The immunomodulatory effect of oral NaHCO3 is mediated by the splenic nerve: multivariate impact revealed by artificial neural networks.

Stimulation of the inflammatory reflex (IR) is a promising strategy for treating systemic inflammatory disorders. Recent studies suggest oral sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) as a potential activator of the IR, offering a safe and cost-effective treatment approach. However, the mechanisms underlying NaHCO3-induced anti-inflammatory effects remain unclear. We investigated whether oral NaHCO3's immunomodulatory effects are mediated by the splenic nerve. Female rats received NaHCO3 or water (H2O) for four days, and splenic immune markers were assessed using flow cytometry. NaHCO3 led to a significant increase (p < 0.05, and/or partial eta squared > 0.06) in anti-inflammatory markers, including CD11bc + CD206 + (M2-like) macrophages, CD3 + CD4 + FoxP3 + cells (Tregs), and Tregs/M1-like ratio. Conversely, proinflammatory markers, such as CD11bc + CD38 + TNFα + (M1-like) macrophages, M1-like/M2-like ratio, and SSChigh/SSClow ratio of FSChighCD11bc + cells, decreased in the spleen following NaHCO3 administration. These effects were abolished in spleen-denervated rats, suggesting the necessity of the splenic nerve in mediating NaHCO3-induced immunomodulation. Artificial neural networks accurately classified NaHCO3 and H2O treatment in sham rats but failed in spleen-denervated rats, highlighting the splenic nerve's critical role. Additionally, spleen denervation independently influenced Tregs, M2-like macrophages, Tregs/M1-like ratio, and CD11bc + CD38 + cells, indicating distinct effects from both surgery and treatment. Principal component analysis (PCA) further supported the separate effects. Our findings suggest that the splenic nerve transmits oral NaHCO3-induced immunomodulatory changes to the spleen, emphasizing NaHCO3's potential as an IR activator with therapeutic implications for a wide spectrum of systemic inflammatory conditions.

Device therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Device therapy is a nonpharmacological approach that presents a crucial advancement for managing patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). This review investigated the impact of device-based interventions and emphasized their potential for optimizing treatment for this complex patient demographic. Cardiac resynchronization therapy, augmented by atrioventricular node ablation with His-bundle pacing or left bundle-branch pacing, is effective for enhancing cardiac function and establishing atrioventricular synchrony. Cardiac contractility modulation and vagus nerve stimulation represent novel strategies for increasing myocardial contractility and adjusting the autonomic balance. Left ventricular expanders have demonstrated short-term benefits in HFpEF patients but require more investigation for long-term effectiveness and safety, especially in patients with AF. Research gaps regarding complications arising from left ventricular expander implantation need to be addressed. Device-based therapies for heart valve diseases, such as transcatheter aortic valve replacement and transcatheter edge-to-edge repair, show promise for patients with AF and HFpEF, particularly those with mitral or tricuspid regurgitation. Clinical evaluations show that these device therapies lessen AF occurrence, improve exercise tolerance, and boost left ventricular diastolic function. However, additional studies are required to perfect patient selection criteria and ascertain the long-term effectiveness and safety of these interventions. Our review underscores the significant potential of device therapy for improving the outcomes and quality of life for patients with AF and HFpEF.

Left Vagus Stimulation Modulates Contralateral Subthalamic ß Power Improving the Gait in Parkinson's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) showed early evidence of efficacy for the gait treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). OBJECTIVES: Providing data on neurophysiological and clinical effects of transauricular VNS (taVNS). METHODS: Ten patients with recording deep brain stimulation (DBS) have been enrolled in a within participant design pilot study, double-blind crossover sham-controlled trial of taVNS. Subthalamic local field potentials (ß band power), Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scales (UPDRS), and a digital timed-up-and-go test (TUG) were measured and compared with real versus sham taVNS during medication-off/DBS-OFF condition. RESULTS: The left taVNS induced a reduction of the total ß power in the contralateral (ie, right) subthalamic nucleus and an improvement of TUG time, speed, and variability. The taVNS-induced ß reduction correlated with the improvement of gait speed. No major clinical changes were observed at UPDRS. CONCLUSIONS: taVNS is a promising strategy for the management of PD gait, deserving prospective trials of chronic neuromodulation. © 2023 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Efficacy of transauricular vagus nerve stimulation for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced painful peripheral neuropathy: a randomized controlled exploratory study.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced painful peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common adverse event in cancer patients, and there is still a lack of effective treatment. Transauricular vagal nerve stimulation (taVNS) is a minimally invasive treatment, but there are few reports regarding its efficacy for CIPN. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and possible mechanism of taVNS in patients with CIPN. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with CIPN were randomly divided into a taVNS group (n = 14) and a sham stimulation (SS) group (n = 13). A numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain, NCICTCAE 4.0 (neurotoxicity classification), quantitative sensory test (QST), Short-Form-Health Survey-12 (SF-12), and Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS) were administered before the intervention (D-10) and on the day after the intervention (D0), and the inflammatory cytokines in plasma were also measured. The NRS, NCI-CTCAE 4.0, SF-12, and AIS were administered again at D30 and D90. RESULTS: Compared with the SS group, the NRS and AIS in the taVNS group were significantly lower at D0. The impact lasted until D30. There were no statistically significant differences in the NRS and AIS between the 2 groups at D90. On D30, the mental component score of the SF-12 was significantly higher in the taVNS group than in the SS group. No adverse events were found. There was no significant difference in QST and plasma inflammatory cytokines between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: taVNS can relieve chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain in the short term, can improve sleep status and quality of life, and is expected to become a novel clinical treatment method for CIPN.

The Development of a New Vagus Nerve Simulation Electroceutical to Improve the Signal Attenuation in a Living Implant Environment.

An electroceutical is a medical device that uses electrical signals to control biological functions. It can be inserted into the human body as an implant and has several crucial advantages over conventional medicines for certain diseases. This research develops a new vagus nerve simulation (VNS) electroceutical through an innovative approach to overcome the communication limitations of existing devices. A phased array antenna with a better communication performance was developed and applied to the electroceutical prototype. In order to effectively respond to changes in communication signals, we developed the steering algorithm and firmware, and designed the smart communication protocol that operates at a low power that is safe for the patients. This protocol is intended to improve a communication sensitivity related to the transmission and reception distance. Based on this technical approach, the heightened effectiveness and safety of the prototype have been ascertained, with the actual clinical tests using live animals. We confirmed the signal attenuation performance to be excellent, and a smooth communication was achieved even at a distance of 7 m. The prototype showed a much wider communication range than any other existing products. Through this, it is conceivable that various problems due to space constraints can be resolved, hence presenting many benefits to the patients whose last resort to the disease is the VNS electroceutical.

Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation Normalizes Induced Gastric Myoelectrical Dysrhythmias in Controls Assessed by Body-Surface Gastric Mapping.

OBJECTIVES: Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (TaVNS) is a supplementary treatment for gastric symptoms resulting from dysrhythmias. The main objective of this study was to quantify the effects of 10, 40, and 80 Hz TaVNS and sham in healthy individuals in response to a 5-minute water-load (WL5) test. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen healthy volunteers aged between 21 and 55 years (body mass index: 27.1 ± 3.2) were recruited. Each subject fasted for up to eight hours and participated in four 95-minute sessions, which consisted of 30 fasted baseline, 30 minutes TaVNS, WL5, and 30 minutes post-WL5. Heart rate variability was assessed using sternal electrocardiogram. Body-surface gastric mapping and bloating (/10) were recorded. One-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey test was performed to test the difference between TaVNS protocols in terms of frequency, amplitude, bloating scores, root mean square of the successive differences (RMSSD), and stress index (SI). RESULTS: On average, the subjects consumed 526 ± 160 mL of water, with volume ingested correlated to bloating (mean score 4.1 ± 1.8; r = 0.36, p = 0.029). In general, the reduction in frequency and rhythm stability during the post-WL5 period in sham was normalized by all three TaVNS protocols. Both 40- and 80-Hz protocols also caused increases in amplitude during the stim-only and/or post-WL5 periods. RMSSD increased during the 40-Hz protocol. SI increased during the 10-Hz protocol but decreased during the 40- and 80-Hz protocols. CONCLUSION: TaVNS proved effective in normalizing gastric dysrhythmias by WL5 in healthy subjects by altering both parasympathetic and sympathetic pathways.

Combination of Acute and Maintenance Esketamine Treatment With Adjunctive Long-Term Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Difficult-to-Treat Depression.

INTRODUCTION: The antidepressant effect of N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists is often short lasting, raising the question of the best maintenance strategy, which has remained unanswered. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) as a treatment option for refractory and chronic major depression was shown to reduce the need for maintenance treatment sessions in patients receiving electroconvulsive therapy. To our knowledge, there are no published data on the combination of VNS and esketamine in the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a naturalistic prospective and retrospective observational study in patients treated with long-term VNS owing to difficult-to-treat depression. These patients also have received esketamine maintenance sessions in addition to short-term treatment. We have investigated the need for maintenance esketamine sessions per month after VNS implantation (number of sessions/number of months between visits), the change in depression severity (mean Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] score), and the number of hospitalizations per month (number of hospitalizations/number of postoperative observation months). Follow-up visits have been scheduled every three months after VNS implantation (follow-up period 12-24 months, mean 17). RESULTS: All patients (n = 8, mean age 53.1 years) had severe difficult-to-treat depression (DTD) (mean MADRS at baseline 30.9). Mean number of hospitalizations per month decreased from 0.17 to 0.11 after VNS implantation (p = 0.041, T = 2.030, df = 7). Mean MADRS at 12 months was 18.3 (40.8% MADRS reduction, p = 0.008, T = 3.146, df = 7). Six of eight patients were offered maintenance esketamine treatment. Mean number of esketamine treatment sessions per month and case decreased from 2.3 at the six-month visit to 0.8 at 12 months (p = 0.076, T = 1,690, df = 5) after VNS implantation. Termination of maintenance esketamine was possible in four cases after a mean of 11.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: Combination of esketamine and VNS was effective in patients with DTD to relieve disease severity and reduce hospitalizations. The need for esketamine treatment sessions decreased after 6 months of VNS. No safety concerns arose in this study regarding the combination treatment. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Clinicaltrials.gov registration number for the study is NCT03320304.

The diversity of neuroimmune circuits controlling lung inflammation.

It is becoming increasingly appreciated that the nervous and immune systems communicate bidirectionally to regulate immunological outcomes in a variety of organs including the lung. Activation of neuronal signaling can be induced by inflammation, tissue damage, or pathogens to evoke or reduce immune cell activation in what has been termed a neuroimmune reflex. In the periphery, these reflexes include the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway, sympathetic reflex, and sensory nociceptor-immune cell pathways. Continual advances in neuroimmunology in peripheral organ systems have fueled small-scale clinical trials that have yielded encouraging results for a range of immunopathologies such as rheumatoid arthritis. Despite these successes, several limitations should give clinical investigators pause in the application of neural stimulation as a therapeutic for lung inflammation, especially if inflammation arises from a novel pathogen. In this review, the general mechanisms of each reflex, the evidence for these circuits in the control of lung inflammation, and the key knowledge gaps in our understanding of these neuroimmune circuits will be discussed. These limitations can be overcome not only through a better understanding of neuroanatomy but also through a systematic evaluation of stimulation parameters using immune activation in lung tissues as primary readouts. Our rapidly evolving understanding of the nervous and immune systems highlights the importance of communication between these cells in health and disease. This integrative approach has tremendous potential in the development of targeted therapeutics if specific challenges can be overcome.

Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation at nonspecific timings during training can compromise motor adaptation in healthy humans.

Adding afferent vagus nerve stimulation to motor training via implanted electrodes can modify neuromotor adaptation depending on the stimulation timing. This study aimed to understand neuromotor adaptations when transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) is applied at nonspecific timings during motor skill training in healthy humans. Twenty-four healthy young adults performed visuomotor training to match a complex force trajectory pattern with the index and little finger abduction forces concurrently. Participants were assigned to the tVNS group receiving tVNS at the tragus or the sham group receiving sham stimulation to the earlobe. The corresponding stimulations were applied at nonspecific timings throughout the training trials. Visuomotor tests were performed without tVNS or sham stimulation before and after training sessions across days. The reduction in the root mean square error (RMSE) against the trained force trajectory was attenuated in the tVNS group compared with the sham group, while its in-session reduction was not different between groups. The reduction of RMSE against an untrained trajectory pattern was not different between groups. No training effect was observed in corticospinal excitability or GABA-mediated intracortical inhibition. These findings suggest that adding tVNS at nonspecific timings during motor skill training can compromise motor adaptation but not transfer in healthy humans.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Adding vagus nerve stimulation via implanted electrodes during motor training can facilitate motor recovery in disabled animals and humans. No study examined the effect of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) during training on neuromotor adaptation in healthy humans. We have found that adding tVNS at nonspecific timings during motor skill training can compromise motor adaptation but not transfer in healthy humans.

Neurostimulation in generalized epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: There are three neurostimulation devices available to treat generalized epilepsy: vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation (DBS), and responsive neurostimulation (RNS). However, the choice between them is unclear due to lack of head-to-head comparisons. A systematic comparison of neurostimulation outcomes in generalized epilepsy has not been performed previously. The goal of this meta-analysis was to determine whether one of these devices is better than the others to treat generalized epilepsy. METHODS: Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a systematic review of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was performed for studies reporting seizure outcomes following VNS, RNS, and DBS implantation in generalized drug-resistant epilepsy between the first pivotal trial study for each modality through August 2022. Specific search criteria were used for VNS ("vagus", "vagal", or "VNS" in the title and "epilepsy" or "seizure"), DBS ("deep brain stimulation", "DBS", "anterior thalamic nucleus", "centromedian nucleus", or "thalamic stimulation" in the title and "epilepsy" or "seizure"), and RNS ("responsive neurostimulation" or "RNS" in the title and "epilepsy" or "seizure"). From 4409 articles identified, 319 underwent full-text reviews, and 20 studies were included. Data were pooled using a random-effects model using the meta package in R. RESULTS: Sufficient data for meta-analysis were available from seven studies for VNS (n = 510) and nine studies for DBS (n = 87). Data from RNS (five studies, n = 18) were insufficient for meta-analysis. The mean (SD) follow-up durations were as follows: VNS, 39.1 (23.4) months; DBS, 23.1 (19.6) months; and RNS, 22.3 (10.6) months. Meta-analysis showed seizure reductions of 48.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 38.7%-57.9%) for VNS and 64.8% (95% CI = 54.4%-75.2%) for DBS (p = .02). SIGNIFICANCE: Our meta-analysis indicates that the use of DBS may lead to greater seizure reduction than VNS in generalized epilepsy. Results from RNS use are promising, but further research is required.

Can a basic solution activate the inflammatory reflex? A review of potential mechanisms, opportunities, and challenges.

Stimulation of the inflammatory reflex (IR) is a promising strategy to treat systemic inflammatory disorders. However, this strategy is hindered by the cost and side effects of traditional IR activators. Recently, oral intake of sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) has been suggested to activate the IR, providing a safe and inexpensive alternative. Critically, the mechanisms whereby NaHCO3 might achieve this effect and more broadly the pathways underlying the IR remain poorly understood. Here, we argue that the recognition of NaHCO3 as a potential IR activator presents exciting clinical and research opportunities. To aid this quest, we provide an integrative review of our current knowledge of the neural and cellular pathways mediating the IR and discuss the status of physiological models of IR activation. From this vantage point, we derive testable hypotheses on potential mechanisms whereby NaHCO3 might stimulate the IR and compare NaHCO3 with classic IR activators. Elucidation of these mechanisms will help determine the therapeutic value of NaHCO3 as an IR activator and provide new insights into the IR circuitry.

Aesthetic transaxillary subpectoral placement of vagus nerve stimulator in children and young adults: A technical note.

INTRODUCTION: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a neuromodulation therapy for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), refractory status epilepticus, and treatment-resistant depression. The lead is tunneled into the subcutaneous space and connected to the generator, which is usually implanted in a subcutaneous pocket below the clavicle. Surgical complications in the chest region include skin breakdown or infection. An alternative approach is to perform a subclavear subpectoral implantation. In our surgical series, we report a new aesthetic implantation method for VNS generators in children and young patients: the transaxillary subpectoral placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From May 2021 to May 2023, 10 vagus nerve stimulation generators were placed subpectorally with a transaxillary approach by the authors. We considered operative time, surgical complications such as blood loss, infections, device migration, pain, and adverse events at follow-up. RESULTS: In this surgical series, we reviewed all cases of subpectoral implantation of VNS generators in children and young adults at our institution in the last 2 years. All patients were treated with subpectoral Sentiva 1000 (Livanova PLC) insertion with axillary access by a neurosurgeon and a pediatric surgeon. The operative time was slightly longer compared to the traditional subcutaneous implant. All generators reported impedances within the optimal range. Blood loss was not significant and no other perioperative complications were reported. Patients and families were highly satisfied with the outcomes in terms of comfort and aesthetic results after surgery and at the last follow-up. No cases of infection occurred, and no malfunctions or displacements of the generator were registered at clinical follow-up. CONCLUSION: The transaxillary subpectoral placement of theVNS generator is an aesthetic and anatomic approach, which provides several benefits to children and young adults.

Neuro-stimulation in focal epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Different neurostimulation modalities are available to treat drug-resistant focal epilepsy when surgery is not an option including vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), responsive neurostimulation (RNS), and deep brain stimulation (DBS). Head-to-head comparisons of efficacy do not exist between them nor are likely to be available in the future. We performed a meta-analysis on VNS, RNS, and DBS outcomes to compare seizure reduction efficacy for focal epilepsy. METHODS: We systematically reviewed the literature for reported seizure outcomes following implantation with VNS, RNS, and DBS in focal-onset seizures and performed a meta-analysis. Prospective or retrospective clinical studies were included. RESULTS: Sufficient data were available at years one (n = 642, two (n = 480), and three (n = 385) for comparing the three modalities with each other. Seizure reduction for the devices at years one, two, and three respectively were: RNS: 66.3%, 56.0%, 68.4%; DBS- 58.4%, 57.5%, 63.8%; VNS 32.9%, 44.4%, 53.5%. Seizure reduction at year one was greater for RNS (p < 0.01) and DBS (p < 0.01) compared to VNS. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate the seizure reduction efficacy of RNS is similar to DBS, and both had greater seizure reductions compared to VNS in the first-year post-implantation, with the differences diminishing with longer-term follow-up. SIGNIFICANCE: The results help guide neuromodulation treatment in eligible patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy.

Estimating health related quality of life effects in vitiligo. Mapping EQ-5D-5 L utilities from vitiligo specific scales: VNS, VitiQoL and re-pigmentation measures using data from the HI-Light trial.

BACKGROUND: Vitiligo is reported to affect 2% of the world's population and has a significant impact on health related quality of life (HRQoL). The relationship between HRQoL and clinical outcomes used in vitiligo require further examination. Mapping condition specific measures of HRQoL: vitiligo specific quality of life instrument (VitiQoL), vitiligo noticeability scale (VNS) and vitiligo re-pigmentation scores (RPS) to the EQ-5D have not yet been reported. METHODS: Data collected from a randomised clinical trial (HI-Light) in vitiligo was used to develop mapping algorithms for the EQ-5D-5 L and the relationship between HRQoL, clinical outcomes and EQ-5D were investigated. Two EQ-5D-5 L value sets (Van Hout and Alava) using linear and non-linear models were considered. Logistic regression models were used to model the probability of vitiligo noticeability (VNS) in terms of RPS, EQ-5D and VitiQoL scores. RESULTS: Mapping from RPS appeared to perform better followed by VNS for the Alava crosswalks using polynomial models: Mean observed vs. predicted utilities of 0.9008 (0.005) vs. 0.8984 (0.0004) were observed for RPS. For VNS, mean observed vs. predicted utilities of 0.9008 (0.005) vs. 0.8939 (0.0003) were observed. For VitiQoL, mean observed vs. predicted utilities of 0.9008 (0.005) vs. 0.8912 (0.0002) were observed. For patients with the least re-pigmentation (RPS < 25%), a Total VitiQoL score of about 20 points gives around an 18% chance of vitiligo being no longer or a lot less noticeable. CONCLUSION: The algorithm based on RPS followed by VNS performed best. The relationship between effects from vitiligo specific HRQoL instruments and clinical RPS was established allowing for plausible clinically relevant differences to be identified, although further work is required in this area.

Externalization of an infected vagus nerve stimulator generator without a break in anti-seizure therapy: a technical note.

INTRODUCTION: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a widely used treatment for drug-resistant epilepsy. An infection of the VNS generator pocket occurs in 3-8% of cases. Current standard of care requires the removal of the device, antibiotic therapy, and then replacement of the device. The consequential break in VNS therapy leaves patients highly susceptible to seizures. METHODS: Retrospective case report. RESULTS: The externalized generator continued to provide electroceutical coverage of the patient's seizures while the pocket was sterilized with IV antibiotics as well as betadine and local antibiotics. The externalized generator was kept safe against the patient's chest with ioban and an entriely new system was implanted on post-externalization day 5. The patient is now 7 months post-operative and without any evidence of infection. CONCLUSIONS: We report successful management of an infected VNS generator with externalization and short interval replacement of the entire system without any break in anti-seizure therapy.

Investigation of the effectiveness of vagus nerve stimulation for pediatric drug-resistant epilepsies secondary to nonaccidental trauma.

PURPOSE: Epilepsy following non-accidental trauma (NAT) occurs in 18% of pediatric patients. About 33% of patients with epilepsy develop drug-resistant epilepsy. For these patients, vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a palliative treatment option. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of VNS among pediatric NAT-related epilepsy patients compared to those with non-NAT-related epilepsy. METHODS: We performed an 11-year retrospective analysis of VNS implantations for drug-resistant epilepsy at UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh. Patients were split into two groups: NAT vs. non-NAT. The primary outcome was the attainment of ≥ 50% seizure frequency reduction at 1-year post-VNS implantation. Fisher's exact tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to compare groups. Significance was assessed at the alpha = 0.05 level. RESULTS: This analysis included data from 370 pediatric VNS patients, of whom 9 had NAT-related epilepsy. NAT patients had a significantly younger age of epilepsy onset than non-NAT patients (0.3 years vs. 3.3 years). Otherwise, there were no statistically significant baseline differences between groups, including patient sex and quantity of antiseizure medications pre-VNS. Overall, 71% of NAT patients experienced ≥ 50% seizure frequency reduction compared to 48% of non-NAT patients (p = 0.269). CONCLUSION: VNS may allow a higher proportion of pediatric patients with NAT-related epilepsy to achieve ≥ 50% seizure frequency reduction compared to other epilepsy etiologies. While the results of this study were not statistically significant, the effect size was large. Our results underscore the need for larger, multi-center studies to validate the effectiveness of VNS for this patient population.

Vagus Nerve Stimulation Electrode Impedance Over Time in Children With Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: This manuscript describes the behavior of impedance of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) electrode over time in a cohort of children with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nineteen consecutive pediatric patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome submitted to VNS were studied. All patients had at least four years of follow-up. Serial impedance measurements were carried out during every out-patient visit. A baseline value was obtained one month after surgery, before generator activation and yearly values were recorded for the next four years. Outcome regarding seizures was obtained through analysis of standardized seizure diaries filled out by the patient, relatives, or caregivers. RESULTS: There were 12 boys. Age ranged from four to 14 years (mean = 7.2). Mean impedance value was 2635 Ω at baseline, 2576 Ω after one year, 2418 Ω after two years, 2340 Ω after three years, and 2241 Ω after four years. There was a mean impedance decrease of 17% after four years. This decrease was statistically significant compared with baseline by the second year of follow-up: p = 0.342 after one year, p = 0.007 after two years, p = 0.001 after three years, and p = 0.001 after four years. There was no significant relationship between impedance values and seizure outcome at any time point. CONCLUSIONS: VNS electrode impedance significantly decreased during long-term follow-up in children with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. To our knowledge, this is the first report on such findings regarding VNS in the literature. These findings suggest that the electrode/nerve interface is stable during long-term follow-up of VNS therapy and that this preserved anatomical relationship might be related to our ability to safely stimulate and review/explant the system whenever needed.

Combined Neuromodulation (Vagus Nerve Stimulation and Deep Brain Stimulation) in Patients With Refractory Generalized Epilepsy: An Observational Study.

INTRODUCTION: This article describes our findings while treating patients with refractory generalized epilepsy with combined vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) and centro-median deep brain stimulation (CMDBS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 11 consecutive patients with refractory generalized epilepsy (ten with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome) previously submitted to VNS and who subsequently underwent CMDBS were retrospectively studied. The VNS final parameters were 2 to 2.5 mA, 30 Hz, and 500 µs, cycling mode, 30 seconds "on" and 5 minutes "off" for all patients. The CMDBS final parameters were 4 to 5 V, 130 Hz, and 300 µs, bipolar, continuous stimulation in all patients. RESULTS: There were eight male participants, ranging in age from eight to 49 years (mean 19 years). Follow-up time after VNS ranged from 18 to 132 months (mean 52 months) and from an additional 18 to 164 months (mean 42 months) during combined VNS-CMDBS. All patients had daily seizures. Atypical absences were noted in eight patients, tonic seizures in seven, bilateral tonic-clonic seizures in four, atonic seizures in three, and myoclonic seizures in two patients. Four patients were initially considered responders to VNS. All these patients also had an additional >50% seizure frequency reduction during combined VNS-CMDBS. Seven patients were not responders to VNS, and of those, four had an additional >50% seizure frequency reduction during combined VNS-CMDBS. Eight patients had an additional >50% reduction in seizure frequency when moved from VNS alone to VNS-CMDBS therapy. There were two nonresponders during combined VNS-CMDBS therapy, and both were nonresponders to VNS alone. Nine patients were considered responders during VNS-CMDBS combined therapy compared with baseline. DISCUSSION: This study showed that combined VNS-CMDBS therapy was able to double the number of responders compared with VNS alone in a cohort of patients with refractory generalized epilepsy. We believe these data represent the first evidence that combined neuromodulation may be useful in this quite homogeneous patient population.

Norwegian population-based study of long-term effects, safety, and predictors of response of vagus nerve stimulation treatment in drug-resistant epilepsy: The NORPulse study.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) over time, and to determine which patient groups derive the most benefit. METHODS: Long-term outcomes are reported in 436 epilepsy patients from a VNS quality registry (52.8% adults, 47.2% children), with a median follow-up of 75 months. Patients were stratified according to evolution of response into constant responders, fluctuating responders, and nonresponders. The effect was evaluated at 6, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify predictors of response. RESULTS: The cumulative probability of ≥50% seizure reduction was 60%; however, 15% of patients showed a fluctuating course. Of those becoming responders, 89.5% (230/257) did so within 2 years. A steady increase in effect was observed among constant responders, with 48.7% (19/39) of those becoming seizure-free and 29.3% (39/133) with ≥75% seizure reduction achieving these effects within 2-5 years. Some effect (25%-<50%) at 6 months was a positive predictor of becoming a responder (odds ratio [OR] = 10.18, p < .0001) and having ≥75% reduction at 2 years (OR = 3.34, p = .03). Patients without intellectual disability had ORs of 3.34 and 3.11 of having ≥75% reduction at 2 and 5 years, respectively, and an OR of 6.22 of being seizure-free at last observation. Patients with unchanged antiseizure medication over the observation period showed better responder rates at 2 (63.0% vs. 43.1%, p = .002) and 5 years (63.4% vs. 46.3%, p = .031) than patients whose antiseizure medication was modified. Responder rates were higher for posttraumatic (70.6%, p = .048) and poststroke epilepsies (75.0%, p = .05) than other etiologies (46.5%). SIGNIFICANCE: Our data indicate that the effect of VNS increases over time and that there are important clinical decision points at 6 and 24 months for evaluating and adjusting the treatment. There should be better selection of candidates, as certain patient groups and epilepsy etiologies respond more favorably.

Practical considerations in epilepsy neurostimulation.

Neuromodulation is a key therapeutic tool for clinicians managing patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Multiple devices are available with long-term follow-up and real-world experience. The aim of this review is to give a practical summary of available neuromodulation techniques to guide the selection of modalities, focusing on patient selection for devices, common approaches and techniques for initiation of programming, and outpatient management issues. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (DBS-ANT), and responsive neurostimulation (RNS) are all supported by randomized controlled trials that show safety and a significant impact on seizure reduction, as well as a suggestion of reduction in the risk of sudden unexplained death in epilepsy (SUDEP). Significant seizure reductions are observed after 3 months for DBS, RNS, and VNS in randomized controlled trials, and efficacy appears to improve with time out to 7 to 10 years of follow-up for all modalities, albeit in uncontrolled follow-up or retrospective studies. A significant number of patients experience seizure-free intervals of 6 months or more with all three modalities. Number and location of epileptogenic foci are important factors affecting efficacy, and together with comorbidities such as severe mood or sleep disorders, may influence the choice of modality. Programming has evolved-DBS is typically initiated at lower current/voltage than used in the pivotal trial, whereas target charge density is lower with RNS, however generalizable optimal parameters are yet to be defined. Noninvasive brain stimulation is an emerging stimulation modality, although it is currently not used widely. In summary, clinical practice has evolved from those established in pivotal trials. Guidance is now available for clinicians who wish to expand their approach, and choice of neuromodulation technique may be tailored to individual patients based on their epilepsy characteristics, risk tolerance, and preferences.