Female reproductive status and exogenous sex hormone use in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with tocilizumab and csDMARDs.

OBJECTIVES: Sex is well known to influence risk, severity and treatment outcomes of RA, although the underlying causes are uncertain. The aim of this research was to examine whether factors influencing female sex hormones (reproductive status and exogenous sex hormone use) are associated with the efficacy of DMARDs. METHODS: Individual participant data were pooled from five phase 3 clinical trials where RA patients were treated with tocilizumab and/or conventional synthetic DMARDs. The primary outcome was the time to first remission according to the Simplified Disease Activity Index. The relationship between menopausal status or use of exogenous sex hormones and the time of first remission was assessed via Cox proportional analysis. Analysed data included sex, baseline menopausal status (premenopausal, perimenopausal, early postmenopausal and postmenopausal), participant age, body mass index, race, number of previous DMARDs and baseline disease activity. RESULTS: Analysis included 4474 female patients, of whom 2817 (62.9%) were postmenopausal, 202 (4.5%) were early postmenopausal, 1021 (22.8%) were premenopausal and 414 (9.2%) were perimenopausal. Of these, 221 (7.8%), 13 (6.4%), 255 (25%) and 47 (11.4%), respectively, were taking exogenous sex hormones. In the pooled analysis, perimenopausal status was associated with reduced remission compared with premenopausal status [adjusted HR 0.78 (95% CI 0.61, 0.99)]. Sex hormone use was associated with significantly higher remission [adjusted HR 1.20 (95% CI 1.01, 1.43)]. CONCLUSION: Perimenopausal women were less likely to achieve remission compared with premenopausal RA patients. The use of exogenous sex hormones appeared to be associated with more frequent remission in female RA patients, particularly those who were perimenopausal and early postmenopausal, although further research is required to confirm and identify the drivers for this observation and how it interacts with menopausal status.

Patient-individual tapering of DMARDs in rheumatoid arthritis patients in a real-world setting.

OBJECTIVE: We aim to provide real-world evidence on the effectiveness of patient-individual tapering of DMARDs for patients with RA in daily clinical practice using medical records and claims data. METHODS: We utilize data obtained through a controlled prospective cohort study in Germany conducted from July 2018 to March 2021. Participants consist of RA patients in sustained remission (>6 months) who were eligible for tapering at enrolment. Patients treated with individual tapering based on shared decision making (n = 200) are compared with patients without any dose reduction (n = 237). The risk of loss of remission and the risk of flare is assessed with risk-adjusted Kaplan-Meier estimators and Cox regressions. We evaluate differences in costs 1 year before and after baseline based on claims data for the subgroup of patients insured at one major sickness fund in Germany (n = 76). RESULTS: The risk of flare (hazard ratio 0.88, 95% CI 0.59, 1.30) or loss of remission (hazard ratio 1.04, 95% CI 0.73, 1.49) was not statistically different between the individual tapering group and the continuation group. Minor increases of disease activity and decreases of quality of life were observed 12 months after baseline, again with no statistically significant difference. Drug costs decreased by 1017€ in the individual tapering group while they increased by 1151€ in the continuation group (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Individual tapering of DMARDs does not increase the average risk of experiencing flares or loss of remission. Encouraging rheumatologists and patients to apply tapering in shared decision making may be a feasible approach to allow individualization of treatment in RA.

The beneficial effect of csDMARDs co-medication on drug persistence of first-line TNF inhibitor in rheumatoid arthritis patients: data from Czech ATTRA registry.

The study aimed to compare treatment retention for first-line TNF inhibitor (TNFi) in the ATTRA registry patients receiving either combination with conventional synthetic DMARDs or TNFi as monotherapy. A retrospective multicenter study analyzed data of all adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis (n = 3032) starting TNF inhibitor as the first-line biological therapy in combination with csDMARDs or in monotherapy from January 1st 2012 to December 31st 2020. Kaplan-Meier method was employed to calculate drug retentions. Survival curves of treatment retentions were compared through Log-rank test between the studied subgroups. The hazard ratio for drug discontinuation was assessed through univariate cox regression models. In patients who started the first line TNFi therapy, the median treatment retention was 47.7 (42.2; 53.1) months for combination therapy and 22.7 (14.9; 30.6) months for TNFi monotherapy (p < 0.001). Estimated one-year survival was higher in patients on TNFi combined with csDMARDs as compared with TNFi monotherapy (75.3% vs 65.7%); two-year survival rate was 63.2% vs 49.2%, three-year survival rate was 55.4% vs 42.4% and five-year survival 44.9% vs 26.4% of patients. The estimated survival on the first TNFi was higher in patients taking combination therapy with methotrexate than with other csDMARDs (p = 0.003). Use of csDMARDs co-medication was associated with significantly better first TNFi drug survival compared to monotherapy. The combination of TNFi with MTX is more effective than the combination with leflunomide, which did not demonstrate a significant effect.

Having a co-morbidity predicts worse outcome in early rheumatoid arthritis despite intensive treatment: a post hoc evaluation of the pragmatic randomized controlled CareRA trial.

OBJECTIVES: To quantify the prevalence of co-morbidities in patients with early RA and determine their prognostic value for effectiveness outcomes in a randomized trial. METHODS: We included patients from the 2-year pragmatic randomized CareRA trial, who had early RA (diagnosis < 1 year), were DMARD naïve and then treated-to-target with different remission induction schemes. Prevalence of co-morbidities was registered at baseline and the Rheumatic Diseases Comorbidity Index (RDCI; range 0-9) was calculated. We tested the relation between baseline RDCI and outcomes including disease activity (DAS28-CRP), physical function (HAQ index), quality of life (SF-36 domains) and hospitalizations over 2 years, using linear mixed models or generalized estimating equations models. RESULTS: Of 379 included patients, 167 (44%) had a RDCI of minimum 1. RDCI scores of 1, 2 or ≥3 were obtained in 65 (17%), 70 (19%), and 32 (8%) participants, respectively. The most frequent co-morbidity was hypertension (22%). Patients with co-morbidities had significantly higher HAQ (ß = 0.215; 95% CI: 0.071, 0.358), DAS28-CRP (ß = 0.225; 95% CI: 0.132, 0.319) and lower SF-36 physical component summary scores (ß =-3.195; 95% CI: -4.844, -1.546) over 2 years than patients without co-morbidities, after adjusting for possible confounders including disease activity and randomized treatment. Patients with co-morbidities had over time lower chances of achieving remission (OR = 0.724; 95% CI: 0.604, 0.867) and a higher risk of hospitalization (OR = 3.725; 95% CI: 2.136, 6.494). CONCLUSION: At disease onset, almost half of RA patients had at least one clinically important co-morbidity. Having co-morbidities was associated with worse functionality and disease activity outcomes over 2 years, despite intensive remission induction treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trials NCT01172639.

First-line csDMARD monotherapy drug retention in psoriatic arthritis: methotrexate outperforms sulfasalazine.

OBJECTIVES: Conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) are the first-line treatment for PsA, but there is conflicting data regarding their efficacy and scarce reports describing the duration of use (drug retention) of csDMARD in this population. Their position in treatment recommendations is a matter of growing debate due to the availability of alternative treatment options with higher levels of evidence. We aimed to study drug retention and predictors for drug retention among PsA patients receiving first-line csDMARD monotherapy. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study in DMARD-naïve adult PsA patients in whom a first csDMARD was prescribed as monotherapy primarily to treat PsA-related symptoms. The main outcome was time to failure of the csDMARD (i.e. stopping the csDMARD or adding another DMARD). RESULTS: A total of 187 patients were included, who were mainly prescribed MTX (n = 163) or SSZ (n = 21). The pooled median drug retention time was 31.8 months (interquartile range 9.04-110). Drug retention was significantly higher in MTX (median 34.5 months; interquartile range 9.60-123) as compared with SSZ-treated patients (median 12.0 months; interquartile range 4.80- 55.7) (P =0.016, log-rank test). In multivariable Cox regression, the use of MTX and older age were associated with increased retention. The main reasons for treatment failure were inefficacy (52%) and side effects (28%). Upon failure, MTX treated patients were more commonly, subsequently treated with a biologic DMARD compared with SSZ (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: MTX outperforms SSZ as a first-line csDMARD in DMARD-naïve PsA patients with respect to monotherapy drug retention in daily clinical practice.

The predictors of and reasons for non-adherence in an observational cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis commencing methotrexate.

OBJECTIVE: In order to develop interventions to optimize MTX use for the treatment of RA we evaluated the rate of, reasons for and predictors of MTX non-adherence during the first 6 months of therapy. METHODS: The Rheumatoid Arthritis Medication Study (RAMS) is a prospective multicentre cohort study of incident MTX users in the UK. Prior to MTX commencement demographic, clinical and psychological data were collected. A weekly patient-completed diary recorded MTX dose, possible side effects and adherence over 26 weeks. The number of non-adherent weeks was calculated. Potential baseline predictors of ever non-adherence (⩾1 week non-adherent) during the first 6 months of MTX therapy were identified using logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: 606 patients with RA were included; 69% female, mean (s.d.) age 60 (13) years and DAS28 score 4.2 (1.2). Over the first 6 months following MTX initiation, 158 (26%) patients were ever non-adherent (71% intentional, 19% non-intentional, 10% unexplained) and mean (s.d.) number of non-adherent weeks was 2.5 (2.1). Multivariable predictors of ever non-adherence included DAS28 [odds ratios (OR) 1.1, 95% CI 1.0, 1.4], fatigue (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.0, 1.2 per cm), ⩾2 comorbidities vs no comorbidities (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1, 3.5) and high medication concerns despite perceived need (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.0, 1.1 per unit decrease in need/concern differential). CONCLUSION: This is the largest study evaluating early intentional and non-intentional non-adherence to MTX, which has identified that patient beliefs and multi-morbidity strongly link with non-adherence. These findings can direct the design of and provide potential targets for interventions to improve patient adherence.

Therapeutic Options and Cost-Effectiveness for Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: During the last two decades, the therapeutic decisions and strategies for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management have improved dramatically. Today, the therapeutic armamentarium is significantly augmented, and by using both old and new drugs, remission or low disease activity is a reasonable goal. The use of conventional synthetic (cs) disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in combination with biologic (b) or targeted synthetic (ts) DMARDs has revolutionized RA treatment. Methotrexate administration is considered fundamental among other csDMARDs for the treatment of RA. It is recommended as the initial drug (monotherapy), or in combination with other csDMARDs, bDMARDs, and tsDMARDs in a step-up strategy. Furthermore, it can be used with other csDMARDs as initial combination-therapy. On the other hand, despite the fact that bDMARDs and ts DMARDs are highly efficacious and can also be used as monotherapy in certain cases, cost-effectiveness is still questionable when compared with csDMARDs. In this direction, the classic argument of utmost importance has to do with the most appropriate treatment strategy that shall be initially applied: csDMARD combination-therapy versus monotherapy, or step-up combinationtherapy with bDMARDs, especially tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFa) blockers. For this reason, a literature review of the most important csDMARDs combination and bDMARDs combination studies has been deployed. RECENT FINDINGS: The results showed that the triple csDMARDs therapy approach is more effective and less expensive. In addition, workers' productivity is higher than any other treatment options for RA. Triple-therapy constitutes a smart, efficacious, and significantly cheaper choice for RA therapeutic management.

Clinical predictors of inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) including methotrexate (MTX) in untreated rheumatoid arthritis patients: A single-center observational study.

Objectives: To investigate predictors of inadequate response to first conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) including methotrexate (MTX) in untreated rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in daily clinical practice.Methods: Inadequate response to MTX or other csDMARDs was defined as being not low disease activity at 12 months in more than 3 of 4 composite measures, and discontinuation or start of biologic DMARDs. The association between baseline factors and csDMARDs-IR was assessed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.Results: Four hundred and eleven and 146 patients were started on MTX and other csDMARDs, respectively; 218 patients were responsive to MTX, with a response rate of 47.0%. Tender joint count (TJC, ≥6 in 28joints, odds ratio [OR] = 1.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-2.64) and CRP (≥1.0 mg/dL, OR = 1.72, 95%CI: 1.10-2.70) at baseline were identified as predictors on multivariate logistic regression analysis. TJC (OR = 3.60, 95%CI: 1.29-10.00) was the factor identified as a predictor of the development of other csDMARDs-IR.Conclusion: In this observational study, patients with untreated RA at risk of inadequate response to MTX included those with a higher TJC and higher CRP, while a higher TJC was the only independent predictor of an inadequate response to csDMARDs other than MTX.

Gradual tapering TNF inhibitors versus conventional synthetic DMARDs after achieving controlled disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: first-year results of the randomised controlled TARA study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of two tapering strategies after achieving controlled disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), during 1 year of follow-up. METHODS: In this multicentre single-blinded (research nurses) randomised controlled trial, patients with RA were included who achieved controlled disease, defined as a Disease Activity Score (DAS) ≤ 2.4 and a Swollen Joint Count (SJC) ≤ 1, treated with both a conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARD) and a TNF inhibitor. Eligible patients were randomised into gradual tapering csDMARDs or TNF inhibitors. Medication was tapered if the RA was still under control, by cutting the dosage into half, a quarter and thereafter it was stopped. Primary outcome was proportion of patients with a disease flare, defined as DAS > 2.4 and/or SJC > 1. Secondary outcomes were DAS, European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ5D) and functional ability (Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index [HAQ-DI]) after 1 year and over time. RESULTS: A total of 189 patients were randomly assigned to tapering csDMARDs (n = 94) or tapering anti-TNF (n = 95). The cumulative flare rates in the csDMARD and anti-TNF tapering group were, respectively, 33 % (95% CI,24% to 43 %) and 43 % (95% CI, 33% to 53 % (p = 0.17). Mean DAS, HAQ-DI and EQ-5D did not differ between tapering groups after 1 year and over time. CONCLUSION: Up to 9 months, flare rates of tapering csDMARDs or TNF inhibitors were similar. After 1 year, a non-significant difference was found of 10 % favouring csDMARD tapering. Tapering TNF inhibitors was, therefore, not superior to tapering csDMARDs. From a societal perspective, it would be sensible to taper the TNF inhibitor first, because of possible cost reductions and less long-term side effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR2754.

Effects of concomitant glucocorticoids in TOZURA, a common-framework study programme of subcutaneous tocilizumab in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: This post hoc analysis of the TOZURA study programme evaluated the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous tocilizumab (TCZ-SC) as monotherapy or with concomitant conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) in patients with RA categorized by baseline glucocorticoid (GC) use. METHODS: TOZURA was a multinational, open-label, single-arm, common-framework study programme (11 protocols, 22 countries) in patients with moderate to severe RA in whom csDMARDs or biologic therapies had failed or who were MTX naïve. Patients received once-weekly TCZ-SC 162 mg for ⩾24 weeks as monotherapy or in combination with csDMARDs and/or oral GC use (⩽10 mg/day prednisone or equivalent), which was to be continued unchanged for 24 weeks. Treatment subgroups were defined by baseline GC use and analysed for efficacy and safety. RESULTS: Of 1804 patients who received TCZ-SC, 145 received monotherapy + GC, 208 received monotherapy without GC, 730 received combination therapy + GC and 721 received combination therapy without GC. The median GC dose in both GC subgroups was 5 mg/day. The proportion of patients who achieved clinical remission, defined as DAS in 28 joints using ESR <2.6, increased similarly from baseline to week 24 in all subgroups. Improvements in patient-reported outcomes were similar in all subgroups. Overall adverse event profiles were generally similar between subgroups, with some slight numerical differences between GC and non-GC subgroups. CONCLUSION: The incremental efficacy benefits of TCZ-SC as monotherapy and in combination with csDMARDs were similar between patients with and without previous and continued oral GC treatment, with generally similar safety profiles. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01941940, NCT01941095, NCT01951170, NCT01987479, NCT01988012, NCT01995201, NCT02001987, NCT02011334, NCT02031471, NCT02046603, NCT02046616.

Effectiveness of Remission Induction Strategies for Early Rheumatoid Arthritis: a Systematic Literature Review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the effectiveness of remission induction strategies compared to single csDMARD-initiating strategies according to current guidelines in early RA. RECENT FINDINGS: Twenty-nine studies, heterogeneous on, e.g., specific treatment strategy and remission outcome used, were identified. Using DAS28-remission over 12 months, 13 (76%) of 17 remission induction strategies showed significantly more patients achieving remission. Pooled relative "risk" was 1.73 [95%CI 1.59-1.88] for bDMARD-based remission induction strategies and 1.20 [95%CI 1.03-1.40] for combination csDMARD-based remission induction strategies compared to single csDMARD-initiating strategies. When additional glucocorticoid "bridging therapy" was used in single csDMARD-initiating strategies, the higher proportion patients achieving remission in remission induction strategies was no longer statistically significant (pooled RR 1.06 [95%CI 0.83-1.35]). For other remission outcomes, results were in line with above. Remission induction strategies are more effective in achieving remission compared to single csDMARD-initiating strategies, possibly more so in bDMARD-based induction strategies. However, compared to single csDMARD-initiating strategies with glucocorticoids, induction strategies may not be more effective.

Incidence of infection other than tuberculosis in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases treated with bDMARDs: a real-time clinical experience from India.

Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARD) have transformed the treatment paradigm of chronic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs), but they are often associated with adverse drug reactions. The present study evaluated the frequency, characteristics and type of infections, other than tuberculosis (TB), in ARD patients receiving bDMARDs. The multicentre, cross-sectional, retrospective, observational study was conducted across 12 centers in Karnataka, India, between January to August 2016. The study included patients receiving bDMARD therapy for various ARDs. Outcome variables considered were any infection, minor infections and major infections, other than TB. Clinical variables were compared between infection and no infection group, and the increase in the likelihood of infection with respect to various clinical variables was assessed. The study involved 209 subjects with a median (range) age of 41 (16-84) years and male to female ratio of 0.97:1. A total of 29 (13.88%) subjects developed infection following bDMARD therapy, out of whom a majority had minor infection (n = 26). The likelihood of developing any infection was noted to be more in subjects receiving anti-TNF (golimumab, P = 0.03) and those on three or more conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs (P < 0.01). Infection risk was higher in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (P = 0.04), other connective tissue disease (P < 0.01) and in patients with comorbidities (P = 0.13). The risk of infection was associated with the use of anti-TNF therapy and more than three csDMARDs, co morbidities and Adds such as systemic lupus erythematosus and connective tissue disease.

A Practical Approach to the Use of Conventional Synthetic, Biologic and Targeted Synthetic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs for the Treatment of Inflammatory Arthritis in Patients with a History of Malignancy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) have been used in the treatment of inflammatory arthritis (IA) for many years. More recently, biologic (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic (tsDMARDs) DMARDs have further improved treatment. Due to increased patient longevity and effective oncology treatment, rheumatologists often encounter patients with IA and previous malignancy. The immunosuppressive effect of DMARDs causes concern regarding impaired tumour surveillance with a potential increased risk of malignancy. We reviewed the literature regarding the risk of malignancy in patients on cs-/b-/tsDMARDS and sought to provide practical advice regarding use of these drugs in patients with previous malignancy. RECENT FINDINGS: Data from randomised controlled trials is limited as patients with pre-existing malignancy are often excluded. Reassuringly, an increasing range of "real world" data from various national b/tsDMARD registries has not provided a convincing signal that these drugs increase tumour recurrence. Nevertheless, awareness of, and adherence to, national screening guidelines for malignancy is important. Given the improvement in quality of life achieved with these novel and well-tolerated therapeutic agents, the benefit/risk profile remains overwhelmingly favourable in most patients.

Effect of anti-TNF and conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug treatment on work disability and clinical outcome in a multicentre observational cohort study of psoriatic arthritis.

Objectives: To determine the effect of medical treatment on work disability in patients with active PsA in a real-world setting. Methods: Four hundred patients with active PsA commencing or switching to anti-TNF or conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) were recruited to a multicentre UK prospective observational cohort study. Work disability was measured using the work productivity and activity-specific health problem instrument and peripheral joint activity was measured with the disease activity in PsA composite measure. Results: Four hundred patients were recruited, of whom 229 (57.25%) were working (of any age). Sixty-two patients of working age (24%) were unemployed. At 6 months there was a 10% improvement in presenteeism ( P = 0.007) and a 15% improvement in work productivity ( P = 0.001) among working patients commenced on csDMARDs ( n = 164) vs a larger and more rapid 30% improvement in presenteeism ( P < 0.001) and 40% improvement in work productivity ( P < 0.001) among those commenced on anti-TNF therapy ( n = 65). Clinical response was poor among patients commenced on a csDMARD ( n = 272), with an 8.4 point improvement in disease activity in PsA ( P < 0.001) vs those commenced on anti-TNF therapy ( n = 121), who had a 36.8 point improvement ( P < 0.001). Conclusion: We report significant and clinically meaningful improvements in both work disability and clinical outcomes after commencement of anti-TNF therapy in a real-world setting. Improvements in all outcomes among those commencing csDMARDs were slower and of a smaller magnitude.

Effect of traditional therapeutics on prevalence and clinical outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 in Chinese patients with autoimmune diseases.

The impact of the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on autoimmune diseases (AID) patients has been an important focus. This study was undertaken to characterize the incidence, clinical manifestations and hospitalization among AID affected by COVID-19 and to analyze the association between immunomodulatory medication and these outcomes. Clinical, demographic, maintenance treatment, symptoms and disease course data and outcomes of AID patients with COVID-19 infection were assessed via an online survey tool and printed copy from 1 January till February 28, 2023. A total of 432 patients with AID were enrolled in the study. The results showed the most common conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) was hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). The usage of csDMARDs didn't increase the risk of COVID-19 infection. Patients who warranted hospitalization were significantly older. ILD was associated with higher hospitalization rate. No csDMARDs other than calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) was associated with increased risk of hospitalization. HCQ intake was associated with cough. Compared with no glucocorticoids (GCs) group, high doses of GCs were accompanied with higher proportion of gastrointestinal symptoms and tachycardia, lower proportion of sore throat and ageusia. GCs didn't provoke the COVID-19 infection in patients with AID, but chronic use of oral GCs was significantly more common in those requiring hospitalization, and higher dose of GCs were correlated with higher risk of hospitalization. 97 patients discontinued csDMARDs after infection, which resulted in an elevated risk of hospitalization. Meanwhile, withdrawal of csDMARDs was associated with higher odds of disease flare and lower proportion of remission than maintenance groups. Collectively, our analysis provides the evidence that maintenance treatment of csDMARDs may be more prudent for AID patients during COVID-19 pandemic.

Deciphering difficult-to-treat psoriatic arthritis (D2T-PsA): a GRAPPA perspective from an international survey of healthcare professionals.

Objectives: This study contributes to the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA)'s effort to define 'difficult-to-treat' PsA (D2T-PsA), leveraging insights of healthcare professionals who are GRAPPA members. The primary objective is to inform GRAPPA's D2T PsA project, ensuring the consensus definition reflects clinical experience and expertise. Methods: An online survey was conducted among GRAPPA's healthcare professionals managing PsA patients. The survey covered demographic details, structured questions, and open-ended queries to gather comprehensive insights into the experts' viewpoints. Results: About 223 physicians completed the survey, comprising 179 (80.2%) rheumatologists and 40 (17.9%) dermatologists. The majority, 184 (82.5%), favoured establishing distinct definitions for D2T-PsA and complex-to-manage PsA (C2M-PsA). Furthermore, 202 (90.5%) supported a definition that includes objective inflammation signs (clinical, laboratory, imaging, among others). However, opinions varied on the criteria for prior treatment failures, with most (93, 41.7%) favouring a definition that includes at least one conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug and two or more biological- or targeted-synthetic-DMARDs with different mechanisms of action. Conclusion: The survey reveals a majority opinion among GRAPPA experts favouring the differentiation between D2T-PsA and C2M-PsA, and the inclusion of objective inflammatory markers in these definitions. However, there is less than 50% agreement on the specific treatment failure criteria, particularly regarding the number of therapies needed to classify PsA as D2T. These findings suggest a need for continued discussion to reach a more unified approach in defining D2T-PsA, reflecting the complexity of the condition.

Retention of triple therapy with methotrexate, sulfasalazine, and hydroxychloroquine compared to combination methotrexate and leflunomide in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: There are various combination conventional synthetic disease-modifying-antirheumatic drug (csDMARD) treatment strategies used in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A commonly used csDMARD combination is triple therapy with methotrexate (MTX), sulfasalazine (SSZ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). Another approach is double therapy with MTX and leflunomide (LEF). We compared the real-world retention of these two treatment combinations. METHODS: Patients with RA from the Ontario Best Practices Research Initiative (OBRI) who received triple or double therapy on or after OBRI enrolment were included. Retention rates were compared between these two groups. We also analyzed which medication in the combination was discontinued and the reasons for treatment discontinuation. Disease activity was assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 months after treatment initiation as well as at time of discontinuation. Risk factors for treatment discontinuation were also examined. RESULTS: Six hundred and ninety-two patients were included (258 triple and 434 double therapy). There were 175 (67.8%) discontinuations in the triple therapy group and 287 (66.1%) discontinuations in patients on double therapy. The median survival for triple therapy was longer (15.1 months; 95% CI: 11.2-21.2) compared to double therapy (9.6 months; 95%CI: 7.03-12.2). However, this was not statistically significant. Disease activity at 6 and 12 months, measured by 28-joint count Disease Activity Score based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) was lower with triple therapy (mean DAS28 at 6 months 3.4 vs. 3.9, P<0.0001 and at 12 months 3.2 vs. 3.5, P=0.0005). CONCLUSION: Patients on triple therapy remained on treatment longer than patients on double therapy. However, this difference was not statistically significant.

Pharmacologic Treatment Strategies in Psoriatic Arthritis.

PURPOSE: The goal of this narrative review was to provide current data on psoriatic arthritis (PsA) therapeutic strategies, supporting treatment decisions with a domain-based approach. METHODS: This narrative review of treatment strategies for PsA focused on several disease domains (ie, peripheral arthritis, enthesitis, axial disease, dactylitis, skin and nail disease), as well as the so-called "related conditions" of uveitis, Crohn's disease, and ulcerative colitis. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, international guidelines, and recent congress abstracts. FINDINGS: Currently, multiple approved treatment options offer a wide range of options, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors; inhibitors of interleukin-17 (IL-17), IL-12/23 (IL-12/23), IL-23 (IL-23), and Janus kinase; the phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor apremilast; and the T-cell modulator abatacept. However, no treatment option shows clear superiority concerning efficacy on peripheral arthritis and dactylitis over the others, whereas limited evidence suggests that the IL-17 inhibitor ixekizumab and the IL-12/23 inhibitor ustekinumab may be superior to TNF inhibitors in treating enthesitis. Recent data on enthesitis have also shown promising results for methotrexate. Treatment of axial PsA is mostly derived from axial spondyloarthritis, and more data are needed focusing on this specific subgroup of PsA patients. Thus far, the most important finding from the only randomized controlled trial in this specific population is that the IL-17 inhibitor secukinumab was superior to placebo in terms of clinical and radiologic end-points in axial PsA. Regarding psoriatic skin involvement, head-to-head trials in PsA as well as skin psoriasis showed the superiority of IL-17, IL-23, and IL-12/23 inhibitors over TNF inhibitors. When treating PsA with concurrent uveitis, according to the existing data, monoclonal TNF inhibitor antibodies should be preferred. In PsA and concomitant inflammatory bowel disease, treatment decisions must include the consideration of which specific type of inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis) is present, as some of the agents either lack data or are ineffective in treating these 2 conditions. In both types, IL-17 inhibitors should be avoided. When determining treatment strategy, comorbidities should be carefully assessed, and the corresponding risk profile of the respective treatment modalities should be taken into consideration. IMPLICATIONS: There are many approved therapeutic options for treating patients with PsA, and additional emerging treatment options are in the pipeline. Individualized treatment decisions for each patient, depending on the leading disease phenotype, underlying comorbidities, and patient preferences, should be made based on shared decision-making.

Impact of csDMARDs adherence on clinical remission in patients with new-onset inflammatory arthritis: a prospective cohort study from the ELECTRA database.

Background: Major improvements in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have made clinical remission an achievable and desirable goal but, despite the relevance gained by a profound disease suppression, many patients with RA still miss clinical remission due to several factors influencing disease activity, including treatment adherence. Objective: To evaluate the effect of adherence to conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) on the achievement of clinical remission in a cohort of patients with new-onset inflammatory arthritis. Study design: A prospective cohort study was conducted using the ELECTRA database, which consists of clinical data from patients followed at the IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation (Pavia, Italy), linked to regional administrative healthcare databases. Methods: We enrolled patients with new-onset active disease between January 2006 and December 2013 and followed them until their first clinical remission or end of follow-up (December 2015). To assess the association of csDMARD adherence with clinical remission, we estimated the csDMARD proportion of days covered (PDC) during follow-up. PDC was added to the main clinical adjustment covariates as a time-dependent variable in a proportional hazard Cox regression model. Results: The cohort included 324 patients with a mean (SD) age of 58 (13.9) and predominantly female (74.5%). A total of 219 patients (67.6%) achieved clinical remission during follow-up and 85 (26.2%) in the first 6 months (early clinical remission). Cox regression models showed that a 10% increment of PDC increased the probability of achieving clinical remission by 10% (p < 0.001) and the probability of early clinical remission by 21% (p = 0.03). Conclusion: Patients at disease onset with higher adherence to csDMARDs were more likely to achieve clinical remission and early clinical remission. Our study highlighted the importance of close monitoring of patients to increase their likelihood of following therapeutic indications and achieving favorable disease outcomes, such as lower disability.

Systemic and Local Medical or Surgical Therapies for Ear, Nose and/or Throat Manifestations in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis: A Systematic Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: Ear, nose and throat (ENT) manifestations are common in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV), yet how to treat these manifestations remains controversial. Therefore, we systematically reviewed the literature on the efficacy of therapies on ENT manifestations in AAV. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, searching Medline, Embase and Cochrane libraries, including clinical studies between January 2005 and January 2022, in adults with AAV and ENT involvement, reporting on the effects of local and systemic therapy. The critical appraisal was performed using tools provided by the Cochrane Library and the level of evidence (LoE) was scored according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine. RESULTS: After screening 5609 identified studies, 136 full-text articles were assessed. Finally, 31 articles were included for critical appraisal and data-extraction. Nearly all studies (n = 29) were retrospective and scored low on LoE. The included studies evaluated local interventions (n = 11), glucocorticoids combined with conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) (n = 8), rituximab (n = 6), or mepolizumab (n = 6). Due to heterogeneity across studies meta-analysis was not performed. Four studies on mepolizumab for sinonasal symptoms (n = 92) showed response in 33-100% and relapse in 35%. Local therapy for subglottic stenosis was effective in 80-100% of patients in 11 studies (n = 157), but relapses were common (up to 83%). In five studies, hearing improvement was observed in 56-100%, with better outcomes when glucocorticoids were combined with csDMARDs compared to glucocorticoids only. CONCLUSION: Response rates of ENT manifestations varied widely in studies and relapses were observed frequently. Heterogeneity among studies impaired comparison.