Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 78
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc ; 24(4): 360-371, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29103404

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Adverse effects of heavy drinking on cognition have frequently been reported. In the present study, we systematically examined for the first time whether clinical neuropsychological assessments may be sensitive to alcohol abuse in elderly patients with suspected minor neurocognitive disorder. METHODS: A total of 144 elderly with and without alcohol abuse (each group n=72; mean age 66.7 years) were selected from a patient pool of n=738 by applying propensity score matching (a statistical method allowing to match participants in experimental and control group by balancing various covariates to reduce selection bias). Accordingly, study groups were almost perfectly matched regarding age, education, gender, and Mini Mental State Examination score. Neuropsychological performance was measured using the CERAD (Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease). Classification analyses (i.e., decision tree and boosted trees models) were conducted to examine whether CERAD variables or total score contributed to group classification. RESULTS: Decision tree models disclosed that groups could be reliably classified based on the CERAD variables "Word List Discriminability" (tapping verbal recognition memory, 64% classification accuracy) and "Trail Making Test A" (measuring visuo-motor speed, 59% classification accuracy). Boosted tree analyses further indicated the sensitivity of "Word List Recall" (measuring free verbal recall) for discriminating elderly with versus without a history of alcohol abuse. CONCLUSIONS: This indicates that specific CERAD variables seem to be sensitive to alcohol-related cognitive dysfunctions in elderly patients with suspected minor neurocognitive disorder. (JINS, 2018, 24, 360-371).


Subject(s)
Alcohol-Related Disorders/complications , Cognitive Dysfunction/diagnosis , Cognitive Dysfunction/etiology , Neuropsychological Tests/standards , Aged , Alcohol-Related Disorders/classification , Case-Control Studies , Cognitive Dysfunction/classification , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity
2.
Alcohol Alcohol ; 53(3): 294-301, 2018 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29236958

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The goals of the current study were to identify latent classes of alcohol users among Italian emerging adults (18-33 years), examine differences in the class solution based on socio-demographic characteristics, and examine whether differences exist across classes in experiencing different types of alcohol-related negative consequences. METHODS: Participants (N = 5955; 62.72% female; mean age 27.19 years) were drawn from a pre-recruited Web panel designed to be representative of the Italian young adults (18-33 years) population. Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to identify common patterns of alcohol use. RESULTS: Four classes of drinking patterns were identified: (a) Current Nondrinkers (15%); (b) Weekend Non-Risky Drinkers (51%); (c) Weekend Risky Drinkers (20%); and (d) Daily Drinkers (13%). The number and type of classes did not differ across several demographic variables, although proportions within classes varied by sex, age, occupation status and geographic area. Weekend Risky Drinkers experienced the greatest number of alcohol-related negative consequences. CONCLUSIONS: The great majority of the sample displayed drinking patterns with relatively infrequent involvement in risky drinking. Preventive interventions should, instead, target those who drink alcohol on weekends only, but show the greatest negative consequences. SHORT SUMMARY: Four classes of drinking patterns were identified in a large representative sample of Italian young adults. The great majority of the sample displayed drinking patterns with relatively little involvement in risky drinking, though those misusing alcohol at weekends were at greatest risk to experience alcohol-related negative consequences.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Abstinence/classification , Alcohol Abstinence/trends , Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Alcohol Drinking/trends , Alcohol-Related Disorders/classification , Alcohol-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Alcohol-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Risk Behaviors , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Young Adult
3.
Psychol Med ; 46(8): 1769-84, 2016 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27019218

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Item response theory (IRT) analyses of alcohol use disorder (AUD) and other psychological disorders are a predominant method for assessing overall and individual criterion severity for psychiatric diagnosis. However, no investigation has established the consistency of the relative criteria severities across different samples. METHOD: PubMed/Medline, PsycINFO, Web of Science and ProQuest databases were queried for entries relating to alcohol use and IRT. Study data were extracted using a standardized data entry sheet. Consistency of reported criteria severities across studies was analysed using generalizability theory to estimate generalized intraclass correlations (ICCs). RESULTS: A total of 451 citations were screened and 34 papers (30 unique samples) included in the research synthesis. The AUD criteria set exhibited low consistency in the ordering of criteria using both traditional [ICC = 0.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06-0.56] and generalized (ICC = 0.18, 95% CI 0.15-0.21) approaches. These results were partially accounted for by previously studied factors such as age and type of sample (e.g. clinical v. community), but the largest source of unreliability was the diagnostic instrument employed. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the robust finding of unidimensional structure of AUDs, inconsistency in the relative severities across studies suggests low replicability, challenging the generalizability of findings from any given study. Explicit modeling of well-studied factors like age and sample type is essential and increases the generalizability of findings. Moreover, while the development of structured diagnostic interviews is considered a landmark contribution toward improving psychiatric research, variability across instruments has not been fully appreciated and is substantial.


Subject(s)
Alcoholism/diagnosis , Alcohol-Related Disorders/classification , Alcohol-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Alcoholism/classification , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Severity of Illness Index
4.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res ; 40(8): 1728-36, 2016 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27426631

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The current study sought to examine the diagnostic overlap in DSM-IV and DSM-5 alcohol use disorder (AUD) and determine the clinical correlates of changing diagnostic status across the 2 classification systems. METHODS: DSM-IV and DSM-5 definitions of AUD were compared using cross-national community survey data in 9 low-, middle-, and high-income countries. Participants were 31,367 respondents to surveys in the World Health Organization's World Mental Health Survey Initiative. The Composite International Diagnostic Interview, version 3.0, was used to derive DSM-IV and DSM-5 lifetime diagnoses of AUD. Clinical characteristics, also assessed in the surveys, included lifetime DSM-IV anxiety; mood and drug use disorders; lifetime suicidal ideation, plan, and attempt; general functional impairment; and psychological distress. RESULTS: Compared with DSM-IV AUD (12.3%, SE = 0.3%), the DSM-5 definition yielded slightly lower prevalence estimates (10.8%, SE = 0.2%). Almost one-third (n = 802) of all DSM-IV abuse cases switched to subthreshold according to DSM-5 and one-quarter (n = 467) of all DSM-IV diagnostic orphans switched to mild AUD according to DSM-5. New cases of DSM-5 AUD were largely similar to those who maintained their AUD across both classifications. Similarly, new DSM-5 noncases were similar to those who were subthreshold across both classifications. The exception to this was with regard to the prevalence of any lifetime drug use disorder. CONCLUSIONS: In this large cross-national community sample, the prevalence of DSM-5 lifetime AUD was only slightly lower than the prevalence of DSM-IV lifetime AUD. Nonetheless, there was considerable diagnostic switching, with a large number of people inconsistently identified across the 2 DSM classifications.


Subject(s)
Alcohol-Related Disorders/classification , Alcohol-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Global Health/classification , Health Surveys/classification , Mental Health/classification , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alcohol-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Surveys/standards , Humans , Internationality , Male , Middle Aged , World Health Organization , Young Adult
5.
Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract ; 19(2): 137-47, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25666860

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The current nosological classifications may describe a syndrome of "alcoholism" that is too heterogeneous to produce prognostic models for clinical management. Multidimensional alcoholism typologies (ATs) could represent a valuable paradigm in the search for targeted treatment. The main goal of this study was to evaluate the clinical implications of 3 empirically-validated ATs, focusing on various measures of clinical performance. METHOD: This was a 3-month naturalistic study in which drinking status, and participation in the clinical protocol and group psychotherapy were recorded and used as indicators of treatment performance. The clinical profiles of the subtypes were also compared and graphically presented. Alcohol-dependent outpatients were classified according to the Cloninger, Lesch, and NETER typologies. RESULTS: The results showed that the type II (Cloninger), type IV (Lesch), and sociopathic and addictopathic (NETER) subgroups showed a worse outcome in terms of abstinence rates and clinical healthcare resource use. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings point to the need to differentiate multidimensional alcoholism subtypes before planning the clinical management of alcohol use disorders.


Subject(s)
Alcohol-Related Disorders/classification , Alcohol-Related Disorders/therapy , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outpatients , Prospective Studies , Young Adult
6.
Psychiatr Pol ; 49(2): 295-304, 2015.
Article in Polish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26093593

ABSTRACT

The aim of the article was to assess how the perception of alcohol craving, which is one of the symptoms of alcohol dependence, evolved, as well as how it was reflected in the diagnostic classifications. The purpose of this article was also a discussion of the models of the origins of craving, explaining the etiology of this phenomenon and the tools for measuring this concept. The concept of craving, defined as a strong need or compulsion to drink alcohol, functioned for many years, not only in the clinical practice but also as a concept inherently associated with alcohol dependence. However, among experts and researchers, there was no consensus about the etiology of this phenomenon and its development. Some emphasize the emotional - motivational aspect of it, while in the literature also its cognitive - behavioral nature is highlighted. Craving as a symptom has been recognized as a diagnostic criterion of alcohol dependence in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems - ICD 10. In the year 2013, it was also indicated as a symptom of disorder resulting from alcohol abuse in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - DSM 5. It seems to be significant also to discuss the tools used to measure craving, both in clinical trials and therapeutic practice, among them: the Alcohol Specific Role Play Test, Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale (OCDS) Lubeck Craving Scale (LCRR) and Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ).


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Alcohol-Related Disorders/classification , Alcohol-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Craving/classification , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Humans , Risk Factors
7.
Psychol Med ; 44(15): 3303-14, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25065388

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The DSM-5 alcohol use disorder (AUD) criteria proposal contains 11 criteria that include most of the DSM-IV abuse and dependence criteria plus craving. The aims of the current study in a large and international alcohol-consuming sample were to confirm the dimensionality of the DSM-5 AUD criteria and to differentiate grades of severity of DSM-5 AUD in subjects who pass the proposed DSM-5 diagnostic threshold of two criteria. METHOD: We used the World Health Organization (WHO)/International Society on Biomedical Research on Alcoholism (ISBRA) Study on State and Trait Markers of Alcohol Use and Dependence dataset. Subjects included in the analyses were aged ≥ 18 years and were recruited in five countries: Australia, Brazil, Canada, Finland and Japan. Assessment of AUD and additional characteristics was conducted using an adapted version of the Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule (AUDADIS). Dimensionality of the DSM-5 criteria was evaluated using factor analysis and item response theory (IRT) models. The IRT results led to the classification of AUD patients into three severity groups. External validators were used to differentiate statistically across subgroups. RESULTS: A total of 1424 currently drinking individuals were included in the analyses. Factor and IRT analyses confirmed the dimensional structure of DSM-5 AUD criteria. More than 99% of the subjects could be allocated to one of the suggested severity subgroups. The magnitude of the external validators differed significantly across the severity groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirm the dimensional structure of the proposed DSM-5 AUD criteria. The suggested stages of severity (mild, moderate and severe) may be useful to clinicians by grouping individuals not only in the mild but also in the moderate to severe spectrum of DSM-5 AUD.


Subject(s)
Alcohol-Related Disorders/classification , Severity of Illness Index , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alcohol-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Australia , Brazil , Canada , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Disease Progression , Female , Finland , Humans , Japan , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
8.
Psychol Med ; 44(1): 143-59, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23551901

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is evidence that measures of alcohol consumption, dependence and abuse are valid indicators of qualitatively different subtypes of alcohol involvement yet also fall along a continuum. The present study attempts to resolve the extent to which variations in alcohol involvement reflect a difference in kind versus a difference in degree. METHOD: Data were taken from the 2001-2002 National Epidemiologic Survey of Alcohol and Related Conditions. The sample (51% male; 72% white/non-Hispanic) included respondents reporting past 12-month drinking at both waves (wave 1: n = 33644; wave 2: n = 25186). We compared factor mixture models (FMMs), a hybrid of common factor analysis (FA) and latent class analysis (LCA), against FA and LCA models using past 12-month alcohol use disorder (AUD) criteria and five indicators of alcohol consumption reflecting frequency and heaviness of drinking. RESULTS: Model comparison revealed that the best-fitting model at wave 1 was a one-factor four-class FMM, with classes primarily varying across dependence and consumption indices. The model was replicated using wave 2 data, and validated against AUD and dependence diagnoses. Class stability from waves 1 to 2 was moderate, with greatest agreement for the infrequent drinking class. Within-class associations in the underlying latent factor also revealed modest agreement over time. CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence that alcohol involvement can be considered both categorical and continuous, with responses reduced to four patterns that quantitatively vary along a single dimension. Nosologists may consider hybrid approaches involving groups that vary in pattern of consumption and dependence symptomatology as well as variation of severity within group.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking , Alcoholism/classification , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome , Adolescent , Adult , Alcohol-Related Disorders/classification , Central Nervous System Depressants/adverse effects , Ethanol/adverse effects , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Theoretical , Risk-Taking , Severity of Illness Index , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/etiology , Young Adult
9.
Prescrire Int ; 23(153): 247, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25964978

ABSTRACT

A meta-analysis suggests that brief behavioural interventions can help some drinkers reduce their declared alcohol consumption.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Abstinence , Alcohol Drinking/prevention & control , Alcohol-Related Disorders/therapy , Behavior Therapy/methods , Psychotherapy, Brief , Alcohol Drinking/psychology , Alcohol-Related Disorders/classification , Alcohol-Related Disorders/psychology , Humans , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
10.
Am J Addict ; 21(3): 233-42, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22494225

ABSTRACT

One major limitation of the DSM-IV criteria for alcohol abuse and dependence is that a cluster of individuals who endorse a subthreshold number of dependence criteria and no abuse criteria do not receive a formal diagnosis; despite elevated risk for alcohol-related problems relative to those with an abuse diagnosis. These individuals have been referred to as diagnostic orphans. The primary aim of this study was to examine alcohol use correlates of a group of diagnostic orphans in a sample of 396 nontreatment seeking college students who reported drinking on at least one occasion in the last 90 days. DSM-IV criteria were assessed using a modified version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview-Substance Abuse Module (CIDI-SAM). Diagnostic orphans represented 34.1% (n = 135) of the original sample who did not receive a formal diagnosis; with the most frequently endorsed dependence criteria being tolerance and drinking larger/longer amounts than intended. Diagnostic orphans reported a range of alcohol-related negative consequences and reported greater frequencies of social and enhancement drinking motives in comparison to coping motives. They were similar to alcohol abusers and dissimilar to those with dependence or those without a diagnosis on alcohol consumption, alcohol problem severity, drinking motives and restraint variables. The present findings indicate that diagnostic orphans in college students represent a distinct group of drinkers who may be at risk for the development of alcohol use disorders and may be in need of intervention, given their similarity to those with an abuse diagnosis. Prevention and intervention efforts across college campuses should target this group to prevent escalation of alcohol problem severity.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking , Alcohol-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Alcoholism/diagnosis , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Adolescent , Alcohol-Related Disorders/classification , Alcoholism/classification , Female , Humans , Male , Students , Universities , Young Adult
11.
Subst Use Misuse ; 47(3): 318-28, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22080725

ABSTRACT

This study utilized data from a National Institute on Drug Abuse and National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism funded community-based HIV prevention program in the Midwest in 2000. We categorized women who met lifetime criteria for alcohol dependence (using the DIS) and who also had used cocaine (n = 324) into four alcohol typologies based on onset of regular drinking and the length of time to dependence. The Risk Behavior Assessment measured sex behaviors, combined into a risk index, before and after the program. Generalized linear modeling compared decreases over time. Women who began drinking regularly later and became dependent more slowly significantly decreased risky sex behaviors. Tailored prevention protocols may more effectively decrease HIV risk.


Subject(s)
Alcohol-Related Disorders/psychology , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Risk-Taking , Sexual Behavior/psychology , Unsafe Sex/psychology , Adult , Alcohol-Related Disorders/classification , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (U.S.) , National Institute on Drug Abuse (U.S.) , United States
12.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res ; 34(6): 1073-83, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20374206

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We have previously reported on an empirical classification of Alcohol Dependence (AD) individuals into subtypes using nationally representative general population data from the 2001 to 2002 Wave 1 of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC) and latent class analysis. Our results suggested a typology of 5 separate clusters based upon age of onset of AD, multigenerational familial AD, rates of antisocial personality disorder (ASPD), endorsement of specific AD and Alcohol Abuse (AA) criteria, and the presence of comorbid mood, anxiety, and substance use disorders (SUD). In this report, we focus on the clinical follow-up of these cluster members in Wave 2 of the NESARC (2004 to 2005). METHODS: The mean interval between NESARC Wave 1 and NESARC Wave 2 interviews was 36.6 (SD = 2.6) months. For these analyses, we utilized a Wave 2 NESARC sample that was comprised of a total of 1,172 individuals who were initially ascertained as having past-year AD at NESARC Wave 1 and initially subtyped into one of 5 groupings using latent class analysis. We identified these subtypes as: (i) Young Adult, characterized by very early age of onset, minimal family history, and low rates of psychiatric and SUD comorbidity; (ii) Functional, characterized by older age of onset, higher psychosocial functioning, minimal family history, and low rates of psychiatric and SUD comorbidity; (iii) Intermediate Familial, characterized by older age of onset, significant familial AD, and elevated comorbid rates of mood disorders SUD; (iv) Young Antisocial, characterized by early age of onset and elevated rates of ASPD, significant familial AD, and elevated rates of comorbid mood disorders and SUD; (v) Chronic Severe, characterized by later onset, elevated rates of ASPD, significant familial AD, and elevated rates of comorbid mood disorders and SUD. In this report, we examine Wave 2 recovery status, health status, alcohol consumption behavior, and treatment episodes based upon these subtypes. RESULTS: Significantly fewer of the Young Adult and Functional subtypes continued to meet full DSM-IV AD criteria in Wave 2 than did the Intermediate Familial, the Young Antisocial, and the Chronic Severe subtypes. However, we did not find that treatment seeking for alcohol problems increased over Wave 1 reports. In Wave 2, Young Antisocial and Chronic Severe subtypes had highest rates of past-year treatment seeking. In terms of health status, the Intermediate Familial, the Young Antisocial, and the Chronic Severe subtypes had significantly worse mental health scores than the Young Adult and Functional subtypes. For physical health status, the Functional, Intermediate Familial, Young Antisocial, and the Chronic Severe subtypes had significantly worse scores than the Young Adult subtype. In terms of alcohol consumption behavior, the Young Adult, Functional, and Young Antisocial subtypes significantly reduced their risk drinking days between Wave 1 and Wave 2, whereas the Intermediate Familial and the Chronic Severe subtypes did not. DISCUSSION: The results suggest that the empirical AD typology predicts differential clinical outcomes 3 years later. Persistence of full AD, treatment seeking, and worse mental health status were associated most strongly with those subtypes manifesting the greatest degree of psychiatric comorbidity. Reductions in alcohol consumption behavior and good physical health status were seen among the 2 younger subtypes. Overall, the least prevalent subtype, the Chronic Severe, showed the greatest stability in the manifestations of AD, despite having the highest rate of treatment seeking.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Alcohol-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Alcoholism/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Status , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Adult , Alcohol-Related Disorders/classification , Alcohol-Related Disorders/therapy , Alcoholism/classification , Alcoholism/diagnosis , Alcoholism/therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (U.S.) , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
13.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res ; 33(5): 868-78, 2009 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19320629

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is limited information on the validity of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) alcohol use disorders (AUD) symptom criteria among adolescents in the general population. The purpose of this study is to assess the DSM-IV AUD symptom criteria as reported by adolescent and adult drinkers in a single representative sample of the U.S. population aged 12 years and older. This design avoids potential confounding due to differences in survey methodology when comparing adolescents and adults from different surveys. METHODS: A total of 133,231 current drinkers (had at least 1 drink in the past year) aged 12 years and older were drawn from respondents to the 2002 to 2005 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health. DSM-IV AUD criteria were assessed by questions related to specific symptoms occurring during the past 12 months. Factor analytic and item response theory models were applied to the 11 AUD symptom criteria to assess the probabilities of symptom item endorsements across different values of the underlying trait. RESULTS: A 1-factor model provided an adequate and parsimonious interpretation for the 11 AUD criteria for the total sample and for each of the gender-age groups. The MIMIC model exhibited significant indication for item bias among some criteria by gender, age, and race/ethnicity. Symptom criteria for "tolerance,""time spent," and "hazardous use" had lower item thresholds (i.e., lower severity) and low item discrimination, and they were well separated from the other symptoms, especially in the 2 younger age groups (12 to 17 and 18 to 25). "Larger amounts,""cut down,""withdrawal," and "legal problems" had higher item thresholds but generally lower item discrimination, and they tend to exhibit greater dispersion at higher AUD severity, particularly in the youngest age group (12 to 17). CONCLUSIONS: Findings from the present study do not provide support for the 2 separate DSM-IV diagnoses of alcohol abuse and dependence among either adolescents or adults. Variations in criteria severity for both abuse and dependence offer support for a dimensional approach to diagnosis which should be considered in the ongoing development of DSM-V.


Subject(s)
Alcohol-Related Disorders/classification , Alcohol-Related Disorders/psychology , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Ethnicity/psychology , Racial Groups/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Alcohol-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Child , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sex Factors , Young Adult
14.
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen ; 34(3): 188-192, 2019 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30595024

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The French nationwide exhaustive hospital discharge database (PMSI) is used for activity-based payment of hospital services. We hypothesized that the release of articles about alcohol and dementia could influence the identification of these diagnoses in PMSI. METHODS: We analyzed temporal evolution of coding for dementia and other persistent or late-onset cognitive impairment (OPLOCI) due to alcohol and other psychoactive substances in the PMSI database from 2007 to 2017 (285 748 938 inpatient stays). These codings use the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10). RESULTS: The number of inpatient stays with dementia and OPLOCI due to alcohol increased from 34 to 1704 from 2007 to 2017. While the number of diagnosed dementias remained stable at around 400 from 2013, the number of OPLOCIs increased 10-fold from 2013 to 2017. This increase was not found with dementia or OPLOCI due to other psychoactive substances than alcohol. CONCLUSION: Notoriety of a diagnosis in the literature seems to have an impact on the coding.


Subject(s)
Alcohol-Related Disorders/classification , Clinical Coding , Databases, Factual/statistics & numerical data , Dementia/classification , Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data , France , Humans , Retrospective Studies
15.
Health Inf Manag ; 48(3): 127-134, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29673266

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite the reliance on administrative data in epidemiological studies, there is little information on the completeness of co-morbidities in administrative data coded from medical records. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to quantify the agreement between the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Australian Modification (ICD-10-AM) administrative coding of mental health, drug and alcohol co-morbidities and medical records in a severely injured patient population. METHOD: A random sample of patients (n = 500) captured by the Victorian State Trauma Registry and definitively managed at the state's adult major trauma services was selected for the study. Retrospective medical record review was conducted to collect data about documented co-morbidities. The agreement between ICD-10-AM data generated from routine hospital coding and medical record-based co-morbidities was determined using Cohen's κ and prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) statistics. RESULTS: The percentage of agreement between the medical record and ICD-10-AM coding for mental health, drug and alcohol co-morbidities was 72.8%, and the PABAK showed moderate agreement (PABAK = 0.46; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.37, 0.54). There was no difference in agreement between unintentional injury patients (PABAK = 0.52; 95% CI: 0.42, 0.62) compared with intentional injury patients (PABAK = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.23, 0.49), and no change in agreement for patients admitted before (PABAK = 0.40; 95% CI: 0.30, 0.50) and after the introduction of mandatory co-morbidity coding (PABAK = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.37, 0.54). CONCLUSION: Despite documentation in the medical record, a large proportion of mental health, drug and alcohol conditions were not coded in ICD-10-AM. Acknowledgement of these limitations is needed when using ICD-10-AM coded co-morbidities in research studies and health policy development. IMPLICATIONS: This work has implications for researchers of drug and alcohol abuse; mental health; accidents and injuries; workers' compensation; health workforce; health services; and policy decisions for healthcare, emergency services, insurance industry, national productivity and welfare costings reliant on those research outcomes.


Subject(s)
Alcohol-Related Disorders/classification , Documentation/standards , International Classification of Diseases , Medical Records , Mental Health/classification , Wounds and Injuries , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Comorbidity , Data Accuracy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Victoria , Young Adult
16.
J Am Coll Health ; 67(7): 620-626, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30285556

ABSTRACT

Individuals who restrict their caloric intake and/or exercise excessively to mitigate the calories from alcohol consumption may suffer from an eating disorder, substance abuse disorder, or both. While the term "drunkorexia" has been used in both academic articles and popular culture, issues persist with respect to diagnosing and treating this condition. Classifying the behavior as a subcategory of Other Specified Feeding and Eating Disorders (OSFED) would provide patients with an increased likelihood of receiving insurance coverage for this condition. A consistent definition of this behavior and a more medically accurate/appropriate term-such as "alcoholimia"-are both needed to advance treatment and prevention efforts.


Subject(s)
Alcohol-Related Disorders/classification , Alcohol-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Alcohol-Related Disorders/therapy , Feeding and Eating Disorders/classification , Feeding and Eating Disorders/diagnosis , Feeding and Eating Disorders/therapy , Students/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Alcohol-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Feeding and Eating Disorders/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , United States/epidemiology , Universities , Young Adult
17.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res ; 32(7): 1146-58, 2008 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18540913

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Current effort is directed at defining new classification schemes for alcohol use disorders (AUD) based on genetic/biological, physiological, and behavioral endophenotypes. METHODS: We describe briefly findings of in vivo brain proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1)H MRS) studies in AUD and propose that they be further explored and expanded regarding their value as a potential endophenotype for AUD. RESULTS: In vivo (1)H MRS, as part of the emerging field of "imaging genomics," may provide readily accessible, objective, functionally significant and region-specific neurobiological measures that successfully link genotypes to neurocognition and to psychiatric symptomatology in relatively small patient cohorts. We discuss several functional gene variants that may affect specific (1)H MRS-detectable metabolites and provide recent data from our own work that supports the view of genetic effects on metabolite measures. CONCLUSIONS: MRS-genetics research will not only offer clues to the functional significance and downstream effects of genetic differences in AUD, but, via monitoring and/or predicting the efficacy of pharmacological and behavioral interventions as a function of genotype, has the potential to influence future clinical management of AUD.


Subject(s)
Alcohol-Related Disorders/classification , Alcohol-Related Disorders/genetics , Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy , Protons , Brain/metabolism , Humans , Phenotype
18.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res ; 32(2): 306-13, 2008 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18162067

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In DSM-IV, the diagnostic threshold for alcohol dependence (AD) is met when a patient presents with at least 3 of 7 criteria. We have computed the predictive value for each individual DSM-IV AD criterion, and examined subtypes of AD criteria endorsement patterns and their associated severity indicators for community-dwelling AD individuals. METHODS: We utilized data from the 2001 to 2002 National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC). Positive predictive values (PPV) for DSM-IV AD were computed for each of the individual criteria. Patterns of criteria endorsements were identified by latent class analysis (LCA). Sociodemographic status, age of onset and duration of AD, patterns of drinking, and drinking treatment history, were conditional on DSM criteria endorsement clusters, as indicators of the respondents' clinical severity. RESULTS: At the individual criterion level, the single criterion with the greatest PPV was D7--"Activities given up" with approximately 95% of drinking individuals who endorsed this DSM criterion correctly diagnosed as having DSM-IV AD. In addition to D7, only D5--"Physical/Psychological problems", and D6--"Time spent" had a PPV for AD substantially >50%. The LCA of AD endorsement patterns yielded a 6-cluster solution. The most common response pattern (34.5% of those with AD) was endorsement of 5 criteria: D1--"Quit/Control," D2--"Larger/Longer," D3--"Tolerance," D4--"Withdrawal," and D5--"Physical/Psychological problems." The most severe cluster (14%) was comprised of those who were likely to endorse 7/7 criteria. Cluster 1 (8.3%) did not include an endorsement of withdrawal, despite a heavy pattern of alcohol consumption. Unmarried status was associated with more severe criteria endorsement patterns. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings indicate a Guttman-like scaling of endorsement which yielded associations with severity for some of the concurrent indicators included in the analysis. However, severity measures did not always increase with DSM-IV AD criterion endorsement counts. Although endorsement of 6/7 or 7/7 criteria was associated with greater severity across a variety of indicators, fewer criteria were randomly associated with these measures. These data do not support the use of AD symptom counts as a phenotypic dependent variable. At least 2 extant diagnostic criteria showed relatively low PPV for AD, indicating a need for further assessment of these criteria with new symptoms or re-wording of the current symptom items.


Subject(s)
Alcoholism/diagnosis , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Activities of Daily Living/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Alcohol-Related Disorders/classification , Alcohol-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Alcohol-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Alcohol-Related Disorders/psychology , Alcoholism/classification , Alcoholism/epidemiology , Alcoholism/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Ethanol/toxicity , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Factors , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/classification , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/diagnosis , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/epidemiology , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/psychology , United States
19.
Drug Alcohol Depend ; 96(1-2): 187-91, 2008 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18430524

ABSTRACT

Individuals who endorse one or two of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criterion items for alcohol dependence but do not meet criteria for either alcohol abuse or dependence have been referred to in the literature as "diagnostic orphans." The goal of the present study is to compare diagnostic orphans for alcohol use disorders (AUD) to patients with lifetime DSM-IV alcohol abuse, alcohol dependence, and those with no-AUD symptoms on a series of demographic, diagnostic, and clinical measures. Participants were treatment-seeking psychiatric outpatients (n=1793; 61.5% women) who completed an in-depth, face-to-face diagnostic evaluation for DSM-IV axis I and axis II disorders. Results revealed that diagnostic orphans were younger, had a higher frequency of family history positive for alcoholism, and higher rates of cannabis dependence, as compared to the no-AUD symptoms group. Diagnostic orphans differed significantly from patients with alcohol abuse and dependence on a number of demographic, diagnostic, and clinical measures. Most notably, on a lifetime basis, diagnostic orphans were less likely to meet diagnostic criteria for various substance use disorders, as compared to individuals with alcohol abuse and dependence. Taken together, these results generally do not support combining diagnostic orphans to individuals with alcohol abuse.


Subject(s)
Alcohol-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Age Factors , Alcohol-Related Disorders/classification , Alcohol-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Alcoholism/classification , Alcoholism/diagnosis , Alcoholism/epidemiology , Ambulatory Care , Chi-Square Distribution , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Family , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Marijuana Abuse/diagnosis , Marijuana Abuse/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/classification , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Psychometrics
20.
Alcohol Alcohol ; 43(3): 326-33, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18258726

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Archival data from structured interviews of 1193 male prison inmates were subjected to taxometric analysis to determine the latent structure of the alcohol use disorder construct. METHODS: Analyses were performed using three taxometric procedures: mean above minus below a cut (MAMBAC), maximum eigenvalue (MAXEIG), and latent mode factor analysis (L-Mode). RESULTS: The outcomes were based on three indicators: (1) DSM-IV alcohol dependence criteria 1 and 2 (tolerance/withdrawal), (2) DSM-IV alcohol dependence criteria 3, 4, and 5 and DSM-IV alcohol abuse criterion 3 (loss of control), and (3) DSM-IV alcohol dependence criteria 6 and 7 and DSM-IV alcohol abuse criteria 1, 2, and 4 (negative social/psychological consequences). The outcomes revealed consistent support for a taxonic (categorical) interpretation of alcohol use disorders. CONCLUSIONS: There may be a taxonic boundary separating those who do and do not qualify for a diagnosis of alcohol dependence or abuse with important implications for diagnosis and treatment.


Subject(s)
Alcohol-Related Disorders/classification , Alcohol-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Federal Government , Interviews as Topic/standards , Prisoners , Adult , Alcohol-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Alcohol-Related Disorders/psychology , Humans , Interviews as Topic/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Prisoners/psychology , Reproducibility of Results , Time Factors , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL