Prenatal diagnosis and genetic analysis of small supernumerary marker chromosomes in the eastern chinese han population: A retrospective study of 36 cases.

BACKGROUND: Small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMCs) are additional chromosomes with unclear structures and origins, and their correlations with clinical fetal phenotypes remain incompletely understood, which reduces the accuracy of genetic counseling. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a cohort of 36 cases of sSMCs diagnosed in our center. We performed G-banding and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). The resulting karyotypes were compared with case reports in the literature and various databases including OMIM, DECIPHER, ClinVar, ClinGen, ISCA, DGV, and PubMed. RESULTS: Karyotype analysis data revealed that 19 out of 36 fetuses were mosaic. Copy number variants (CNVs) analysis results showed that 27 out of 36 fetuses harbored pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants. Among these 27 cases, 11 fetuses carried sex chromosome-related CNVs, including 4 female cases exhibiting Turner syndrome phenotypes and 7 cases showing Y chromosome deletions. In the remaining 16 fetuses with autosomal CNVs, 9 fetuses carried variants associated with Cat eye syndrome, Emanuel syndrome, Tetrasomy 18p, and 15q11-q13 duplication syndrome. Among these, 22 fetuses were terminated, and the remaining 5 fetuses were delivered and developed normally. Additionally, we identified a few variants with unclear pathogenicity. CONCLUSION: Cytogenetic analysis is essential for identifying the pathogenicity of sSMCs and increasing the accuracy of genetic counseling.

Prenatal Diagnosis by Trio Clinical Exome Sequencing: Single Center Experience.

Fetal anomalies, characterized by structural or functional abnormalities occurring during intrauterine life, pose a significant medical challenge, with a notable prevalence, affecting approximately 2-3% of live births and 20% of spontaneous miscarriages. This study aims to identify the genetic cause of ultrasound anomalies through clinical exome sequencing (CES) analysis. The focus is on utilizing CES analysis in a trio setting, involving the fetuses and both parents. To achieve this objective, prenatal trio clinical exome sequencing was conducted in 51 fetuseses exhibiting ultrasound anomalies with previously negative results from chromosomal microarray (CMA) analysis. The study revealed pathogenic variants in 24% of the analyzed cases (12 out of 51). It is worth noting that the findings include de novo variants in 50% of cases and the transmission of causative variants from asymptomatic parents in 50% of cases. Trio clinical exome sequencing stands out as a crucial tool in advancing prenatal diagnostics, surpassing the effectiveness of relying solely on chromosomal microarray analysis. This underscores its potential to become a routine diagnostic standard in prenatal care, particularly for cases involving ultrasound anomalies.

Section E6.7-6.12 of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) Technical Laboratory Standards: Cytogenomic studies of acquired chromosomal abnormalities in solid tumors.

Clinical cytogenomic studies of solid tumor samples are critical to the diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment selection for cancer patients. An overview of current cytogenomic techniques for solid tumor analysis is provided, including standards for sample preparation, clinical and technical considerations, and documentation of results. With the evolving technologies and their application in solid tumor analysis, these standards now include sequencing technology and optical genome mapping, in addition to the conventional cytogenomic methods, such as G-banded chromosome analysis, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and chromosomal microarray analysis. This updated Section E6.7-6.12 supersedes the previous Section E6.5-6.8 in Section E: Clinical Cytogenetics of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Standards for Clinical Genetics Laboratories.

Diagnostic yield of chromosomal microarray in the largest Latino clinical cohort.

Copy number variants (CNVs) remain a major etiological cause of neurodevelopmental delay and congenital malformations. Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) represents the gold standard for CNVs molecular characterization. We applied CMA throughout the patient's clinical diagnostic workup, as the patient's medical provider requested. We collected CMA results of 3380 patients enrolled for 5 years (2016-2021). We found 830 CNVs in 719 patients with potential clinical significance, that is, (i) pathogenic, (ii) likely pathogenic, and (iii) variants of uncertain significance (VUS), from which 10.6% (predominantly involving chromosomes 15 and 22) were most likely the final cause underpinning the patients' clinical phenotype. For those associated with neurodevelopmental phenotypes, the rate of pathogenic or likely pathogenic findings among the patients with CNVs was 60.75%. When considering epileptic phenotypes, it was 59%. Interestingly, our protocol identified two gains harbored in 17q21.31 and 9q34.3, internationally classified initially as VUS. However, because of their high frequency, we propose that these two VUS be reclassified as likely benign in this widely heterogeneous phenotypic population. These results support the diagnostic yield efficiency of CMA in characterizing CNVs to define the final molecular cause of genetic diseases in this cohort of Colombian patients, the most significant sample of patients from a Latino population, and define new benign polymorphic CNVs.

Clinical and molecular cytogenetic studies of five new patients with 20q11q12 deletion and review of the literature: Proposition of two critical regions.

Deletions of the long arm of chromosome 20 (20q) are rare, with only 16 reported patients displaying a proximal interstitial 20q deletion. A 1.62 Mb minimal critical region at 20q11.2, encompassing three genes GDF5, EPB41L1, and SAMHD1, is proposed to be responsible for this syndrome. The leading clinical features include growth retardation, intractable feeding difficulties with gastroesophageal reflux, hypotonia and psychomotor developmental delay. Common facial dysmorphisms including triangular face, hypertelorism, and hypoplastic alae nasi were additionally reported. Here, we present the clinical and molecular findings of five new patients with proximal interstitial 20q deletions. We analyzed the phenotype and molecular data of all previously reported patients with 20q11.2q12 microdeletions, along with our five new cases. Copy number variation analysis of patients in our cohort has enabled us to identify the second critical region in the 20q11.2q12 region and redefine the first region that is initially identified. The first critical region spans 359 kb at 20q11.2, containing six MIM genes, including two disease-causing genes, GDF5 and CEP250. The second critical region spans 706 kb at 20q12, encompassing four MIM genes, including two disease-causing genes, MAFB and TOP1. We propose GDF5 to be the primary candidate gene generating the phenotype of patients with 20q11.2 deletions. Moreover, we hypothesize TOP1 as a potential candidate gene for the second critical region at 20q12. Of note, we cannot exclude the possibility of a synergistic role of other genes involved in the deletion, including a contiguous gene deletion syndrome or position effect affecting both critical regions. Further studies focusing on patients with proximal 20q deletions are required to support our hypothesis.

Large regions of homozygosity in prenatal diagnosis.

Chromosomal microarrays (CMA) incorporate single nucleotide polymorphisms to enable the detection of regions of homozygosity (ROH). Here, we retrospectively analyzed 6288 prenatal cases who performed CMA to explored the clinical implications of large ROH in prenatal diagnosis. We analyzed cases with ROH larger than 10 megabases and reviewed the ultrasound findings; karyotype results and pregnancy follow-up data. Cases with possible imprinting disorders were assessed by methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. In total, we identified 50 cases with large ROH and chromosomes 1 and 2 were the most affected. About 59.18% of the ROH cases had ultrasound abnormalities, with the most common findings being ultrasound soft-marker abnormalities. There were seven fetuses had ROH which covered almost the entire chromosome and four had terminal ROH that involved almost the entire long arm of the chromosomes, which indicated uniparental disomy (UPD), of which 70% showed abnormal ultrasound findings. Ten cases with multiple ROH on different chromosomes indicated the third to fifth degree of consanguinity. In this study, we highlighted the clinical relevance of large ROH related to UPD. The analysis of ROH allowed us to gain further understanding of complex cytogenetic and disease mechanisms in prenatal diagnosis.

3q29 duplications: A cohort of 46 patients and a literature review.

Duplications of the 3q29 cytoband are rare chromosomal copy number variations (CNVs) (overlapping or recurrent ~1.6 Mb 3q29 duplications). They have been associated with highly variable neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) with various associated features or reported as a susceptibility factor to the development of learning disabilities and neuropsychiatric disorders. The smallest region of overlap and the phenotype of 3q29 duplications remain uncertain. We here report a French cohort of 31 families with a 3q29 duplication identified by chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), including 14 recurrent 1.6 Mb duplications, eight overlapping duplications (>1 Mb), and nine small duplications (<1 Mb). Additional genetic findings that may be involved in the phenotype were identified in 11 patients. Focusing on apparently isolated 3q29 duplications, patients present mainly mild NDD as suggested by a high rate of learning disabilities in contrast to a low proportion of patients with intellectual disabilities. Although some are de novo, most of the 3q29 duplications are inherited from a parent with a similar mild phenotype. Besides, the study of small 3q29 duplications does not provide evidence for any critical region. Our data suggest that the overlapping and recurrent 3q29 duplications seem to lead to mild NDD and that a severe or syndromic clinical presentation should warrant further genetic analyses.

Amniocentesis in pregnancies at or beyond 24 weeks: an international multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Amniocentesis for genetic diagnosis is most commonly done between 15 and 22 weeks of gestation but can be performed at later gestational ages. The safety and genetic diagnostic accuracy of amniocentesis have been well-established through numerous large-scale multicenter studies for procedures before 24 weeks, but comprehensive data on late amniocentesis remain sparse. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the indications, diagnostic yield, safety, and maternal and fetal outcomes associated with amniocentesis performed at or beyond 24 weeks of gestation. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted an international multicenter retrospective cohort study examining pregnant individuals who underwent amniocentesis for prenatal diagnostic testing at gestational ages between 24w0d and 36w6d. The study, spanning from 2011 to 2022, involved 9 referral centers. We included singleton or twin pregnancies with documented outcomes, excluding cases where other invasive procedures were performed during pregnancy or if amniocentesis was conducted for obstetric indications. We analyzed indications for late amniocentesis, types of genetic tests performed, their results, and the diagnostic yield, along with pregnancy outcomes and postprocedure complications. RESULTS: Of the 752 pregnant individuals included in our study, late amniocentesis was primarily performed for the prenatal diagnosis of structural anomalies (91.6%), followed by suspected fetal infection (2.3%) and high-risk findings from cell-free DNA screening (1.9%). The median gestational age at the time of the procedure was 28w5d, and 98.3% of pregnant individuals received results of genetic testing before birth or pregnancy termination. The diagnostic yield was 22.9%, and a diagnosis was made 2.4 times more often for fetuses with anomalies in multiple organ systems (36.4%) compared to those with anomalies in a single organ system (15.3%). Additionally, the diagnostic yield varied depending on the specific organ system involved, with the highest yield for musculoskeletal anomalies (36.7%) and hydrops fetalis (36.4%) when a single organ system or entity was affected. The most prevalent genetic diagnoses were aneuploidies (46.8%), followed by copy number variants (26.3%) and monogenic disorders (22.2%). The median gestational age at delivery was 38w3d, with an average of 59 days between the procedure and delivery date. The overall complication rate within 2 weeks postprocedure was 1.2%. We found no significant difference in the rate of preterm delivery between pregnant individuals undergoing amniocentesis between 24 and 28 weeks and those between 28 and 32 weeks, reinforcing the procedure's safety across these gestational periods. CONCLUSION: Late amniocentesis, at or after 24 weeks of gestation, especially for pregnancies complicated by multiple congenital anomalies, has a high diagnostic yield and a low complication rate, underscoring its clinical utility. It provides pregnant individuals and their providers with a comprehensive diagnostic evaluation and results before delivery, enabling informed counseling and optimized perinatal and neonatal care planning.

Diagnostic yield of the chromosomal microarray analysis in turkish patients with unexplained development delay/intellectual disability(ID), autism spectrum disorders and/or multiple congenital anomalies and new clinical findings.

BACKGROUND: Chromosomal microarray analysis is an essential tool for copy number variants detection in patients with unexplained developmental delay/intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorders, and multiple congenital anomalies. The study aims to determine the clinical significance of chromosomal microarray analysis in this patient group. Another crucial aspect is the evaluation of copy number variants detected in terms of the diagnosis of patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: A Chromosomal microarray analysis was was conducted on a total of 1227 patients and phenotype-associated etiological diagnosis was established in 135 patients. Phenotype-associated copy number variants were detected in 11% of patients. Among these, 77 patients 77 (57%, 77/135) were diagnosed with well-recognized genetic syndromes and phenotype-associated copy number variants were found in 58 patients (42.9%, 58/135). The study was designed to collect data of patients in Kocaeli Derince Training and Research Hospital retrospectively. In our study, we examined 135 cases with clinically significant copy number variability among all patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, chromosomal microarray analysis revealed pathogenic de novo copy number variants with new clinical features. Chromosomal microarray analysis in the Turkish population has been reported in the largest patient cohort to date.

Fetal agenesis of corpus callosum: chromosomal copy number abnormalities and postnatal follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: Agenesis of the corpus callosum (ACC) is an anomaly that can occur in fetuses during pregnancy. However, there is currently no treatment for fetal ACC. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective analysis of obstetric outcomes of fetal ACC to explore the relationship between fetal ACC phenotypes and chromosomal copy number abnormalities. METHODS AND RESULTS: Amniotic fluid or umbilical cord blood were extracted from pregnant women with fetal ACC for karyotype analysis and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). Among the 48 fetuses with ACC, 22 (45.8%, 22/48) had isolated ACC, and 26 (54.2%, 26/48) had non-isolated ACC. Chromosomal abnormalities were detected via karyotype analysis in four cases. In addition to the four cases of pathogenic copy number variations (CNVs) detected using karyotype analysis, CMA revealed two cases of pathogenic CNVs with 17q12 microduplication and 16p12.2 microdeletion. The obstetric outcomes of 26 patients with non-isolated ACC were followed up, and 17 chose to terminate the pregnancy. In addition, seven of the nine cases with non-isolated ACC showed no obvious abnormality during postnatal follow-up, whereas only one case with normal CMA showed an abnormal phenotype at six months. Of the 22 patients with isolated ACC, six chose to terminate the pregnancy. Postnatal follow-up of 16 isolated ACC cases revealed only one with benign CNV, presenting with intellectual disability. CONCLUSION: Pregnant women with fetal ACC should be offered prenatal CMA, particularly non-isolated ACC. Patients with ACC should undergo prolonged postnatal follow-up, and appropriate intervention should be provided if necessary.

Incremental yield of whole-genome sequencing over chromosomal microarray analysis and exome sequencing for congenital anomalies in prenatal period and infancy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: First, to determine the incremental yield of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) over quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR)/chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) with and without exome sequencing (ES) in fetuses, neonates and infants with a congenital anomaly that was or could have been detected on prenatal ultrasound. Second, to evaluate the turnaround time (TAT) and quantity of DNA required for testing using these pathways. METHODS: This review was registered prospectively in December 2022. Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, MEDLINE (Web of Science), The Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched electronically (January 2010 to December 2022). Inclusion criteria were cohort studies including three or more fetuses, neonates or infants with (i) one or more congenital anomalies; (ii) an anomaly which was or would have been detectable on prenatal ultrasound; and (iii) negative QF-PCR and CMA. In instances in which the CMA result was unavailable, all cases of causative pathogenic copy number variants > 50 kb were excluded, as these would have been detectable on standard prenatal CMA. Pooled incremental yield was determined using a random-effects model and heterogeneity was assessed using Higgins' I2 test. Subanalyses were performed based on pre- or postnatal cohorts, cases with multisystem anomalies and those meeting the NHS England prenatal ES inclusion criteria. RESULTS: A total of 18 studies incorporating 902 eligible cases were included, of which eight (44.4%) studies focused on prenatal cohorts, incorporating 755 cases, and the remaining studies focused on fetuses undergoing postmortem testing or neonates/infants with congenital structural anomalies, constituting the postnatal cohort. The incremental yield of WGS over QF-PCR/CMA was 26% (95% CI, 18-36%) (I2 = 86%), 16% (95% CI, 9-24%) (I2 = 85%) and 39% (95% CI, 27-51%) (I2 = 53%) for all, prenatal and postnatal cases, respectively. The incremental yield increased in cases in which sequencing was performed in line with the NHS England prenatal ES criteria (32% (95% CI, 22-42%); I2 = 70%) and in those with multisystem anomalies (30% (95% CI, 19-43%); I2 = 65%). The incremental yield of WGS for variants of uncertain significance (VUS) was 18% (95% CI, 7-33%) (I2 = 74%). The incremental yield of WGS over QF-PCR/CMA and ES was 1% (95% CI, 0-4%) (I2 = 47%). The pooled median TAT of WGS was 18 (range, 1-912) days, and the quantity of DNA required was 100 ± 0 ng for WGS and 350 ± 50 ng for QF-PCR/CMA and ES (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: While WGS in cases with congenital anomaly holds great promise, its incremental yield over ES is yet to be demonstrated. However, the laboratory pathway for WGS requires less DNA with a potentially faster TAT compared with sequential QF-PCR/CMA and ES. There was a relatively high rate of VUS using WGS. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Prenatal phenotypes and pregnancy outcomes of fetuses with 16p11.2 microdeletion/microduplication.

BACKGROUND: Chromosomal 16p11.2 deletions and duplications are genomic disorders which are characterized by neurobehavioral abnormalities, obesity, congenital abnormalities. However, the prenatal phenotypes associated with 16p11.2 copy number variations (CNVs) have not been well characterized. This study aimed to provide an elaborate summary of intrauterine phenotypic features for these genomic disorders. METHODS: Twenty prenatal amniotic fluid samples diagnosed with 16p11.2 microdeletions/microduplications were obtained from pregnant women who opted for invasive prenatal testing. Karyotypic analysis and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) were performed in parallel. The pregnancy outcomes and health conditions of all cases after birth were followed up. Meanwhile, we made a pooled analysis of the prenatal phenotypes in the published cases carrying 16p11.2 CNVs. RESULTS: 20 fetuses (20/20,884, 0.10%) with 16p11.2 CNVs were identified: five had 16p11.2 BP2-BP3 deletions, 10 had 16p11.2 BP4-BP5 deletions and five had 16p11.2 BP4-BP5 duplications. Abnormal ultrasound findings were recorded in ten fetuses with 16p11.2 deletions, with various degrees of intrauterine phenotypic features observed. No ultrasound abnormalities were observed in any of the 16p11.2 duplications cases during the pregnancy period. Eleven cases with 16p11.2 deletions terminated their pregnancies. For 16p11.2 duplications, four cases gave birth to healthy neonates except for one case that was lost to follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Diverse prenatal phenotypes, ranging from normal to abnormal, were observed in cases with 16p11.2 CNVs. For 16p11.2 BP4-BP5 deletions, abnormalities of the vertebral column or ribs and thickened nuchal translucency were the most common structural and non-structural abnormalities, respectively. 16p11.2 BP2-BP3 deletions might be closely associated with fetal growth restriction and single umbilical artery. No characteristic ultrasound findings for 16p11.2 duplications have been observed to date. Given the variable expressivity and incomplete penetrance of 16p11.2 CNVs, long-term follow-up after birth should be conducted for these cases.

The application of the ICD-10 for antepartum stillbirth patients in a referral centre of Eastern China: a retrospective study from 2015 to 2022.

BACKGROUND: The causes of some stillbirths are unclear, and additional work must be done to investigate the risk factors for stillbirths. OBJECTIVE: To apply the International Classification of Disease-10 (ICD-10) for antepartum stillbirth at a referral center in eastern China. METHODS: Antepartum stillbirths were grouped according to the cause of death according to the International Classification of Disease-10 (ICD-10) criteria. The main maternal condition at the time of antepartum stillbirth was assigned to each patient. RESULTS: Antepartum stillbirths were mostly classified as fetal deaths of unspecified cause, antepartum hypoxia. Although more than half of the mothers were without an identified condition at the time of the antepartum stillbirth, where there was a maternal condition associated with perinatal death, maternal medical and surgical conditions and maternal complications during pregnancy were most common. Of all the stillbirths, 51.2% occurred between 28 and 37 weeks of gestation, the main causes of stillbirth at different gestational ages also differed. Autopsy and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) were recommended in all stillbirths, but only 3.6% received autopsy and 10.5% underwent chromosomal microarray analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The ICD-10 is helpful in classifying the causes of stillbirths, but more than half of the stillbirths in our study were unexplained; therefore, additional work must be done. And the ICD-10 score may need to be improved, such as by classifying stillbirths according to gestational age. Autopsy and CMA could help determine the cause of stillbirth, but the acceptance of these methods is currently low.

Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Fetuses With Ultrasonographic Soft Markers: A Meta-Analysis of the Current Evidence.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasonographic soft markers are normal variants, rather than fetal abnormalities, and guidelines recommend a detailed survey of fetal anatomy to determine the necessity of antenatal karyotyping. Anecdotal reports have described cases with ultrasonographic soft markers in which chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) revealed pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs) despite normal results on conventional karyotyping, but CMA for ultrasonographic soft markers remains a matter of debate. In this systematic review, we evaluated the clinical significance of CMA for pregnancies with isolated ultrasonographic soft markers and a normal fetal karyotype. METHODS: An electronic search was conducted by an experienced librarian through the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases. We reviewed 3,338 articles (3,325 identified by database searching and 13 by a hand search) about isolated ultrasonographic soft markers, and seven ultrasonographic markers (choroid plexus cysts, echogenic bowel, echogenic intracardiac focus, hypoplastic nasal bone, short femur [SF], single umbilical artery, and urinary tract dilatation) were included for this study. RESULTS: Seven eligible articles were included in the final review. Pathogenic or likely pathogenic CNVs were found in fetuses with isolated ultrasonographic soft markers and a normal karyotype. The overall prevalence of pathogenic or likely pathogenic CNVs was 2.0% (41 of 2,048). The diagnostic yield of CMA was highest in fetuses with isolated SF (9 of 225, 3.9%). CONCLUSION: CMA could aid in risk assessment and pregnancy counseling in pregnancies where the fetus has isolated ultrasonographic soft markers along with a normal karyotype.

Reproductive outcomes in couples with recurrent pregnancy loss after embryonic chromosomal microarray analysis.

BACKGROUND: Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) has been widely applied to explore the genetic etiology in recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). However, the reproductive prognosis in RPL couples with different types of chromosomally abnormal miscarriage remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the reproductive prognosis among RPL couples after genetic testing in products of conception (POCs) by CMA. STUDY DESIGN: In this retrospective study, 1101 RPL couples referred for genetic testing in POCs by CMA. A total of 830 couples who met the inclusion criteria were followed up for at least 24 months after the index miscarriage. The rates of live birth and adverse pregnancy events in subsequent pregnancy and cumulative pregnancies were examined. RESULTS: For couples with three or more miscarriage, compared with those with chromosomally normal miscarriage, a significantly higher subsequent live birth rate was found in couples with chromosomally abnormal miscarriage (66.9% vs 71.6%, P = .040). However, differences in cumulative live birth rate among couples with chromosomally abnormal miscarriage and normal miscarriage were nonsignificant (82.7% vs 80.2%, P = .131). Women with advanced maternal age showed a significant decrease in the live birth rate (P < 0.01) and an increase in the miscarriage rate (P < 0.01) than those aged < 35 years old, regardless of whether the miscarriage was chromosomally normal or abnormal. RPL couples with chromosomally normal miscarriage showed a significant decrease in live birth rates in subsequent pregnancy and cumulative pregnancies, when they had experienced a large number of previous miscarriages; however, no significant difference was observed in those with chromosomally abnormal miscarriage. CONCLUSION: For women with three or more previous miscarriages, RPL couples with chromosomally normal miscarriage manifested a poorer reproductive prognosis than those with chromosomally abnormal miscarriage in subsequent pregnancy, while the cumulative live birth rate was similar. Advanced maternal age was a predictor of adverse pregnancy events, regardless of embryonic chromosomal results. Furthermore, among RPL women with large numbers of previous miscarriages, the supportive care and counselling regarding individual risk is necessary for those with chromosomally normal miscarriage.

Comparative analysis of the application with the combination of CMA and karyotype in routine and late amniocentesis.

PURPOSE: This is a retrospective comparative study. We aimed to analyze the results of karyotype and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) of amniotic fluid across different gestational weeks and evaluate the clinical value in prenatal diagnosis, particularly in the late pregnancies. METHODS: Samples from 580 pregnant women of 18-23 weeks of gestation (mid-gestation group) and 196 pregnant women of 24-32 weeks of gestation (late group) were performed both standard G-band karyotype analysis and CMA. RESULTS: Among the 580 pregnant women in the routine group, the most common indications were positive Down's screening (213/580, 36.7%), followed by advanced maternal age (196/580, 33.8%); while fetal structural anomalies on ultrasonography were the top reason for amniocentesis in the late group (56/196, 28.6%). In the routine group, the total detection rate was 12.1% (70/580), of which 4.1% (24/580) were identified by karyotype analysis and 11.2% (65/580) by CMA. The total detection rate was 15.3% (30/196) in the late group, of which 5.1% (10/196) were detected by karyotype analysis, and 14.3% (28/196) by CMA. CONCLUSION: Karyotype analysis and CMA are complementary in detecting chromosomal abnormalities. Amniotic cavity puncture in the karyotype analysis in 18-23 weeks of gestation and 24-32 weeks of gestation is safe and effective, more obvious effect on the latter.

Selection of prenatal screening with nuchal translucency > 95th centile and below 99th centile: a 4-year observational study with real-world data.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to analyze the genetic outcomes of fetuses with nuchal translucency (NT) > 95th centile, and determine whether prenatal genetic counseling, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) or non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) are truly beneficial for the outcomes of fetuses with increased NT > 95th centile and below 99th centile. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 535 pregnant women were included in this study, with a fetal NT > 95th centile at 11-13+6 weeks of gestation from January 2017 to December 2020. 324 pregnant women with fetal NT > 95th centile and below 99th centile combined with other risk factors and NT > 99th centile received prenatal diagnostic karyotype analysis and CMA, and 211 pregnant women with fetal isolated increased NT > 95th centile and below 99th centile were selected to carry out NIPT. RESULTS: A total of 211 pregnant women who underwent NIPT were included in the study, NIPT results showed that 8 high-risk cases were confirmed by prenatal diagnosis. Overall, the detection rate of NIPT was 3.79%. A total of 324 pregnant women with fetal NT > 95th centile and below 99th centile, along with other risk factors, and those with fetal NT > 99th centile, received karyotype analysis and CMA for prenatal diagnosis. Among them, a total of 73 genetic abnormalities were detected, including 45 cases of chromosomal aneuploidy, 7 cases of structural abnormalities, and 21 cases of copy number variations (CNVs) with a size of less than 10 Mb. In addition, the 73 women with genetic abnormalities are divided into three groups based on the NT measurement (Group 1: Fetuses with NT > 95th centile and below 99th centile, Group 2: Fetuses with NT > 99th centile, and Group 3: Fetuses with NT > 99th centile). 13.11% (8/61) of pathogenic genetic abnormalities (6 chromosomal aneuploidy, 1 structural abnormality, and 1 likely pathogenic CNV) will be missed if genetic counseling and prenatal genetic testing were not conducted in fetuses with increased NT > 95th centile and below 99th centile combined with other risks. Pathogenic CNVs were the most common abnormalities in group 3, and one likely pathogenic CNV was detected in group 1 and group 3, respectively, and a total of 14 CNVs of unknown clinical significance (VOUS) were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Through this study, we demonstrated that the critical value of NT > 95th centile for invasive detection or NIPT. Invasive testing combined with CMA may be recommended for fetuses with NT > 95th centile and below 99th centile and with other risks. But when isolated NT > 95th centile and below 99th centile, NIPT would be appropriate.

Pathogenic copy number variations are associated with foetal short femur length in a tertiary referral centre study.

Shortened foetal femur length (FL) is a common abnormal phenotype that often causes anxiety in pregnant women, and standard clinical treatments remain unavailable. We investigated the clinical characteristics, genetic aetiology and obstetric pregnancy outcomes of foetuses with short FL and provided a reference for perinatal management of such cases. Chromosomal microarray analysis was used to analyse the copy number variations (CNV) in short FL foetuses. Of the 218 foetuses with short FL, 33 foetuses exhibited abnormal CNVs, including 19 with pathogenic CNVs and 14 with variations of uncertain clinical significance. Of the 19 foetuses with pathogenic CNVs, four had aneuploidy, 14 had deletions/duplications, and one had pathogenic uniparental diploidy. The 7q11.23 microdeletion was detected in three foetuses. The severity of short FL was not associated with the rate of pathogenic CNVs. The duration of short FL for the intrauterine ultrasound phenotype in foetuses carrying a pathogenic CNV was independent of the gestational age. Further, maternal age was not associated with the incidence of foetal pathogenic CNVs. Adverse pregnancy outcomes occurred in 77 cases, including termination of pregnancy in 63 cases, postnatal dwarfed foetuses with intellectual disability in 11 cases, and three deaths within 3 months of birth. Pathogenic CNVs closely related to foetal short FL were identified, among which the 7q11.23 microdeletion was highly associated with short FL development. This study provides a reference for the perinatal management of foetuses with short FL.

Phenotypic findings and pregnancy outcomes of fetal rare autosomal aneuploidies detected using chromosomal microarray analysis.

BACKGROUND: Aneuploidies are the most common chromosomal abnormality and the main genetic cause of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Since numerous studies have focused on common trisomies, relatively little is known about the association between phenotypic findings and rare autosomal aneuploidies (RAAs). We conducted a retrospective study of 48,904 cases for chromosomal microarray analysis in a large tertiary referral center and reported the overall frequencies, clinical manifestations, and outcomes of prenatal RAAs. RESULTS: A total of 90 RAAs were detected, of which 83 cases were mosaic trisomies and 7 were non-mosaic trisomies. Chromosomes 16, 22, and 9 were identified as the major chromosomes involving RAAs. The four predominant indications for prenatal diagnosis in our RAA cases were RAA-positive in noninvasive prenatal screening, advanced maternal age, ultrasound abnormalities, and high-risk for serum prenatal screening. Cardiovascular defects were the most frequently observed structural abnormalities, followed by musculoskeletal anomalies. Increased nuchal translucency and persistent left superior vena cava, the major soft marker abnormalities involved, were also observed in our RAA cases. Clinical outcomes were available for all RAAs, with 63 induced abortions and 27 live births recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Variable phenotypes and outcomes were observed, which were highly heterogeneous in cases of prenatal RAAs. Thus, a cautious and comprehensive strategy should be implemented during prenatal counseling for RAAs.

Copy number variant analysis for syndromic congenital heart disease in the Chinese population.

BACKGROUND: Syndromic congenital heart disease (CHD) is among the most severe conditions in the pediatric population. Copy number variant (CNV) is an important cause of syndromic CHD, but few studies focused on CNVs related to these patients in China. The present study aimed to identify pathogenic CNVs associated with syndromic CHD in the Chinese population. METHODS: A total of 109 sporadic patients with syndromic CHD were applied chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). Phenotype spectrum of pathogenic or likely pathogenic CNVs was analyzed. CHD-related genes were prioritized from genes within pathogenic or likely pathogenic CNVs by VarElect, OVA, AMELIE, and ToppGene. RESULTS: Using CMA, we identified 43 candidate CNVs in 37/109 patients. After filtering CNVs present in the general population, 29 pathogenic/likely pathogenic CNVs in 24 patients were identified. The diagnostic yield of CMA for pathogenic/likely pathogenic CNVs was 23.1% (24/104), excluding 5 cases with aneuploidies or gross chromosomal aberrations. The overlapping analysis of CHD-related gene lists from different prioritization tools highlighted 16 CHD candidate genes. CONCLUSION: As the first study focused on CNVs in syndromic CHD from the Chinese population, this study reveals the importance of CMA in exploring the genetic etiology of syndromic CHD and expands our understanding of these complex diseases. The bioinformatic analysis of candidate genes suggests several CHD-related genes for further functional research.