Choroid plexus mast cells drive tumor-associated hydrocephalus.

Tumor-associated hydrocephalus (TAH) is a common and lethal complication of brain metastases. Although other factors beyond mechanical obstructions have been suggested, the exact mechanisms are unknown. Using single-nucleus RNA sequencing and spatial transcriptomics, we find that a distinct population of mast cells locate in the choroid plexus and dramatically increase during TAH. Genetic fate tracing and intracranial mast-cell-specific tryptase knockout showed that choroid plexus mast cells (CPMCs) disrupt cilia of choroid plexus epithelia via the tryptase-PAR2-FoxJ1 pathway and consequently increase cerebrospinal fluid production. Mast cells are also found in the human choroid plexus. Levels of tryptase in cerebrospinal fluid are closely associated with clinical severity of TAH. BMS-262084, an inhibitor of tryptase, can cross the blood-brain barrier, inhibit TAH in vivo, and alleviate mast-cell-induced damage of epithelial cilia in a human pluripotent stem-cell-derived choroid plexus organoid model. Collectively, we uncover the function of CPMCs and provide an attractive therapy for TAH.

An Allosteric Anti-tryptase Antibody for the Treatment of Mast Cell-Mediated Severe Asthma.

Severe asthma patients with low type 2 inflammation derive less clinical benefit from therapies targeting type 2 cytokines and represent an unmet need. We show that mast cell tryptase is elevated in severe asthma patients independent of type 2 biomarker status. Active ß-tryptase allele count correlates with blood tryptase levels, and asthma patients carrying more active alleles benefit less from anti-IgE treatment. We generated a noncompetitive inhibitory antibody against human ß-tryptase, which dissociates active tetramers into inactive monomers. A 2.15 Å crystal structure of a ß-tryptase/antibody complex coupled with biochemical studies reveal the molecular basis for allosteric destabilization of small and large interfaces required for tetramerization. This anti-tryptase antibody potently blocks tryptase enzymatic activity in a humanized mouse model, reducing IgE-mediated systemic anaphylaxis, and inhibits airway tryptase in Ascaris-sensitized cynomolgus monkeys with favorable pharmacokinetics. These data provide a foundation for developing anti-tryptase as a clinical therapy for severe asthma.

Mast cell activation syndrome: Current understanding and research needs.

Mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS) is a term applied to several clinical entities that have gained increased attention from patients and medical providers. Although several descriptive publications about MCAS exist, there are many gaps in knowledge, resulting in confusion about this clinical syndrome. Whether MCAS is a primary syndrome or exists as a constellation of symptoms in the context of known inflammatory, allergic, or clonal disorders associated with systemic mast cell activation is not well understood. More importantly, the underlying mechanisms and pathways that lead to mast cell activation in MCAS patients remain to be elucidated. Here we summarize the known literature, identify gaps in knowledge, and highlight research needs. Covered topics include contextualization of MCAS and MCAS-like endotypes and related diagnostic evaluations; mechanistic research; management of typical and refractory symptoms; and MCAS-specific education for patients and health care providers.

No indication of aberrant neutrophil extracellular trap release in indolent or advanced systemic mastocytosis.

In disease states with chronic inflammation, there is a crosstalk between mast cells and neutrophil granulocytes in the inflamed microenvironment, which may be potentiated by tryptase. In systemic mastocytosis (SM), mast cells are constitutively active and tryptase is elevated in blood. Mast cell activation in SM leads to symptoms from various organs depending on where the active mast cells reside, for example, palpitations, flush, allergic symptoms including anaphylactic reactions, and osteoporosis. Whether neutrophil function is altered in SM is not well understood. In the current study, we assessed nucleosomal citrullinated histone H3 (H3Cit-DNA) as a proxy for neutrophil extracellular trap release in plasma from 55 patients with indolent and advanced SM. We observed a strong trend towards a correlation between leukocyte count, eosinophil count and neutrophil count and H3Cit-DNA levels in patients with advanced SM but not in indolent SM; however, no differences in H3Cit-DNA levels in SM patients compared with healthy controls. H3Cit-DNA levels did not correlate with SM disease burden, tryptase levels, history of anaphylaxis or presence of cutaneous mastocytosis; thus, there is no evidence of a general neutrophil extracellular trap release in SM. Interestingly, H3Cit-DNA levels and leukocyte counts were elevated in a subgroup of SM patients with aberrant mast cell CD2 expression, which warrants further investigation. In conclusion, we found no evidence of global increase in neutrophil extracellular trap release in SM.

Airway tryptase levels inform the lack of clinical efficacy of the tryptase inhibitor MTPS9579A in asthma.

BACKGROUND: Tryptase, a mast cell protease, has been identified as a potential therapeutic target in managing patients with refractory asthma. We assessed the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of MTPS9579A, an anti-tryptase antibody, in a phase 2a randomized trial for patients with uncontrolled asthma and a phase 1c trial to understand activity within the lower respiratory tract. METHODS: Phase 2a patients (n = 134) received 1800 mg MTPS9579A or placebo intravenously every 4 weeks for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was time to the first composite exacerbation event. Phase 1c patients (n = 27) received one intravenous dose of 300 or 1800 mg MTPS9579A or placebo. Both trials measured MTPS9579A concentrations and effects on tryptase in serum and nasal lining fluid; phase 1c also analyzed bronchial lining fluid. RESULTS: MTPS9579A did not meet the primary endpoint (hazard ratio = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.55-1.47; p = 0.6835); exacerbation rates in the placebo group were low. Serum and nasal MTPS9579A pharmacokinetics and tryptase levels were consistent with data from healthy volunteers. However, in phase 1c patients, compared to nasal levels, MTPS9579A bronchial concentrations were 6.8-fold lower, and bronchial active and total tryptase levels were higher (119-fold and 30-fold, respectively). Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling predicted intravenous doses of 3800 mg every 4 weeks would be necessary to achieve 95% active tryptase inhibition from baseline. CONCLUSIONS: The MTPS9579A dose tested in the phase 2a study was insufficient to inhibit tryptase in bronchial lining fluid, likely contributing to the observed lack of efficacy.

Prevalence of hypersensitivity reactions in various forms of mastocytosis: A pilot study of 2485 adult patients with mastocytosis collected in the ECNM registry.

BACKGROUND: Hypersensitivity reactions (HR) are common in mastocytosis. However, little is known about triggers and risk factors. The registry of the European Competence Network on Mastocytosis (ECNM) enables reliable studies in a larger cohort of mastocytosis patients. We assessed prevalence, triggers and risk factors of HR in adults with mastocytosis in the ECNM registry. METHODS: Data were collected in 27 ECNM centers. We analyzed potential triggers (Hymenoptera venoms, food, drug, inhalant and others) and risk factors at diagnosis and during follow-up. The study group consisted of 2485 adults with mastocytosis, 1379 women (55.5%) and 1106 men (44.5%). Median age was 48.2 years (range 18-91 years). RESULTS: Nine hundred and forty eight patients (38.1%) reported one or more HR`. Most common triggers were Hymenoptera venoms in cutaneous mastocytosis (CM) and indolent systemic mastocytosis (ISM), whereas in advanced SM (advSM), most common elicitors were drugs, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents and penicillin. In multivariate analyses, tryptase level < 90 ng/mL, <15% infiltration by mast cells in bone marrow biopsy-sections, and diagnosis of ISM were identified as independent risk factors for HR. For drug-induced HR, prominent risk factors were advSM and high tryptase levels. New reactions were observed in 4.8% of all patients during 4 years follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: HR are mainly triggered by Hymenoptera venoms in patients with CM and ISM and by drugs in patients with advSM. Tryptase levels <90 ng/mL, mast cell bone marrow infiltration <15%, and WHO category ISM are predictors of HR. New HR occur in 4.8% of all patients within 4 years.

Luteolin Is More Potent than Cromolyn in Their Ability to Inhibit Mediator Release from Cultured Human Mast Cells.

INTRODUCTION: Mast cells are known for their involvement in allergic reactions but also in inflammatory reactions via secretion of numerous pro-inflammatory chemokines, cytokines, and enzymes. Drug development has focused on antiproliferative therapy for systemic mastocytosis and not on inhibitors of mast cell activation. The only drug available as a "mast cell blocker" is disodium cromoglycate (cromolyn), but it is poorly absorbed after oral administration, is a weak inhibitor of histamine release from human mast cells, and it develops rapid anaphylaxis. Instead, certain natural flavonoids, especially luteolin, can inhibit mast cell activation. METHODS: Here, we compared pretreatment (0-120 min) with equimolar concentration (effective dose for 50% inhibition = 100 mm for inhibition of histamine release by cromolyn) of cromolyn and luteolin on release of mediators from the cultured human LADR mast cell line stimulated either by immunoglobulin E (IgE) and anti-IgE or with IL-33. RESULTS: We show that luteolin is significantly more potent than cromolyn inhibiting release of histamine, tryptase, metalloproteinase-9, and vascular endothelial growth factor. Moreover, while luteolin also significantly inhibited release of IL-1ß, IL-6, and IL-8 (CXCL8) and TNF, cromolyn had no effect. CONCLUSION: These findings support the use of luteolin, especially in liposomal form to increase oral absorption, may be a useful alternative to cromolyn.

Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Management of Biphasic Anaphylaxis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Biphasic anaphylaxis is a variant of anaphylaxis characterized by recurrence of symptoms after initial resolution of anaphylaxis. It was first described in the mid 1990s by Popa and Lerner. Our understanding of the pathophysiology and epidemiology of the condition has advanced considerably since then. The purpose of this manuscript is to review the literature surrounding biphasic anaphylaxis while highlighting key works and recent advances. RECENT FINDINGS: Prior studies have estimated biphasic anaphylaxis occurs in 0.4-20% of anaphylaxis episodes. The wide range may be related to differences in anaphylaxis diagnostic criteria which was inconsistent across studies. Recently identified risk factors for occurrence of biphasic anaphylaxis include severe initial symptoms including hypotension or hypoxia, delay in epinephrine use, and greater than one dose of epinephrine required to treat symptoms. Despite our progress to better understand biphasic anaphylaxis, there remain gaps in the literature. This article aims to review the recent literature including, epidemiology, risk factors, and management of biphasic anaphylaxis.

Predictors of Clonality and Underlying Mastocytosis in Mast Cell Activation Syndromes.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Mast cell (MC) activation can present with a wide range of symptoms. The mechanisms that cause such activation are varied. One of them is the presence of clonal MCs which is defined, within other possible changes, by the presence of a somatic, activating mutation in the KIT gene. The clinical course and prognosis of patients with this underlying disease may be different from other causes of MC activation (MCA). For this reason, it is important to early diagnose, or at least suspect, which patients with MCA are due to clonal MCs. RECENT FINDINGS: The diagnosis of clonality must be made in a comprehensive manner. However, this paper reviews chronologically each of the stages from the patient's first visit to the doctor's office which can be indicative of clonality: clinical presentation of MCA, physical examination, analytical determinations of tryptase, and/or KIT mutational analysis and bone involvement, among others. The different clonality predictive scores proposed are also reviewed and compared. Although the gold standard for the diagnosis of certainty of MC clonality is the performance of a bone marrow (BM) biopsy, there are clinical symptoms, signs, and biological parameters suggestive of clonality, as well as predictive scores, which can guide (or rule out) an early diagnosis and avoid unnecessary BM biopsies.

Reversible Elevation of Tryptase Over the Individual's Baseline: Why is It the Best Biomarker for Severe Systemic Mast Cell Activation and MCAS?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Mast cell (MC) activation syndromes (MCAS) are conditions defined by recurrent episodes of severe systemic anaphylaxis or similar systemic events triggered by MC-derived mediators that can be measured in biological fluids. Since some symptoms of MC activation may occur due to other, non-MC etiologies and lead to confusion over diagnosis, it is of crucial importance to document the involvement of MC and their products in the patients´ symptomatology. RECENT FINDINGS: The most specific and generally accepted marker of severe systemic MC activation is an event-related, transient increase in the serum tryptase level over the individual baseline of the affected individual. However, baseline concentrations of serum tryptase vary among donors, depending on the genetic background, age, kidney function, and underlying disease. As a result, it is of critical importance to provide a flexible equation that defines the diagnostic increase in tryptase qualifying as MCAS criterion in all patients, all situations, and all ranges of baseline serum tryptase. In 2012, the consensus group proposed the 120% + 2 ng/ml formula, which covers the great majority of groups, including cases with low, normal, or elevated basal serum tryptase level. This formula has been validated in subsequent studies and has proven to be a robust and consistent diagnostic criterion of MCAS. The present article is discussing the impact of this formula and possible limitations as well as alternative markers and mediators that may be indicative of MCAS.

Alpha-Tryptase as a Risk-Modifying Factor for Mast Cell-Mediated Reactions.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To provide an overview on the current understanding of genetic variability in human tryptases and summarize the literature demonstrating the differential impact of mature tryptases on mast cell-mediated reactions and associated clinical phenotypes. RECENT FINDINGS: It is becoming increasingly recognized that tryptase gene composition, and in particular the common genetic trait hereditary alpha-tryptasemia (HαT), impacts clinical allergy. HαT has consistently been associated with clonal mast cell disorders (MCD) and has also been associated with more frequent anaphylaxis among these patients, and patients in whom no allergic trigger can be found, specifically idiopathic anaphylaxis. Additionally, more severe anaphylaxis among Hymenoptera venom allergy patients has been linked to HαT in both retrospective and prospective studies. An increased relative number of α-tryptase-encoding gene copies, even in the absence of HαT, has also been associated with systemic mastocytosis and has been shown to positively correlate with the severity of mast cell-mediated reactions to vibration and food. These findings may be due to increased generation of α/ß-tryptase heterotetramers and differences in their enzymatic activity relative to ß-tryptase homotetramers. HαT is a naturally occurring overexpression model of α-tryptase in humans. Increased relative α-tryptase expression modifies immediate hypersensitivity symptoms and is associated with more frequent and severe mast cell-mediated reactions, ostensibly due to increased α/ß-tryptase heterotetramer production.

Using the Right Criteria for MCAS.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The current article aims to provide a comprehensive update on diagnostic criteria for mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), addressing challenges in diagnosing and classifying MCAS and its variants. RECENT FINDINGS: In recent years, there has been a significant increase in our knowledge regarding the underlying mechanisms responsible for the activation of mast cells (MCs) in various pathological conditions. Furthermore, a set of criteria and a classification for MCASs have been established. MCAS is characterized by the presence of typical clinical symptoms, a substantial elevation in serum tryptase levels during an attack compared to the patient's baseline tryptase levels, and a response to MC mediator-targeting therapy. In this report, a thorough examination was conducted on the contemporary literature relating to MCAS, with a focus on comparing the specificity, sensitivity, and robustness of MCAS-related parameters within proposals for diagnosing and classifying MCAS and its variants. Moreover, the significance of employing specific consensus criteria in the assessment and categorization of MCAS in individual patients was underscored, due to the escalating occurrence of patients receiving a misdiagnosis of MCAS based on nonspecific criteria.

Mast Cells in Aspirin-Exacerbated Respiratory Disease.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) is a syndrome of high type 2 inflammation and is known to critically involve mast cell activation. The mast cell is an important cell in the baseline inflammatory processes in the upper and lower airway by maintaining and amplifying type 2 inflammation. But it also is prominent in the hypersensitivity reaction to COX-1 inhibition which defines this condition. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent work highlights the mast cell as a focal point in AERD pathogenesis. Using AERD as a specific model of both high type 2 asthma and chronic sinusitis, the role of mast cell activity can be better understood in other aspects of airway inflammation. Further dissecting out the mechanism of COX-1-mediated mast cell activation in AERD will be an important next phase in our understanding of NSAID-induced hypersensitivity as well as AERD pathophysiology.

Short-term biological variation of serum tryptase.

OBJECTIVES: Serum tryptase is a biomarker of mast cell activation. Among others, it is used in the diagnosis of anaphylaxis where a significant increase during the acute phase supports the diagnosis. When evaluating changes in biomarker levels, it is of utmost importance to consider the biological variation of the marker. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term biological variation of serum tryptase. METHODS: Blood samples were drawn at 9 AM three days in a row from apparently healthy subjects. On day two, additional blood samples were drawn every third hour for 12 h. The tryptase concentration was measured in serum using a fluoroenzyme immunoassay (ImmunoCAP™, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Linear mixed-effects models were used to calculate components of biological variation. RESULTS: In 32 subjects, the overall mean concentration of tryptase was 4.0 ng/mL (range, 1.3-8.0 ng/mL). The within-subject variation was 3.7 % (95 % confidence interval (CI) 3.0-4.4 %), the between-subject variation was 31.5 % (95 % CI 23.1-39.8 %), and the analytical variation was 3.4 % (95 % CI 2.9-4.1 %). The reference change value was 13.3 % for an increase in tryptase at a 95 % level of significance. No significant day-to-day variation was observed (p=0.77), while a minute decrease in the serum concentration was observed during the day (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Serum tryptase is a tightly regulated biomarker with very low within-subject variation, no significant day-to-day variation, and only minor semidiurnal variation. In contrast, a considerable between-subject variation exists. This establishes serum tryptase as a well-suited biomarker for monitoring.

Mast Cell Activation Syndrome and Gut Dysfunction: Diagnosis and Management.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS) is a clinical disorder that may explain irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) type symptoms as well as other allergic symptoms experienced by an individual. The diagnosis and treatment of MCAS with specific focus on gastrointestinal (GI) manifestations is reviewed. RECENT FINDINGS: Although biomarkers for MCAS remain elusive, testing for baseline serum tryptase will distinguish the type of mast cell disorder and urine tests for mast cell mediator metabolites may support the diagnosis. Endoscopy and Colonoscopy with biopsies is not used to diagnose MCAS but is important to rule out other conditions that may cause symptoms. There is increased awareness of the association between MCAS and autonomic dysfunction, small fiber neuropathy, and connective tissue disorders which all impact GI symptoms. MCAS is a disorder often of unknown etiology (idiopathic) and characterized by intermittent allergy type symptoms that affect multiple organ systems after exposure to a trigger. GI symptoms including abdominal cramping and loose stool are prominent and mimic those of IBS. Diagnostic testing is performed to assess for elevations in mast cell mediators during symptoms and to rule out other conditions. A comprehensive treatment plan includes medications that target mast cells, treatments for associated conditions including autonomic dysfunction, and management of comorbid psychiatric illness and nutritional deficits.

Epidemiology of perioperative anaphylaxis in France in 2017-2018: the 11th GERAP survey.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative anaphylaxis is rare but is associated with significant morbidity. This complication has been well described in France by the GERAP (Groupe d'Etude des Réactions Anaphylactiques Périopératoires), a network focused on its study. The epidemiology of perioperative anaphylaxis is evolving, influenced by environmental factors and clinical practice. The aim of this study was to update the epidemiology of perioperative anaphylaxis in France. METHODS: This multicentre retrospective study was performed in 26 allergy clinics of the GERAP network in 2017-8. RESULTS: There were 765 patients with perioperative anaphylaxis included. Most cases were severe, with 428 (56%) reactions graded as 3 or 4 according to the Ring and Messmer classification. Skin test results were available for 676 patients, with a culprit agent identified in 471 cases (70%). Neuromuscular blocking agents were the main cause of perioperative anaphylaxis (n=281; 60%), followed by antibiotics (n=118; 25%) and patent blue dye (n=11; 2%). Cefazolin was the main antibiotic responsible for perioperative anaphylaxis (52% of antibiotic-related reactions). Suxamethonium and rocuronium were the main neuromuscular blocking agents responsible for perioperative anaphylaxis with 7.1 (6.1-8.4) and 5.6 (4.2-7.4) reactions per 100,000 vials sold, respectively, whereas cefazolin-related cases were estimated at 0.7 (0.5-0.9) reactions per 100,000 vials sold. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that most commonly identified triggering agents remain neuromuscular blocking agents. Reactions to antibiotics, particularly cefazolin, are becoming increasingly frequent. The origin of sensitisation to cefazolin is unknown, as no cross-sensitisation has been described, and it should be the subject of further study. Perioperative anaphylaxis should be followed over the years and understood given the changing triggers. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04654923).

A comparison of mast cells in skin biopsies of cutaneous mastocytosis with other inflammatory dermatoses: A study of 33 cases.

BACKGROUND: Histopathologic criteria for diagnosis of cutaneous mastocytosis include 20 mast cells per high-power field or clusters of 15 mast cells. We aimed to determine the specificity of these criteria for cutaneous mastocytosis in comparison with inflammatory disorders of mast cell activation. METHODS: Twenty-six cases of spongiotic dermatitis or urticaria were identified from 2021 to 2022. Recuts were stained with mast cell tryptase and slides were reviewed for the presence of 20 mast cells per high-power field and for clusters of 15 mast cells. In addition, seven cases of mastocytosis were reviewed for the same criteria. RESULTS: Twelve of 26 cases (46.1%) of spongiotic dermatitis/urticaria had at least 20 mast cells per high-power field. Three of 26 cases (11.5%) of spongiotic dermatitis/urticaria had a cluster of 15 mast cells. Six of seven cases (85.7%) of mastocytosis had at least 20 mast cells per high-power field; four of seven cases (57.1%) of mastocytosis had a cluster of 15 mast cells. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, the finding of 20 mast cells per high-power field was nonspecific as a single criterion for cutaneous mastocytosis. The finding of clusters of 15 mast cells was more specific but not sensitive.

Expression of CD25, mast cell markers and T-cell markers in eosinophilic esophagitis.

While eosinophilic esophagitis (EOE) is defined by histologic presence of eosinophils, a few studies have established the presence of mast cells in EOE and even shown their correlation with symptom persistence despite resolution of eosinophils. Expression of aberrant mast cell markers CD25 and CD2 have not been studied in EOE. This study quantifies the number of hotspot cells per high power field expressing CKIT/CD117, tryptase, CD25, CD2 and CD3 by immunohistochemical stains in endoscopic esophageal biopsies of the following three cohorts: (1) established and histologically confirmed EOE, (2) suspected EOE with biopsies negative for eosinophils, and (3) no history of or suspicion for EOE with histologically unremarkable biopsies. In this study, mast cells were highlighted by CKIT and tryptase in EOE, and not seen in other clinically mimicking cases. There were also significantly higher densities of CD25 and pan-T-cell marker staining in EOE cases. These findings suggest an inflammatory cellular milieu in EOE, beyond just eosinophils, that can be demonstrated by immunohistochemistry, and that invite further study into the role that these cells may play in EOE.

Anaphylaxis biomarkers: present and future.

Summary: Anaphylaxis is a severe, rapidly developing, and life-threatening systemic hypersensitivity reaction. The diagnosis of anaphylaxis is primarily clinical. Numerous studies on the mechanisms and the biomarkers of the disease are initiated every year. The biomarkers of anaphylaxis may become an important tool for the diagnosis, prevention, repeated risk assessment, severity stratification, and new therapeutic strategies for treatment of the disease. Various immune and non-immune mediators produced and released by effector cell populations are currently considered as biomarkers of anaphylaxis. Here, we review the current data on potential biomarkers of anaphylaxis and the possibilities and perspectives for their use in future clinical practice.

Clinical spectrum of patients diagnosed with childhood mastocytosis: a retrospective single center experience.

Summary: Background. Pediatric cutaneous mastocytosis patients diagnosed and followed up by our specialist were enrolled in this study, and clinical and laboratory evaluations were retrospectively analyzed from patients' archived files. Methods. Patients, who applied to the Division of Pediatric Allergy And Immunology Unit of a University Training and Research Hospital between 01.01.2010 and 28.04.2021, were enrolled in this study. Results. Of the 33 patients included in the study, 11 (33.3%) were female and 22 (67.7%) were male. The median age of onset of the patient's complaints was 7 (0-60) months. The median age at diagnosis was 11 (2-64) months. Their complaints' median regression age was 54 (6-192) months. Resistant clinical findings were followed in 13 (39.4%) patients. Itching, redness, gastrointestinal symptoms, and maculopapular eruption were the most common complaints. The rashes were mostly polymorphic and larger than 1 cm. Heat was the most common trigger. Darier's sign was positive in 97% of the patients. Antihistamines were the most commonly used drug for prophylaxis and treatment. The autoinjector prescription rate was 24.2%. Conclusions. Quality of life was mildly affected in 48,5% of the patients based on the CDLQI scores. Thus, patients should be followed up through adolescence for the development of systemic signs and symptoms.