ABSTRACT
Inhibitory modulation of glutamatergic information processing is a prerequisite for proper network function. Among the many groups of interneurons (INs), somatostatin-expressing interneurons (SOM-INs) play an important role in the maintenance of physiological brain activity. We have previously shown that somatostatin (SOM) causes a reduction in pyramidal cell (PC) excitability. However, the mechanisms of action of the peptide on cortical synaptic circuits are still unclear. To understand the effects of the neuropeptide SOM on cortical synaptic circuits, we performed a detailed side-by-side comparison of its postsynaptic effects on PCs, SOM-INs, and layer 1 interneurons (L1-INs) in the anterior cingulate cortex of male and female mice and found that SOM produced pronounced postsynaptic effects in PCs while having little to no effect on either IN type. This comparison allowed us to link the observed postsynaptic effects to SOM-induced modulations of glutamatergic and GABAergic synaptic transmission and to trace the impact of the neuropeptide on the neuronal circuitry between these three cell types. We show here that SOM depresses glutamatergic synaptic transmission via a presynaptic mechanism while exerting a differential impact on GABAA receptor- and GABAB receptor-mediated transmission at the pre- and postsynaptic level resulting in a shift of inhibition in L2/3 PCs from L1-INs to SOM-INs. In summary, this study unravels a novel aspect by which SOM modulates synaptic signaling between PCs, L1-INs, and SOM-INs.
Subject(s)
Gyrus Cinguli , Synaptic Transmission , Mice , Male , Animals , Female , Gyrus Cinguli/metabolism , Synaptic Transmission/physiology , Pyramidal Cells/metabolism , Interneurons/physiology , Somatostatin/metabolismABSTRACT
Large scale transitions between active (up) and silent (down) states during quiet wakefulness or NREM sleep regulate fundamental cortical functions and are known to involve both excitatory and inhibitory cells. However, if and how inhibition regulates these activity transitions is unclear. Using fluorescence-targeted electrophysiological recording and cell-specific optogenetic manipulation in both anesthetized and non-anesthetized mice, we found that two major classes of interneurons, the parvalbumin and the somatostatin positive cells, tightly control both up-to-down and down-to-up state transitions. Inhibitory regulation of state transition was observed under both natural and optogenetically-evoked conditions. Moreover, perturbative optogenetic experiments revealed that the inhibitory control of state transition was interneuron-type specific. Finally, local manipulation of small ensembles of interneurons affected cortical populations millimetres away from the modulated region. Together, these results demonstrate that inhibition potently gates transitions between cortical activity states, and reveal the cellular mechanisms by which local inhibitory microcircuits regulate state transitions at the mesoscale.