between May 2013 and August 2021 were enrolled. Only patients who had undergone RHC and vasodilator challenge with sodium nitroprusside were analyzed. We collected all available clinical, instrumental, and haemodynamic parameters, at baseline and after nitroprusside infusion and evaluated potential associations with post-LVAD RVF. Of the 54 patients analyzed, 19 (35%) developed RVF after LVAD implantation. Fractional area change (FAC) (OR: 0.647, CI: 0.481-0.871; P = 0.004), pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) (OR: 0.856, CI: 0.761-0.964; P = 0.010), and post-sodium nitroprusside (NTP) PAPi (OR: 0.218, CI: 0.073-0.653; P = 0.006) were independent predictors of post-LVAD RVF. The model combining FAC, PASP, and post-NTP PAPi demonstrated a predictive accuracy of 90.7%. Addition of post-NTP PAPi significantly increased the predictive accuracy of the European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support right-sided heart failure risk score [79.4 vs. 70.4%; area under the curve (AUC): 0.841 vs. 0.724, P = 0.022] and the CRITT score (79.6% vs. 74%; AUC: 0.861 vs. 0.767 P = 0.033). CONCLUSION: Post-NTP PAPi has observed to be an independent predictor of RVF following LVAD implantation. Dynamic assessment of PAPi using a vasodilator challenge may represent a method of testing RV functional reserve in candidates for LVAD implantation. Larger and prospective studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.

Ischaemic versus non-ischaemic: how does heart failure aetiology affect pulmonary arterial capacitance and pulmonary artery pulsatility index in end-stage heart failure?

BACKGROUND: The aetiology of heart failure may have different effects on right ventricular (RV) function, pulmonary pressures and RV afterload. Pulmonary arterial capacitance (PAC) and pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) are novel haemodynamic indices used in determining RV afterload and RV function, respectively. We aimed to investigate whether there was a difference in PAC and PAPi between ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICMP) and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICMP) in patients with end-stage heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 215 subjects undergoing evaluation for heart transplantation or left ventricular (LV) assist device were classified into two groups: ICMP (n = 101) and NICMP (n = 114). The patients with LV ejection fraction ≤ 25% were included in the study. ICMP group had lower PAC and higher PAPi values compared to NICMP group [1.25 (0.82-1.86) vs. 1.58 (1.02-2.21), p = 0.002 and 3.4 (2.2-5.0) vs. 2.5 (1.7-4.0); p = 0.007]. Pulmonary vascular resistance, pulmonary artery systolic and mean pressure were higher in ICMP group compared to NICMP group [3.5 ± 1.8 vs. 2.9 ± 2.3, p = 0.004; 59.0 (42.0-73.0) vs. 46.0 (37.0-59.0), p < 0.001, 35.0 (27.0-46.0) vs. 31.0 (23.0-39.0), p = 0.002]. The patients with ICMP had higher tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion and less RV dilatation. ICMP was an independent risk factor for pulmonary hypertension (OR: 4.02, 95% CI: 1.13-14.24, p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: ICMP was associated with lower PAC and higher PAPi. These results indicated that an ischaemic aetiology is associated with higher RV afterload and better RV function in the end-stage heart failure.

Impact of extracorporeal CPR with transcatheter heart pump support (ECPELLA) on improvement of short-term survival and neurological outcome in patients with refractory cardiac arrest - A single-site retrospective cohort study.

Aim: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR) using veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is a novel lifesaving method for refractory cardiac arrest. Although VA-ECMO preserves end-organ perfusion, it may affect left ventricular (LV) recovery due to increased LV load. An emerging treatment modality, ECPELLA, which combines VA-ECMO and a transcatheter heart pump, Impella, can simultaneously provide circulatory support and LV unloading. In this single-site cohort study, we assessed impact of ECPELLA support on clinical outcomes of refractory cardiac arrest patients. Method: We retrospectively reviewed 165 consecutive cardiac arrest patients, who underwent E-CPR by VA-ECMO with or without intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or ECPELLA from January 2012 to September 2021. We assessed 30-day survival rate, neurological outcome, hemodynamic data, and safety profiles including hemolysis, acute kidney injury, blood transfusion and embolic cerebral infarction. Results: Among 165 E-CPR patients, 35 patients were supported by ECPELLA, and 130 patients were supported by conventional VA-ECMO with or without IABP. Following propensity score matching of 30 ECPELLA and 30 VA-ECMO patients, the 30-day survival (ECPELLA: 53%, VA-ECMO: 20%, p < 0.01) and favorable neurological outcome determined by the Cerebral Performance Category score 1 or 2 (ECPELLA: 33%, VA-ECMO: 7%, p < 0.01) were significantly higher with ECPELLA. Patients receiving ECPELLA also showed significantly higher total mechanical circulatory support flow and lower arterial pulse pressure for the first 3 days (p < 0.01) of treatment. There were no statistical differences in safety profiles between treatment groups. Conclusion: ECPELLA may be associated with improved 30-day survival and neurological outcome in patients with refractory cardiac arrest.