What is Thy3a? A study of 336 Thy3a (AUS/FLUS) thyroid FNAs with histology compares UK RCPath with other reporting systems and shows how Thy3a subclassification can improve risk stratification and help address overuse of this category.

INTRODUCTION: Thy3a (AUS/FLUS) is an indeterminate and heterogeneous category in thyroid cytology. Thy3a reporting rates vary widely, with many laboratories documenting overuse. Subclassification of Thy3a helps with risk stratification. We aimed to investigate whether subclassification can also help address Thy3a overuse. We compare the UK reporting system with other terminologies. METHODS: An audit of thyroid fine needle aspirations (FNAs) reported at our institution between 2012 and 2017 was performed. Thy3a FNAs followed by histology were reviewed and subcategorised into four subgroups: Scanty Atypia (SA), Scanty Microfollicular (SMF), Favour Benign (FB) and Thyroiditis versus Neoplasm (TVN). Review and subclassification were blinded to histology outcomes. FNAs were correlated with histology and statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: Our Thy3a rate was high (24% of all thyroid FNAs). For 336 Thy3a FNAs with histology, the malignancy rates of the four subgroups were: SA 68%, SMF 20%, FB 4%, TVN 31%. There were significant associations between subgroup and malignancy risk, and between subgroup and tumour risk. On histology, SA had more malignancies than expected and FB had fewer. SA and SMF had more tumours than expected and FB had fewer. SMF and Thy3f FNAs were similar in terms of tumour and malignancy outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Subclassification of Thy3a FNAs into these four subgroups is recommended. This can improve risk stratification and help address overuse of Thy3a. We propose that some FB and SMF cases could be safely diverted to Thy2 and Thy3f respectively. We compare various reporting terminologies and question how indeterminate FNAs should be classified.

BRAFV600E mutation as a predictor of thyroid malignancy in indeterminate nodules: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Thyroid nodules are usually diagnosed using fine-needle aspiration (FNA). The sensitivity limitations of FNA result in 10-30% of nodules being classified as "indeterminate". The BRAFV600E mutation is associated with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). We conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic utility of the BRAFV600E mutation in indeterminate nodules. METHOD: PUBMED and EMBASE were searched for studies testing for the BRAFV600E involving indeterminate nodules (Thy3a, Thy3f, Thy4) and containing information on final surgical histopathology. Thirty two studies involving 3150 indeterminate nodules were included in the analysis. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity and specificity for BRAFV600E for the diagnosis of thyroid malignancy was 0.40 (95% CI: 0.32-0.48) and 1.00 (95% CI: 0.98-1.00) respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 205.4 (95% CI: 40.1-1052). With a Fagan plot, the post-test probability of thyroid cancer, given a negative mutation was 6%, but this rose to 92% with a positive result. On subgroup analysis, for Thy3a nodules, the pooled sensitivity and specificity for thyroid malignancy was 0.21 (95% CI: 0.13-0.34) and 1.00 (95% CI: 0.98-1.00). For Thy3f nodules, the pooled sensitivity and specificity was 0.09 (95% CI: 0.03-0.20) and 1.00 (95% CI: 0.05-1.00) respectively. For Thy4 nodules, the corresponding sensitivity and specificity was 0.58 (95% CI: 0.5-0.64) and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.95-1.00) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a high specificity for thyroid cancer, BRAFV600E mutation has a low overall sensitivity and therefore has a limited diagnostic value as a single screening test.