Distal Metaphyseal Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy Fixation: A Biomechanical Analysis.

PURPOSE: Ulnar shortening osteotomy can be used to treat ulnar impaction syndrome and other causes of ulnar wrist pain. Distal metaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomy (DMUSO) is one technique that has been proposed to reduce the complications seen with a diaphyseal USO or a wafer resection. However, to our knowledge, the optimal fixation construct for DMUSO has not been studied. We sought to characterize the biomechanical stiffness and rotational stability of different DMUSO constructs. METHODS: A DMUSO was performed on 40 human cadaveric ulnas using 4 different fixation constructs (10 specimens per group): one 3.0 mm antegrade screw; two 2.2 mm antegrade screws; one 3.0 mm retrograde screw; and two 2.2 mm retrograde screws. Biaxial testing using axial load and cyclical axial torque was performed until failure, defined as 10° of rotation or 2 mm displacement. Specimens were assessed for stiffness at failure. Bone density was assessed using the second metacarpal cortical percentage. RESULTS: Bone density was similar between all 4 testing groups. Of the 4 groups, the 2 antegrade screw group exhibited the highest rotational stiffness of 232 ± 102 Nm/deg. In paired analysis, this was significantly greater than 1 retrograde screw constructs. In multivariable analysis, 2-screw constructs were significantly stiffer than 1 screw and antegrade constructs were significantly stiffer than retrograde. Maximum failure torque did not differ with orientation, but 2 screws failed at significantly higher torques. CONCLUSION: Using 2 screws for DMUSO fixation constructs may provide higher stiffness and maximum failure torque, and antegrade screw constructs may provide more stiffness than retrograde constructs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Antegrade screw fixation using 2 screws may provide the strongest construct for DMUSO. Antegrade fixation may be preferred because it avoids violating the distal radioulnar joint capsule and articular surface of the ulna.

Risk Factors for Complications in Ulnar Shortening Osteotomies: A Multicenter Retrospective Review.

PURPOSE: Ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) is commonly performed to alleviate pathologies causing ulnar-sided wrist pain. Surgical complications include nonunion and hardware removal, with rates up to 18% and 45%, respectively. The primary objective of the study was to report the overall complication rate of USO. The secondary objective was to identify risk factors for complications. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter cohort review was undertaken, including six Canadian cities over a 6-year period (January 2013-December 2018). Chart review was used to collect demographic data, surgical technique, implant used, and postoperative complications. Descriptive statistics of demographics and operative characteristics, including plate positioning, type of osteotomy, plate type, and ulnar variance (mm), were analyzed. Univariate analyses were used to select predictor variables for nonunion and hardware removal. These predictor variables were then entered into an adjusted multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: A total of 361 USOs were performed. Mean age was 46 ± 16 years (60.7% men). The overall complication rate was 37.1%, hardware removal rate was 29.6%, and nonunion rate was 9.4%. There was a workers' compensation claim associated with 21.6% of all complications, and it was a risk factor for both hardware removal (odds ratio [OR] = 3.81) and nonunion (OR = 2.88). Neither smoking nor diabetes was associated with complication rates. Seventy percent of plates were placed volarly, 25.5% dorsally, and 3.9% directly ulnar. Osteotomies were oblique in 83.7% of cases and transverse in 15.5%. Adjusted multivariate regression analysis revealed that younger age (OR = 0.98) was a risk factor for hardware removal and male sex (OR = 2.49) was a risk factor for nonunion. A surgical factor associated with hardware removal was direct ulnar plate placement (OR = 9.93). No surgical factors were associated with nonunions. CONCLUSIONS: There are substantial rates of complications with USOs. Direct ulnar plate placement should be avoided. Patients should be thoroughly counseled on the risks of complications prior to proceeding with USO. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Is ulnar shortening osteotomy effective for the treatment of ulnar styloid impaction syndrome compared to ulnar impaction syndrome?

PURPOSE: This study aimed at evaluating the outcomes of ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) for the treatment of ulnar styloid impaction syndrome (USIS) and to compare them with those of USO for the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS). METHODS: We enrolled 144 patients who underwent USO between March 2015 and October 2021. The patients were divided into a UIS group (group I, n = 93) and a USIS group (group II, n = 51). Clinical and radiological parameters, including Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, ulnar variance, ulnar styloid length, and ulnar styloid process index (USPI), were collected pre-operatively and one year post-operatively, and a comparative analysis was performed. RESULTS: The DASH score showed significant improvement in both groups (p < .001 and p < .001), and there was no significant difference between the two groups one year after surgery (p = .143). The USPI was significantly different between the two groups (p < .001). The ulno-lunate and ulno-triquetrum distances showed significant increases in both groups, with significant differences between the two groups (p = .020, and p < .001, respectively). The incidence of post-operative arthritic changes in the distal radioulnar joint was significantly greater in the UIS group than that in the USIS group (21 vs 3, respectively; p = .017). No remarkable differences were observed in the post-operative evidence of chondromalacia at the last follow-up between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The USO, which was performed as a treatment for USIS showed reliable outcomes compared to the USO for the treatment of UIS. Therefore, USO is a viable option for the treatment of USIS.

Comparing radial lengthening osteotomy with ulnar shortening osteotomy to treat ulnar impaction syndrome after distal radius fracture malunion.

INTRODUCTION: Distal radius mal-unions often cause radius shortening and ulnar impaction syndrome. The modern treatments of ulnar impaction syndrome following distal radius mal-union are ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) and distal radius lengthening osteotomy (DRLO). However, there are few studies to compare long-term outcomes of these two treatments. This study compares isolated USO to DRLO for the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome following distal radius mal-union. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 68 patients with extra-articular distal radius mal-unions treated by isolated USO in 36 patients and DRLO in 32 patients. Pain visual analog scale (VAS), wrist motion, grip strength, radiographic parameters including sigmoid inclination, DASH score, and perioperative complications were analyzed. Mean follow-up was 62.6 months. RESULTS: The postoperative VAS scores for pain on exertion were less in the DRLO group than the USO group (1.2 vs. 2.8, p = 0.02). The DASH scores were 16.7 and 29.8 in the DRLO and USO groups, respectively (p = 0.02). The reduction of pain and improvement of function showed significantly better in the DRLO group. The mean operative time was shorter in the USO group. Most of the sigmoid inclinations were changed in DRLO. There were two re-operations following USO for painful nonunion and two patients had subsequent DRUJ osteoarthritis at the last follow-up. CONCLUSION: Although both treatments improved range of motion, grip strength, and VAS for pain, DRLO was found in better reduction of pain and improvement of function. USO is a simpler procedure with a shorter operative time but it has an increased potential to cause subsequent osteoarthritis of the DRUJ as its incongruity of DRUJ after USO especially in reverted inclination. DRLO can be a preferred method for treating USWP in relevant distal radial mal-union.

Outcomes of ulna shortening osteotomy: a cohort analysis of 106 patients.

BACKGROUND: Ulna shortening osteotomy (USO) for ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS) aims to improve pain and function by unloading the ulnar carpus. Previous studies often lack validated patient-reported outcomes or have small sample sizes. The primary objective of this study was to investigate patient-reported pain and hand function at 12 months after USO for UIS. Secondary objectives were to investigate the active range of motion, grip strength, complications, and whether outcomes differed based on etiology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We report on 106 patients with UIS who received USO between 2012 and 2019. In 44 of these patients, USO was performed secondary to distal radius fracture. Pain and function were measured with the Patient Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) before surgery and at 3 and 12 months after surgery. Active range of motion and grip strength were measured before surgery and at 3 and 12 months after surgery. Complications were scored using the International Consortium for Health Outcome Measurement Complications in Hand and Wrist conditions (ICHAW) tool. RESULTS: The PRWHE total score improved from a mean of 64 (SD = 18) before surgery to 40 (22) at 3 months and 32 (23) at 12 months after surgery (P < 0.001; effect size Cohen's d = -1.4). There was no difference in the improvement in PRWHE total score (P = 0.99) based on etiology. Also, no clinically relevant changes in the active range of motion were measured. Independent of etiology, mean grip strength improved from 24 (11) before surgery to 30 (12) at 12 months (P = 0.001). Sixty-four percent of patients experienced at least one complication, ranging from minor to severe. Of the 80 complications in total, 50 patients (47%) had complaints of hardware irritation, of which 34 (32%) had their hardware removed. Six patients (6%) needed refixation because of nonunion. CONCLUSION: We found beneficial outcomes in patients with UIS that underwent USO, although there was a large variance in the outcome and a relatively high number of complications (which includes plate removals). Results of this study may be used in preoperative counseling and shared decision-making when considering USO. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic III.

Influence of TFCC foveal tear on the location of lunate chondromalacia in ulnar impaction syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify the location of lunate chondromalacia and to compare the difference in location according to presence or absence of triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) foveal tear, which induces distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 97 patients (102 wrists) who were diagnosed with and treated for idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS) between 2014 and 2018. Subjects were divided into two groups according to presence or absence of TFCC foveal tear with DRUJ instability. Group I had UIS without a TFCC foveal tear (52 wrists, mean age of 43.2 years), while Group II had UIS with a TFCC foveal tear (50 wrists, mean age of 45.3 years). There was no significant difference in age, sex, or duration of symptoms between the two groups. All patients underwent wrist MR Arthrography (MRA) in the same gantry, and all scanned coronal sections of the lunate were standardized into 10 slices, including the whole anteroposterior width of the lunate. Each slice was sequentially numbered from dorsal to volar side, and the location of chondromalacia was marked in each numbered section. Radiological parameters including ulnar variance and ulnolunate distance (ULD), which indicated the distance between the ulnar head and lunate, were measured in the wrist series. RESULTS: The most frequent location of lunate chondromalacia was slightly to the volar side of the lunate in both groups. Group I showed a higher frequency of chondromalacia in the volar side of the lunate. In Group II, chondromalacia was identified with high frequency not only on the volar side of the lunate but also on the dorsal side. In other words, Group II showed broader chondromalacia in the lunate. There was no significant difference in ulnar variance (Group I, 3.19 ± 1.42 mm; Group II, 2.76 mm ± 1.67 mm) or ulnolunate distance (Group I, 1.66 ± 0.94 mm; Group II, 2.05 mm ± 0.87 mm). The average ULD decreased during radial deviation but increased during ulnar deviation. CONCLUSION: This study showed that lunate chondromalacia associated with idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome occurs more frequently on the volar side of the lunate. Also, TFCC foveal tear, which causes DRUJ instability, leads to broader lunate chondromalacia in idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome. Therefore, further analysis of the pattern of lunate chondromalacia can provide a clue for DRUJ instability.

Ulnar shortening osteotomy as a treatment of symptomatic ulnar impaction syndrome after malunited distal radius fractures.

A malunited distal radius fracture can lead to symptomatic ulnar impaction syndrome, which is a common cause for ulnar-sided wrist pain. If conservative treatment fails and symptoms persist after an arthroscopic ulnocarpal debridement, ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) is the treatment of choice. Since the first USO described by Milch in 1941 after a malunited Colles fracture, many techniques have been described varying in surgical approach, type of osteotomy and osteosynthesis material used. Many studies demonstrated good to very good functional results after USO, reporting, however, a delayed union or non-union rate up to 18%. A modern, low profile, locking plate showed in our short-term study very good functional results and no implant-associated complications, in particular no non-union.

Nonunion Rates Among Ulnar-Shortening Osteotomy for Ulnar Impaction Syndrome: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to systematically review all available literature reporting nonunion rates of ulnar-shortening osteotomies (USO) used for the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS) and to compare those rates among transverse versus oblique cuts for the osteotomy. METHODS: Electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for studies that evaluated outcomes of both transverse and oblique USO for UIS. Level of evidence was determined by 2 independent reviewers. Studies were screened based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. A total of 37 studies (1,423 patients) were included in final analysis. The average rate of nonunion and delayed union for each group (transverse and oblique osteotomy) was calculated. RESULTS: The average rate of nonunion among all osteotomies was 4.0%. The average rate of nonunion was 4.16% and 3.86% in transverse osteotomies and oblique osteotomies, respectively. This difference was not statistically significant. The average rate of delayed union, in those studies that reported delayed union, was 5.7%. The average rate of delayed union was 7.41% and 4.1% in transverse osteotomies and oblique osteotomies, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our review of the literature, there is no difference in the rate of nonunion between transverse and oblique osteotomies. Therefore, the decision of which of the 2 surgical techniques should not be based on rate of nonunion. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

The Parallelogram Effect: The Association Between Central Band and Positive Ulnar Variance.

PURPOSE: Ulnar impaction syndrome is a poorly understood degenerative wrist condition characterized by symptoms of pain thought to be caused by increased loads between the ulnar head and the carpals. Radiographic evaluation often reveals an ulnar-positive wrist. We hypothesize that progressive elongation of the central band of the forearm interosseous ligaments changes the longitudinal radial-ulnar relationships, resulting in an ulnar-positive wrist. The objective of the study was to identify a relationship between the loss of integrity of the forearm interosseous ligaments and increased ulnar variance. METHODS: Six cadaveric human forearms were used to measure displacement of the radius relative to the ulna during axial loading of the lunate fossa of the radius. Radial heights were measured in supination and pronation under a 5-lbF (22-N) preload. Gradual axial loads were applied up to 50 lbF (222N); the resultant axial displacement was measured in supination and pronation. All measurements were evaluated with the interosseous ligament intact and repeated with the central band cut. RESULTS: With an applied 5-lbF preload, cutting the central band increased ulnar variance by 3.02 ± 0.80 mm in supination and by 2.15 ± 0.79 mm in pronation. In supination, when the loads were increased from the 5-lbF preload to 50 lbF, the radius displaced 2.1 times further after the central band was cut (3.00 mm) compared with the group with the intact forearm construct (1.41 mm). In pronation, when the loads were increased from the 5-lbF preload to 50 lbF, the radius displaced 1.8 times further when the central band was cut (2.84 mm) than with the intact forearm construct (1.57 mm). CONCLUSIONS: Because of a parallelogram effect, the radius shifted proximally under a 5-lbF preload, creating an ulnar-positive wrist relationship. Dynamic loading of the forearm after ligament excision resulted in significant additional radial displacement relative to the intact forearm. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Deficiency in the ligamentous restraints of the central band leads to positive ulnar variance, which could be a factor (among others) that contributes to idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome.

Metaphyseal Versus Diaphyseal Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy for Treatment of Ulnar Impaction Syndrome: A Comparative Study.

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes and complication rates of diaphyseal and metaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomies for the treatment of ulnar abutment syndrome. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study comparing 35 patients who underwent either a metaphyseal (n = 14) or diaphyseal (n = 21) osteotomy. Radiographic and clinical outcomes were compared. Complication rates including infection, hardware removal, and reoperations were also assessed. RESULTS: There were no differences in patient characteristics, ulnar variance, or pain and functional scores between groups. Metaphyseal osteotomy surgery time was shorter (45.5 vs 71.7 minutes) and resulted in greater ulnar shortening (4.8 vs 3.4 mm) compared with diaphyseal osteotomies. At an average 19.2-month follow-up, metaphyseal osteotomies were associated with greater improvement in pain and Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire scores. The need for implant removal was the same in both groups. There were no complications in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study suggest that metaphyseal osteotomies are a safe and effective alternative to diaphyseal osteotomies for the management of ulnar abutment syndrome. Although improved surgical time and postoperative outcomes are encouraging, further large-scale and properly powered studies with long-term outcomes will help characterize the benefit of one technique over another. Ultimately, the decision between a metaphyseal and diaphyseal osteotomy may be surgeon preference. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Soft tissue complications of dorsal versus volar plating for ulnar shortening osteotomy.

PURPOSE: To compare the results and complications of fixed-angle dorsal locking plate fixation for ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) with the conventional technique of volar plating. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 32 patients undergoing USO on 34 wrists and compared the outcomes of 16 consecutive cases with dorsal 2.4/2.7-mm fixed-angle plating and 18 consecutive cases with volar 3.5-mm plating. A minimum of 12 months' follow-up was used to assess outcomes. Primary outcomes were painful hardware and removal of symptomatic implants. Secondary outcomes were pain, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation, range of motion, time to union, grip strength, and complications. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation, pain score, range of motion, or time to union. Relative grip strength compared with the contralateral upper extremity in the dorsal group was higher than the volar group. After adjusting for hand dominance, dorsal plating was significantly associated with higher relative grip strength. There were 2 complications in the dorsal group, including one case with painful hardware. This was significantly lower than in the volar group, which had 10 complications including 2 nonunions and 6 cases of hardware-related soft tissue irritation. CONCLUSIONS: Both volar and dorsal plating techniques for USO yielded good functional outcomes. There was a higher incidence of painful hardware requiring removal of implants in the volar group. Based on these findings, we advocate dorsal plate position using a smaller fixed-angle plate for USO in ulnar impaction syndrome. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic III.

Comparison of compression screw and perpendicular clamp in ulnar shortening osteotomy.

PURPOSE: To biomechanically quantify 2 techniques, compression screw and perpendicular clamp, for generating compression during ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) in order to promote reliable primary bone healing. METHODS: Fourteen fresh-frozen cadaveric human forearms were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups. Group I (n = 7) underwent USO according to the traditional AO plate fixation technique using a screw placed eccentrically in an oblong hole to generate compression at the osteotomy site. Group II (n = 7) underwent USO with a commercially available USO plating system using a clamp placed perpendicular to the osteotomy site to generate compression. Both techniques involved a 2-mm resection osteotomy performed with cutting jigs to minimize variability and an interfragmentary lag screw to augment compression. A digital pressure sensor measured contact area at the osteotomy site and average pressure in the observed contact area; these values were used to calculate force across the osteotomy site. Measurements were obtained after the following steps: reduction of osteotomy, compression screw placement (group 1 only), lag screw placement, and final construct with all clamps removed. RESULTS: Group II demonstrated significantly greater force than group I, and lag screw placement resulted in significantly increased force independent of fixation technique. The effect of the lag screw on force was maintained after clamp removal. Although technique of fixation did not significantly influence contact area, lag screw placement significantly increased contact area independent of fixation method. However, this effect was not maintained after clamp removal. Average pressure in the observed contact area was not significantly influenced by fixation technique or stage of fixation. CONCLUSIONS: Perpendicular clamp compression significantly increased force as compared with traditional compression screw technique, and lag screw placement significantly increased force in both constructs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Larger compressive forces across the osteotomy may promote primary bone union and decrease the rates of delayed union or nonunion.

Ulnar impaction syndrome: incidence of lunotriquetral ligament degeneration and outcome of ulnar-shortening osteotomy.

PURPOSE: We hypothesized that most patients with ulnar impaction syndrome have degenerative changes of the proximal lunotriquetral (LT) membrane and that ulnar-shortening osteotomy is an effective procedure in these patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 50 wrists of 49 patients with idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome who underwent an arthroscopic evaluation at the time of ulnar-shortening osteotomy, and subsequently at plate removal. Based on the Geissler classification, patients were divided into group A, normal, and group B, grades I to IV. The degree of degeneration of the proximal LT membrane at first-look arthroscopy was compared with that at second-look arthroscopy. RESULTS: After ulnar-shortening osteotomy, both groups improved significantly in wrist range of motion and grip strength. According to the Mayo wrist score, 29, 18, and 3 patients showed excellent, good, and fair results, respectively. Of the 50 wrists, 25 had degenerative changes (group B) in the proximal LT membrane at the time of first-look arthroscopy. Of the 25 wrists in group B, 11 wrists improved based on the Geissler grade, 9 wrists showed no changes, and 2 wrists became worse. Clinically, patients demonstrated improvement after ulnar-shortening osteotomy regardless of the degree of degenerative LT ligament changes. CONCLUSIONS: Degenerative LT membrane changes that were seen in about half of our patients were mostly of a mild nature, and the clinical outcomes of ulnar-shortening osteotomy were acceptable. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Arthroscopic wafer procedure versus ulnar shortening osteotomy for ulnar impaction syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to systematically compare the efficacy and safety of arthroscopic wafer procedure (AWP) versus ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) for ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS) treatment. METHODS: All the studies included in this meta-analysis compared the efficacy of AWP to USO for UIS and were acquired through a comprehensive search across multiple databases. The meta-analysis was performed by calculating the effect sizes with the Cochrane Collaboration's RevMan 5.4 software. RESULTS: A total of 8 articles were included in this analysis, comprising 148 cases in the AWP group and 163 cases in the USO group. The pooled estimates indicated no significant differences in combined Darrow's Criteria or Modified Mayo Wrist Score, Modified Mayo Wrist Score, DASH scores, grip strength, VAS score, and postoperative ulnar variation. On the other hand, the patients in the AWP group exhibited fewer complications (OR = 0.17, 95%CI 0.05-0.54, P = 0.003) and a lower reoperation rate (OR = 0.12, 95%CI 0.05-0.28, P < 0.00001) than those in the USO group. CONCLUSIONS: The two surgical techniques were both effective in treating UIS but the AWP group showed fewer complications and a lower reoperation rate. Therefore, AWP may present a superior alternative for UIS treatment.

Outcomes of Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy with an Intramedullary Bone Graft for Idiopathic Ulnar Impaction Syndrome.

Background: Although several techniques for the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS) have been introduced, there have still been reports on various complications such as delayed union, nonunion, refracture, wrist pain, plate irritation, and chronic regional pain syndrome. This study aimed to compare the differences in radiological and clinical outcomes of patients in which intramedullary bone grafting was performed in addition to plate stabilization with those without additional bone grafting during ulnar shortening osteotomies (USOs). Methods: Between November 2014 and June 2021, 53 wrists of 50 patients with idiopathic UIS were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether intramedullary bone grafting was performed. Among the 53 wrists, USO with an intramedullary bone graft was performed in 21 wrists and USO without an intramedullary bone graft was performed in 32 wrists. Demographic data and factors potentially associated with bone union time were analyzed. Results: There was no significant difference between the 2 groups when comparing postoperative radioulnar distance, postoperative ulnar variance, amount of ulnar shortening, and postoperative Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score. Compared to the without-intramedullary bone graft group, bone union time of the osteotomy site was significantly shortened, from 8.8 ± 3.0 weeks to 6.7 ± 1.3 weeks in the with-intramedullary bone graft group. Moreover, there were no cases of nonunion or plate-induced symptoms. Both in univariable and multivariable analyses, intramedullary bone grafting was associated with shorter bone union time. Conclusions: USO with an intramedullary bone graft for idiopathic UIS has favorable radiological and clinical outcomes. The advantage of this technique is the significant shortening of bone union time.

Algorithm-Guided Treatment of Ulna Impaction Syndrome: A 10-Year Follow-Up Study of Ulna Shortening Osteotomy and Wafer Procedure.

Background: Ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS) is a common degenerative wrist condition which results from positive ulnar variance, leading to an overload on the ulnar carpus. Ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) and the arthroscopic wafer procedure (AWP) are established therapies for UIS if conservative management fails. This study assessed an algorithm-guided treatment of UIS over a period of 10 years. Methods: This prospective observational study compared the outcome of 54 patients who underwent either USO or AWP for UIS based on a predefined treatment algorithm. The mean follow-up period was 10 years. Primary outcome parameters were the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH), whereas secondary outcome parameters were grip and pinch strength and range of motion. Results: The median preoperative ulnar variance was 2.6 mm in the USO group and 2.0 mm in the AWP group. The postoperative average ulnar variance was 0 mm in both groups. The preoperative pain at rest was 3.4 in the USO group and 2.3 in the AWP group. One year after surgery, there was a significant reduction to VAS 0.7 and 0.2, respectively. These results persisted to the 10-year follow-up (VAS 0.9 and 0.2). The pain in motion also decreased significantly in the first year (from 6.8 and 6.7 to 2.2 and 2.1), as well as after 10 years (2.4 and 1.0). The preoperative DASH score averaged 31.3 in the USO group and 35.8 in the AWP group. At the 10-year follow-up, the DASH of both groups decreased significantly to 4.35 in the AWP group compared to 12.7 in the USO group. Conclusions: Our data show that, when using our algorithm, both USO and AWP, two common operative treatment options of UIS, reliably reduce pain and significantly reduce the DASH score over at least a period of ten years. The results after 10 years differ from short-term results in so far as after one year, the USO group showed to some degree similar outcome parameters compared to AWP, whereas at the 10-year follow-up, AWP reached slightly better primary outcome parameters. The algorithm presented, thus, produced excellent short- and long-term outcomes. Our findings and the applied algorithm can assist in decision-making and patient education.

A modified partial wedge-shaped metaphyseal ulnar osteotomy for the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome with reverse oblique sigmoid notch.

We describe a modified metaphyseal ulnar osteotomy to treat ulnar impaction syndrome with a reverse oblique sigmoid notch. Based on a computational analysis of radiographs, a modified wedge metaphyseal ulnar osteotomy was devised with its apex positioned at the ulnar styloid base to avoid impaction between the sigmoid notch and ulnar head. Subsequently, nine patients with ulnar impaction syndrome and a reverse oblique sigmoid notch underwent this operation, combined with arthroscopic exploration and transosseous triangular fibrocartilage complex repair. The mean follow-up was 14 months. All patients achieved bone union within 5 weeks, with no degenerative changes being observed during the follow-up assessments. The final follow-up assessments revealed decreases in ulnar variance and in the scores for Visual Analogue Scale, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire and the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation. All patients achieved excellent or good grades on the Modified Mayo Wrist Score. This technique is effective in treating the ulnar impaction syndrome with a reverse oblique sigmoid notch.Level of evidence: IV.

Ulnar-Sided Wrist Pain: A Diagnostic Evaluation Guide From 30-Plus Years of Experience.

INTRODUCTION: While multiple ulnar-sided wrist pain (USWP) diagnostic evaluation guides have been presented, none have included original clinical data or statistical analysis. The purpose of this study is to provide a diagnostic evaluation guide derived from original clinical data and analysis to help clinicians arrive at a differential diagnosis for USWP. METHODS: Using a computer search of patients presenting with sprains, instability, and laxity of the wrist, 385 patient charts were identified. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, subjective complaints, physical findings, and diagnostic test findings were reviewed. Statistical analysis was performed to determine sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic methods on their ability to identify lunotriquetral ligament tears, triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tears, and ulnar impaction syndrome. Diagnostic arthroscopy was used as the reference standard. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients, comprising 101 cases of USWP, were included in the study. The onset of injury was traumatic in 83 out of 101 cases with motor vehicle accidents (N=46) being the most common, followed by overuse (N=18), and a fall onto an outstretched hand (N=16). The ulnocarpal tenderness test exhibited sensitivity/specificity of 72%/33%; lunotriquetral ligament laxity test of 42%/62%; bone scan of 80%/33%; radiocarpal arthrogram of 90%/98% for TFCC tears and 50%/91% for lunotriquetral ligament tears; midcarpal arthrogram of 82%/86% for lunotriquetral ligament tears. The mean ulnar variance on standard posteroanterior view radiograph was 0.95 mm, increasing to 2.67 mm on gripping posteroanterior view. CONCLUSION: Physicians should suspect a lunotriquetral ligament and/or TFCC tear with the acute onset of USWP following a loaded dorsiflexed mechanism of injury. Ulnocarpal tenderness tests and pre-operative ulnar variance measures are effective for increasing suspicion of USW pathology. Bone scans are helpful in diagnosing ulnar impaction syndrome in conjunction with radiographic findings. A combination of midcarpal arthrogram for lunotriquetral ligament tears and radiocarpal arthrogram for TFCC tears should be employed.

Ulnocarpal Abutment Syndrome With Triquetrum Degeneration.

We present the case of a 47-year-old patient with a congenital positive ulnar variance and elucidate its effects on nearby structures in relation to ulnocarpal abutment syndrome (UAS). While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) helped to identify soft tissue changes in the wrist, the use of an arthrogram, in this case, allowed for a more comprehensive and detailed analysis of the ligaments and soft tissues. Image findings included a complex degenerative tear of the disc of the triangular fibrocartilage (TFCC), a degenerated triquetrum, and partial tears of the scapholunate and lunotriquetral ligaments. Mild dorsal angulation of the lunate was noted, representing dorsal intercalated segmental instability (DISI), suggesting scapholunate ligament injury. Palmar classification was utilized to classify the extent of the TFCC injury as Type IIE. This case shines a light on the presentation of UAS in a patient that was not the usual demographic affected by this pathology, as well as their UAS affecting the triquetrum rather than the more commonly associated lunate.

Arthroscopic distal metaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomy for ulnar impaction syndrome: a different technique.

Ulnar impaction syndrome generally occurs with positive ulnar variance. The solution to the problem is to unload the ulnocarpal joint. Effective surgical options include diaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomy, open wafer osteotomy, and arthroscopic wafer osteotomy. Recently, Slade and Gillon described an open procedure of ulnar shortening in the osteochondral region of the ulnar head. The procedure minimizes the risk of hemarthrosis and does not require hardware removal, which are problems with other surgical options. This article introduces a new arthroscopic technique of distal metaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomy for ulnar impaction syndrome. This technique offers the advantages of minimizing surgical injury to the dorsal capsule of the distal radoulnar joint and so protects its stability.